Search (304 results, page 1 of 16)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.07
    0.074745074 = product of:
      0.14949015 = sum of:
        0.14949015 = sum of:
          0.06412516 = weight(_text_:6 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06412516 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.47423035 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.08536499 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08536499 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
    Footnote
    Auch unter: http:\\www.shef.ac.uk/--is/publications/infres/6-2/ paper92a.html
    Source
    Information Research. 6(2001), no.2
  2. Manley, S.: Letters to the editor and the race for publication metrics (2022) 0.04
    0.036996923 = product of:
      0.07399385 = sum of:
        0.07399385 = sum of:
          0.03174033 = weight(_text_:6 in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03174033 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.23473203 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
          0.042253513 = weight(_text_:22 in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042253513 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2022 19:22:26
  3. Crespo, J.A.; Herranz, N.; Li, Y.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: ¬The effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices at the web of science subject category level (2014) 0.03
    0.03267708 = product of:
      0.06535416 = sum of:
        0.06535416 = sum of:
          0.022671666 = weight(_text_:6 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022671666 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.16766575 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
          0.042682495 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042682495 = score(doc=1291,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article studies the impact of differences in citation practices at the subfield, or Web of Science subject category level, using the model introduced in Crespo, Li, and Ruiz-Castillo (2013a), according to which the number of citations received by an article depends on its underlying scientific influence and the field to which it belongs. We use the same Thomson Reuters data set of about 4.4 million articles used in Crespo et al. (2013a) to analyze 22 broad fields. The main results are the following: First, when the classification system goes from 22 fields to 219 subfields the effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices increases from ?14% at the field level to 18% at the subfield level. Second, we estimate a set of exchange rates (ERs) over a wide [660, 978] citation quantile interval to express the citation counts of articles into the equivalent counts in the all-sciences case. In the fractional case, for example, we find that in 187 of 219 subfields the ERs are reliable in the sense that the coefficient of variation is smaller than or equal to 0.10. Third, in the fractional case the normalization of the raw data using the ERs (or subfield mean citations) as normalization factors reduces the importance of the differences in citation practices from 18% to 3.8% (3.4%) of overall citation inequality. Fourth, the results in the fractional case are essentially replicated when we adopt a multiplicative approach.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.6, S.1244-1256
  4. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996) 0.03
    0.03171165 = product of:
      0.0634233 = sum of:
        0.0634233 = sum of:
          0.027205998 = weight(_text_:6 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027205998 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.20119889 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
          0.0362173 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0362173 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 4.1996 12:46:16
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
  5. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.03
    0.03171165 = product of:
      0.0634233 = sum of:
        0.0634233 = sum of:
          0.027205998 = weight(_text_:6 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027205998 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.20119889 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
          0.0362173 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0362173 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
  6. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.03
    0.03171165 = product of:
      0.0634233 = sum of:
        0.0634233 = sum of:
          0.027205998 = weight(_text_:6 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027205998 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.20119889 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.0362173 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0362173 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
    Source
    Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.6, S.1451-1464
  7. Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.; Wilkinson, D.: Link and co-inlink network diagrams with URL citations or title mentions (2012) 0.03
    0.026426375 = product of:
      0.05285275 = sum of:
        0.05285275 = sum of:
          0.022671666 = weight(_text_:6 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022671666 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.16766575 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
          0.030181082 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030181082 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2012 18:16:22
  8. Ortega, J.L.: ¬The presence of academic journals on Twitter and its relationship with dissemination (tweets) and research impact (citations) (2017) 0.03
    0.026426375 = product of:
      0.05285275 = sum of:
        0.05285275 = sum of:
          0.022671666 = weight(_text_:6 in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022671666 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.16766575 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
          0.030181082 = weight(_text_:22 in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030181082 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.6, S.674-687
  9. Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020) 0.03
    0.026426375 = product of:
      0.05285275 = sum of:
        0.05285275 = sum of:
          0.022671666 = weight(_text_:6 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022671666 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.16766575 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
          0.030181082 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030181082 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.6, S.945-962
