-
Osareh, F.: Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis : a review of literature II (1996)
0.22
0.22423057 = product of:
0.33634585 = sum of:
0.29152334 = weight(_text_:citation in 7105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.29152334 = score(doc=7105,freq=18.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
1.2434349 = fieldWeight in 7105, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7105)
0.044822514 = product of:
0.08964503 = sum of:
0.08964503 = weight(_text_:reports in 7105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08964503 = score(doc=7105,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.39809695 = fieldWeight in 7105, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7105)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Part 2 of a 2 part article reviewing the technique of bibliometrics and one of its most widely used methods, citation analysis. Reports on studies of author co-citation, periodical by periodical citation analysis and country by country citation analysis in addition to the mapping of science as an application of citation analysis. Considers the limitations, problems and reliability of citation analysis
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Neuhaus, C.; Daniel, H.-D.: Data sources for performing citation analysis : an overview (2008)
0.22
0.22250943 = product of:
0.33376414 = sum of:
0.29454443 = weight(_text_:citation in 1735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.29454443 = score(doc=1735,freq=24.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
1.2563207 = fieldWeight in 1735, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1735)
0.039219696 = product of:
0.07843939 = sum of:
0.07843939 = weight(_text_:reports in 1735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07843939 = score(doc=1735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.34833482 = fieldWeight in 1735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1735)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of new citation-enhanced databases and to identify issues to be considered when they are used as a data source for performing citation analysis. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reports the limitations of Thomson Scientific's citation indexes and reviews the characteristics of the citation-enhanced databases Chemical Abstracts, Google Scholar and Scopus. Findings - The study suggests that citation-enhanced databases need to be examined carefully, with regard to both their potentialities and their limitations for citation analysis. Originality/value - The paper presents a valuable overview of new citation-enhanced databases in the context of research evaluation.
- Object
- Science citation index
Social sciences citation index
Arts and humanities citation index
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.22
0.21936135 = product of:
0.32904202 = sum of:
0.27485085 = weight(_text_:citation in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27485085 = score(doc=6091,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
1.1723217 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.054191172 = product of:
0.108382344 = sum of:
0.108382344 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.108382344 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Tsay, M.-Y.: From Science Citation Index to Journal Citation Reports, amd criteria for journals evaluation (1997)
0.20
0.19526169 = product of:
0.29289252 = sum of:
0.224962 = weight(_text_:citation in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.224962 = score(doc=657,freq=14.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.9595307 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
0.06793051 = product of:
0.13586102 = sum of:
0.13586102 = weight(_text_:reports in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13586102 = score(doc=657,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.60333365 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Investigates the characteristics of Journal Citation Reports (JCR) through the study of the Science Citation Index (SCI). Other criteria for evaluating a journal are also discussed. The compilation process of SCI data, and the characteristics, applications and limitations of SCI are studied. A detailed description of JCR is provided including: journal ranking listing, citing journal listing, cited journal listing, subject category listing, source data, impact factor, immediacy index, cited half-life and citing half-life. The applications and limitations of JCR are also explored. In addition to the criteria listed in JCR, the size, circulation and influence of journals are also considered significant criteria fir evaluation purposes
- Object
- Science Citation Index
Journal Citation Reports
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.18
0.18453708 = product of:
0.2768056 = sum of:
0.24293612 = weight(_text_:citation in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24293612 = score(doc=613,freq=8.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
1.0361958 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.033869483 = product of:
0.067738965 = sum of:
0.067738965 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067738965 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Abschnitte zu: The origins of citation indexing in science - Citation analysis in sociology, history and philosophy of science - From ASIS to ASIST
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998)
0.18
0.18056244 = product of:
0.27084365 = sum of:
0.1629665 = weight(_text_:citation in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1629665 = score(doc=3692,freq=10.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.69510126 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.10787715 = sum of:
0.06723377 = weight(_text_:reports in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06723377 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.29857272 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.04064338 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04064338 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study to examine the patterns of self citation in 6 disciplines distributed among the physical and social sciences and humanities. Sample articles were examined to deermine the relative numbers and ages of self citations and citations to other in the bibliographies and to the exposure given to each type of citation in the text of the articles. significant differences were found in the number and age of citations between disciplines. Overall, 9% of all citations were self citations; 15% of physical sciences citations were self citations, as opposed to 6% in the social sciences and 3% in the humanities. Within disciplines, there was no significantly different amount of coverage between self citations and citations to others. Overall, it appears that a lack of substantive differences in self citation behaviour is consistent across disciplines
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:33:24
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Bensman, S.J.: Distributional differences of the impact factor in the sciences versus the social sciences : an analysis of the probabilistic structure of the 2005 journal citation reports (2008)
0.18
0.17624287 = product of:
0.2643643 = sum of:
0.20613813 = weight(_text_:citation in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20613813 = score(doc=1953,freq=16.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.8792412 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
0.058226153 = product of:
0.11645231 = sum of:
0.11645231 = weight(_text_:reports in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11645231 = score(doc=1953,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.51714313 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper examines the probability structure of the 2005 Science Citation Index (SCI) and Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) Journal Citation Reports (JCR) by analyzing the Impact Factor distributions of their journals. The distribution of the SCI journals corresponded with a distribution generally modeled by the negative binomial distribution, whereas the SSCI distribution fit the Poisson distribution modeling random, rare events. Both Impact Factor distributions were positively skewed - the SCI much more so than the SSCI - indicating excess variance. One of the causes of this excess variance was that the journals highest in the Impact Factor in both JCRs tended to class in subject categories well funded by the National Institutes of Health. The main reason for the SCI Impact Factor distribution being more skewed than the SSCI one was that review journals defining disciplinary paradigms play a much more important role in the sciences than in the social sciences.
- Object
- Science Citation Index
Social Sciences Citation Index
Journal Citation Reports
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Magri, M.; Solari, A.: ¬The SCI Journal Citation Reports : a potential tool for studying journals? (1996)
0.17
0.17203873 = product of:
0.2580581 = sum of:
0.1901276 = weight(_text_:citation in 5076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1901276 = score(doc=5076,freq=10.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.8109515 = fieldWeight in 5076, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5076)
0.06793051 = product of:
0.13586102 = sum of:
0.13586102 = weight(_text_:reports in 5076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13586102 = score(doc=5076,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.60333365 = fieldWeight in 5076, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5076)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Analyses 6 indicators of the Science Citation Index Journals Citation Reports over a 19 year period: number of total citations, number of citations to the previous 2 years, number of source items, impact factor, immediacy index and cited half life. Proposes a box plot method to aggregate the values of each indicator so as to obtain at a glance portrayals of the JCR population from 1974 to 1993. This 'rereading' of the JCR, which presents the JCR product differently, makes it possible to shed new light on the large sub population of journals not at the top of the rankings
- Object
- Journal Citation Reports
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Rousseau, R.: Timelines in citation research (2006)
0.17
0.17182502 = product of:
0.25773752 = sum of:
0.1943489 = weight(_text_:citation in 1746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1943489 = score(doc=1746,freq=8.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.8289566 = fieldWeight in 1746, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1746)
0.06338861 = product of:
0.12677722 = sum of:
0.12677722 = weight(_text_:reports in 1746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12677722 = score(doc=1746,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.5629941 = fieldWeight in 1746, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1746)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The timeline used in ISI's Journal Citation Reports (JCR; Thomson ISI, formerly the Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, PA) for half-life calculations, is not a timeline for (average) cited age. These two timelines are shifted over half a year.
- Object
- Journal Citation Reports
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.17
0.16578043 = product of:
0.24867064 = sum of:
0.224962 = weight(_text_:citation in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.224962 = score(doc=6920,freq=14.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.9595307 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.023708638 = product of:
0.047417276 = sum of:
0.047417276 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047417276 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Over a 35-year period, Irving H. Sher played a critical role in the development and implementation of the Science Citation Index and other ISI products. Trained as a biochemist, statistician, and linguist, Sher brought a unique combination of talents to ISI as Director of Quality Control and Director of Research and Development. His talents as a teacher and mentor evoked loyalty. He was a particularly inventive but self-taught programmer. In addition to the SCI, Social Sciences Citation Index, and Arts and Humanities Citation Index,
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
- Object
- Science Citation Index
Social Sciences Citation Index
Arts and Humanities Citation Index
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.17
0.16569339 = product of:
0.24854007 = sum of:
0.1943489 = weight(_text_:citation in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1943489 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.8289566 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.054191172 = product of:
0.108382344 = sum of:
0.108382344 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.108382344 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Snyder, H.; Cronin, B.; Davenport, E.: What's the use of citation? : Citation analysis as a literature topic in selected disciplines of the social sciences (1995)
0.16
0.15983668 = product of:
0.23975502 = sum of:
0.20613813 = weight(_text_:citation in 1825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20613813 = score(doc=1825,freq=16.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.8792412 = fieldWeight in 1825, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1825)
0.033616886 = product of:
0.06723377 = sum of:
0.06723377 = weight(_text_:reports in 1825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06723377 = score(doc=1825,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.29857272 = fieldWeight in 1825, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1825)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study to investigate the place and role of citation analysis in selected disciplines in the social sciences, including library and information science. 5 core library and information science periodicals: Journal of documentation; Library quarterly; Journal of the American Society for Information Science; College and research libraries; and the Journal of information science, were studed to determine the percentage of articles devoted to citation analysis and develop an indictive typology to categorize the major foci of research being conducted under the rubric of citation analysis. Similar analysis was conducted for periodicals in other social sciences disciplines. Demonstrates how the rubric can be used to dertermine how citatiion analysis is applied within library and information science and other disciplines. By isolating citation from bibliometrics in general, this work is differentiated from other, previous studies. Analysis of data from a 10 year sample of transdisciplinary social sciences literature suggests that 2 application areas predominate: the validity of citation as an evaluation tool; and impact or performance studies of authors, periodicals, and institutions
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Brown, C.: ¬The evolution of preprints in the scholarly communication of physicists and astronomers (2001)
0.15
0.1544505 = product of:
0.23167576 = sum of:
0.19205788 = weight(_text_:citation in 5184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19205788 = score(doc=5184,freq=20.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.8191847 = fieldWeight in 5184, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5184)
0.039617877 = product of:
0.079235755 = sum of:
0.079235755 = weight(_text_:reports in 5184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079235755 = score(doc=5184,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.3518713 = fieldWeight in 5184, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5184)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In one of two bibliometric papers in this issue Brown looks at formal publication and citation of Eprints as shown by the policies and practices of 37 top tier physics journals, and by citation trends in ISI's SciSearch database and Journal Citation Reports. Citation analysis was carried out if Eprint cites were indicated by editor response, instruction to authors sections, reports in the literature, or actual examination of citation lists. Total contribution to 12 archives and their citation counts in the journals were compiled. Of the 13 editors surveyed that responded, 8 published papers that had appeared in the archive. Two of these required removal from the archive at publication; two of the 13 did not publish papers that have appeared as Eprints. A review journal that solicits its contributions allowed citation of Eprints. Seven allowed citations to Eprints, but were less than enthusiastic.Nearly 36,000 citations were made to the 12 archives. Citations to the 37 journals and their impact factors remain constant over the period of 1991 to 1998. Eprint citations appear to peak about 3 years after appearance as do citations to published papers. Contribution to the archives, and their use as measured by citation, is clearly growing. Citation form and publishing policy varies from journal to journal.
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Clusters and maps of science journals based on bi-connected graphs in Journal Citation Reports (2004)
0.15
0.14746177 = product of:
0.22119266 = sum of:
0.1629665 = weight(_text_:citation in 4427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1629665 = score(doc=4427,freq=10.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.69510126 = fieldWeight in 4427, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4427)
0.058226153 = product of:
0.11645231 = sum of:
0.11645231 = weight(_text_:reports in 4427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11645231 = score(doc=4427,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.51714313 = fieldWeight in 4427, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4427)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The aggregated journal-journal citation matrix derived from Journal Citation Reports 2001 can be decomposed into a unique subject classification using the graph-analytical algorithm of bi-connected components. This technique was recently incorporated in software tools for social network analysis. The matrix can be assessed in terms of its decomposability using articulation points which indicate overlap between the components. The articulation points of this set did not exhibit a next-order network of "general science" journals. However, the clusters differ in size and in terms of the internal density of their relations. A full classification of the journals is provided in the Appendix. The clusters can also be extracted and mapped for the visualization.
- Object
- Journal Citation Reports
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Visualization of the citation impact environments of scientific journals : an online mapping exercise (2007)
0.15
0.14671463 = product of:
0.22007194 = sum of:
0.19205788 = weight(_text_:citation in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19205788 = score(doc=82,freq=20.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.8191847 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
0.02801407 = product of:
0.05602814 = sum of:
0.05602814 = weight(_text_:reports in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05602814 = score(doc=82,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.24881059 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Aggregated journal-journal citation networks based on the Journal Citation Reports 2004 of the Science Citation Index (5,968 journals) and the Social Science Citation Index (1,712 journals) are made accessible from the perspective of any of these journals. A vector-space model Is used for normalization, and the results are brought online at http://www.leydesdorff.net/jcr04 as input files for the visualization program Pajek. The user is thus able to analyze the citation environment in terms of links and graphs. Furthermore, the local impact of a journal is defined as its share of the total citations in the specific journal's citation environments; the vertical size of the nodes is varied proportionally to this citation impact. The horizontal size of each node can be used to provide the same information after correction for within-journal (self-)citations. In the "citing" environment, the equivalents of this measure can be considered as a citation activity index which maps how the relevant journal environment is perceived by the collective of authors of a given journal. As a policy application, the mechanism of Interdisciplinary developments among the sciences is elaborated for the case of nanotechnology journals.
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.15
0.14645365 = product of:
0.21968046 = sum of:
0.17178178 = weight(_text_:citation in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17178178 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.73270106 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.047898684 = product of:
0.09579737 = sum of:
0.09579737 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09579737 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014)
0.14
0.14209752 = product of:
0.21314627 = sum of:
0.19282457 = weight(_text_:citation in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19282457 = score(doc=1521,freq=14.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.82245487 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.02032169 = product of:
0.04064338 = sum of:
0.04064338 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04064338 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Traditional citation analysis has been widely applied to detect patterns of scientific collaboration, map the landscapes of scholarly disciplines, assess the impact of research outputs, and observe knowledge transfer across domains. It is, however, limited, as it assumes all citations are of similar value and weights each equally. Content-based citation analysis (CCA) addresses a citation's value by interpreting each one based on its context at both the syntactic and semantic levels. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of CAA research in terms of its theoretical foundations, methodical approaches, and example applications. In addition, we highlight how increased computational capabilities and publicly available full-text resources have opened this area of research to vast possibilities, which enable deeper citation analysis, more accurate citation prediction, and increased knowledge discovery.
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 16:52:04
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Alvarez, P.; Pulgarin, A.: ¬The Rasch model : measuring the impact of scientific journals: analytical chemistry (1996)
0.14
0.14208907 = product of:
0.2131336 = sum of:
0.16831109 = weight(_text_:citation in 8505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16831109 = score(doc=8505,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.71789753 = fieldWeight in 8505, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8505)
0.044822514 = product of:
0.08964503 = sum of:
0.08964503 = weight(_text_:reports in 8505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08964503 = score(doc=8505,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.39809695 = fieldWeight in 8505, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8505)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Focuses on a way to determine a ranking of science journals according to the number of citations-to and items-published data used by Science Citation Insitute of Citation Reports of the Institute for Science Information to determine journal ranking by impact factor. Applies latent traits theory to bibliometrics
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Lawrence, S.; Giles, C.L.; Bollaker, K.: Digital libraries and Autonomous Citation Indexing (1999)
0.14
0.14142518 = product of:
0.21213776 = sum of:
0.17852087 = weight(_text_:citation in 4951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17852087 = score(doc=4951,freq=12.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.7614453 = fieldWeight in 4951, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4951)
0.033616886 = product of:
0.06723377 = sum of:
0.06723377 = weight(_text_:reports in 4951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06723377 = score(doc=4951,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.29857272 = fieldWeight in 4951, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4951)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Autonomous Citation Indexing (ACI) automates the construction of citation indexes - Lower cost, wider availability: ACI is completely autonomous - no manual effort is required. This should result in lower cost and wider availability. Broader coverage: Because no manual effort is required, there are few barriers to indexing a broader range of literature, compared to indexes like the Science Citation Index that require manual effort. More timely feedback: Conference papers, technical reports, and preprints can be indexed, providing far more timely feedback in many cases (often such publications appear far in advance of corresponding journal publications). Citation context: ACI groups together the context of citations to a given article, allowing researchers to easily see what is being said and why the article was cited. Benefits for both literature search and evaluation. Freely available: Our implementation of ACI is available at no cost for non-commercial use. Several orgnizations have requested the software and expressed interest in providing an index within their domain, or in using ACI within their own digital libraries.
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.13
0.13256171 = product of:
0.19884256 = sum of:
0.17852087 = weight(_text_:citation in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17852087 = score(doc=201,freq=12.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.7614453 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.02032169 = product of:
0.04064338 = sum of:
0.04064338 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04064338 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
- Theme
- Citation indexing
