Search (1293 results, page 1 of 65)

0.08914983 = product of:
  0.17829967 = sum of:
    0.17829967 = sum of:
      0.14307477 = weight(_text_:search in 1348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14307477 = score(doc=1348,freq=34.0), product of:
          0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.7916603 = fieldWeight in 1348, product of:
            5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
              34.0 = termFreq=34.0
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1348)
      0.035224903 = weight(_text_:22 in 1348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035224903 = score(doc=1348,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1348, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1348)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article reports the results of a study that examined relationships between primary emotions, secondary emotions, and mood in the online information search context. During the experiment, participants were asked to search Google to obtain information on the two given search tasks. Participants' primary emotions were inferred from analysis of their facial expressions, data on secondary emotions were obtained through participant interviews, and mood was measured using the Positive Affect Negative Affect Scale (PANAS; Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988) prior, during, and after the search. The search process was represented by the collection of search actions, search performance, and search outcome quality variables. The findings suggest existence of direct relationships between primary emotions and search actions, which in turn imply the possibility of inferring emotions from search actions and vice versa. The link between secondary emotions and searchers' evaluative judgments, and lack of evidence of any relationships between secondary emotions and other search process variables, point to the strengths and weaknesses of self-reported emotion measures in understanding searchers' affective experiences. Our study did not find strong relationships between mood and search process and outcomes, indicating that while mood can have a limited effect on search activities, it is a relatively stable and long-lasting state that cannot be easily altered by the search experience and, in turn, cannot significantly affect the search. The article proposes a model of relationships between emotions, mood, and several facets of the search process. Directions for future work are also discussed.

Date

22. 8.2014 16:58:40

0.08617224 = sum of:
  0.06882188 = product of:
    0.20646563 = sum of:
      0.20646563 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20646563 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4408377 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.017350364 = product of:
    0.03470073 = sum of:
      0.03470073 = weight(_text_:search in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03470073 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.19200584 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

While classifications are heavily used to categorize web content, the evolution of the web foresees a more formal structure - ontology - which can serve this purpose. Ontologies are core artifacts of the Semantic Web which enable machines to use inference rules to conduct automated reasoning on data. Lightweight ontologies bridge the gap between classifications and ontologies. A lightweight ontology (LO) is an ontology representing a backbone taxonomy where the concept of the child node is more specific than the concept of the parent node. Formal lightweight ontologies can be generated from their informal ones. The key applications of formal lightweight ontologies are document classification, semantic search, and data integration. However, these applications suffer from the following problems: the disambiguation accuracy of the state of the art NLP tools used in generating formal lightweight ontologies from their informal ones; the lack of background knowledge needed for the formal lightweight ontologies; and the limitation of ontology reuse. In this dissertation, we propose a novel solution to these problems in formal lightweight ontologies; namely, faceted lightweight ontology (FLO). FLO is a lightweight ontology in which terms, present in each node label, and their concepts, are available in the background knowledge (BK), which is organized as a set of facets. A facet can be defined as a distinctive property of the groups of concepts that can help in differentiating one group from another. Background knowledge can be defined as a subset of a knowledge base, such as WordNet, and often represents a specific domain.

Content

PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.

0.08258625 = product of:
  0.1651725 = sum of:
    0.1651725 = product of:
      0.4955175 = sum of:
        0.4955175 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4955175 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4408377 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051997773 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.08002403 = product of:
  0.16004805 = sum of:
    0.16004805 = sum of:
      0.117778175 = weight(_text_:search in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.117778175 = score(doc=108,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.6516894 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
      0.04226988 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04226988 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The explosion of the information available on the Internet has made traditional information retrieval systems, characterized by one size fits all approaches, less effective. Indeed, users are overwhelmed by the information delivered by such systems in response to their queries, particularly when the latter are ambiguous. In order to tackle this problem, the state-of-the-art reveals that there is a growing interest towards contextual information retrieval (CIR) which relies on various sources of evidence issued from the user's search background and environment, in order to improve the retrieval accuracy. This chapter focuses on mobile context, highlights challenges they present for IR, and gives an overview of CIR approaches applied in this environment. Then, the authors present an approach to personalize search results for mobile users by exploiting both cognitive and spatio-temporal contexts. The experimental evaluation undertaken in front of Yahoo search shows that the approach improves the quality of top search result lists and enhances search result precision.

Date

20. 4.2012 13:19:22

Footnote

Vgl.: http://www.igi-global.com/book/next-generation-search-engines/64434.

Source

Next generation search engines: advanced models for information retrieval. Eds.: C. Jouis, u.a

0.076164514 = product of:
  0.15232903 = sum of:
    0.15232903 = sum of:
      0.1241491 = weight(_text_:search in 1435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1241491 = score(doc=1435,freq=40.0), product of:
          0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.68694097 = fieldWeight in 1435, product of:
            6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
              40.0 = termFreq=40.0
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1435)
      0.028179923 = weight(_text_:22 in 1435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028179923 = score(doc=1435,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1435, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1435)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Background: Faceted navigation (sometimes known as faceted search, faceted browsing, or guided navigation) is the solution applied to an increasingly diverse range of search and discovery applications in the second decade of XXI century. Faceted search is now the dominant interaction paradigm for most of the e-commerce sites and becomes an important solution for universal and specialized search engines for the content-heavy sites such as media publishers, libraries and even non-profits - to make their often broad range of content more findable. Faceted search interfaces are increasingly used to support complex and iterative information-seeking tasks such as exploratory search. These interfaces provide clickable categories in conjunction with search result lists so that searchers can narrow and browse the results without reformulating their queries. User studies demonstrate that faceted search provides more effective information-seeking support to users than best-first search. Faceted search interfaces are presented as an answer to the investigative nature, uncertainty and ambiguity in exploratory search tasks. Objectives: The interesting research questions are: What is the scale of faceted navigating in search and discovery application? Is faceted search intuitive information finding? How faceted search tools affect searcher behavior - the tactics searchers use when querying, looking at search results, and selecting them? What are the key benefits and weaknesses of faceted navigating for users? In what sense faceted navigation is the panacea for information overload? What faceted implementations are the most prominent? What are the most important findings in the field of faceted search for the development of knowledge organization and information science? Methods: To answer research questions listed above, multiple methods will be applied: the conceptual analysis (to clarify the concept of faceted navigation); selected aspects of information seeking and exploratory search will be subject to critical literature review; critical analysis of some user studies will be performed. Case studies of several search and discovery tools will be used to exemplify concrete solutions in them. Findings: The study explores faceted navigation and reveals the most actual solutions in modern search engines, discovery tools, library catalogs. It attempts to explain specific features of this method from the users' perspective, not information architects. It helps knowledge organization specialists to confront theory with users' practice and propose new efficient support for information environments.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.07247912 = product of:
  0.14495824 = sum of:
    0.14495824 = sum of:
      0.109733336 = weight(_text_:search in 4573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.109733336 = score(doc=4573,freq=20.0), product of:
          0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.60717577 = fieldWeight in 4573, product of:
            4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
              20.0 = termFreq=20.0
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4573)
      0.035224903 = weight(_text_:22 in 4573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035224903 = score(doc=4573,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4573, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4573)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This study explores how user subject knowledge influences search task processes and outcomes, as well as how search behavior is influenced by subject-oriented information visualization (IV) tools. To enable integrated searches, the proposed WikiMap + integrates search functions and IV tools (i.e., a topic network and hierarchical topic tree) and gathers information from Wikipedia pages and Google Search results. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed interfaces, we design subject-oriented tasks and adopt extended evaluation measures. We recruited 48 novices and 48 knowledgeable users, that is, intermediates, for the evaluation. Our results show that novices using the proposed interface demonstrate better search performance than intermediates using Wikipedia. We therefore conclude that our tools help close the gap between novices and intermediates in information searches. The results also show that intermediates can take advantage of the search tool by leveraging the IV tools to browse subtopics, and formulate better queries with less effort. We conclude that embedding the IV and the search tools in the interface can result in different search behavior but improved task performance. We provide implications to design search systems to include IV features adapted to user levels of subject knowledge to help them achieve better task performance.

Date

9.12.2018 16:22:25

0.07213438 = product of:
  0.14426877 = sum of:
    0.14426877 = sum of:
      0.10199889 = weight(_text_:search in 105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10199889 = score(doc=105,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.5643796 = fieldWeight in 105, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=105)
      0.04226988 = weight(_text_:22 in 105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04226988 = score(doc=105,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 105, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=105)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Result clustering has recently attracted a lot of attention to provide the users with a succinct overview of relevant search results than traditional search engines. This chapter proposes a mixed clustering method to organize all returned search results into a hierarchical tree structure. The clustering method accomplishes two main tasks, one is label construction and the other is tree building. This chapter uses precision to measure the quality of clustering results. According to the results of experiments, the author preliminarily concluded that the performance of the system is better than many other well-known commercial and academic systems. This chapter makes several contributions. First, it presents a high performance system based on the clustering method. Second, it develops a divisive hierarchical clustering algorithm to organize all returned snippets into hierarchical tree structure. Third, it performs a wide range of experimental analyses to show that almost all commercial systems are significantly better than most current academic systems.

Date

17. 4.2012 15:22:11

Footnote

Vgl.: http://www.igi-global.com/book/next-generation-search-engines/64429.

Source

Next generation search engines: advanced models for information retrieval. Eds.: C. Jouis, u.a

0.07081252 = product of:
  0.14162505 = sum of:
    0.14162505 = sum of:
      0.091809504 = weight(_text_:search in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.091809504 = score(doc=2657,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.5079997 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
      0.049815536 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049815536 = score(doc=2657,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Die Arbeit geht dem Status quo der unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Großunternehmen nach und beleuchtet Faktoren, die darauf Einfluss haben. Aus der Analyse des Ist-Zustands wird der Bedarf an Enterprise-Search-Software abgeleitet und es werden Rahmenbedingungen für deren erfolgreiche Einführung skizziert. Die Untersuchung stützt sich auf eine im Jahr 2009 durchgeführte Onlinebefragung von 469 österreichischen Großunternehmen (Rücklauf 22 %) und daran anschließende Leitfadeninterviews mit zwölf Teilnehmern der Onlinebefragung. Der theoretische Teil verortet die Arbeit im Kontext des Informations- und Wissensmanagements. Der Fokus liegt auf dem Ansatz der Enterprise Search, ihrer Abgrenzung gegenüber der Suche im Internet und ihrem Leistungsspektrum. Im empirischen Teil wird zunächst aufgezeigt, wie die Unternehmen ihre Informationen organisieren und welche Probleme dabei auftreten. Es folgt eine Analyse des Status quo der Informati-onssuche im Unternehmen. Abschließend werden Bekanntheit und Einsatz von Enterprise-Search-Software in der Zielgruppe untersucht sowie für die Einführung dieser Software nötige Rahmenbedingungen benannt. Defizite machen die Befragten insbesondere im Hinblick auf die übergreifende Suche im Unternehmen und die Suche nach Kompetenzträgern aus. Hier werden Lücken im Wissensmanagement offenbar. 29 % der Respondenten der Onlinebefragung geben zu-dem an, dass es in ihren Unternehmen gelegentlich bis häufig zu Fehlentscheidungen infolge defizitärer Informationslagen kommt. Enterprise-Search-Software kommt in 17 % der Unternehmen, die sich an der Onlinebefragung beteiligten, zum Einsatz. Die durch Enterprise-Search-Software bewirkten Veränderungen werden grundsätzlich posi-tiv beurteilt. Alles in allem zeigen die Ergebnisse, dass Enterprise-Search-Strategien nur Erfolg haben können, wenn man sie in umfassende Maßnahmen des Informations- und Wissensmanagements einbettet.

Date

22. 1.2016 20:40:31

0.069925636 = product of:
  0.13985127 = sum of:
    0.13985127 = sum of:
      0.06940146 = weight(_text_:search in 4233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06940146 = score(doc=4233,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.3840117 = fieldWeight in 4233, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4233)
      0.07044981 = weight(_text_:22 in 4233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07044981 = score(doc=4233,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4233, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4233)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

1. 2.2016 18:25:22

Source

Semantic keyword-based search on structured data sources: First COST Action IC1302 International KEYSTONE Conference, IKC 2015, Coimbra, Portugal, September 8-9, 2015. Revised Selected Papers. Eds.: J. Cardoso et al

0.069925636 = product of:
  0.13985127 = sum of:
    0.13985127 = sum of:
      0.06940146 = weight(_text_:search in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06940146 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.3840117 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
      0.07044981 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07044981 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

1. 2.2016 18:25:22

Source

Semantic keyword-based search on structured data sources: First COST Action IC1302 International KEYSTONE Conference, IKC 2015, Coimbra, Portugal, September 8-9, 2015. Revised Selected Papers. Eds.: J. Cardoso et al

0.069925636 = product of:
  0.13985127 = sum of:
    0.13985127 = sum of:
      0.06940146 = weight(_text_:search in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06940146 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.3840117 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
      0.07044981 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07044981 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

1. 2.2016 18:25:22

Source

Semantic keyword-based search on structured data sources: First COST Action IC1302 International KEYSTONE Conference, IKC 2015, Coimbra, Portugal, September 8-9, 2015. Revised Selected Papers. Eds.: J. Cardoso et al

0.069925636 = product of:
  0.13985127 = sum of:
    0.13985127 = sum of:
      0.06940146 = weight(_text_:search in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06940146 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.3840117 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
      0.07044981 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07044981 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

1. 2.2016 18:25:22

Source

Semantic keyword-based search on structured data sources: First COST Action IC1302 International KEYSTONE Conference, IKC 2015, Coimbra, Portugal, September 8-9, 2015. Revised Selected Papers. Eds.: J. Cardoso et al

0.069925636 = product of:
  0.13985127 = sum of:
    0.13985127 = sum of:
      0.06940146 = weight(_text_:search in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06940146 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.3840117 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
      0.07044981 = weight(_text_:22 in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07044981 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

1. 2.2016 18:25:22

Source

Semantic keyword-based search on structured data sources: First COST Action IC1302 International KEYSTONE Conference, IKC 2015, Coimbra, Portugal, September 8-9, 2015. Revised Selected Papers. Eds.: J. Cardoso et al

0.069925636 = product of:
  0.13985127 = sum of:
    0.13985127 = sum of:
      0.06940146 = weight(_text_:search in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06940146 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.3840117 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
      0.07044981 = weight(_text_:22 in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07044981 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

1. 2.2016 18:25:22

Source

Semantic keyword-based search on structured data sources: First COST Action IC1302 International KEYSTONE Conference, IKC 2015, Coimbra, Portugal, September 8-9, 2015. Revised Selected Papers. Eds.: J. Cardoso et al

0.069925636 = product of:
  0.13985127 = sum of:
    0.13985127 = sum of:
      0.06940146 = weight(_text_:search in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06940146 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.3840117 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
      0.07044981 = weight(_text_:22 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07044981 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

1. 2.2016 18:25:22

Source

Semantic keyword-based search on structured data sources: First COST Action IC1302 International KEYSTONE Conference, IKC 2015, Coimbra, Portugal, September 8-9, 2015. Revised Selected Papers. Eds.: J. Cardoso et al

0.069925636 = product of:
  0.13985127 = sum of:
    0.13985127 = sum of:
      0.06940146 = weight(_text_:search in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06940146 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.3840117 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
      0.07044981 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07044981 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

1. 2.2016 18:25:22

Source

Semantic keyword-based search on structured data sources: First COST Action IC1302 International KEYSTONE Conference, IKC 2015, Coimbra, Portugal, September 8-9, 2015. Revised Selected Papers. Eds.: J. Cardoso et al

0.069925636 = product of:
  0.13985127 = sum of:
    0.13985127 = sum of:
      0.06940146 = weight(_text_:search in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06940146 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.3840117 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
      0.07044981 = weight(_text_:22 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07044981 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou

0.069925636 = product of:
  0.13985127 = sum of:
    0.13985127 = sum of:
      0.06940146 = weight(_text_:search in 3279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06940146 = score(doc=3279,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.3840117 = fieldWeight in 3279, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3279)
      0.07044981 = weight(_text_:22 in 3279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07044981 = score(doc=3279,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3279, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3279)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou

0.06966355 = product of:
  0.1393271 = sum of:
    0.1393271 = sum of:
      0.10410219 = weight(_text_:search in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10410219 = score(doc=1786,freq=18.0), product of:
          0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.5760175 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
            4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
              18.0 = termFreq=18.0
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
      0.035224903 = weight(_text_:22 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035224903 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose - One core element of interactive information retrieval (IIR) experiments is the assignment of search tasks. The purpose of this paper is to provide an analytical review of current practice in developing those search tasks to test, observe or control task complexity and difficulty. Design/methodology/approach - Over 100 prior studies of IIR were examined in terms of how each defined task complexity and/or difficulty (or related concepts) and subsequently interpreted those concepts in the development of the assigned search tasks. Findings - Search task complexity is found to include three dimensions: multiplicity of subtasks or steps, multiplicity of facets, and indeterminability. Search task difficulty is based on an interaction between the search task and the attributes of the searcher or the attributes of the search situation. The paper highlights the anomalies in our use of these two concepts, concluding with suggestions for future methodological research related to search task complexity and difficulty. Originality/value - By analyzing and synthesizing current practices, this paper provides guidance for future experiments in IIR that involve these two constructs.

Date

6. 4.2015 19:31:22

0.06966355 = product of:
  0.1393271 = sum of:
    0.1393271 = sum of:
      0.10410219 = weight(_text_:search in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10410219 = score(doc=2745,freq=18.0), product of:
          0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.5760175 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
            4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
              18.0 = termFreq=18.0
            3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
      0.035224903 = weight(_text_:22 in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035224903 = score(doc=2745,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051997773 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Relevance judgments occur within an information search process, where time, context and situation can impact the judgments. The determination of relevance is dependent on a number of factors and variables which include the criteria used to determine relevance. The relevance judgment process and the criteria used to make those judgments are manifestations of the cognitive changes which occur during the information search process. Understanding why these relevance criteria choices are made, and how they vary over the information search process can provide important information about the dynamic relevance judgment process. This information can be used to guide the development of more adaptive information retrieval systems which respond to the cognitive changes of users during the information search process. The research data analyzed here was collected in two separate studies which examined a subject's relevance judgment over an information search process. Statistical analysis was used to examine these results and determine if there were relationships between criteria selections, relevance judgments, and the subject's progression through the information search process. Findings confirm and extend findings of previous studies, providing strong statistical evidence of an association between the information search process and the choices of relevance criteria by users, and identifying specific changes in the user preferences for specific criteria over the course of the information search process.

Date

29. 1.2016 19:22:14