Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"ja"
  1. Matsushita, A.: Science Citation Index on CD-ROM (1992) 0.09
    0.09161695 = product of:
      0.27485085 = sum of:
        0.27485085 = weight(_text_:citation in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27485085 = score(doc=5723,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            1.1723217 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Object
    Science Citation Index
  2. Fukuda, M.; Kageura, K.: Research into 'see also' references in the dictionary of terminology : using semantic relations between entries (1993) 0.01
    0.014940838 = product of:
      0.044822514 = sum of:
        0.044822514 = product of:
          0.08964503 = sum of:
            0.08964503 = weight(_text_:reports in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08964503 = score(doc=1050,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.39809695 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports a study to clarify the nature and functions of 'see also' references in the dictionaly of terminology by surveying 3 such dictionaries, using semantic relations between referring entries and referred entries as a key. The following points were clarified: major types of semantic relations between referring and referred entries and their quantitative tendencies; correlations between the general nature of dictionaries and overall tendencies of 'see also' references; some tendencies concerning the directions of references under some semantic relations; and correlations between the nature of dictionaries and the directions of 'see also' references
  3. Ueda, S.: Online public access catalogues (OPACs) of university libraries in Japan (1995) 0.01
    0.014940838 = product of:
      0.044822514 = sum of:
        0.044822514 = product of:
          0.08964503 = sum of:
            0.08964503 = weight(_text_:reports in 3342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08964503 = score(doc=3342,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.39809695 = fieldWeight in 3342, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3342)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a postal survey of the use of OPACs in Japanese university libraries based upon an 84.9% return rate. These revealed that 60.4% of university libraries used OPACs, that most libraries were linked to the automated circulation system, but that only 6.5% had Internet connection
  4. Oshiro, Z.; Kaji, K.: ¬A survey of Japanese Internet OPACs (1997) 0.01
    0.014940838 = product of:
      0.044822514 = sum of:
        0.044822514 = product of:
          0.08964503 = sum of:
            0.08964503 = weight(_text_:reports in 1773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08964503 = score(doc=1773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.39809695 = fieldWeight in 1773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1773)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports a survey conducted in April 1997 of 136 Japanese WWW and Telnet OPACs from the persepctive of their functions and user interfaces. These included: types of searchable files; access points; kinds of displays; login commands; search methods; Boolean operation; help functions; search history; and browsing of indexed terms. Results indicate a sharp rise in the number of WWW OPACs and problems with the provision of functions and user interfaces by Japanese WWW OPACs
  5. Klein, R.D.: ¬The problem of cataloguing world literature using the Nippon Decimal Classification (1994) 0.01
    0.009031862 = product of:
      0.027095586 = sum of:
        0.027095586 = product of:
          0.054191172 = sum of:
            0.054191172 = weight(_text_:22 in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054191172 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Nippon Decimal Classification (NDC) system, extensively used in Japanese libraries, was devised in 1929. It is difficult to use NDC to classify world literature, such as fiction in English by non American, non British writers. This is not necessarily straightforward in other classification schemes but a survey of 40 Japanese university libraries, of which 24 responded, showed remarkable inconsistencies in the treatment of 22 world literature authors. NDC clearly needs updating to deal with this problem