Search (36 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Literaturübersicht"
  1. Osareh, F.: Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis : a review of literature II (1996) 0.22
    0.22423057 = product of:
      0.33634585 = sum of:
        0.29152334 = weight(_text_:citation in 7105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29152334 = score(doc=7105,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            1.2434349 = fieldWeight in 7105, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7105)
        0.044822514 = product of:
          0.08964503 = sum of:
            0.08964503 = weight(_text_:reports in 7105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08964503 = score(doc=7105,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.39809695 = fieldWeight in 7105, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7105)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Part 2 of a 2 part article reviewing the technique of bibliometrics and one of its most widely used methods, citation analysis. Reports on studies of author co-citation, periodical by periodical citation analysis and country by country citation analysis in addition to the mapping of science as an application of citation analysis. Considers the limitations, problems and reliability of citation analysis
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  2. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.22
    0.21936135 = product of:
      0.32904202 = sum of:
        0.27485085 = weight(_text_:citation in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27485085 = score(doc=6091,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            1.1723217 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
        0.054191172 = product of:
          0.108382344 = sum of:
            0.108382344 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108382344 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  3. Hjerppe, R.: ¬An outline of bibliometrics and citation analysis (1980) 0.09
    0.09161695 = product of:
      0.27485085 = sum of:
        0.27485085 = weight(_text_:citation in 1115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27485085 = score(doc=1115,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            1.1723217 = fieldWeight in 1115, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1115)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  4. Osareh, F.: Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis : a review of literature I (1996) 0.07
    0.07242956 = product of:
      0.21728867 = sum of:
        0.21728867 = weight(_text_:citation in 7170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21728867 = score(doc=7170,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.9268017 = fieldWeight in 7170, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7170)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Part 1 of a 2 part article reviewing the technique of bibliometrics and one of its most widely used methods, citation analysis. Traces the history and development of bibliometrics, including its definition, scope, role in scholarly communication and applications. Treats citation analysis similarly with particular reference to bibliographic coupling and cocitation coupling
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  5. Kabdeho, T.: Dictionary of dictionaries (1992) 0.06
    0.06478297 = product of:
      0.1943489 = sum of:
        0.1943489 = weight(_text_:citation in 3713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1943489 = score(doc=3713,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.8289566 = fieldWeight in 3713, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3713)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Description or citation of some 6000 titles
  6. Bensman, S.J.: Garfield and the impact factors (2007) 0.06
    0.06478297 = product of:
      0.1943489 = sum of:
        0.1943489 = weight(_text_:citation in 4680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1943489 = score(doc=4680,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.8289566 = fieldWeight in 4680, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4680)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  7. Hsueh, D.C.: Recon road maps : retrospective conversion literature, 1980-1990 (1992) 0.05
    0.047945403 = product of:
      0.1438362 = sum of:
        0.1438362 = sum of:
          0.08964503 = weight(_text_:reports in 2193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08964503 = score(doc=2193,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04999695 = queryNorm
              0.39809695 = fieldWeight in 2193, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2193)
          0.054191172 = weight(_text_:22 in 2193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054191172 = score(doc=2193,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04999695 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2193, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2193)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper aims to bring together in one place books, articles, reports, and lectures on retrospective conversion in print and non-print formats, appearing between 1980-1990. The bibliography, preceded by a brief review of the literature, is divided into ten broad categories to facilitate quick reference.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 14(1992) nos.3/4, S.5-22
  8. Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010) 0.04
    0.041952223 = product of:
      0.12585667 = sum of:
        0.12585667 = sum of:
          0.07843939 = weight(_text_:reports in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07843939 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04999695 = queryNorm
              0.34833482 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
          0.047417276 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047417276 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04999695 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Candela, L.; Castelli, D.; Manghi, P.; Tani, A.: Data journals : a survey (2015) 0.03
    0.034356356 = product of:
      0.10306907 = sum of:
        0.10306907 = weight(_text_:citation in 2156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10306907 = score(doc=2156,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.4396206 = fieldWeight in 2156, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2156)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Data occupy a key role in our information society. However, although the amount of published data continues to grow and terms such as data deluge and big data today characterize numerous (research) initiatives, much work is still needed in the direction of publishing data in order to make them effectively discoverable, available, and reusable by others. Several barriers hinder data publishing, from lack of attribution and rewards, vague citation practices, and quality issues to a rather general lack of a data-sharing culture. Lately, data journals have overcome some of these barriers. In this study of more than 100 currently existing data journals, we describe the approaches they promote for data set description, availability, citation, quality, and open access. We close by identifying ways to expand and strengthen the data journals approach as a means to promote data set access and exploitation.
