Search (36 results, page 1 of 2)

0.06743932 = product of:
  0.13487864 = sum of:
    0.13487864 = sum of:
      0.078518786 = weight(_text_:search in 3366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.078518786 = score(doc=3366,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.43445963 = fieldWeight in 3366, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3366)
      0.056359846 = weight(_text_:22 in 3366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056359846 = score(doc=3366,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3366, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3366)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

As the LoC moves to make massive amounts of multimedia items available over networks, it must consider the challenge these new digital collections present for navigation. Discusses the search needs of the LC's digital collections audience and how relevant searching aids might be provided for them. Factors to be considered include: the variety of search needs of users; the different technology levels of users; and the need for the provision of both free text and structured searching. Considers the design of graphical user interfaces and the role of language in the successful navigation of a large database

Date

22. 2.1996 11:37:48

0.06743932 = product of:
  0.13487864 = sum of:
    0.13487864 = sum of:
      0.078518786 = weight(_text_:search in 3605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.078518786 = score(doc=3605,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.43445963 = fieldWeight in 3605, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3605)
      0.056359846 = weight(_text_:22 in 3605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056359846 = score(doc=3605,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3605, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3605)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Presents a multimedia model which describes the various multimedia components, their structure and their relationships with a pre-defined taxonomy of concepts, in order to support search engine information retrieval process

Date

1. 8.1996 22:08:06

0.040318605 = product of:
  0.08063721 = sum of:
    0.08063721 = product of:
      0.16127442 = sum of:
        0.16127442 = weight(_text_:search in 2038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16127442 = score(doc=2038,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051997773 = queryNorm
            0.89236253 = fieldWeight in 2038, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2038)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Web search engines are beginning to offer access to multimedia searching, including audio, video and image searching. In this paper we report findings from a study examining the state of multimedia search functionality on major general and specialized Web search engines. We investigated 102 Web search engines to examine: (1) how many Web search engines offer multimedia searching, (2) the type of multimedia search functionality and methods offered, such as "query by example", and (3) the supports for personalization or customization which are accessible as advanced search. Findings include: (1) few major Web search engines offer multimedia searching and (2) multimedia Web search functionality is generally limited. Our findings show that despite the increasing level of interest in multimedia Web search, those few Web search engines offering multimedia Web search, provide limited multimedia search functionality. Keywords are still the only means of multimedia retrieval, while other methods such as "query by example" are offered by less than 1% of Web search engines examined.

0.032603197 = product of:
  0.06520639 = sum of:
    0.06520639 = sum of:
      0.03470073 = weight(_text_:search in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03470073 = score(doc=150,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.19200584 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
      0.030505663 = weight(_text_:22 in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030505663 = score(doc=150,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.16753313 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Classification

006.7 22

Date

7. 3.2007 19:30:22

DDC

006.7 22

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.3, S.457-458 (A.M.A. Ahmad): "The concept of the semantic web has emerged because search engines and text-based searching are no longer adequate, as these approaches involve an extensive information retrieval process. The deployed searching and retrieving descriptors arc naturally subjective and their deployment is often restricted to the specific application domain for which the descriptors were configured. The new era of information technology imposes different kinds of requirements and challenges. Automatic extracted audiovisual features are required, as these features are more objective, domain-independent, and more native to audiovisual content. This book is a useful guide for researchers, experts, students, and practitioners; it is a very valuable reference and can lead them through their exploration and research in multimedia content and the semantic web. The book is well organized, and introduces the concept of the semantic web and multimedia content analysis to the reader through a logical sequence from standards and hypotheses through system examples, presenting relevant tools and methods. But in some chapters readers will need a good technical background to understand some of the details. Readers may attain sufficient knowledge here to start projects or research related to the book's theme; recent results and articles related to the active research area of integrating multimedia with semantic web technologies are included. This book includes full descriptions of approaches to specific problem domains such as content search, indexing, and retrieval. This book will be very useful to researchers in the multimedia content analysis field who wish to explore the benefits of emerging semantic web technologies in applying multimedia content approaches. The first part of the book covers the definition of the two basic terms multimedia content and semantic web. The Moving Picture Experts Group standards MPEG7 and MPEG21 are quoted extensively. In addition, the means of multimedia content description are elaborated upon and schematically drawn. This extensive description is introduced by authors who are actively involved in those standards and have been participating in the work of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO)/MPEG for many years. On the other hand, this results in bias against the ad hoc or nonstandard tools for multimedia description in favor of the standard approaches. This is a general book for multimedia content; more emphasis on the general multimedia description and extraction could be provided.
The final part of the book discusses research in multimedia content management systems and the semantic web, and presents examples and applications for semantic multimedia analysis in search and retrieval systems. These chapters describe example systems in which current projects have been implemented, and include extensive results and real demonstrations. For example, real case scenarios such as ECommerce medical applications and Web services have been introduced. Topics in natural language, speech and image processing techniques and their application for multimedia indexing, and content-based retrieval have been elaborated upon with extensive examples and deployment methods. The editors of the book themselves provide the readers with a chapter about their latest research results on knowledge-based multimedia content indexing and retrieval. Some interesting applications for multimedia content and the semantic web are introduced. Applications that have taken advantage of the metadata provided by MPEG7 in order to realize advance-access services for multimedia content have been provided. The applications discussed in the third part of the book provide useful guidance to researchers and practitioners properly planning to implement semantic multimedia analysis techniques in new research and development projects in both academia and industry. A fourth part should be added to this book: performance measurements for integrated approaches of multimedia analysis and the semantic web. Performance of the semantic approach is a very sophisticated issue and requires extensive elaboration and effort. Measuring the semantic search is an ongoing research area; several chapters concerning performance measurement and analysis would be required to adequately cover this area and introduce it to readers."

