Search (2701 results, page 1 of 136)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Comaromi, C.L.: Summation of classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment (1990) 0.09
    0.093738616 = product of:
      0.18747723 = sum of:
        0.18747723 = sum of:
          0.11684212 = weight(_text_:classification in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11684212 = score(doc=3576,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.70372736 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
          0.0706351 = weight(_text_:22 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0706351 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Classification structure and indexes to classifications need to be better understood before classification can be a major access point in online catalogs.
    Date
    8. 1.2007 12:22:40
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 11(1990) no.1, S.99-102
  2. Dewey, M.: Decimal classification beginnings (1990) 0.09
    0.09195298 = product of:
      0.18390596 = sum of:
        0.18390596 = sum of:
          0.09914383 = weight(_text_:classification in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09914383 = score(doc=3554,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
          0.08476212 = weight(_text_:22 in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08476212 = score(doc=3554,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the author's development of the Dewey Decimal Classification
    Date
    25.12.1995 22:28:43
  3. Houissa, A.: Arabic personal names : their components and rendering in catalog entries (1991) 0.09
    0.09033932 = product of:
      0.18067864 = sum of:
        0.18067864 = sum of:
          0.081789486 = weight(_text_:classification in 2857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.081789486 = score(doc=2857,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 2857, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2857)
          0.09888914 = weight(_text_:22 in 2857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09888914 = score(doc=2857,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2857, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2857)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 13(1991) no.2, S.3-22
  4. FID/CR news; 38 (1995) 0.09
    0.09033932 = product of:
      0.18067864 = sum of:
        0.18067864 = sum of:
          0.081789486 = weight(_text_:classification in 2040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.081789486 = score(doc=2040,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 2040, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2040)
          0.09888914 = weight(_text_:22 in 2040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09888914 = score(doc=2040,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2040, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2040)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    DDC - LCC - IFLAS Section on Classification and Indexing - ALA/ALCTS Subject Analysis Committee
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.1, S.41-42
  5. Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996) 0.09
    0.09008109 = product of:
      0.18016218 = sum of:
        0.18016218 = sum of:
          0.12365409 = weight(_text_:classification in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12365409 = score(doc=7242,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.7447551 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
          0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056508083 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a comparative study of 3 classification schemes: LCC, DDC and NLM Classification to determine their effectiveness in classifying materials on health insurance. Examined 2 hypotheses: that there would be no differences in the scatter of the 3 classification schemes; and that there would be overlap between all 3 schemes but no difference in the classes into which the subject was placed. There was subject scatter in all 3 classification schemes and litlle overlap between the 3 systems
    Date
    22. 4.1997 21:10:19
    Object
    NLM Classification
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 23(1996) no.2, S.89-104
  6. Friman, M.; Jansson, P.; Suominen, V.: Chaos or order? : Aby Warburg's library of cultural history and its classification (1995) 0.09
    0.08549476 = product of:
      0.17098951 = sum of:
        0.17098951 = sum of:
          0.114481434 = weight(_text_:classification in 1089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.114481434 = score(doc=1089,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.6895092 = fieldWeight in 1089, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1089)
          0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 1089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056508083 = score(doc=1089,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1089, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1089)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The classification system of the Warburg Institute library, London, UK, is considered. First, a brief review of the scholary work of Aby Warburg and the history of this library is given to illustrate the background of the classification. The classification is described and its basic features are clarified with examples. Finally, the classification of the Warburg Institute library is contrasted with ordinary classification thinking in library and information science
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.1, S.23-29
  7. Satija, M.P.: ¬A deserted bastion : classification and indexing in India, a state-of-the-art (1993) 0.09
    0.08549476 = product of:
      0.17098951 = sum of:
        0.17098951 = sum of:
          0.114481434 = weight(_text_:classification in 1535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.114481434 = score(doc=1535,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.6895092 = fieldWeight in 1535, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1535)
          0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 1535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056508083 = score(doc=1535,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1535, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1535)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Provides a brief history of Ranganathan's development of classification systems. Describes the literature on and by Ranganathan. Ranganathan's mark has been furthered by the Documentation Research and Training Centre at Bangalore. Discusses India's contribution to subject cataloguing and classification terminology; classification practices in India; teaching research and literature on classification and classification organisations and conferences
