Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0603228 = product of:
  0.18096839 = sum of:
    0.18096839 = sum of:
      0.12677722 = weight(_text_:reports in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12677722 = score(doc=3098,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04999695 = queryNorm
          0.5629941 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
      0.054191172 = weight(_text_:22 in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054191172 = score(doc=3098,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04999695 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Reports an investigation into the feasibility of usinf tutorials to train students to use on-line public access catalogues (OPACs). The library developed instructional software which conveys a conceptual model of an on-line catalogue and how it works. Reports the results of an experiment conducted to compare the effectiveness of the computer tutorial and the standard introductory classroom lecture on using the OPAC at the University of Toronto

Source

Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.4, S.2-22

0.018488344 = product of:
  0.05546503 = sum of:
    0.05546503 = product of:
      0.11093006 = sum of:
        0.11093006 = weight(_text_:reports in 3379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11093006 = score(doc=3379,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.49261987 = fieldWeight in 3379, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3379)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Reports results of an evaluation study of 3 WWW based prototypes for bibliographic displays developed as part of an ongoing research project at the Faculty of Information Studies, Toronto University. The development of these prototypes builds upon results obtained in earlier phases of the project that addressed issues of both the content and form of bibliographic displays in OPACs. Anticipation of continued growth in the number of catalogues available through the WWW, combined with research evidence that existing Web based displays have not shown improvement over their text based counterparts, motivated the development of these prototypes for use on the Web. Reports findings from a focus group evaluation of the 3 prototypes and makes suggestions for future research

0.014940838 = product of:
  0.044822514 = sum of:
    0.044822514 = product of:
      0.08964503 = sum of:
        0.08964503 = weight(_text_:reports in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08964503 = score(doc=492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.39809695 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

In a study at the University of Toronto libraries, observers recorded protocols for 100 OPAC search sessions. This article reports on the analysis of these protocols, and examines zero-hit subject searches in particular to explore the the effectiveness of various conversions of users' queries to improve recall. Although the number of zero-hit subject searches analyzes was small, this exploratory study yielded some findings that merit consideration in efforts to improve subject access in OPACs.

0.014940838 = product of:
  0.044822514 = sum of:
    0.044822514 = product of:
      0.08964503 = sum of:
        0.08964503 = weight(_text_:reports in 2774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08964503 = score(doc=2774,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.39809695 = fieldWeight in 2774, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2774)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Reports results of a study to evaluate the OPACs in 12 Canadian academic libraries, using a checklist of functional capabilities and interface features of an ideal OPAC system, to serve as an evaluation standard or benchmark for evaluating the strenghts and weaknesses of the OPACs. Findings suggest that, among the 10 areas evaluated, screen displays is the best developed area, and subject search aids is the weakest. Identifies possible directions for the future development of OPACs and suggests areas for future OPAC research

0.013073232 = product of:
  0.039219696 = sum of:
    0.039219696 = product of:
      0.07843939 = sum of:
        0.07843939 = weight(_text_:reports in 3378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07843939 = score(doc=3378,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.34833482 = fieldWeight in 3378, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3378)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Reports and combines the results of 2 assessments of full bibliographic displays in the online catalogue of academic libraries. The first assessment evaluated displays in 12 OPACs while the second evaluated displays in 10 WWW based catalogues. Displays were evaluated against a checklist of desirable features derived from published display guidelines. Results showed that, on average, displays in OPACs scored 58% and displays in Web catalogues scored 60%. Discusses some of the weaknesses identified by the assessments, focusing on those found in the majority of the displays evaluated

0.0112056285 = product of:
  0.033616886 = sum of:
    0.033616886 = product of:
      0.06723377 = sum of:
        0.06723377 = weight(_text_:reports in 8495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06723377 = score(doc=8495,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.29857272 = fieldWeight in 8495, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8495)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

In an experiment to evaluate the effectiveness of a concept based computer tutorial for training OPAC users, it was found that Toronto University students who viewed the tutorial performed significantly better on search tasks than those who received no instruction. Reports the results of a second experiment to investigate the effectiveness of the computer tutorial. 15 students viewed the computer tutorial and another 15 students served as a control group and did not receive any instruction. Results showed no significant differences in performance between the students who viewed the computer tutorial and those who did not receive any instruction. Discusses the differences between the results of the 2 experiments in terms of the characteristics of the participants and the characteristics of the OPACs and relates these findings to the findings of other studies on concept based instruction and offer suggestions for future research