0.028772324 = product of:
  0.05754465 = sum of:
    0.05754465 = product of:
      0.1150893 = sum of:
        0.1150893 = weight(_text_:search in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1150893 = score(doc=3090,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051997773 = queryNorm
            0.6368113 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Searching for multimedia is an important activity for users of Web search engines. Studying user's interactions with Web search engine multimedia buttons, including image, audio, and video, is important for the development of multimedia Web search systems. This article provides results from a Weblog analysis study of multimedia Web searching by Dogpile users in 2006. The study analyzes the (a) duration, size, and structure of Web search queries and sessions; (b) user demographics; (c) most popular multimedia Web searching terms; and (d) use of advanced Web search techniques including Boolean and natural language. The current study findings are compared with results from previous multimedia Web searching studies. The key findings are: (a) Since 1997, image search consistently is the dominant media type searched followed by audio and video; (b) multimedia search duration is still short (>50% of searching episodes are <1 min), using few search terms; (c) many multimedia searches are for information about people, especially in audio search; and (d) multimedia search has begun to shift from entertainment to other categories such as medical, sports, and technology (based on the most repeated terms). Implications for design of Web multimedia search engines are discussed.

0.024290511 = product of:
  0.048581023 = sum of:
    0.048581023 = product of:
      0.097162046 = sum of:
        0.097162046 = weight(_text_:search in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.097162046 = score(doc=1492,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051997773 = queryNorm
            0.5376164 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Develops an integrated conceptual representation scheme for multimedia documents that are viewed to comprise an object-oriented database. Develops the necessary abstractions for the conceptual model and extensions to the RM/T relational model used as the search structure. Develops a retrieval model in which the database search space is 1st narrowed down, based on user query, by an associative search. The associative search is followed by semantic and media-specific searches. A query langugae called SQLX is introduced to fomulate these searches directly from the conceptual model. In SQLX, connector attributes replace join, and abstract data type enables use of objects and their methods in query formulation. Describes a temporal model for time-dependent presentations and with the directions for future work

0.022952376 = product of:
  0.045904752 = sum of:
    0.045904752 = product of:
      0.091809504 = sum of:
        0.091809504 = weight(_text_:search in 2743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.091809504 = score(doc=2743,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051997773 = queryNorm
            0.5079997 = fieldWeight in 2743, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Awareness of another's activity is an important aspect of facilitating collaboration between users, enabling an "understanding of the activities of others" (Dourish & Bellotti, 1992). In this paper we investigate the role of awareness and its effect on search performance and behaviour in collaborative multimedia retrieval. We focus on the scenario where two users are searching at the same time on the same task, and via an interface, can see the activity of the other user. The main research question asks: does awareness of another searcher aid a user when carrying out a multimedia search session? To encourage awareness, an experimental study was designed where two users were asked to compete to find as many relevant video shots as possible under different awareness conditions. These were individual search (no awareness), Mutual awareness (where both users could see the other's search screen), and unbalanced awareness (where one user is able to see the other's screen, but not vice-versa). Twelve pairs of users were recruited, and the four worst performing TRECVID 2006 search topics were used as search tasks, under four different awareness conditions. We present the results of this study, followed by a discussion of the implications for multimedia information retrieval systems.