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.3, S.51-54
  8. Gresham, J.L.: ¬The place of religion in the universe of knowledge according to various systems of bibliographic classification (1994) 0.08
    0.08050743 = product of:
      0.16101485 = sum of:
        0.16101485 = sum of:
          0.104506776 = weight(_text_:classification in 905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.104506776 = score(doc=905,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.6294329 = fieldWeight in 905, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=905)
          0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056508083 = score(doc=905,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 905, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=905)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Considers ways in which bibliographic classification schemes have attempted to map the subject of religion into their treatment of the universe of knowledge and attemps to understand the different conceptions of religion reflected by these various classification schemes. Specific schemes considered include: DDC, LoC, BC, Ernest Cushing Richardson Classification; Julia Pettee's Union Classification; CC
    Date
    20.10.2000 14:22:53
  9. Langridge, D.W.: Classification: its kinds, systems, elements and application (1992) 0.08
    0.08043255 = product of:
      0.1608651 = sum of:
        0.1608651 = sum of:
          0.0809506 = weight(_text_:classification in 770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0809506 = score(doc=770,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 770, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=770)
          0.079914495 = weight(_text_:22 in 770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.079914495 = score(doc=770,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 770, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=770)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    COMPASS
    Subject classification
    Date
    26. 7.2002 14:01:22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of documentation 49(1993) no.1, S.68-70. (A. Maltby); Journal of librarianship and information science 1993, S.108-109 (A.G. Curwen); Herald of library science 33(1994) nos.1/2, S.85 (P.N. Kaula); Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.45 (M.P. Satija)
    Subject
    Subject classification
  10. Laakso, J.; Puukko, O.: Classification of fiction by topic in the light of experiments carried out in two public libraries : [Original in Finnisch] (1992) 0.08
    0.0774337 = product of:
      0.1548674 = sum of:
        0.1548674 = sum of:
          0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07010528 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
          0.08476212 = weight(_text_:22 in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08476212 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 10:22:39
  11. Electronic Resources: Selection and Bibliographic Control : [Themenheft] (1996) 0.08
    0.0774337 = product of:
      0.1548674 = sum of:
        0.1548674 = sum of:
          0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 4206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07010528 = score(doc=4206,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 4206, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4206)
          0.08476212 = weight(_text_:22 in 4206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08476212 = score(doc=4206,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4206, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4206)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.1-238
  12. Chan, L.M.: Library of Congress Subject Headings : principles and application (1995) 0.08
    0.0774337 = product of:
      0.1548674 = sum of:
        0.1548674 = sum of:
          0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 3985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07010528 = score(doc=3985,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 3985, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3985)
          0.08476212 = weight(_text_:22 in 3985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08476212 = score(doc=3985,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3985, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3985)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25.11.2005 18:37:22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 23(1996) no.1, S.127-130 (L. Kuyper-Rushing)
  13. Languages of the world : cataloguing issues and problems (1993) 0.08
    0.0774337 = product of:
      0.1548674 = sum of:
        0.1548674 = sum of:
          0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07010528 = score(doc=4242,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
          0.08476212 = weight(_text_:22 in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08476212 = score(doc=4242,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    15. 6.1996 18:06:22
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.17, nos.1/2
  14. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.08
    0.0774337 = product of:
      0.1548674 = sum of:
        0.1548674 = sum of:
          0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07010528 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
          0.08476212 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08476212 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: From classification to thesauri: making good use of facets
  15. Neely, T.Y.: Using subject terminology & classification to provide effective reference service to diverse populations (1995) 0.08
    0.07662748 = product of:
      0.15325496 = sum of:
        0.15325496 = sum of:
          0.08261986 = weight(_text_:classification in 5560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08261986 = score(doc=5560,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.49761042 = fieldWeight in 5560, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5560)
          0.0706351 = weight(_text_:22 in 5560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0706351 = score(doc=5560,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5560, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5560)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the current classification system and historical treatment of subject matter relating to African American subjects. Gives examples of carrying out searches on CARL catalogues, INFOTRAC, the Reader's Guide to Periodical Literature, and Education Index
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 21(1995) no.2, S.22-26
  16. Yi, H.; Shubai, L.: Application of classification in information organization under the networking environment (1998) 0.07
