Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0104102185 = product of:
  0.020820437 = sum of:
    0.020820437 = product of:
      0.041640874 = sum of:
        0.041640874 = weight(_text_:search in 2032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041640874 = score(doc=2032,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051997773 = queryNorm
            0.230407 = fieldWeight in 2032, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2032)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The increasing volume of information in the contemporary world entails demand for efficient knowledge management (KM) systems; a logical method of information organization that will allow proper semantic querying to identify things that match meaning in natural language. On this concept, the role of an information manager goes beyond implementing a search and clustering system, to the ability to map and logically present the subject domain and related cross domains. From Knowledge Abstraction to Management answers this need by analysing ontology tools and techniques, helping the reader develop

0.006940146 = product of:
  0.013880292 = sum of:
    0.013880292 = product of:
      0.027760584 = sum of:
        0.027760584 = weight(_text_:search in 3971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027760584 = score(doc=3971,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051997773 = queryNorm
            0.15360467 = fieldWeight in 3971, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3971)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Bergman and Whittaker report that many of us use hierarchical folders for our personal digital organizing. Critics of this method point out that information is hidden from sight in folders that are often within other folders so that we have to remember the exact location of information to access it. Because of this, information scientists suggest other methods: search, more flexible than navigating folders; tags, which allow multiple categorizations; and group information management. Yet Bergman and Whittaker have found in their pioneering PIM research that these other methods that work best for public information management don't work as well for personal information management. Bergman and Whittaker describe personal information collection as curation: we preserve and organize this data to ensure our future access to it. Unlike other information management fields, in PIM the same user organizes and retrieves the information. After explaining the cognitive and psychological reasons that so many prefer folders, Bergman and Whittaker propose the user-subjective approach to PIM, which does not replace folder hierarchies but exploits these unique characteristics of PIM.