Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × classification_ss:"025.04 / dc22"
  1. Stuckenschmidt, H.; Harmelen, F. van: Information sharing on the semantic web (2005) 0.01
    0.0056679165 = product of:
      0.011335833 = sum of:
        0.011335833 = product of:
          0.022671666 = sum of:
            0.022671666 = weight(_text_:6 in 2789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022671666 = score(doc=2789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.16766575 = fieldWeight in 2789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2789)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 7.2008 19:43:34
  2. O'Connor, B.C.; Kearns, J.; Anderson, R.L.: Doing things with information : beyond indexing and abstracting (2008) 0.00
    0.004534333 = product of:
      0.009068666 = sum of:
        0.009068666 = product of:
          0.018137332 = sum of:
            0.018137332 = weight(_text_:6 in 4297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018137332 = score(doc=4297,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.1341326 = fieldWeight in 4297, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4297)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: 1. Background concepts and models 2. Considerations of representation 3. Representation, function, and utility 4. Failures of representation: Indeterminacy and depth 5. Aboutness and user-generated descriptors 6. Responses to indeterminacy 7. Doing things with word-based documents 8. Functional application of information measurement 9. Functional ontology construction 10. Creek pebbles: A summary metaphor and touchstone for exploration
  3. TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval (2005) 0.00
    0.0040078224 = product of:
      0.008015645 = sum of:
        0.008015645 = product of:
          0.01603129 = sum of:
            0.01603129 = weight(_text_:6 in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01603129 = score(doc=636,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.11855759 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: 1. The Text REtrieval Conference - Ellen M. Voorhees and Donna K. Harman 2. The TREC Test Collections - Donna K. Harman 3. Retrieval System Evaluation - Chris Buckley and Ellen M. Voorhees 4. The TREC Ad Hoc Experiments - Donna K. Harman 5. Routing and Filtering - Stephen Robertson and Jamie Callan 6. The TREC Interactive Tracks: Putting the User into Search - Susan T. Dumais and Nicholas J. Belkin 7. Beyond English - Donna K. Harman 8. Retrieving Noisy Text - Ellen M. Voorhees and John S. Garofolo 9.The Very Large Collection and Web Tracks - David Hawking and Nick Craswell 10. Question Answering in TREC - Ellen M. Voorhees 11. The University of Massachusetts and a Dozen TRECs - James Allan, W. Bruce Croft and Jamie Callan 12. How Okapi Came to TREC - Stephen Robertson 13. The SMART Project at TREC - Chris Buckley 14. Ten Years of Ad Hoc Retrieval at TREC Using PIRCS - Kui-Lam Kwok 15. MultiText Experiments for TREC - Gordon V. Cormack, Charles L. A. Clarke, Christopher R. Palmer and Thomas R. Lynam 16. A Language-Modeling Approach to TREC - Djoerd Hiemstra and Wessel Kraaij 17. BM Research Activities at TREC - Eric W. Brown, David Carmel, Martin Franz, Abraham Ittycheriah, Tapas Kanungo, Yoelle Maarek, J. Scott McCarley, Robert L. Mack, John M. Prager, John R. Smith, Aya Soffer, Jason Y. Zien and Alan D. Marwick Epilogue: Metareflections on TREC - Karen Sparck Jones
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.6, S.910-911 (J.L. Vicedo u. J. Gomez): "The Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) is a yearly workshop hosted by the U.S. government's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) that fosters and supports research in information retrieval as well as speeding the transfer of technology between research labs and industry. Since 1992, TREC has provided the infrastructure necessary for large-scale evaluations of different text retrieval methodologies. TREC impact has been very important and its success has been mainly supported by its continuous adaptation to the emerging information retrieval needs. Not in vain, TREC has built evaluation benchmarks for more than 20 different retrieval problems such as Web retrieval, speech retrieval, or question-answering. The large and intense trajectory of annual TREC conferences has resulted in an immense bulk of documents reflecting the different eval uation and research efforts developed. This situation makes it difficult sometimes to observe clearly how research in information retrieval (IR) has evolved over the course of TREC. TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval succeeds in organizing and condensing all this research into a manageable volume that describes TREC history and summarizes the main lessons learned. The book is organized into three parts. The first part is devoted to the description of TREC's origin and history, the test collections, and the evaluation methodology developed. The second part describes a selection of the major evaluation exercises (tracks), and the third part contains contributions from research groups that had a large and remarkable participation in TREC. Finally, Karen Spark Jones, one of the main promoters of research in IR, closes the book with an epilogue that analyzes the impact of TREC on this research field.
  4. Antoniou, G.; Harmelen, F. van: ¬A semantic Web primer (2004) 0.00
    0.0028339582 = product of:
      0.0056679165 = sum of:
        0.0056679165 = product of:
          0.011335833 = sum of:
            0.011335833 = weight(_text_:6 in 468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011335833 = score(doc=468,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.083832875 = fieldWeight in 468, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=468)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    The next chapter introduces resource description framework (RDF) and RDF schema (RDFS). Unlike XML, RDF provides a foundation for expressing the semantics of dada: it is a standard dada model for machine-processable semantics. Resource description framework schema offers a number of modeling primitives for organizing RDF vocabularies in typed hierarchies. In addition to RDF and RDFS, a query language for RDF, i.e. RQL. is introduced. This chapter and the next chapter are two of the most important chapters in the book. Chapter 4 presents another language called Web Ontology Language (OWL). Because RDFS is quite primitive as a modeling language for the Web, more powerful languages are needed. A richer language. DAML+OIL, is thus proposed as a joint endeavor of the United States and Europe. OWL takes DAML+OIL as the starting point, and aims to be the standardized and broadly accepted ontology language. At the beginning of the chapter, the nontrivial relation with RDF/RDFS is discussed. Then the authors describe the various language elements of OWL in some detail. Moreover, Appendix A contains an abstract OWL syntax. which compresses OWL and makes OWL much easier to read. Chapter 5 covers both monotonic and nonmonotonic rules. Whereas the previous chapter's mainly concentrate on specializations of knowledge representation, this chapter depicts the foundation of knowledge representation and inference. Two examples are also givwn to explain monotonic and non-monotonic rules, respectively. "To get the most out of the chapter. readers had better gain a thorough understanding of predicate logic first. Chapter 6 presents several realistic application scenarios to which the Semantic Web technology can be applied. including horizontal information products at Elsevier, data integration at Audi, skill finding at Swiss Life, a think tank portal at EnerSearch, e-learning. Web services, multimedia collection indexing, online procurement, raid device interoperability. These case studies give us some real feelings about the Semantic Web.
  5. Spink, A.; Jansen, B.J.: Web searching : public searching of the Web (2004) 0.00
    0.0028339582 = product of:
      0.0056679165 = sum of:
        0.0056679165 = product of:
          0.011335833 = sum of:
            0.011335833 = weight(_text_:6 in 1443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011335833 = score(doc=1443,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.083832875 = fieldWeight in 1443, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1443)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Information science and knowledge management; 6

Types