    0.07499089 = product of:
      0.14998178 = sum of:
        0.14998178 = sum of:
          0.0934737 = weight(_text_:classification in 3236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0934737 = score(doc=3236,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 3236, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3236)
          0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 3236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056508083 = score(doc=3236,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3236, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3236)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Classification plays a very important role in the traditional organization and manual retrieval of documents. The advantages of classification are becoming evident again in the networked environment, in the areas of online browsing, organization of non text information, management of hypertext, and as a common language for the organization of information, which will promote the integration of classification schemes and thesauri
    Source
    Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information. 17(1998) no.1, S.19-22
  17. Thomas, A.R.: Blissful beliefs : Henry Evelyn Bliss councels on classification (1995) 0.07
    0.070444 = product of:
      0.140888 = sum of:
        0.140888 = sum of:
          0.091443434 = weight(_text_:classification in 5543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.091443434 = score(doc=5543,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 5543, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5543)
          0.04944457 = weight(_text_:22 in 5543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04944457 = score(doc=5543,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5543, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5543)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Study of the organization of knowledge and of theories, systems, and practices of library classification provides a foundation for considering the design of an effective scheme. Use of existing standard systems has disadvantages and requires a library to either adapt itself to a standard or adapt that standard to the library. Prompt reclassification to an effective system will produce ultimate economy in service. Helpful order within a system is secured by application of certain principles. The scheme should be plastic to accommodate differing requirements and include alternative locations and citation orders of components. Construction and application of a relative classification present persistent problems.
    Pages
    S.17-22
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.19, nos.3/4
    Source
    Classification: options and opportunities. Ed.: A.R. Thomas
  18. Klein, R.D.: ¬The problem of cataloguing world literature using the Nippon Decimal Classification (1994) 0.07
    0.06872934 = product of:
      0.13745868 = sum of:
        0.13745868 = sum of:
          0.0809506 = weight(_text_:classification in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0809506 = score(doc=867,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
          0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056508083 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Nippon Decimal Classification (NDC) system, extensively used in Japanese libraries, was devised in 1929. It is difficult to use NDC to classify world literature, such as fiction in English by non American, non British writers. This is not necessarily straightforward in other classification schemes but a survey of 40 Japanese university libraries, of which 24 responded, showed remarkable inconsistencies in the treatment of 22 world literature authors. NDC clearly needs updating to deal with this problem
  19. Lorenz, B.: ¬The Regensburg Classification Scheme : users and partners (1995) 0.07
    0.06872934 = product of:
      0.13745868 = sum of:
        0.13745868 = sum of:
          0.0809506 = weight(_text_:classification in 2886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0809506 = score(doc=2886,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 2886, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2886)
          0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 2886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056508083 = score(doc=2886,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2886, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2886)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Description of the history and development of the home-made Regensburg Classification Scheme since 1964 and its notation which has been built according to the one of the Library of Congress. Although not intended in the beginning, the scheme has become the common tool for a number of Bavarian libraries since 1970 and also of libraries in Switzerland (since 1986) and the socalled new German states (after 1990). The individual schedules are listed and also the classification aids published with the scheme's progressing. Concludingly future plans are outlined
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) nos.3/4, S.158-161
  20. Dimitrova, N.; Golshani, F.: Motion recovery for video content classification (1995) 0.07
    0.06872934 = product of:
      0.13745868 = sum of:
        0.13745868 = sum of:
          0.0809506 = weight(_text_:classification in 3834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0809506 = score(doc=3834,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 3834, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3834)
          0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 3834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056508083 = score(doc=3834,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3834, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3834)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the analysis of video for the classification of images in order to develop a video database. Covers compression; motion recovery in digital video; low-level motion extraction; single macroblock tracing; intermediate-level motion analysis; high-level motion analysis; spatiotemporal hierarchical representation; information filtering and digital video; content filtering opertaors; the query language; querying video contents; an architecture for video classification and retrieval; the visual query language VEVA; and implementation of macroblock tracing
    Date
    8. 4.1996 9:22:36

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 2293
  • m 220
  • s 140
  • el 34
  • b 16
  • i 13
  • x 11
  • p 10
  • ? 8
  • r 8
  • d 3
  • h 2
  • l 2
  • u 2
  • au 1
  • n 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications