-
Birmingham, J.: Internet search engines (1996)
0.13
0.12555163 = product of:
0.25110325 = sum of:
0.25110325 = sum of:
0.1665635 = weight(_text_:search in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1665635 = score(doc=5664,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.921628 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
0.08453976 = weight(_text_:22 in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08453976 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Basically a good listing in table format of features from the major search engines
- Content
- Darstellung zu verschiedenen search engines des Internet
- Date
- 10.11.1996 16:36:22
- Source
- http://www.stark.k12.oh.us/Docs/search/
-
Notess, G.R.: DejaNews and other Usenet search tools (1998)
0.10
0.10192698 = product of:
0.20385396 = sum of:
0.20385396 = sum of:
0.1241491 = weight(_text_:search in 5229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1241491 = score(doc=5229,freq=10.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.68694097 = fieldWeight in 5229, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5229)
0.07970486 = weight(_text_:22 in 5229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07970486 = score(doc=5229,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 5229, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5229)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Internet Newsgroup archives on services such as DejaNews offer important sources of information that may not be found elsewhere online. Describes the content of the DejaNews Database which goes back to 1995 and covers more than 14,000 newsgroups. There are 2 search options: quick search and power search. Most Web search engines offer links to DejaNews, but AltaVista offers a smaller alternative and supplement to DejaNews. Reference.COM also offers a searchable archive, as well as a useful current awareness service which allows setting up multiple searches under the user profile tab
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.22-28
-
Iivonen, M.: Consistency in the selection of search concepts and search terms (1995)
0.10
0.10177215 = product of:
0.2035443 = sum of:
0.2035443 = sum of:
0.16127442 = weight(_text_:search in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16127442 = score(doc=1757,freq=30.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.89236253 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.04226988 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04226988 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Considers intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency in the selection of search terms. Based on an empirical study where 22 searchers from 4 different types of search environments analyzed altogether 12 search requests of 4 different types in 2 separate test situations between which 2 months elapsed. Statistically very significant differences in consistency were found according to the types of search environments and search requests. Consistency was also considered according to the extent of the scope of search concept. At level I search terms were compared character by character. At level II different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a rather simple evaluation of linguistic expressions. At level III, in addition to level II, the hierarchical approach of the search request was also controlled. At level IV different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a broad interpretation of the search concept. Both intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency grew most immediately after a rather simple evaluation of linguistic impressions
-
Vidmar, D.J.: Darwin on the Web : the evolution of search tools (1999)
0.10
0.09789589 = product of:
0.19579178 = sum of:
0.19579178 = sum of:
0.097162046 = weight(_text_:search in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097162046 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.5376164 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
0.09862973 = weight(_text_:22 in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09862973 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Computers in libraries. 19(1999) no.5, S.22-28
-
Dunning, A.: Do we still need search engines? (1999)
0.10
0.09789589 = product of:
0.19579178 = sum of:
0.19579178 = sum of:
0.097162046 = weight(_text_:search in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097162046 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.5376164 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
0.09862973 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09862973 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Ariadne. 1999, no.22
-
Berinstein, P.: Turning visual : image search engines on the Web (1998)
0.10
0.09617919 = product of:
0.19235837 = sum of:
0.19235837 = sum of:
0.13599853 = weight(_text_:search in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13599853 = score(doc=3595,freq=12.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.75250614 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
0.056359846 = weight(_text_:22 in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056359846 = score(doc=3595,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Gives an overview of image search engines on the Web. They work by: looking for graphics files; looking for a caption; looking for Web sites whose titles indicate the presence of picturres on a certain subject; or employing human intervention. Describes the image search capabilities of: AltaVista; Amazing Picture Machine (Http://www.ncrtec.org/picture.htm); HotBot; ImageSurfer (http://ipix.yahoo.com); Lycos; Web Clip Art Search Engine and WebSEEK. The search engines employing human intervention provide the best results
- Object
- Web Clip Art Search Engine
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.37-38,40-42
-
Sukiasyan, E.: Homo quaerens (the seeking man) : on the problem of development of the reader's cognitive capacities in the searching process (1992)
0.09
0.09025447 = product of:
0.18050894 = sum of:
0.18050894 = sum of:
0.1241491 = weight(_text_:search in 2380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1241491 = score(doc=2380,freq=10.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.68694097 = fieldWeight in 2380, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2380)
0.056359846 = weight(_text_:22 in 2380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056359846 = score(doc=2380,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2380, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2380)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Analyses the process of search of bibliographical information through the catalogue. Preference is given to the interactive and interdependent search by the user himself, who should organisze the search, chosse its parameters and the information he needs. Search through the bibliographer or automated search with the delivery of a ready list is always formal, less effective and lacks cognitive aspects
- Pages
- S.15-22
-
Conhaim, W.W.: Search tools (1996)
0.09
0.09025447 = product of:
0.18050894 = sum of:
0.18050894 = sum of:
0.1241491 = weight(_text_:search in 4738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1241491 = score(doc=4738,freq=10.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.68694097 = fieldWeight in 4738, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4738)
0.056359846 = weight(_text_:22 in 4738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056359846 = score(doc=4738,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4738, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4738)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes the 3 most popular searching tools for the WWW: InfoSeek, Yahoo and Lycos. Searching Internet directories can also be a useful search technique. Lists other searching engines. Points out a number of evaluations of these search engines published on the WWW. A number of search tools are available for specialized areas. Sites are available that enable parallel searching using several tools at once. Describes WWW pages with information about search engines
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:39:31
-
Marchiori, M.: ¬The quest for correct information on the Web : hyper search engines (1997)
0.09
0.08892408 = product of:
0.17784816 = sum of:
0.17784816 = sum of:
0.1285333 = weight(_text_:search in 7453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1285333 = score(doc=7453,freq=14.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.71119964 = fieldWeight in 7453, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7453)
0.049314864 = weight(_text_:22 in 7453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049314864 = score(doc=7453,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7453, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7453)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Presents a novel method to extract from a web object its hyper informative content, in contrast with current search engines, which only deal with the textual information content. This method is not only valuable per se, but it is shown to be able to considerably increase the precision of current search engines. It integrates with existing search engine technology since it can be implemented on top of every search engine, acting as a post-processor, thus automatically transforming a search engine into its corresponding hyper version. Shows how the hyper information can be usefully employed to face the search engines persuasion problem
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Hock, R.E.: How to do field searching in Web search engines : a field trip (1998)
0.09
0.08793517 = product of:
0.17587034 = sum of:
0.17587034 = sum of:
0.096165486 = weight(_text_:search in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096165486 = score(doc=3601,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.5321022 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.07970486 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07970486 = score(doc=3601,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Explains how 5 Internet search engines (AltaVista, HotBot, InfoSeek, Lycos, and Yahoo) handle field searching. Includes a chart which identifies where on a search engine's page a particular field is searched and the prefix syntax used, and gives examples. Details the individual fields that can be searched: data, title, URL, images, audiovideo and other page content, links and page depth
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.18-22
-
Westmancoat, J.: ¬The new British Library Maps file : how to get the best from a Blaise search (1997)
0.08
0.08429915 = product of:
0.1685983 = sum of:
0.1685983 = sum of:
0.09814849 = weight(_text_:search in 1629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09814849 = score(doc=1629,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.54307455 = fieldWeight in 1629, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1629)
0.07044981 = weight(_text_:22 in 1629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07044981 = score(doc=1629,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1629, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1629)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In July 1997 the first part of the major retrospective conversion programme on the British Library's Maps catalogue was completed. Discusses the scope of the enlarged file and outlines changes in search techniques, geographic headings and searching by data
- Date
- 17. 1.1999 13:49:22
-
Poynder, R.: WinSPIRS from SilverPlatter (1994)
0.08
0.083910756 = product of:
0.16782151 = sum of:
0.16782151 = sum of:
0.08328175 = weight(_text_:search in 8113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08328175 = score(doc=8113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.460814 = fieldWeight in 8113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8113)
0.08453976 = weight(_text_:22 in 8113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08453976 = score(doc=8113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 8113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Examines the new Windows search interface to SilverPlatter's CD-ROM database products. Introduces the functions of the software. Reports on the experiences of those involved in beta testing the product
- Date
- 23. 1.1999 19:32:22
-
Jascó, P.: WebSPIRS 4.0 : Javascript search software (1998)
0.08
0.083910756 = product of:
0.16782151 = sum of:
0.16782151 = sum of:
0.08328175 = weight(_text_:search in 4538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08328175 = score(doc=4538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.460814 = fieldWeight in 4538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4538)
0.08453976 = weight(_text_:22 in 4538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08453976 = score(doc=4538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4538)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 3.1997 16:22:15
-
Dimitroff, A.; Wolfram, D.: Searcher response in a hypertext-based bibliographic information retrieval system (1995)
0.08
0.08370109 = product of:
0.16740218 = sum of:
0.16740218 = sum of:
0.111042336 = weight(_text_:search in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.111042336 = score(doc=187,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.6144187 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
0.056359846 = weight(_text_:22 in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056359846 = score(doc=187,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article examines searcher behavior and affective response to a hypertext-based bibliographic information retrieval system called HyperLynx for searchers with different search skills and backgrounds. Search times and number of nodes visited were recorded for five specified search queries, and views of the system were recorded for each searcher. No significant differences were found in search times or user satisfaction with the system, indicating that a hypertext-based approach to bibliographic retrieval could be appropriate for a variety of searcher experience levels
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.1, S.22-29
-
Sieverts, E.: Slimmerds onder de zoekmachines (1998)
0.08
0.08370109 = product of:
0.16740218 = sum of:
0.16740218 = sum of:
0.111042336 = weight(_text_:search in 2414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.111042336 = score(doc=2414,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.6144187 = fieldWeight in 2414, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2414)
0.056359846 = weight(_text_:22 in 2414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056359846 = score(doc=2414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2414)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Web search engines generally use best match search techniques, rather than traditional Boolean operators. Precision in searching will depend on the numbers of selected terms appearing in a document and the inclusion of less-common words in the search string. Users are, therefore, recommended to enter as many words as possible. ExCite and WebCrawler lead users from a relevant document to other documents containing similar word patterns, while MusCat and EuroFerret suggest additional keywords for searching
- Date
- 29.12.1998 11:22:34
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: Top of the class among the search engines
-
Notess, G.R.: Toward more comprehensive Web searching : single searching versus megasearching (1998)
0.08
0.08370109 = product of:
0.16740218 = sum of:
0.16740218 = sum of:
0.111042336 = weight(_text_:search in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.111042336 = score(doc=3278,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.6144187 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
0.056359846 = weight(_text_:22 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056359846 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In spite of their size, the major Web indexes are not comprehensive. Considers approaches carrying out comprehensive searches, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages. In the single search tool approach, users search the largest of the databses one by one, using the command language uniqe to each to increase the precision of the esearch. In the megasearch approach, search engines use 1 form that simultaneously seands a single query to a number of search engines and then presents the results. Inference Find, Dogpile and MetaFind are examples of good metasearch engines
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.2, S.73-76
-
CannCasciato, D.: ¬The OLUC from a NACO point of view : eliminating derived search keys (1994)
0.08
0.07626267 = product of:
0.15252534 = sum of:
0.15252534 = sum of:
0.096165486 = weight(_text_:search in 6575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096165486 = score(doc=6575,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.5321022 = fieldWeight in 6575, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6575)
0.056359846 = weight(_text_:22 in 6575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056359846 = score(doc=6575,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6575, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6575)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Explains how the current resurgence of cooperative cataloguing initiatives require that OCLC Online Union Catalog (OLUC) search keys evolve to allow more precise searching. Describes the results achieved by searching personal and corporate authors by word and phrase to obtain guidance on deciding about heading formation and necessary references. Concludes that phrase searching needs to be brought into existence in OLUC search mechanisms as quickly as possible to speed up cataloguing, and that OCLC needs to take note of these requirements by eliminating limitations on searching
- Source
- OCLC systems and services. 10(1994) no.4, S.22-25
-
Fong, W.W.: Searching the World Wide Web (1996)
0.08
0.07626267 = product of:
0.15252534 = sum of:
0.15252534 = sum of:
0.096165486 = weight(_text_:search in 6597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096165486 = score(doc=6597,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.5321022 = fieldWeight in 6597, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6597)
0.056359846 = weight(_text_:22 in 6597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056359846 = score(doc=6597,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6597, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6597)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reviews the availability on the WWW, of search engines designed to organize various web information sources. Discusses the differences and similarities of each search engine and their advantages and disadvantages. Search engines included in the study were: AltaVista, CUI W3 Catalog, InfoSeek, Lycos, Magellan, Yahoo
- Source
- Journal of library and information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.15-36
-
Hsieh-Yee, I.: ¬The retrieval power of selected search engines : how well do they address general reference questions and subject questions? (1998)
0.07
0.073238455 = product of:
0.14647691 = sum of:
0.14647691 = sum of:
0.097162046 = weight(_text_:search in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097162046 = score(doc=2186,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.5376164 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
0.049314864 = weight(_text_:22 in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049314864 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Evaluates the performance of 8 major Internet search engines in answering 21 real reference questions and 5 made up subject questions. Reports on the retrieval and relevancy ranking abilities of the search engines. Concludes that the search engines did not produce good results for the reference questions unlike for the subject questions. The best engines are identified by type of questions, with Infoseek best for the subject questions, and OpenText best for refrence questions
- Date
- 25.12.1998 19:22:51
-
Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Customizable multi-engine search tool with clustering (1997)
0.07
0.073238455 = product of:
0.14647691 = sum of:
0.14647691 = sum of:
0.097162046 = weight(_text_:search in 2670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097162046 = score(doc=2670,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.5376164 = fieldWeight in 2670, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2670)
0.049314864 = weight(_text_:22 in 2670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049314864 = score(doc=2670,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2670, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2670)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Proposes a new idea of searching under the multi-engine search architecture to overcome the problems associated with relevance ranking. These include clustering of the search results and extraction of co-occurence keywords, which, with the user's feedback, better refines the query in the searching process. The system also provides the construction of the concept space to gradually customize the search tool to fit the usage for the user at the same time
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
