Search (561 results, page 1 of 29)

  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  1. Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998) 0.18
    0.18208592 = product of:
      0.27312887 = sum of:
        0.14727221 = weight(_text_:citation in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14727221 = score(doc=108,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.62816036 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
        0.12585667 = sum of:
          0.07843939 = weight(_text_:reports in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07843939 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04999695 = queryNorm
              0.34833482 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
          0.047417276 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047417276 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04999695 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Citation analysis has long been used by librarians as an important tool of collection development and the advent of Internet technology and especially the WWW adds a new facet to the role played by citation analysis. One of the reasons why librarians create WWW homepages is to provide users with further sources of interest or reference and to do this libraries include links from their own homepages to other information sources. Reports current research on the analysis of WWW pages as an introduction to an examination of the homepages of 25 art libraries to determine what sites are most often included. The types of linked sites are analyzed based on 3 criteria: location, focus and evidence that the link was evaluated before the connection was establisheds
    Date
    10. 1.1999 16:22:37
  2. Tonta, Y.: Scholarly communication and the use of networked information sources (1996) 0.17
    0.17463975 = product of:
      0.2619596 = sum of:
        0.12623332 = weight(_text_:citation in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12623332 = score(doc=6389,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.5384232 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
        0.13572629 = sum of:
          0.09508291 = weight(_text_:reports in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09508291 = score(doc=6389,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04999695 = queryNorm
              0.4222456 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
          0.04064338 = weight(_text_:22 in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04064338 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04999695 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the use of networked information sources in scholarly communication. Networked information sources are defined broadly to cover: documents and images stored on electronic network hosts; data files; newsgroups; listservs; online information services and electronic periodicals. Reports results of a survey to determine how heavily, if at all, networked information sources are cited in scholarly printed periodicals published in 1993 and 1994. 27 printed periodicals, representing a wide range of subjects and the most influential periodicals in their fields, were identified through the Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index Journal Citation Reports. 97 articles were selected for further review and references, footnotes and bibliographies were checked for references to networked information sources. Only 2 articles were found to contain such references. Concludes that, although networked information sources facilitate scholars' work to a great extent during the research process, scholars have yet to incorporate such sources in the bibliographies of their published articles
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.240-245
  3. Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998) 0.13
    0.12654515 = product of:
      0.18981771 = sum of:
        0.08589089 = weight(_text_:citation in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08589089 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.36635053 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
        0.10392682 = sum of:
          0.05602814 = weight(_text_:reports in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05602814 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04999695 = queryNorm
              0.24881059 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
          0.047898684 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047898684 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04999695 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Internet based electronic resources are growing dramatically but there have been no empirical studies evaluating the impact of e-sources, as a whole, on formal scholarly communication. reports results of an investigation into how much e-sources have been used in formal scholarly communication, using a case study in the area of Library and Information Science (LIS) during the period 1994 to 1996. 4 citation based indicators were used in the study of the impact measurement. Concludes that, compared with the impact of print sources, the impact of e-sources on formal scholarly communication in LIS is small, as measured by e-sources cited, and does not increase significantly by year even though there is observable growth of these impact across the years. It is found that periodical format is related to the rate of citing e-sources, articles are more likely to cite e-sources than are print priodical articles. However, once authors cite electronic resource, there is no significant difference in the number of references per article by periodical format or by year. Suggests that, at this stage, citing e-sources may depend on authors rather than the periodical format in which authors choose to publish
    Date
    30. 1.1999 17:22:22
  4. Brahmi, F.: Finding medical informatics sites online (1998) 0.12
    0.1183308 = product of:
      0.1774962 = sum of:
        0.12146806 = weight(_text_:citation in 7969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12146806 = score(doc=7969,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.5180979 = fieldWeight in 7969, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7969)
        0.05602814 = product of:
          0.11205628 = sum of:
            0.11205628 = weight(_text_:reports in 7969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11205628 = score(doc=7969,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.49762118 = fieldWeight in 7969, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7969)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of searching the WWW for the term 'medican informatics' on 6 Web search engines and briefly reviews a number of selected Web site focusing on medical informatics auch as http://www.cpmc.columbia.edu/edu/textbook/ and http://www.hslib.washington.edu/informatics
    Object
    Science Citation Index
  5. Garfield, E.: Agony and ecstasy of the Internet : experiences of an information scientist qua publisher (1996) 0.11
    0.10631131 = product of:
      0.15946695 = sum of:
        0.12024725 = weight(_text_:citation in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12024725 = score(doc=3044,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.51289076 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
        0.039219696 = product of:
          0.07843939 = sum of:
            0.07843939 = weight(_text_:reports in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07843939 = score(doc=3044,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.34833482 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports recent experiences with the publishing, via the Internet and WWW of ISI's biweekly newspaper, The Scientist; which was originally mounted on the NSFnet. Compares the use of the Internet for SDI by comparing Web searches via AltaVista with similar searches on CD-ROM. Predicts that future current awareness services and SDI services will be linked to electronic periodicals in electronic libraries. Concludes with a note on cited reference searching, a variation on the theme of hypertext searching, with particular reference to SCI and Web crawlers
    Object
    Science citation index
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  6. Caplan, P.: U-R-Stars : standards for controlling Internet resources (1996) 0.09
    0.09466465 = product of:
      0.14199696 = sum of:
        0.09717445 = weight(_text_:citation in 6425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09717445 = score(doc=6425,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.4144783 = fieldWeight in 6425, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6425)
        0.044822514 = product of:
          0.08964503 = sum of:
            0.08964503 = weight(_text_:reports in 6425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08964503 = score(doc=6425,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.39809695 = fieldWeight in 6425, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6425)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The library and Internet communities have been working on standards for identifying and referencing electronic resources. Reports on recent library efforts, including work to record URL and URN (Uniform Resource Locator and Uniform Resource Number) information in USMARC records, and collaboration with the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) to define a Uniform Resource Citation for electronic publications
  7. Harter, S.P.: Scholarly communication and electronic journals : an impact study (1998) 0.08
    0.08284669 = product of:
      0.12427004 = sum of:
        0.09717445 = weight(_text_:citation in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09717445 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.4144783 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
        0.027095586 = product of:
          0.054191172 = sum of:
            0.054191172 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054191172 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Studies the effects of e-journals on the scholarly communities they are serving. Considers to what extent scholars and researchers are aware of, influenced by, using, or building their own work on research published in e-journals. Draws a sample of scholarly, peer-reviewed e-journals and conducts several analyzes thorugh citation analysis. The data show that the impact of journals on scholarly communication has been minimal
    Date
    22. 2.1999 16:56:06
  8. Cronin, B.: Bibliometrics and beyond : some thoughts on web-based citation analysis (2001) 0.08
    0.080164835 = product of:
      0.2404945 = sum of:
        0.2404945 = weight(_text_:citation in 3890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2404945 = score(doc=3890,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            1.0257815 = fieldWeight in 3890, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3890)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  9. Davis, C.: Some experiences of an Internet researcher (1996) 0.07
    0.0719181 = product of:
      0.2157543 = sum of:
        0.2157543 = sum of:
          0.13446754 = weight(_text_:reports in 4830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13446754 = score(doc=4830,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04999695 = queryNorm
              0.59714544 = fieldWeight in 4830, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4830)
          0.08128676 = weight(_text_:22 in 4830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08128676 = score(doc=4830,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04999695 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4830, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4830)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports work as an independent Internet researcher in the field of library research in the USA
    Source
    Audiovisual librarian. 22(1996) no.2, A.112-113
  10. Wiley, D.L.: Cited references on the Web : a review of ISI's Web of Science (1998) 0.07
    0.06942478 = product of:
      0.20827433 = sum of:
        0.20827433 = weight(_text_:citation in 1676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20827433 = score(doc=1676,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.8883528 = fieldWeight in 1676, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1676)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the Web of Science, a new Web interface to the citation indexes produced by ISI. The Web of Science carries the past 10 years of ISI's 3 major citation indexes: AHCI, SSCI, and SCI. Combined, the 3 indexes provide access to article citations from about 8.000 journals and over 10 million records. Topics covered in the review include: pricing; searching in 2 modes: Quick Search and Full Search; lateral searching and citation matching; document delivery; full text; and documentation and help. Provides a list of selected databases that link to full text, a facility not yet available on the Web of Science
    Object
    Arts and Humanities Citation Index
    Social Sciences Citation Index
    Science Citation Index
  11. Vaughan, L.; Shaw , D.: Bibliographic and Web citations : what Is the difference? (2003) 0.06
    0.06401929 = product of:
      0.19205788 = sum of:
        0.19205788 = weight(_text_:citation in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19205788 = score(doc=5176,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.8191847 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Vaughn, and Shaw look at the relationship between traditional citation and Web citation (not hyperlinks but rather textual mentions of published papers). Using English language research journals in ISI's 2000 Journal Citation Report - Information and Library Science category - 1209 full length papers published in 1997 in 46 journals were identified. Each was searched in Social Science Citation Index and on the Web using Google phrase search by entering the title in quotation marks, and followed for distinction where necessary with sub-titles, author's names, and journal title words. After removing obvious false drops, the number of web sites was recorded for comparison with the SSCI counts. A second sample from 1992 was also collected for examination. There were a total of 16,371 web citations to the selected papers. The top and bottom ranked four journals were then examined and every third citation to every third paper was selected and classified as to source type, domain, and country of origin. Web counts are much higher than ISI citation counts. Of the 46 journals from 1997, 26 demonstrated a significant correlation between Web and traditional citation counts, and 11 of the 15 in the 1992 sample also showed significant correlation. Journal impact factor in 1998 and 1999 correlated significantly with average Web citations per journal in the 1997 data, but at a low level. Thirty percent of web citations come from other papers posted on the web, and 30percent from listings of web based bibliographic services, while twelve percent come from class reading lists. High web citation journals often have web accessible tables of content.
