Search (59 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × type_ss:"b"
  1. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.07
    0.06872934 = product of:
      0.13745868 = sum of:
        0.13745868 = sum of:
          0.0809506 = weight(_text_:classification in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0809506 = score(doc=266,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
          0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056508083 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews the enormous changes in cataloging and classification reflected in the literature of 2003 and 2004, and discusses major themes and issues. Traditional cataloging and classification tools have been re-vamped and new resources have emerged. Most notable themes are: the continuing influence of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Control (FRBR); the struggle to understand the ever-broadening concept of an "information entity"; steady developments in metadata-encoding standards; and the globalization of information systems, including multilinguistic challenges.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.06
    0.061301984 = product of:
      0.12260397 = sum of:
        0.12260397 = sum of:
          0.06609589 = weight(_text_:classification in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06609589 = score(doc=249,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056508083 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010) 0.06
    0.060138173 = product of:
      0.12027635 = sum of:
        0.12027635 = sum of:
          0.070831776 = weight(_text_:classification in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070831776 = score(doc=4309,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.42661208 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
          0.04944457 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04944457 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Shorten, J.; Seikel, M.; Ahrberg, J.H.: Why do you still use dewey? : Academic libraries that continue with dewey decimal classification (2005) 0.06
    0.056243166 = product of:
      0.11248633 = sum of:
        0.11248633 = sum of:
          0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07010528 = score(doc=125,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
          0.04238106 = weight(_text_:22 in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04238106 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reclassification was a popular trend during the 1960s and 1970s for many academic libraries wanting to change from Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) to Library of Congress (LC) Classification. In 2002, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale's Morris Library changed from DDC to LC. If one academic library recently converted, might other DDC academic libraries consider switching, too? Conversely, for those academic libraries that remain with DDC, what are the reasons they continue with it? A survey of thirty-four DDC academic libraries in the United States and Canada determined what factors influence these libraries to continue using DDC, and if reclassification is something they have considered or are considering. The survey also investigated whether patrons of these DDC libraries prefer LC and if their preference influences the library's decision to reclassify. Results from the survey indicate that the issue of reclassification is being considered by some of these libraries even though, overall, they are satisfied with DDC. The study was unable to determine if patrons' preference for a classification scheme influenced a library's decision to reclassify.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Buckland, M.K.; Liu, Z.: History of information science (1995) 0.05
    0.051622465 = product of:
      0.10324493 = sum of:
        0.10324493 = sum of:
          0.04673685 = weight(_text_:classification in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04673685 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
          0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056508083 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of the historical development of information science as deemed to be covered by the particular interests of memebers of the American Society for Information Science, as defined as the representation, storage, transmission, selection, retrieval, filtering, and use of documents and messages. Arranges the references cited roughly according to the classification scheme used by Information Science Abstracts, and so uses the headings: background; information science; techniques and technology; information related behaviour; application areas; social aspects; education for information science; institutions; individuals; geographical areas; and conclusions
    Date
    13. 6.1996 19:22:20
  6. Gatti, T.H.: Utilization of students as cataloging assistants at carnegie category I institution libraries (2005) 0.05
    0.051622465 = product of:
      0.10324493 = sum of:
        0.10324493 = sum of:
          0.04673685 = weight(_text_:classification in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04673685 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
          0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056508083 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A survey of 261 libraries was undertaken to determine the level of use of and duties performed by student assistants in monographic cataloging operations. Ninety-five of 142 responding libraries (64.1 percent) indicate that they use student assistants for some type of monographic cataloging tasks. These tasks are downloading of bibliographic and authority records, monographic cataloging, classification, subject heading authority control, holdings, database maintenance, and editing of 246 or 505 MARC tags. Some respondents expressed reluctance to use student assistants for higher-level cataloging tasks.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Martin, K.E.; Mundle, K.: Positioning libraries for a new bibliographic universe (2014) 0.05
    0.04597649 = product of:
      0.09195298 = sum of:
        0.09195298 = sum of:
          0.049571916 = weight(_text_:classification in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049571916 = score(doc=2608,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
          0.04238106 = weight(_text_:22 in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04238106 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper surveys the English-language literature on cataloging and classification published during 2011 and 2012, covering both theory and application. A major theme of the literature centered on Resource Description and Access (RDA), as the period covered in this review includes the conclusion of the RDA test, revisions to RDA, and the implementation decision. Explorations in the theory and practical applications of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), upon which RDA is organized, are also heavily represented. Library involvement with linked data through the creation of prototypes and vocabularies are explored further during the period. Other areas covered in the review include: classification, controlled vocabularies and name authority, evaluation and history of cataloging, special formats cataloging, cataloging and discovery services, non-AACR2/RDA metadata, cataloging workflows, and the education and careers of catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  8. Miller, D.; Olson, T.; Layne, S.S.: Promoting research and best practices in subject reference structures : a decade of work by the subject analysis committee (2005) 0.04
    0.03871685 = product of:
      0.0774337 = sum of:
        0.0774337 = sum of:
          0.03505264 = weight(_text_:classification in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03505264 = score(doc=123,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
          0.04238106 = weight(_text_:22 in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04238106 = score(doc=123,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In 2004, the ALCTS (Association for Library Collections & Technical Services) Cataloging and Classification Section Subject Analysis Committee (SAC) produced the report Recommendations for Providing Access to, Display of, Navigation within and among, and Modifications of Existing Practice Regarding Subject Reference Structures in Automated Systems. This document is one important outcome of nearly ten years' work by three SAC (Subject Analysis Committee) subcommittees investigating the theoretical, pragmatic, and political dimensions of improving subject access through better use of reference structure data. The work of those subcommittees is reviewed and their recommendations are described and summarized. Potential future effects of the report are discussed, as is a snapshot view of several major automation systems' current compliance with the recommendations.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Baga, J.; Hoover, L.; Wolverton, R.E.: Online, practical, and free cataloging resources (2013) 0.04
    0.03871685 = product of:
      0.0774337 = sum of:
        0.0774337 = sum of:
          0.03505264 = weight(_text_:classification in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03505264 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
          0.04238106 = weight(_text_:22 in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04238106 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This comprehensive annotated webliography describes online cataloging resources that are free to use, currently updated, and of high quality. The major aim of this webliography is to provide assistance for catalogers who are new to the profession, unfamiliar with cataloging specific formats, or unable to access costly print and subscription resources. The annotated resources include general websites and webpages, databases, workshop presentations, streaming media, and local documentation. The scope of the webliography is limited to resources reflecting traditional cataloging practices using the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition, RDA: Resource Description and Access, and MAchine Readable Cataloging (MARC) standards. Non-MARC metadata schemas like Dublin Core are not covered. Most components of cataloging are represented in this webliography, such as authority control, classification, subject headings, and genre terms. Guidance also is provided for cataloging miscellaneous formats including sound and videorecordings, streaming media, e-books, video games, graphic novels, kits, rare materials, maps, serials, realia, government documents, and music.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. Filk, C.: Online, Internet und Digitalkultur : eine Bibliographie zur jüngsten Diskussion um die Informationsgesellschaft (1996) 0.03
    0.034962595 = product of:
      0.06992519 = sum of:
        0.06992519 = product of:
          0.13985038 = sum of:
            0.13985038 = weight(_text_:22 in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13985038 = score(doc=44,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 9.1997 19:22:27
    Source
    Rundfunk und Geschichte. 22(1996) H.2/3, S.184-193
  11. Bibliography of papers on classification and allied subjects (1956) 0.03
    0.033047944 = product of:
      0.06609589 = sum of:
        0.06609589 = product of:
          0.13219178 = sum of:
            0.13219178 = weight(_text_:classification in 294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13219178 = score(doc=294,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.7961767 = fieldWeight in 294, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=294)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Editor
    Classification Research Group
  12. Kapur, S.: Classification and cataloguing : a select bibliography (1988) 0.03
    0.02921053 = product of:
      0.05842106 = sum of:
        0.05842106 = product of:
          0.11684212 = sum of:
            0.11684212 = weight(_text_:classification in 7359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11684212 = score(doc=7359,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.70372736 = fieldWeight in 7359, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=7359)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. T.1: Classification systems and thesauri, 1950-1982 (1982) // T.2: Reference tools and conferences in classification and indexing (1984) // T.3: Classification- and indexing systems: theory - structure - methodology, 1950-1982 (1985) // T.4: On universal and special classification systems and thesauri (in Vorb.) // T.5: Language foundation, apllication and environment of classification and indexing (in Vorb.) : International classification and indexing bibliography (ICIB) (1982-) 0.03
    0.028916951 = product of:
      0.057833903 = sum of:
        0.057833903 = product of:
          0.115667805 = sum of:
            0.115667805 = weight(_text_:classification in 2839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.115667805 = score(doc=2839,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.69665456 = fieldWeight in 2839, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2839)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Diese (zum Thema umfangreichste) Bibliographie wird durch eine ständige Rubrik in der Zeitschrift 'International Classification' laufend ergänzt; danach fortgesetzt in: Knowledge organization. - Vgl. zum verwendeten Klassifikationssystem: Dahlberg, I. u.a. in: International classification 9(1982) S.87-93; 12(1985) S.143-152.
  14. Metz, A.: Community service : a bibliography (1996) 0.03
    0.028254041 = product of:
      0.056508083 = sum of:
        0.056508083 = product of:
          0.113016166 = sum of:
            0.113016166 = weight(_text_:22 in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.113016166 = score(doc=5341,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17.10.1996 14:22:33
  15. Singh, S. (Sewa); Singh, S. (Sukhbir): Colon Classification : a select bibliography (1992) 0.03
    0.026126694 = product of:
      0.052253388 = sum of:
        0.052253388 = product of:
          0.104506776 = sum of:
            0.104506776 = weight(_text_:classification in 1479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.104506776 = score(doc=1479,freq=40.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.6294329 = fieldWeight in 1479, product of:
                  6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
                    40.0 = termFreq=40.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1479)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: General Classification, Colon Classification, Edition7, Philosophy, Conference, Literature Survey, Features, History. Countries and Areas , Theoru, Design of Classification, Classification Problems , Research in Classification, Trends in Classification, Depth Classification, Automatic Classification, Uses of Classification, Practical Classification, Application of Classification, Standards, Glossary.Teminology, classification and Reference Service, Classificationand Documentation, Classification and Communication, Classification and Retrieval, Comparison to Other Schemes, Canons, Isolates, Common Isolates , Space Isolates, Time Isolates, Special Isolates, Postulates, Fundamental Categories, Facet Formula, Optionl Facets, Rounds and Levels, Basic Subjects, Notation and Symbols, Array and Chanin, Devices, Mnemonics, Phase Relation, Systems and Specials, Book Number, Cooperative Calssification, Teaching of Classification, Classification of Specific Subjects, Book Science, Bibliography, Library and Information Science, Classification, Cataloguing, Mathematics, Cybernetics, Engineering, Computer, Chemistry, Crystallography, Technology. Food Technology, Corrosion, Parasitism, Geology , Agriculture, Zoology, Animal Husbandry, Medicine, Useful Arts, Military Science, Creative Arts, Aiterature, Sanskrit, Marathi, Tamil, Calssics, Linguistics, Philosophy, Ssocial Science, Geography, Maps, History , Political Science, Economics, Sociology, Law,
    LCSH
    Classification, Colon / Bibliography
    Subject
    Classification, Colon / Bibliography
  16. Albers, C.: Zeitungen in Bibliotheken : Aufsätze, Monographien und Rezensionen aus den Jahren 2002-2003. Mit Nachträgen für die Jahre 1980-2001 (2004) 0.02
    0.024973279 = product of:
      0.049946558 = sum of:
        0.049946558 = product of:
          0.099893115 = sum of:
            0.099893115 = weight(_text_:22 in 4) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099893115 = score(doc=4,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2008 13:32:22
  17. Denda, K.: Beyond subject headings : a structured information retrieval tool for interdisciplinary fields (2005) 0.02
    0.024722286 = product of:
      0.04944457 = sum of:
        0.04944457 = product of:
          0.09888914 = sum of:
            0.09888914 = weight(_text_:22 in 1038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09888914 = score(doc=1038,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1038, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1038)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Jones, E.: ¬The FRBR model as applied to continuing resources (2005) 0.02
    0.024722286 = product of:
      0.04944457 = sum of:
        0.04944457 = product of:
          0.09888914 = sum of:
            0.09888914 = weight(_text_:22 in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09888914 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  19. Chan, L.M.: Year's work in cataloging and classification : 1975 (1976) 0.02
    0.023368426 = product of:
      0.04673685 = sum of:
        0.04673685 = product of:
          0.0934737 = sum of:
            0.0934737 = weight(_text_:classification in 307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0934737 = score(doc=307,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 307, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=307)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Conway, M. O'Hara: Research in cataloging and classification : methods and issues - a selective, annotated bibliography (1994) 0.02
    0.023368426 = product of:
      0.04673685 = sum of:
        0.04673685 = product of:
          0.0934737 = sum of:
            0.0934737 = weight(_text_:classification in 1021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0934737 = score(doc=1021,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 1021, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1021)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This selective bibliography, prepared for the Jun 1993 ALCTS CCS preconference on research in cataloging and classification, is intended for the librarian with little or no experience conducting research. Its aim is to acquaint the librarian with 'a few good books' (and one article) on research methods and statistics; to offer selections 'from the literature' that suggest potentially fruitful areas for research in cataloging and classification; and to assist the librarian in successfully communicating his or her findings to the library community
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.1, S.119-129

Languages

  • e 51
  • d 6
  • m 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 42
  • m 7
  • el 3
  • More… Less…