Search (8224 results, page 2 of 412)

  1. Ranganathan, S.R.: Classification and communication (2006) 0.09
    0.0860644 = product of:
      0.1721288 = sum of:
        0.1721288 = sum of:
          0.122684225 = weight(_text_:classification in 1469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.122684225 = score(doc=1469,freq=18.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.7389137 = fieldWeight in 1469, product of:
                4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                  18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1469)
          0.04944457 = weight(_text_:22 in 1469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04944457 = score(doc=1469,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1469, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1469)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Part I ---Classification and Its Evolution 11. First sense --Primitive use 12. Second sense---Common use 13. Third sense--- Library classification 14. Field of knowledge 15. Enumerative classification 16. Analytico-synthetic classification 17. Uses of analytico-synthetic classification 18. Depth -classification --Confession of a faith Part 2---Communication 21. Co-operative living 22. Communication and language 23. Commercial contact 24. Political understanding 25. Literary exchange 26. Spiritual communion 27. Cultural concord 28. Intellectual team -work Part 3---Classification and Its Future 31. Domains in communication 32. Domain of classification 33. Time-and Space-Facets 34. Preliminary schedules 35. Energy-Facet 36. Matter-Facet 37. Personality -Facet 38. Research and Organisation
  2. Friman, M.; Jansson, P.; Suominen, V.: Chaos or order? : Aby Warburg's library of cultural history and its classification (1995) 0.09
    0.08549476 = product of:
      0.17098951 = sum of:
        0.17098951 = sum of:
          0.114481434 = weight(_text_:classification in 1089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.114481434 = score(doc=1089,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.6895092 = fieldWeight in 1089, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1089)
          0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 1089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056508083 = score(doc=1089,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1089, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1089)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The classification system of the Warburg Institute library, London, UK, is considered. First, a brief review of the scholary work of Aby Warburg and the history of this library is given to illustrate the background of the classification. The classification is described and its basic features are clarified with examples. Finally, the classification of the Warburg Institute library is contrasted with ordinary classification thinking in library and information science
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.1, S.23-29
  3. Satija, M.P.: ¬A deserted bastion : classification and indexing in India, a state-of-the-art (1993) 0.09
    0.08549476 = product of:
      0.17098951 = sum of:
        0.17098951 = sum of:
          0.114481434 = weight(_text_:classification in 1535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.114481434 = score(doc=1535,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.6895092 = fieldWeight in 1535, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1535)
          0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 1535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056508083 = score(doc=1535,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1535, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1535)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Provides a brief history of Ranganathan's development of classification systems. Describes the literature on and by Ranganathan. Ranganathan's mark has been furthered by the Documentation Research and Training Centre at Bangalore. Discusses India's contribution to subject cataloguing and classification terminology; classification practices in India; teaching research and literature on classification and classification organisations and conferences
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.3, S.51-54
  4. Mitchell, J.S.: DDC 22 : an introduction (2003) 0.08
    0.08419766 = product of:
      0.16839533 = sum of:
        0.16839533 = sum of:
          0.057833903 = weight(_text_:classification in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057833903 = score(doc=1936,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
          0.11056142 = weight(_text_:22 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11056142 = score(doc=1936,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.6055961 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, Edition 22 (DDC 22) will be issued simultaneously in print and web versions in July 2003. The new edition is the first full print update to the Dewey Decimal Classification system in seven years-it includes several significant updates and many new numbers and topics. DDC 22 also features some fundamental structural changes that have been introduced with the goals of promoting classifier efficiency and improving the DDC for use in a variety of applications in the web environment. Most importantly, the content of the new edition has been shaped by the needs and recommendations of Dewey users around the world. The worldwide user community has an important role in shaping the future of the DDC.
    Object
    DDC-22
  5. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.08
    0.083608165 = sum of:
      0.0690029 = product of:
        0.20700867 = sum of:
          0.20700867 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20700867 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.4419972 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.014605265 = product of:
        0.02921053 = sum of:
          0.02921053 = weight(_text_:classification in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02921053 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    While classifications are heavily used to categorize web content, the evolution of the web foresees a more formal structure - ontology - which can serve this purpose. Ontologies are core artifacts of the Semantic Web which enable machines to use inference rules to conduct automated reasoning on data. Lightweight ontologies bridge the gap between classifications and ontologies. A lightweight ontology (LO) is an ontology representing a backbone taxonomy where the concept of the child node is more specific than the concept of the parent node. Formal lightweight ontologies can be generated from their informal ones. The key applications of formal lightweight ontologies are document classification, semantic search, and data integration. However, these applications suffer from the following problems: the disambiguation accuracy of the state of the art NLP tools used in generating formal lightweight ontologies from their informal ones; the lack of background knowledge needed for the formal lightweight ontologies; and the limitation of ontology reuse. In this dissertation, we propose a novel solution to these problems in formal lightweight ontologies; namely, faceted lightweight ontology (FLO). FLO is a lightweight ontology in which terms, present in each node label, and their concepts, are available in the background knowledge (BK), which is organized as a set of facets. A facet can be defined as a distinctive property of the groups of concepts that can help in differentiating one group from another. Background knowledge can be defined as a subset of a knowledge base, such as WordNet, and often represents a specific domain.
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  6. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.08
    0.08280347 = product of:
      0.16560695 = sum of:
        0.16560695 = product of:
          0.4968208 = sum of:
            0.4968208 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.4968208 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4419972 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  7. Yi, K.: Automatic text classification using library classification schemes : trends, issues and challenges (2007) 0.08
    0.08255619 = product of:
      0.16511238 = sum of:
        0.16511238 = sum of:
          0.115667805 = weight(_text_:classification in 2560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.115667805 = score(doc=2560,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.69665456 = fieldWeight in 2560, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2560)
          0.04944457 = weight(_text_:22 in 2560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04944457 = score(doc=2560,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2560, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2560)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The proliferation of digital resources and their integration into a traditional library setting has created a pressing need for an automated tool that organizes textual information based on library classification schemes. Automated text classification is a research field of developing tools, methods, and models to automate text classification. This article describes the current popular approach for text classification and major text classification projects and applications that are based on library classification schemes. Related issues and challenges are discussed, and a number of considerations for the challenges are examined.
    Date
    22. 9.2008 18:31:54
  8. Gresham, J.L.: ¬The place of religion in the universe of knowledge according to various systems of bibliographic classification (1994) 0.08
    0.08050743 = product of:
      0.16101485 = sum of:
        0.16101485 = sum of:
          0.104506776 = weight(_text_:classification in 905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.104506776 = score(doc=905,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.6294329 = fieldWeight in 905, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=905)
          0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056508083 = score(doc=905,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 905, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=905)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Considers ways in which bibliographic classification schemes have attempted to map the subject of religion into their treatment of the universe of knowledge and attemps to understand the different conceptions of religion reflected by these various classification schemes. Specific schemes considered include: DDC, LoC, BC, Ernest Cushing Richardson Classification; Julia Pettee's Union Classification; CC
    Date
    20.10.2000 14:22:53
  9. McTavish, J.: Everyday life classification processes and technologies (2014) 0.08
    0.08050743 = product of:
      0.16101485 = sum of:
        0.16101485 = sum of:
          0.104506776 = weight(_text_:classification in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.104506776 = score(doc=1430,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.6294329 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
          0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056508083 = score(doc=1430,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    To "classify" in Library and Information Sciences (LIS) usually involves an engagement with formally established classification systems, such as the Dewey Decimal Classification. In this research I suggest an alternative path for LIS scholars - one that considers the application of LIS theories about classification to the investigation of everyday life "classification" processes and technologies.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  10. Langridge, D.W.: Classification: its kinds, systems, elements and application (1992) 0.08
    0.08043255 = product of:
      0.1608651 = sum of:
        0.1608651 = sum of:
          0.0809506 = weight(_text_:classification in 770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0809506 = score(doc=770,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 770, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=770)
          0.079914495 = weight(_text_:22 in 770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.079914495 = score(doc=770,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 770, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=770)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    COMPASS
    Subject classification
    Date
    26. 7.2002 14:01:22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of documentation 49(1993) no.1, S.68-70. (A. Maltby); Journal of librarianship and information science 1993, S.108-109 (A.G. Curwen); Herald of library science 33(1994) nos.1/2, S.85 (P.N. Kaula); Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.45 (M.P. Satija)
    Subject
    Subject classification
