Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Raghavan, K.S."
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Borem Lima, G.A.; Raghavan, K.S.: Categories in knowledge organization (2014) 0.03
    0.034962818 = product of:
      0.069925636 = sum of:
        0.069925636 = sum of:
          0.03470073 = weight(_text_:search in 1408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03470073 = score(doc=1408,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051997773 = queryNorm
              0.19200584 = fieldWeight in 1408, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1408)
          0.035224903 = weight(_text_:22 in 1408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035224903 = score(doc=1408,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051997773 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1408, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1408)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The categorial approach was formulated by Ranganathan in the 1930s in his Colon Classification and its conceptual and theoretical basis was laid down in his Prolegomena. This view influenced significantly the search for a new approach to knowledge organization that would overcome the rigidity and limitations of enumerative models. The categorical approach or the facet-analytical approach has since become the single most predominant approach in knowledge organization leading to the development of a number of special classification schemes for micro-subjects, new general classification schemes such as BSO (and revision of existing schemes, e.g. BC2), indexing systems such as PRECIS and POPSI, revision and / or development of controlled vocabularies to conform to the faceted approach, emergence of new tools such as the Thesaurofacet and Classaurus, and in recent years, facet analysis has even been used in website design. This paper explores some schemas and raises a few questions as to the relevance of these in the digital environment.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  2. Raghavan, K.S.; Rao, I.K.R.: Facets of facet analysis : a domain analysis (2014) 0.03
    0.034962818 = product of:
      0.069925636 = sum of:
        0.069925636 = sum of:
          0.03470073 = weight(_text_:search in 1411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03470073 = score(doc=1411,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051997773 = queryNorm
              0.19200584 = fieldWeight in 1411, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1411)
          0.035224903 = weight(_text_:22 in 1411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035224903 = score(doc=1411,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051997773 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1411, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1411)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Facet analysis is considered the most distinct approach to knowledge organization within LIS. This paper views 'Facet Analysis' as a domain and visualizes its parameters using domain analytic techniques. Over 150 papers on 'Facet Analysis' published since 2008 were identified via a search in Web of Science. The subject terms and other associated metadata of each of the records were taken to represent the different facets of the domain. The basic research question is: what are the facets of facet analysis? The study seeks to graphically represent the contours of the domain. The analysis of the data suggests that while the traditional aspects continue to dominate research in the area, aspects such as Artificial Intelligence, Information Architecture, etc are emerging as new areas of application. The distribution of authors suggests that interest in the area is now by no means confined to India, Europe and North America. There is evidence to suggest that Facet Analysis as a tool is growing in importance.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  3. Neelameghan, A.; Raghavan, K.S.: Science of consciousness as a domain : issues for knowledge organization (2014) 0.01
    0.012328716 = product of:
      0.024657432 = sum of:
        0.024657432 = product of:
          0.049314864 = sum of:
            0.049314864 = weight(_text_:22 in 1403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049314864 = score(doc=1403,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051997773 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1403, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1403)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik