-
Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999)
0.06
0.06213502 = product of:
0.093202524 = sum of:
0.072880834 = weight(_text_:citation in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072880834 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.31085873 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.02032169 = product of:
0.04064338 = sum of:
0.04064338 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04064338 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A fascinating, broad-ranging article about classification, knowledge, and how they relate. Hierarchies, trees, paradigms (a two-dimensional classification that can look something like a spreadsheet), and facets are covered, with descriptions of how they work and how they can be used for knowledge discovery and creation. Kwasnick outlines how to make a faceted classification: choose facets, develop facets, analyze entities using the facets, and make a citation order. Facets are useful for many reasons: they do not require complete knowledge of the entire body of material; they are hospitable, flexible, and expressive; they do not require a rigid background theory; they can mix theoretical structures and models; and they allow users to view things from many perspectives. Facets do have faults: it can be hard to pick the right ones; it is hard to show relations between them; and it is difficult to visualize them. The coverage of the other methods is equally thorough and there is much to consider for anyone putting a classification on the web.
- Source
- Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
-
Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996)
0.05
0.047945403 = product of:
0.1438362 = sum of:
0.1438362 = sum of:
0.08964503 = weight(_text_:reports in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08964503 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.39809695 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.054191172 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054191172 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a comparative study of 3 classification schemes: LCC, DDC and NLM Classification to determine their effectiveness in classifying materials on health insurance. Examined 2 hypotheses: that there would be no differences in the scatter of the 3 classification schemes; and that there would be overlap between all 3 schemes but no difference in the classes into which the subject was placed. There was subject scatter in all 3 classification schemes and litlle overlap between the 3 systems
- Date
- 22. 4.1997 21:10:19
-
Molholt, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the Information Superhighway (1995)
0.03
0.029965874 = product of:
0.08989762 = sum of:
0.08989762 = sum of:
0.05602814 = weight(_text_:reports in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05602814 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.24881059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
0.033869483 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033869483 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Paper presented at the 36th Allerton Institute, 23-25 Oct 94, Allerton Park, Monticello, IL: "New Roles for Classification in Libraries and Information Networks: Presentation and Reports"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22
-
Holman, E.E.: Statistical properties of large published classifications (1992)
0.02
0.022411257 = product of:
0.06723377 = sum of:
0.06723377 = product of:
0.13446754 = sum of:
0.13446754 = weight(_text_:reports in 4250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13446754 = score(doc=4250,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.59714544 = fieldWeight in 4250, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4250)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reports the results of a survey of 23 published classifications taken from a variety of subject fields
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999)
0.01
0.013547793 = product of:
0.04064338 = sum of:
0.04064338 = product of:
0.08128676 = sum of:
0.08128676 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08128676 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999)
0.01
0.013547793 = product of:
0.04064338 = sum of:
0.04064338 = product of:
0.08128676 = sum of:
0.08128676 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08128676 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997)
0.01
0.009031862 = product of:
0.027095586 = sum of:
0.027095586 = product of:
0.054191172 = sum of:
0.054191172 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054191172 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
-
Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996)
0.01
0.007902879 = product of:
0.023708638 = sum of:
0.023708638 = product of:
0.047417276 = sum of:
0.047417276 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047417276 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
