-
Roto, V.: Search on mobile phones. (2006)
0.11
0.10669871 = product of:
0.21339741 = sum of:
0.21339741 = sum of:
0.15703757 = weight(_text_:search in 5304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15703757 = score(doc=5304,freq=16.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.86891925 = fieldWeight in 5304, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5304)
0.056359846 = weight(_text_:22 in 5304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056359846 = score(doc=5304,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5304, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5304)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The search tools familiar from the personal computer are propagating to mobile devices. Are users willing to type keywords with the limited keypad of an ordinary mobile phone? How does mobile search differ from stationary search? The author found that users are surprisingly willing to use search also with the traditional phone keypad, and foresees a search revolution as mobile devices enable location-based search.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:35:39
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Wildemuth, B.M.: Evidence-based practice in search interface design (2006)
0.09
0.08892408 = product of:
0.17784816 = sum of:
0.17784816 = sum of:
0.1285333 = weight(_text_:search in 5302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1285333 = score(doc=5302,freq=14.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.71119964 = fieldWeight in 5302, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5302)
0.049314864 = weight(_text_:22 in 5302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049314864 = score(doc=5302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5302)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- An evidence-based practice approach to search interface design is proposed, with the goal of designing interfaces that adequately support search strategy formulation and reformulation. Relevant findings from studies of information professionals' searching behaviors, end users' searching of bibliographic databases, and search behaviors on the Web are highlighted. Three brief examples are presented to illustrate the ways in which findings from such studies can be used to make decisions about the design of search interfaces. If academic research can be effectively connected with design practice, we can discover which design practices truly are best practices and incorporate them into future search interfaces.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:30:09
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Vaughan, M.W.; Resnick, M.L.: Search user interfaces : best practices and future visions (2006)
0.08
0.08429915 = product of:
0.1685983 = sum of:
0.1685983 = sum of:
0.09814849 = weight(_text_:search in 5191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09814849 = score(doc=5191,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.54307455 = fieldWeight in 5191, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5191)
0.07044981 = weight(_text_:22 in 5191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07044981 = score(doc=5191,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5191, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5191)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:37:31
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Rose, D.E.: Reconciling information-seeking behavior with search user interfaces for the Web (2006)
0.08
0.08415678 = product of:
0.16831356 = sum of:
0.16831356 = sum of:
0.11899871 = weight(_text_:search in 5296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11899871 = score(doc=5296,freq=12.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.65844285 = fieldWeight in 5296, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5296)
0.049314864 = weight(_text_:22 in 5296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049314864 = score(doc=5296,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5296, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5296)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- User interfaces of Web search engines reflect attributes of the underlying tools used to create them, rather than what we know about how people look for information. In this article, the author examines several characteristics of user search behavior: the variety of information-seeking goals, the cultural and situational context of search, and the iterative nature of the search task. An analysis of these characteristics suggests ways that interfaces can be redesigned to make searching more effective for users.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:58:06
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Hendry, D.G.: Workspaces for search (2006)
0.08
0.08415678 = product of:
0.16831356 = sum of:
0.16831356 = sum of:
0.11899871 = weight(_text_:search in 5297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11899871 = score(doc=5297,freq=12.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.65844285 = fieldWeight in 5297, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5297)
0.049314864 = weight(_text_:22 in 5297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049314864 = score(doc=5297,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5297, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5297)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Progress in search interfaces requires vigorous inquiry into how search features can be embedded into application environments such as those for decision-making, personal information collecting, and designing. Progress can be made by focusing on mid-level descriptions of how search components can draw upon and update workspace content and structure. The immediate goal is to advance our understanding of how to shape and exploit context in search. The long-term goal is to develop an interdisciplinary design resource that enables stakeholders in the computing, social, and information sciences to more richly impact each others' work.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:01:11
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Poynder, R.: WinSPIRS from SilverPlatter (1994)
0.08
0.083910756 = product of:
0.16782151 = sum of:
0.16782151 = sum of:
0.08328175 = weight(_text_:search in 8113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08328175 = score(doc=8113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.460814 = fieldWeight in 8113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8113)
0.08453976 = weight(_text_:22 in 8113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08453976 = score(doc=8113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 8113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Examines the new Windows search interface to SilverPlatter's CD-ROM database products. Introduces the functions of the software. Reports on the experiences of those involved in beta testing the product
- Date
- 23. 1.1999 19:32:22
-
Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006)
0.08
0.07694328 = product of:
0.15388656 = sum of:
0.15388656 = sum of:
0.0841448 = weight(_text_:search in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0841448 = score(doc=5295,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.46558946 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
0.069741756 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069741756 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A new search paradigm, in which the primary user activity is the guided exploration of a complex information space rather than the retrieval of items based on precise specifications, is proposed. The author claims that this paradigm is the norm in most practical applications, and that solutions based on traditional search methods are not effective in this context. He then presents a solution based on dynamic taxonomies, a knowledge management model that effectively guides users to reach their goal while giving them total freedom in exploring the information base. Applications, benefits, and current research are discussed.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:56:22
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Davis, L.: Designing a search user interface for a digital library (2006)
0.08
0.07626267 = product of:
0.15252534 = sum of:
0.15252534 = sum of:
0.096165486 = weight(_text_:search in 5294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096165486 = score(doc=5294,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.5321022 = fieldWeight in 5294, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5294)
0.056359846 = weight(_text_:22 in 5294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056359846 = score(doc=5294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5294)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The author describes some of the challenges, decisions, and processes that affected the design and development of the search user interface for Version 2 of the Digital Library for Earth System Education (DLESE; www.dlese.org), released July 29, 2003. The DLESE is a community-led effort funded by the National Science Foundation and is part of the National Science Digital Library (NSDL).
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:48:54
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Gremett, P.: Utilizing a user's context to improve search results (2006)
0.08
0.07626267 = product of:
0.15252534 = sum of:
0.15252534 = sum of:
0.096165486 = weight(_text_:search in 5299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096165486 = score(doc=5299,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.5321022 = fieldWeight in 5299, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5299)
0.056359846 = weight(_text_:22 in 5299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056359846 = score(doc=5299,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5299, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5299)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Usability evaluations and observations of users shopping at Amazon.com (http://www.amazon.com) revealed some interesting user behaviors. The mixed behavior patterns were leveraged to create an interface for an e-commerce product. The author describes some design practices for providing a scoped search interface for an e-commerce site.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:17:44
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Resnick, M.L.; Vaughan, M.W.: Best practices and future visions for search user interfaces (2006)
0.08
0.07622065 = product of:
0.1524413 = sum of:
0.1524413 = sum of:
0.110171415 = weight(_text_:search in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110171415 = score(doc=5293,freq=14.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.6095997 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
0.04226988 = weight(_text_:22 in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04226988 = score(doc=5293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The authors describe a set of best practices that were developed to assist in the design of search user interfaces. Search user interfaces represent a challenging design domain because novices who have no desire to learn the mechanics of search engine architecture or algorithms often use them. These can lead to frustration and task failure when it is not addressed by the user interface. The best practices are organized into five domains: the corpus, search algorithms, user and task context, the search interface, and mobility. In each section the authors present an introduction to the design challenges related to the domain and a set of best practices for creating a user interface that facilitates effective use by a broad population of users and tasks.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:38:51
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Komlodi, A.; Soergel, D.; Marchionini, G.: Search histories for user support in user interfaces (2006)
0.08
0.07622065 = product of:
0.1524413 = sum of:
0.1524413 = sum of:
0.110171415 = weight(_text_:search in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110171415 = score(doc=5298,freq=14.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.6095997 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
0.04226988 = weight(_text_:22 in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04226988 = score(doc=5298,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The authors describe user interface tools based on search histories to support legal information seekers. The design of the tools was informed by the results of a user study (Komlodi, 2002a) that examined the use of human memory, external memory aids, and search histories in legal information seeking and derived interface design recommendations for information storage and retrieval systems. The data collected were analyzed to identify potential task areas where search histories can support information seeking and use. The results show that many information-seeking tasks can take advantage of automatically and manually recorded history information. These findings encouraged the design of user interface tools building on search history information: direct search history displays, history-enabled scratchpad facilities, and organized results collection tools.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:04:19
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Jones, M.; Buchanan, G.; Cheng, T.-C.; Jain, P.: Changing the pace of search : supporting background information seeking (2006)
0.07
0.073238455 = product of:
0.14647691 = sum of:
0.14647691 = sum of:
0.097162046 = weight(_text_:search in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097162046 = score(doc=5287,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.5376164 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.049314864 = weight(_text_:22 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049314864 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Almost all Web searches are carried out while the user is sitting at a conventional desktop computer connected to the Internet. Although online, handheld, mobile search offers new possibilities, the fast-paced, focused style of interaction may not be appropriate for all user search needs. The authors explore an alternative, relaxed style for Web searching that asynchronously combines an offline handheld computer and an online desktop personal computer. They discuss the role and utility of such an approach, present a tool to meet these user needs, and discuss its relation to other systems.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:37:49
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993)
0.07
0.06743932 = product of:
0.13487864 = sum of:
0.13487864 = sum of:
0.078518786 = weight(_text_:search in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078518786 = score(doc=7701,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.43445963 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.056359846 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056359846 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
- Date
- 23. 1.1999 19:22:09
-
Mochel, K.: Search in the Web shopping environment (2006)
0.07
0.06672983 = product of:
0.13345966 = sum of:
0.13345966 = sum of:
0.0841448 = weight(_text_:search in 5301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0841448 = score(doc=5301,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.46558946 = fieldWeight in 5301, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5301)
0.049314864 = weight(_text_:22 in 5301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049314864 = score(doc=5301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5301)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The author presents a design case study of a search user interface for Web catalogs in the context of online shopping for consumer products such as clothing, furniture, and sporting goods. The case study provides a review of the user data for the user interface (UI), and the resulting redesign recommendations. Based on the case study and its user data, a set of common user requirements for searching in the context of online shopping is provided.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:23:19
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Fieldhouse, M.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬The design of a graphical user interface for a highly interactive information retrieval system (1996)
0.06
0.0590094 = product of:
0.1180188 = sum of:
0.1180188 = sum of:
0.068703935 = weight(_text_:search in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068703935 = score(doc=6958,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.38015217 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
0.049314864 = weight(_text_:22 in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049314864 = score(doc=6958,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports on the design of a GUI for the Okapi 'best match' retrieval system developed at the Centre for Interactive Systems Research, City University, UK, for online library catalogues. The X-Windows interface includes an interactive query expansion (IQE) facilty which involves the user in the selection of query terms to reformulate a search. Presents the design rationale, based on a game board metaphor, and describes the features of each of the stages of the search interaction. Reports on the early operational field trial and discusses relevant evaluation issues and objectives
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
-
Dorner, D.G.; Curtis, A.M.: ¬A comparative review of common user interface products (2004)
0.06
0.0590094 = product of:
0.1180188 = sum of:
0.1180188 = sum of:
0.068703935 = weight(_text_:search in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068703935 = score(doc=2851,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.38015217 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
0.049314864 = weight(_text_:22 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049314864 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A common user interface replaces the multiple interfaces found among individual electronic library resources, reducing the time and effort spent by the user in both searching and learning to use a range of databases. Although the primary function of a common user interface is to simplify the search process, such products can be holistic solutions designed to address requirements other than searching, such as user authentication and site branding. This review provides a detailed summary of software currently on the market. The products reviewed were EnCompass, MetaLib, Find-It-All OneSearch, ZPORTAL, CPORTAL, InfoTrac Total Access, MetaFind, MuseSearch, SiteSearch, Single Search, Chameleon Gateway, and WebFeat.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.182-197
-
Barker, A.L.: DataStar Web : a comparison with 'classic' DataStar command language searching (1998)
0.06
0.05594051 = product of:
0.11188102 = sum of:
0.11188102 = sum of:
0.055521168 = weight(_text_:search in 7691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055521168 = score(doc=7691,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.30720934 = fieldWeight in 7691, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7691)
0.056359846 = weight(_text_:22 in 7691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056359846 = score(doc=7691,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7691, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7691)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Compares and contrasts online searching on DataStar using the 'classic' command language, with access via the more recent Web interface (DataStar Web). The search functionality of the 2 interfaces is not identical, although both use the same retrieval software and access the same databases. Many of the differences affect retrieval effectiveness and may trip up novice and experienced searchers alike
- Source
- Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.3, S.155-167
-
Kalbach, J.: "I'm feeling lucky" : the role of emotions in seeking information on the Web (2006)
0.05
0.05231318 = product of:
0.10462636 = sum of:
0.10462636 = sum of:
0.06940146 = weight(_text_:search in 5300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06940146 = score(doc=5300,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.3840117 = fieldWeight in 5300, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5300)
0.035224903 = weight(_text_:22 in 5300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035224903 = score(doc=5300,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5300, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5300)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Recent research highlights the potential relevance of emotions in interface design. People can no longer be modeled as purely goal-driven, task-solving agents: They also have affective motivations for their choices and behavior implying an extended mandate for search design. Absent from current Web design practice, however, is a pattern for emotive criticism and design reflecting these new directions. Further, discussion of emotions and Web design is not limited to visual design or aesthetic appeal: Emotions users have as they interact with information also have design implications. The author outlines a framework for understanding users' emotional states as they seek information on the Web. It is inspired largely by Carol Kuhlthau's (1991, 1993, 1999) work in library services, particularly her information searching process (ISP), which is adapted to Web design practice. A staged approach resembling traditional models of information seeking behavior is presented here as the basis for creating appropriate search and navigation systems. This user-centered framework is flexible and solution-oriented, enjoys longevity, and considers affective factors. Its aim is a more comprehensive, conceptual analysis of the user's entire information search experience.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:19:20
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Beale, R.: Improving Internet interaction : from theory to practice (2006)
0.05
0.048947945 = product of:
0.09789589 = sum of:
0.09789589 = sum of:
0.048581023 = weight(_text_:search in 5303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048581023 = score(doc=5303,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.2688082 = fieldWeight in 5303, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5303)
0.049314864 = weight(_text_:22 in 5303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049314864 = score(doc=5303,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5303, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5303)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:31:43
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Potmesil, M.: Maps alive : viewing geospatial information on the WWW (1997)
0.04
0.041955378 = product of:
0.083910756 = sum of:
0.083910756 = sum of:
0.041640874 = weight(_text_:search in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041640874 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.230407 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
0.04226988 = weight(_text_:22 in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04226988 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes a WWW based system which allows users to view, search and post geographically indexed information of the Earth. 2 geographic browsers have been developed: a 2D map browser capable of continuous scroll and zoom of an arbitrarily large sheet and a 3D flight-simulator browser capable of continuous flight around the Earth. On the server side, a geographical and geometrical server has been developed which contains large databases of images, elevations, lines, points and polygons stored in tiles structured into hierarchical pyramids or quadtrees. A metadata server has also been developed which contains URL pointers and geographical coordinates of various WWW documents, geographical information and geometrical models
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
