-
¬The structure of knowledge : classifications of science and learning since the Renaissance ; International Summer School in History of Science <1998, Uppsala> (2001)
0.01
0.008929707 = product of:
0.044648536 = sum of:
0.044648536 = weight(_text_:7 in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044648536 = score(doc=86,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.052075688 = queryNorm
0.25881004 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 7. 4.2012 18:48:40
7. 4.2012 18:59:47
-
Szostak, R.: Classifying science : phenomena, data, theory, method, practice (2004)
0.01
0.006561968 = product of:
0.03280984 = sum of:
0.03280984 = weight(_text_:7 in 325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03280984 = score(doc=325,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17251469 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.052075688 = queryNorm
0.19018576 = fieldWeight in 325, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=325)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Content
- Inhalt: - Chapter 1: Classifying Science: 1.1. A Simple Classificatory Guideline - 1.2. The First "Cut" (and Plan of Work) - 1.3. Some Preliminaries - Chapter 2: Classifying Phenomena and Data: 2.1. Classifying Phenomena - 2.2. Classifying Data - Chapter 3: Classifying Theory: 3.1. Typology of Theory - 3.2. What Is a Theory? - 3.3. Evaluating Theories - 3.4. Types of Theory and the Five Types of Causation - 3.5. Classifying Individual Theories - 3.6. Advantages of a Typology of Theory - Chapter 4: Classifying Method: 4.1. Classifying Methods - 4.2. Typology of Strengths and Weaknesses of Methods - 4.3. Qualitative Versus Quantitative Analysis Revisited - 4.4. Evaluating Methods - 4.5. Classifying Particular Methods Within The Typology - 4.6. Advantages of a Typology of Methods - Chapter 5: Classifying Practice: 5.1. Errors and Biases in ScienceChapter - 5.2. Typology of (Critiques of) Scientific Practice - 5.3. Utilizing This Classification - 5.4. The Five Types of Ethical Analysis - Chapter 6: Drawing Connections Across These Classifications: 6.1. Theory and Method - 6.2. Theory (Method) and Phenomena (Data) - 6.3. Better Paradigms - 6.4. Critiques of Scientific Practice: Are They Correlated with Other Classifications? - Chapter 7: Classifying Scientific Documents: 7.1. Faceted or Enumerative? - 7.2. Classifying By Phenomena Studied - 7.3. Classifying By Theory Used - 7.4. Classifying By Method Used - 7.5 Links Among Subjects - 7.6. Type of Work, Language, and More - 7.7. Critiques of Scientific Practice - 7.8. Classifying Philosophy - 7.9. Evaluating the System - Chapter 8: Concluding Remarks: 8.1. The Classifications - 8.2. Advantages of These Various Classifications - 8.3. Drawing Connections Across Classifications - 8.4. Golden Mean Arguments - 8.5. Why Should Science Be Believed? - 8.6. How Can Science Be Improved? - 8.7. How Should Science Be Taught?
- Date
- 7. 9.1996 17:35:55
- Series
- Information Science & Knowledge Management ; 7
-
Boerner, K.: Atlas of science : visualizing what we know (2010)
0.01
0.0056444295 = product of:
0.028222147 = sum of:
0.028222147 = weight(_text_:22 in 3359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028222147 = score(doc=3359,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18236019 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052075688 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3359, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3359)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 1.2017 17:12:16