    Object
    Journal Citation Report
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  12. Brody, T.; Harnad, S.; Carr, L.: Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact (2006) 0.06
    0.06337587 = product of:
      0.1901276 = sum of:
        0.1901276 = weight(_text_:citation in 165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1901276 = score(doc=165,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.8109515 = fieldWeight in 165, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=165)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The use of citation counts to assess the impact of research articles is well established. However, the citation impact of an article can only be measured several years after it has been published. As research articles are increasingly accessed through the Web, the number of times an article is downloaded can be instantly recorded and counted. One would expect the number of times an article is read to be related both to the number of times it is cited and to how old the article is. The authors analyze how short-term Web usage impact predicts medium-term citation impact. The physics e-print archive-arXiv.org-is used to test this.
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  13. Frandsen, T.F.; Wouters, P.: Turning working papers into journal articles : an exercise in microbibliometrics (2009) 0.06
    0.06213502 = product of:
      0.093202524 = sum of:
        0.072880834 = weight(_text_:citation in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072880834 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.31085873 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
        0.02032169 = product of:
          0.04064338 = sum of:
            0.04064338 = weight(_text_:22 in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04064338 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article focuses on the process of scientific and scholarly communication. Data on open access publications on the Internet not only provides a supplement to the traditional citation indexes but also enables analysis of the microprocesses and daily practices that constitute scientific communication. This article focuses on a stage in the life cycle of scientific and scholarly information that precedes the publication of formal research articles in the scientific and scholarly literature. Binomial logistic regression models are used to analyse precise mechanisms at work in the transformation of a working paper (WP) into a journal article (JA) in the field of economics. The study unveils a fine-grained process of adapting WPs to their new context as JAs by deleting and adding literature references, which perhaps can be best captured by the term sculpting.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:59:25
  14. Wouters, P.; Vries, R. de: Formally citing the Web (2004) 0.06
    0.060749315 = product of:
      0.09112397 = sum of:
        0.06871271 = weight(_text_:citation in 3093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06871271 = score(doc=3093,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.29308042 = fieldWeight in 3093, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3093)
        0.022411257 = product of:
          0.044822514 = sum of:
            0.044822514 = weight(_text_:reports in 3093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044822514 = score(doc=3093,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.19904847 = fieldWeight in 3093, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3093)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    How do authors refer to Web-based information sources in their formal scientific publications? It is not yet weIl known how scientists and scholars actually include new types of information sources, available through the new media, in their published work. This article reports an a comparative study of the lists of references in 38 scientific journals in five different scientific and social scientific fields. The fields are sociology, library and information science, biochemistry and biotechnology, neuroscience, and the mathematics of computing. As is weIl known, references, citations, and hyperlinks play different roles in academic publishing and communication. Our study focuses an hyperlinks as attributes of references in formal scholarly publications. The study developed and applied a method to analyze the differential roles of publishing media in the analysis of scientific and scholarly literature references. The present secondary databases that include reference and citation data (the Web of Science) cannot be used for this type of research. By the automated processing and analysis of the full text of scientific and scholarly articles, we were able to extract the references and hyperlinks contained in these references in relation to other features of the scientific and scholarly literature. Our findings show that hyperlinking references are indeed, as expected, abundantly present in the formal literature. They also tend to cite more recent literature than the average reference. The large majority of the references are to Web instances of traditional scientific journals. Other types of Web-based information sources are less weIl represented in the lists of references, except in the case of pure e-journals. We conclude that this can be explained by taking the role of the publisher into account. Indeed, it seems that the shift from print-based to electronic publishing has created new roles for the publisher. By shaping the way scientific references are hyperlinking to other information sources, the publisher may have a large impact an the availability of scientific and scholarly information.
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  15. Rosenberg, V.: ¬An assessment of ISI's new Web of Science : ISI's services brings citiation indexing to new and advanced researchers (1998) 0.06
    0.057260595 = product of:
      0.17178178 = sum of:
        0.17178178 = weight(_text_:citation in 1885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17178178 = score(doc=1885,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.73270106 = fieldWeight in 1885, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1885)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Comments on the affinity of Web technology and citation indexes and reviews the ISI service, Web of Science. Although still requiring refinement, it multiplies the effectiveness of an already effective search tool
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  16. Oxley, H.: ISI spins a Web of science (1998) 0.06
    0.0561037 = product of:
      0.16831109 = sum of:
        0.16831109 = weight(_text_:citation in 3297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16831109 = score(doc=3297,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.71789753 = fieldWeight in 3297, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3297)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Object
    Science Citation Index
    Social Sciences Citation Index
    Arts and Humanities Citation Index
  17. Vaughan, L.; Shaw, D.: Web citation data for impact assessment : a comparison of four science disciplines (2005) 0.05
    0.049589127 = product of:
      0.14876738 = sum of:
        0.14876738 = weight(_text_:citation in 3880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14876738 = score(doc=3880,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.6345377 = fieldWeight in 3880, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3880)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The number and type of Web citations to journal articles in four areas of science are examined: biology, genetics, medicine, and multidisciplinary sciences. For a sample of 5,972 articles published in 114 journals, the median Web citation counts per journal article range from 6.2 in medicine to 10.4 in genetics. About 30% of Web citations in each area indicate intellectual impact (citations from articles or class readings, in contrast to citations from bibliographic services or the author's or journal's home page). Journals receiving more Web citations also have higher percentages of citations indicating intellectual impact. There is significant correlation between the number of citations reported in the databases from the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI, now Thomson Scientific) and the number of citations retrieved using the Google search engine (Web citations). The correlation is much weaker for journals published outside the United Kingdom or United States and for multidisciplinary journals. Web citation numbers are higher than ISI citation counts, suggesting that Web searches might be conducted for an earlier or a more fine-grained assessment of an article's impact. The Web-evident impact of non-UK/USA publications might provide a balance to the geographic or cultural biases observed in ISI's data, although the stability of Web citation counts is debatable.
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  18. Richmond, B.: CCCCCCC.CCC (Ten Cs) for evaluating Internet resources (1998) 0.05
    0.048587225 = product of:
      0.14576167 = sum of:
        0.14576167 = weight(_text_:citation in 3527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14576167 = score(doc=3527,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.62171745 = fieldWeight in 3527, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3527)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses 10 Cs for evaluating Internet resources. These are: content; credibility; critical thinking; copyright; citation; continuity; censorship; connectivity; comparability; and context
  19. Cochenour, D.: Linking remote users and information : cataloguing Internet publications (1994) 0.05
    0.047945403 = product of:
      0.1438362 = sum of:
        0.1438362 = sum of:
          0.08964503 = weight(_text_:reports in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08964503 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04999695 = queryNorm
              0.39809695 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
          0.054191172 = weight(_text_:22 in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054191172 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04999695 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries can add value to Internet resources by adding them to the library's catalogue in a manner consistent with the other resources held within the collection. Reports on OCLC studies into cataloguing Internet resources and accessing electronic periodicals. Existing retrieval methods on the Internet are limited because of shallow directory structures and idiosyncratic naming conventions. Catalogue entries for electronic resources need to provide a complete description of the access methodology if they are to satisfactorily connect remote users without the immediate possibility of backup from reference staff
    Date
    17.10.1995 18:22:54
  20. Norman, S.: Copyright in the global information infrastructure (1995) 0.05
    0.047945403 = product of:
      0.1438362 = sum of:
        0.1438362 = sum of:
          0.08964503 = weight(_text_:reports in 3394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08964503 = score(doc=3394,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04999695 = queryNorm
              0.39809695 = fieldWeight in 3394, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3394)
          0.054191172 = weight(_text_:22 in 3394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054191172 = score(doc=3394,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04999695 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3394, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3394)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the World Intellectual Property (WIPO) Symposium on Copyright in the Global Information Infrastructure, Mexico City, 22-24 May 1995, convened to discuss the issues relating to copyright legislation and how it fits or needs to adapt to the operation of the information superhighway of the future with particular reference to the protection of intellectual property of the information superhigway

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 496
  • m 40
  • s 17
  • el 14
  • r 4
  • x 2
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications