Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Volltextretrieval"
  1. Freitext in Informationssystemen (1985) 0.02
    0.024785958 = product of:
      0.049571916 = sum of:
        0.049571916 = product of:
          0.09914383 = sum of:
            0.09914383 = weight(_text_:classification in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09914383 = score(doc=2036,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Deutsche Fassung von 'Free text in information systems' in: International classification 12(1985) H.2, S.95-98. Wegen einiger Ungereimtheiten sollte die englische Fassung benutzt werden
    Source
    International classification. 12(1985) no.1, S.23-26
  2. Free text in information systems: capabilities and limitations (1985) 0.02
    0.024785958 = product of:
      0.049571916 = sum of:
        0.049571916 = product of:
          0.09914383 = sum of:
            0.09914383 = weight(_text_:classification in 2045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09914383 = score(doc=2045,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 2045, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2045)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Diese Empfehlungen liegen auch in deutscher Übersetzung vor (abgedruckt ebenfalls in International classification), leider ist die Übersetzung nicht in allen Aussagen recht gelungen, so daß das Original vorzuziehen ist
    Source
    International classification. 12(1985), S.95-98
  3. Kristensen, J.; Järvelin, K.: ¬The effectiveness of a searching thesaurus in free-text searching in a full-text database (1990) 0.02
    0.023368426 = product of:
      0.04673685 = sum of:
        0.04673685 = product of:
          0.0934737 = sum of:
            0.0934737 = weight(_text_:classification in 2043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0934737 = score(doc=2043,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 2043, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2043)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International classification. 17(1990), S.77-84
  4. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.01
    0.014127021 = product of:
      0.028254041 = sum of:
        0.028254041 = product of:
          0.056508083 = sum of:
            0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056508083 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
  5. Reinisch, F.: Wer suchet - der findet? : oder Die Überwindung der sprachlichen Grenzen bei der Suche in Volltextdatenbanken (2000) 0.01
    0.014127021 = product of:
      0.028254041 = sum of:
        0.028254041 = product of:
          0.056508083 = sum of:
            0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056508083 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 17:48:06
  6. Zillmann, H.: OSIRIS und eLib : Information Retrieval und Search Engines in Full-text Databases (2001) 0.01
    0.014127021 = product of:
      0.028254041 = sum of:
        0.028254041 = product of:
          0.056508083 = sum of:
            0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056508083 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2001 12:22:31
  7. Dambeck, H.; Engler, T.: Gesucht und gefunden : Neun Volltext-Suchprogramme für den Desktop (2002) 0.01
    0.014127021 = product of:
      0.028254041 = sum of:
        0.028254041 = product of:
          0.056508083 = sum of:
            0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056508083 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    c't. 2002, H.22, S.190-197
  8. Cochrane, P.A.: Subject access - free text and controlled : the case of Papua New Guinea (1985) 0.01
    0.011684213 = product of:
      0.023368426 = sum of:
        0.023368426 = product of:
          0.04673685 = sum of:
            0.04673685 = weight(_text_:classification in 1459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04673685 = score(doc=1459,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 1459, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1459)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The online catalogue can provide the user with efficient and effective access through a variety of access points. New interests in subject heading is indicated. Keyword access and free text searching are considered alternatice methods. An investigation is suggested into the symbiotic relationship between classification and subject heading
  9. Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989) 0.01
    0.010595265 = product of:
      0.02119053 = sum of:
        0.02119053 = product of:
          0.04238106 = sum of:
            0.04238106 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04238106 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 1.1996 10:22:31
  10. Meunier, J.-G.; Bertrand-Gastaldy, S.; Lebel, H.: ¬A call for enhanced representation of content as a means of improving online full-text retrieval (1987) 0.01
    0.010223686 = product of:
      0.020447372 = sum of:
        0.020447372 = product of:
          0.040894743 = sum of:
            0.040894743 = weight(_text_:classification in 2049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040894743 = score(doc=2049,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 2049, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2049)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International classification. 14(1987), S.2-10
  11. Gross, T.; Taylor, A.G.; Joudrey, D.N.: Still a lot to lose : the role of controlled vocabulary in keyword searching (2015) 0.01
    0.010223686 = product of:
      0.020447372 = sum of:
        0.020447372 = product of:
          0.040894743 = sum of:
            0.040894743 = weight(_text_:classification in 2007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040894743 = score(doc=2007,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 2007, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2007)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 53(2015) no.1, S.1-39
  12. Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval : Evaluation and implications (1986) 0.01
    0.00876316 = product of:
      0.01752632 = sum of:
        0.01752632 = product of:
          0.03505264 = sum of:
            0.03505264 = weight(_text_:classification in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03505264 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International classification. 13(1986), S.18-23
  13. Pirkola, A.; Jarvelin, K.: ¬The effect of anaphor and ellipsis resolution on proximity searching in a text database (1995) 0.01
    0.0073026326 = product of:
      0.014605265 = sum of:
        0.014605265 = product of:
          0.02921053 = sum of:
            0.02921053 = weight(_text_:classification in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02921053 = score(doc=4088,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    So far, methods for ellipsis and anaphor resolution have been developed and the effects of anaphor resolution have been analyzed in the context of statistical information retrieval of scientific abstracts. No significant improvements has been observed. Analyzes the effects of ellipsis and anaphor resolution on proximity searching in a full text database. Anaphora and ellipsis are classified on the basis of the type of their correlates / antecedents rather than, as traditional, on the basis of their own linguistic type. The classification differentiates proper names and common nouns of basic words, compound words, and phrases. The study was carried out in a newspaper article database containing 55.000 full text articles. A set of 154 keyword pairs in different categories was created. Human resolution of keyword ellipsis and anaphora was performed to identify sentences and paragraphs which would match proximity searches after resolution. Findings indicate that ellipsis and anaphor resolution is most relevant for proper name phrases and only marginal in the other keyword categories. Therefore the recall effect of restricted resolution of proper name phrases only was analyzed for keyword pairs containing at least 1 proper name phrase. Findings indicate a recall increase of 38.2% in sentence searches, and 28.8% in paragraph searches when proper name ellipsis were resolved. The recall increase was 17.6% sentence searches, and 19.8% in paragraph searches when proper name anaphora were resolved. Some simple and computationally justifiable resolution method might be developed only for proper name phrases to support keyword based full text information retrieval. Discusses elements of such a method