0.02113494 = product of:
  0.04226988 = sum of:
    0.04226988 = product of:
      0.08453976 = sum of:
        0.08453976 = weight(_text_:22 in 2438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08453976 = score(doc=2438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051997773 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2438)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

31.12.1998 22:05:21

0.017612452 = product of:
  0.035224903 = sum of:
    0.035224903 = product of:
      0.07044981 = sum of:
        0.07044981 = weight(_text_:22 in 2756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07044981 = score(doc=2756,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051997773 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2756, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2756)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Part of a special issue featuring papers from the workshop on hypermedia and hypertext standards held in Amsterdam, Netherlands, 22-23 April 1993

0.014089962 = product of:
  0.028179923 = sum of:
    0.028179923 = product of:
      0.056359846 = sum of:
        0.056359846 = weight(_text_:22 in 2679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056359846 = score(doc=2679,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051997773 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2679, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2679)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Bulletin des Bibliothèques de France. 40(1995) no.2, S.18-22

0.014089962 = product of:
  0.028179923 = sum of:
    0.028179923 = product of:
      0.056359846 = sum of:
        0.056359846 = weight(_text_:22 in 6137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056359846 = score(doc=6137,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051997773 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6137, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6137)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Frankfurter Rundschau. Nr. 20 vom 24.1.1997, S.22

0.014089962 = product of:
  0.028179923 = sum of:
    0.028179923 = product of:
      0.056359846 = sum of:
        0.056359846 = weight(_text_:22 in 6385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056359846 = score(doc=6385,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051997773 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6385, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6385)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Audiovisual librarian. 22(1996) no.3, S.194-197

0.014089962 = product of:
  0.028179923 = sum of:
    0.028179923 = product of:
      0.056359846 = sum of:
        0.056359846 = weight(_text_:22 in 7231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056359846 = score(doc=7231,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051997773 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7231, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7231)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.17-20

0.014089962 = product of:
  0.028179923 = sum of:
    0.028179923 = product of:
      0.056359846 = sum of:
        0.056359846 = weight(_text_:22 in 5627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056359846 = score(doc=5627,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051997773 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5627, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5627)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

14. 2.2001 19:09:22

0.013880292 = product of:
  0.027760584 = sum of:
    0.027760584 = product of:
      0.055521168 = sum of:
        0.055521168 = weight(_text_:search in 947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055521168 = score(doc=947,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051997773 = queryNorm
            0.30720934 = fieldWeight in 947, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=947)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Multimedia databases started to appear on the market in 1989. They are computer databases combining a number of features, including text, images, sound and video, and may appear in CD-ROM, CD-I, floppy disk, or videodisc format. Examples of multimedia products are games, instructional programs, and refrence materials. A study of such media in the Netherlands revealed the limitations of search facilities and the difficulty of reading large amounts of text on screen. Multimedia publishers will need to overcome these problems in order to stand any chance of success

0.013880292 = product of:
  0.027760584 = sum of:
    0.027760584 = product of:
      0.055521168 = sum of:
        0.055521168 = weight(_text_:search in 1487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055521168 = score(doc=1487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051997773 = queryNorm
            0.30720934 = fieldWeight in 1487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1487)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Presents the views of 7 European information professionals on the value and use of multimedia databases. The enjoyment of working with a colourful, well designed database may be very appealing, but not if it means that the cost of a search goes up. 4 factors will determine whether the promise of multimedia is realized: ease of use, including the ability to customise; platform independence; affordability; and the development of authoring tools that will allow information workers to create multimedia reports in the context of normal day to day activities

0.013880292 = product of:
  0.027760584 = sum of:
    0.027760584 = product of:
      0.055521168 = sum of:
        0.055521168 = weight(_text_:search in 4712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055521168 = score(doc=4712,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051997773 = queryNorm
            0.30720934 = fieldWeight in 4712, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4712)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Colours, icons, graphics, hypertext links and other multimedia elements are variables that affect information search strategies and information seeking behaviour. These variables are culturally constructed and represented and are subject to individual and community interpretation. Hypothesizes that users in different communities (in intercultural or multicultural context) will interpret differently the meanings of the multimedia objects on the Internet. Users' interpretations of multimedia objects may differ from the intentions of the designers. A study in this area is being undertaken

0.013880292 = product of:
  0.027760584 = sum of:
    0.027760584 = product of:
      0.055521168 = sum of:
        0.055521168 = weight(_text_:search in 6156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055521168 = score(doc=6156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051997773 = queryNorm
            0.30720934 = fieldWeight in 6156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6156)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Discusses the current state of the art in the field of large-scale networked hypermedia systems. Identifies ways in which the future generation of networked hypermedia systems will differ from the present generation. Surveys: type; preparation, storage, and interchange of hypermedia documents; security, costs and copyright; navigation, search and retrieval; usability; and hypermedia as a technology of integration

0.012453884 = product of:
  0.024907768 = sum of:
    0.024907768 = product of:
      0.049815536 = sum of:
        0.049815536 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049815536 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051997773 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 1.2012 13:02:10

Source

Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22

0.012328716 = product of:
  0.024657432 = sum of:
    0.024657432 = product of:
      0.049314864 = sum of:
        0.049314864 = weight(_text_:22 in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049314864 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051997773 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05