Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"McMurdo, G."
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. McMurdo, G.; Meadows, A.J.: Acceptance and use of computer-mediated communication by information students (1996) 0.05 
    0.047945403 = product of:
  0.1438362 = sum of:
    0.1438362 = sum of:
      0.08964503 = weight(_text_:reports in 7667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08964503 = score(doc=7667,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04999695 = queryNorm
          0.39809695 = fieldWeight in 7667, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7667)
      0.054191172 = weight(_text_:22 in 7667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054191172 = score(doc=7667,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04999695 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7667, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7667)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a longitudinal study of the impact of computer mediated communication (CMC) by students and staff of the Department of Communication and Information Studies, Queen Margaret College, Edinburgh over a 5 year period and the value they derived from it. Data covers levels and patterns of messaging as well as perceptions of, and attitudes towards, CMC activities. Despite rapid changes in technological capabilities, there was seen to be some stability of reactions to CMC, with students particularly valuing administrative and course orientated uses
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.335-348
  2. McMurdo, G.: Evaluating Web information and design (1998) 0.01 
    0.013547793 = product of:
  0.04064338 = sum of:
    0.04064338 = product of:
      0.08128676 = sum of:
        0.08128676 = weight(_text_:22 in 2831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08128676 = score(doc=2831,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2831, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2831)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 1.1999 18:38:39
  3. McMurdo, G.: Pretty good encryption (1996) 0.01 
    0.0067738965 = product of:
  0.02032169 = sum of:
    0.02032169 = product of:
      0.04064338 = sum of:
        0.04064338 = weight(_text_:22 in 4978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04064338 = score(doc=4978,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4978, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4978)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.2, S.133-146