  10. Vakkari, P.; Järvelin, K.; Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995-2015 (2023) 0.03
    0.026426375 = product of:
      0.05285275 = sum of:
        0.05285275 = sum of:
          0.022671666 = weight(_text_:6 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022671666 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.16766575 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
          0.030181082 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030181082 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The paper reports a longitudinal analysis of the topical and methodological development of Library and Information Science (LIS). Its focus is on the effects of researchers' disciplines on these developments. The study extends an earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) by a coordinated dataset representing a content analysis of articles published in 31 scholarly LIS journals in 1995, 2005, and 2015. It is novel in its coverage of authors' disciplines, topical and methodological aspects in a coordinated dataset spanning two decades thus allowing trend analysis. The findings include a shrinking trend in the share of LIS from 67 to 36% while Computer Science, and Business and Economics increase their share from 9 and 6% to 21 and 16%, respectively. The earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) for the year 2015 identified three topical clusters of LIS research, focusing on topical subfields, methodologies, and contributing disciplines. Correspondence analysis confirms their existence already in 1995 and traces their development through the decades. The contributing disciplines infuse their concepts, research questions, and approaches to LIS and may also subsume vital parts of LIS in their own structures of knowledge production.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:15:06
  11. Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986) 0.02
    0.024144866 = product of:
      0.04828973 = sum of:
        0.04828973 = product of:
          0.09657946 = sum of:
            0.09657946 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09657946 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
  12. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02
    0.024144866 = product of:
      0.04828973 = sum of:
        0.04828973 = product of:
          0.09657946 = sum of:
            0.09657946 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09657946 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  13. Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987) 0.02
    0.024144866 = product of:
      0.04828973 = sum of:
        0.04828973 = product of:
          0.09657946 = sum of:
            0.09657946 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09657946 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
  14. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.02
    0.021341247 = product of:
      0.042682495 = sum of:
        0.042682495 = product of:
          0.08536499 = sum of:
            0.08536499 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08536499 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  15. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.02
    0.021141099 = product of:
      0.042282198 = sum of:
        0.042282198 = sum of:
          0.018137332 = weight(_text_:6 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018137332 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.1341326 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
          0.024144866 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024144866 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.6, S.549-568
  16. Freitas, J.L.; Gabriel Jr., R.F.; Bufrem, L.S.: Theoretical approximations between Brazilian and Spanish authors' production in the field of knowledge organization in the production of journals on information science in Brazil (2012) 0.02
    0.021141099 = product of:
      0.042282198 = sum of:
        0.042282198 = sum of:
          0.018137332 = weight(_text_:6 in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018137332 = score(doc=144,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.1341326 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
          0.024144866 = weight(_text_:22 in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024144866 = score(doc=144,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Beitrag einer Section "Selected Papers from the 1ST Brazilian Conference on Knowledge Organization And Representation, Faculdade de Ciência da Informação, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro Brasília, DF Brasil, October 20-22, 2011" Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_3_g.pdf.
    Date
    6. 1.1997 18:30:28
  17. Torres-Salinas, D.; Gorraiz, J.; Robinson-Garcia, N.: ¬The insoluble problems of books : what does Altmetric.com have to offer? (2018) 0.02
    0.021141099 = product of:
      0.042282198 = sum of:
        0.042282198 = sum of:
          0.018137332 = weight(_text_:6 in 4633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018137332 = score(doc=4633,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.1341326 = fieldWeight in 4633, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4633)
          0.024144866 = weight(_text_:22 in 4633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024144866 = score(doc=4633,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4633, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4633)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 70(2018) no.6, S.691-707
  18. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.02
    0.021126756 = product of:
      0.042253513 = sum of:
        0.042253513 = product of:
          0.084507026 = sum of:
            0.084507026 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084507026 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  19. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.02
    0.021126756 = product of:
      0.042253513 = sum of:
        0.042253513 = product of:
          0.084507026 = sum of:
            0.084507026 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084507026 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  20. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.02
    0.021126756 = product of:
      0.042253513 = sum of:
        0.042253513 = product of:
          0.084507026 = sum of:
            0.084507026 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084507026 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55

Years

Languages

  • e 284
  • d 18
  • chi 1
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 291
  • m 8
  • s 4
  • el 3
  • b 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…