  11. Dhyani, P.: Universe of subjects and DDC engineering (1987) 0.08
    0.0774337 = product of:
      0.1548674 = sum of:
        0.1548674 = sum of:
          0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07010528 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
          0.08476212 = weight(_text_:22 in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08476212 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International classification. 14(1987), S.19-22
  12. Downing, J.C.: Dewey today : the British and European scene (1976) 0.08
    0.0774337 = product of:
      0.1548674 = sum of:
        0.1548674 = sum of:
          0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 2567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07010528 = score(doc=2567,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 2567, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2567)
          0.08476212 = weight(_text_:22 in 2567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08476212 = score(doc=2567,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2567, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2567)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-29
    Source
    Major classification systems: the Dewey centennial. Papers presented at the Allerton Park Institute, Nov. 1975, Allerton Park, Monticello, Ill. Ed. by K.L. Henderson
  13. Laakso, J.; Puukko, O.: Classification of fiction by topic in the light of experiments carried out in two public libraries : [Original in Finnisch] (1992) 0.08
    0.0774337 = product of:
      0.1548674 = sum of:
        0.1548674 = sum of:
          0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07010528 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
          0.08476212 = weight(_text_:22 in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08476212 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 10:22:39
  14. Electronic Resources: Selection and Bibliographic Control : [Themenheft] (1996) 0.08
    0.0774337 = product of:
      0.1548674 = sum of:
        0.1548674 = sum of:
          0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 4206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07010528 = score(doc=4206,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 4206, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4206)
          0.08476212 = weight(_text_:22 in 4206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08476212 = score(doc=4206,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4206, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4206)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.1-238
  15. Williamson, N.J.: Classification issues in 2011 : report (2012) 0.08
    0.0774337 = product of:
      0.1548674 = sum of:
        0.1548674 = sum of:
          0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 6224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07010528 = score(doc=6224,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 6224, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6224)
          0.08476212 = weight(_text_:22 in 6224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08476212 = score(doc=6224,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6224, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6224)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:17:00
  16. Chan, L.M.: Library of Congress Subject Headings : principles and application (1995) 0.08
    0.0774337 = product of:
      0.1548674 = sum of:
        0.1548674 = sum of:
          0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 3985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07010528 = score(doc=3985,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 3985, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3985)
          0.08476212 = weight(_text_:22 in 3985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08476212 = score(doc=3985,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3985, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3985)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25.11.2005 18:37:22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 23(1996) no.1, S.127-130 (L. Kuyper-Rushing)
  17. Languages of the world : cataloguing issues and problems (1993) 0.08
    0.0774337 = product of:
      0.1548674 = sum of:
        0.1548674 = sum of:
          0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07010528 = score(doc=4242,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
          0.08476212 = weight(_text_:22 in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08476212 = score(doc=4242,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    15. 6.1996 18:06:22
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.17, nos.1/2
  18. Barden, B.R.; Denison, B.: Guide to the SLA loan collection of classification schemes and subject heading lists on deposit at Western Reserve Univ. as of March 20, 1961 (1961) 0.08
    0.0774337 = product of:
      0.1548674 = sum of:
        0.1548674 = sum of:
          0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 6157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07010528 = score(doc=6157,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 6157, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6157)
          0.08476212 = weight(_text_:22 in 6157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08476212 = score(doc=6157,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6157, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6157)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.6, S.483-484 (A.R. Lindsay)
  19. Kumar, K.: Theory of classification (1989) 0.08
    0.0774337 = product of:
      0.1548674 = sum of:
        0.1548674 = sum of:
          0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 6774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07010528 = score(doc=6774,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 6774, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6774)
          0.08476212 = weight(_text_:22 in 6774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08476212 = score(doc=6774,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6774, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6774)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25. 3.2019 18:15:22
  20. Fachsystematik und Einzelsprachensystematik des Instituts für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster (1989) 0.08
    0.0774337 = product of:
      0.1548674 = sum of:
        0.1548674 = sum of:
          0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 1738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07010528 = score(doc=1738,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 1738, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1738)
          0.08476212 = weight(_text_:22 in 1738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08476212 = score(doc=1738,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1738, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1738)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 6.2004 21:22:16
    Footnote
    Rez. in: International classification 19(1992) no.3, S.166-168

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 6946
  • m 723
  • el 337
  • s 317
  • b 59
  • x 52
  • r 33
  • i 25
  • p 24
  • ? 15
  • n 9
  • z 5
  • d 4
  • h 4
  • u 4
  • ag 2
  • l 2
  • au 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications