Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Davis, P.M."
  1. Davis, P.M.: Eigenfactor: Does the principle of repeated improvement result in better estimates than raw citation counts? (2008) 0.05
    0.045808475 = product of:
      0.13742542 = sum of:
        0.13742542 = weight(_text_:citation in 2377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13742542 = score(doc=2377,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.58616084 = fieldWeight in 2377, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2377)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Eigenfactor.org, a journal evaluation tool that uses an iterative algorithm to weight citations (similar to the PageRank algorithm used for Google), has been proposed as a more valid method for calculating the impact of journals. The purpose of this brief communication is to investigate whether the principle of repeated improvement provides different rankings of journals than does a simple unweighted citation count (the method used by the Institute for Scientific Information@ [ISI]).
  2. Davis, P.M.; Cohen, S.A.: ¬The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior 1996-1999 (2001) 0.04
    0.042077776 = product of:
      0.12623332 = sum of:
        0.12623332 = weight(_text_:citation in 5768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12623332 = score(doc=5768,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.5384232 = fieldWeight in 5768, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5768)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A citation analysis of undergraduate term papers in microeconomics revealed a significant decrease in the frequency of scholarly resources cited between 1996 and 1999. Book citations decreased from 30% to 19%, newspaper citations increased from 7% to 19%, and Web citations increased from 9% to 21%. Web citations checked in 2000 revealed that only 18% of URLs cited in 1996 led to the correct Internet document. For 1999 bibliographies, only 55% of URLs led to the correct document. The authors recommend (1) setting stricter guidelines for acceptable citations in course assignments; (2) creating and maintaining scholarly portals for authoritative Web sites with a commitment to long-term access; and (3) continuing to instruct students how to critically evaluate resources
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  3. Davis, P.M.: Author-choice open-access publishing in the biological and medical literature : a citation analysis (2009) 0.03
    0.028342549 = product of:
      0.08502764 = sum of:
        0.08502764 = weight(_text_:citation in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08502764 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.3626685 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  4. Davis, P.M.; Solla, L.R.: ¬An IP-level analysis of usage statistics for electronic journals in chemistry : making inferences about user behavior (2003) 0.01
    0.0112056285 = product of:
      0.033616886 = sum of:
        0.033616886 = product of:
          0.06723377 = sum of:
            0.06723377 = weight(_text_:reports in 1823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06723377 = score(doc=1823,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.29857272 = fieldWeight in 1823, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1823)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study reports an analysis of American Chemical Society electronic journal downloads at Cornell University by individual IP addresses. While the majority of users (IPs) limited themselves to a small number of both journals and article downloads, a small minority of heavy users had a large effect an total journal downloads. There was a very strong relationship between the number of article downloads and the number of users, implying that a user-population can be estimated by just knowing the total use of a journal. Aggregate users (i.e. Library Proxy Server and public library computers) can be regarded as a sample of the entire user population. Analysis of article downloads by format (PDF versus HTML) suggests that individuals are using the system like a networked photocopier, for the purposes of creating print-on-demand copies of articles.
  5. Davis, P.M.: Information-seeking behavior of chemists : a transaction log analysis of referral URLs (2004) 0.01
    0.0112056285 = product of:
      0.033616886 = sum of:
        0.033616886 = product of:
          0.06723377 = sum of:
            0.06723377 = weight(_text_:reports in 2208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06723377 = score(doc=2208,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.29857272 = fieldWeight in 2208, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2208)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study reports an analysis of referral URL data by the Cornell University IP address from the American Chemical Society servers. The goal of this work is to better understand the tools used and pathways taken when scientists connect to electronic journals. While various methods of referral were identified in this study, most individuals were referred infrequently and followed few and consistent pathways each time they connected. The relationship between the number and types of referrals followed an inverse-square law. Whereas the majority of referrals came from established finding tools (library catalog, library e-journal list, and bibliographic databases), a substantial number of referrals originated from generic Web searches. Scientists are also relying an local alternatives or substitutes such as departmental or personal Web pages with lists of linked publications. The use of electronic mail as a method to refer scientists directly to online articles may be greatly underestimated. Implications for the development of redundant library services such as e-journal lists and the practice of publishers to allow linking from other resources are discussed.
  6. Davis, P.M.; Price, J.S.: eJournal interface can influence usage statistics : Implications for libraries, publishers, and Project COUNTER (2006) 0.01
    0.0112056285 = product of:
      0.033616886 = sum of:
        0.033616886 = product of:
          0.06723377 = sum of:
            0.06723377 = weight(_text_:reports in 199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06723377 = score(doc=199,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.29857272 = fieldWeight in 199, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=199)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The design of a publisher's electronic interface can have a measurable effect on electronic journal usage statistics. A study of journal usage from six COUNTER-compliant publishers at 32 research institutions in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Sweden indicates that the ratio of PDF to HTML views is not consistent across publisher interfaces, even after controlling for differences in publisher content. The number of full-text downloads may be artificially inflated when publishers require users to view HTML versions before accessing PDF versions or when linking mechanisms, such as CrossRef, direct users to the full text rather than the abstract of each article. These results suggest that usage reports from COUNTER-compliant publishers are not directly comparable in their current form. One solution may be to modify publisher numbers with adjustment factors deemed to be representative of the benefit or disadvantage due to its interface. Standardization of some interface and linking protocols may obviate these differences and allow for more accurate cross-publisher comparisons.