Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  • × author_ss:"Li, X."
  1. Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Fan, W.: User adoption of physician's replies in an online health community : an empirical study (2020) 0.01
    0.0068014995 = product of:
      0.013602999 = sum of:
        0.013602999 = product of:
          0.027205998 = sum of:
            0.027205998 = weight(_text_:6 in 4) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027205998 = score(doc=4,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.20119889 = fieldWeight in 4, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Online health question-and-answer consultation with physicians is becoming a common phenomenon. However, it is unclear how users identify the most satisfying reply. Based on the dual-process theory of knowledge adoption, we developed a conceptual model and empirical method to study which factors influence adoption of a reply. We extracted 6 variables for argument quality (Ease of understanding, Relevance, Completeness, Objectivity, Timeliness, Structure) and 4 for source credibility (Physician's online experience, Physician's offline expertise, Hospital location, Hospital level). The empirical results indicate that both central and peripheral routes affect user's adoption of a response. Physician's offline expertise negatively affects user's adoption decision, while physician's online experience positively affects it; this effect is positively moderated by user involvement.
  2. Li, X.: Young people's information practices in library makerspaces (2021) 0.01
    0.0056679165 = product of:
      0.011335833 = sum of:
        0.011335833 = product of:
          0.022671666 = sum of:
            0.022671666 = weight(_text_:6 in 245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022671666 = score(doc=245,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.16766575 = fieldWeight in 245, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=245)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.6, S.744-758

Authors