Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  • × author_ss:"Kwasnik, B.H."
  1. Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.06 
    0.06038057 = product of:
  0.12076114 = sum of:
    0.12076114 = sum of:
      0.078380086 = weight(_text_:classification in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.078380086 = score(doc=2464,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05213454 = queryNorm
          0.4720747 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
      0.04238106 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04238106 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05213454 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A fascinating, broad-ranging article about classification, knowledge, and how they relate. Hierarchies, trees, paradigms (a two-dimensional classification that can look something like a spreadsheet), and facets are covered, with descriptions of how they work and how they can be used for knowledge discovery and creation. Kwasnick outlines how to make a faceted classification: choose facets, develop facets, analyze entities using the facets, and make a citation order. Facets are useful for many reasons: they do not require complete knowledge of the entire body of material; they are hospitable, flexible, and expressive; they do not require a rigid background theory; they can mix theoretical structures and models; and they allow users to view things from many perspectives. Facets do have faults: it can be hard to pick the right ones; it is hard to show relations between them; and it is difficult to visualize them. The coverage of the other methods is equally thorough and there is much to consider for anyone putting a classification on the web.
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
  2. Dubin, D.; Kwasnik, B.H.; Tangmanee, C.: Elicitation techniques for classification research : pt.1: ordered trees; pt.2: repertory grids; pt.3: q-methodology (1994) 0.02 
    0.024785958 = product of:
  0.049571916 = sum of:
    0.049571916 = product of:
      0.09914383 = sum of:
        0.09914383 = weight(_text_:classification in 8886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09914383 = score(doc=8886,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 8886, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8886)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Proceedings of the 5th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, Oct. 16, 1994, Alexandria, VA. Ed.: R. Fidel u.a

Authors

Themes