  10. Thelwall, M.; Vaughan, L.; Björneborn, L.: Webometrics (2004) 0.03
    0.028630298 = product of:
      0.08589089 = sum of:
        0.08589089 = weight(_text_:citation in 4279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08589089 = score(doc=4279,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.36635053 = fieldWeight in 4279, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4279)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Webometrics, the quantitative study of Web-related phenomena, emerged from the realization that methods originally designed for bibliometric analysis of scientific journal article citation patterns could be applied to the Web, with commercial search engines providing the raw data. Almind and Ingwersen (1997) defined the field and gave it its name. Other pioneers included Rodriguez Gairin (1997) and Aguillo (1998). Larson (1996) undertook exploratory link structure analysis, as did Rousseau (1997). Webometrics encompasses research from fields beyond information science such as communication studies, statistical physics, and computer science. In this review we concentrate on link analysis, but also cover other aspects of webometrics, including Web log fle analysis. One theme that runs through this chapter is the messiness of Web data and the need for data cleansing heuristics. The uncontrolled Web creates numerous problems in the interpretation of results, for instance, from the automatic creation or replication of links. The loose connection between top-level domain specifications (e.g., com, edu, and org) and their actual content is also a frustrating problem. For example, many .com sites contain noncommercial content, although com is ostensibly the main commercial top-level domain. Indeed, a skeptical researcher could claim that obstacles of this kind are so great that all Web analyses lack value. As will be seen, one response to this view, a view shared by critics of evaluative bibliometrics, is to demonstrate that Web data correlate significantly with some non-Web data in order to prove that the Web data are not wholly random. A practical response has been to develop increasingly sophisticated data cleansing techniques and multiple data analysis methods.
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  11. Poole, A.H.: ¬The information work of community archives : a systematic literature review (2020) 0.02
    0.020244677 = product of:
      0.06073403 = sum of:
        0.06073403 = weight(_text_:citation in 5840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06073403 = score(doc=5840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.25904894 = fieldWeight in 5840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5840)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose This paper scrutinizes the scholarship on community archives' information work. Community archives and archiving projects represent unprecedentedly democratic venues for information work centering on essential documentary concepts such as custody, collection development and appraisal, processing, arrangement and description, organization, representation and naming, collaboration, resource generation and allocation, activism and social justice, preservation, reuse, and sustainability. Design/methodology/approach Unearthed through databases searches, citation chaining, and browsing, sources examined include peer-reviewed journal articles, books, and book chapters published in the English language between 1985 and 2018. Findings The literature on community archives' information work shows considerable geographical (six continents), topical, and (inter)disciplinary variety. This paper first explores scholars' efforts to define both community and community archives. Second, it unpacks the ways in which community archives include new stakeholders and new record types and formats even as they leverage alternative archival principles and practices. Third, it discusses community archives as political venues for empowerment, activism, and social justice work. Fourth, this paper delves into the benefits and challenges of partnerships and collaborations with mainstream institutions. Fifth, it documents the obstacles community archives face: not only tensions within and among communities, but also sustainability concerns. Finally, it sets forth six directions for future research. Originality/value This paper is the first systematic review of the community archives literature.
  12. Dewey, S.H.: Foucault's toolbox : use of Foucault's writings in LIS journal literature, 1990-2016 (2020) 0.02
    0.020244677 = product of:
      0.06073403 = sum of:
        0.06073403 = weight(_text_:citation in 5841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06073403 = score(doc=5841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.25904894 = fieldWeight in 5841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5841)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose To provide a close, detailed analysis of the frequency, nature, and depth of visible use of Michel Foucault's works by library and information science/studies (LIS) scholars. Design/methodology/approach The study conducted extensive full-text searches in a large number of electronically available LIS journal databases to find citations of Foucault's works, then examined each cited article to evaluate the nature and depth of use. Findings Most uses of Foucault are brief or in passing. In-depth explorations of Foucault's works are comparatively rare and relatively little-used by other LIS scholars. Yet the relatively brief uses of Foucault encompass a wide array of different topics spread across a wide spectrum of LIS journal literature. Research limitations/implications The study was limited to articles from particular relatively prominent LIS journals. Results might vary if different journals or non-journal literature were studied. More sophisticated bibliometric techniques might reveal different relative performance among journals and might better test, confirm, or reject various patterns and relationships found here. Other research approaches, such as discourse analysis, social network analysis, or scholar interviews, might reveal patterns of use and influence not visible in this literature sample. Originality/value This intensive study of both quality and quantity of citations may challenge some existing assumptions regarding citation analysis, plus illuminating Foucault scholarship. It also indicates possible problems for future application of artificial intelligence (AI) approaches to similar depth-of-use studies.
  13. Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval (2008) 0.02
    0.018063724 = product of:
      0.054191172 = sum of:
        0.054191172 = product of:
          0.108382344 = sum of:
            0.108382344 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108382344 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:01:26
  14. Morris, S.A.: Mapping research specialties (2008) 0.02
    0.018063724 = product of:
      0.054191172 = sum of:
        0.054191172 = product of:
          0.108382344 = sum of:
            0.108382344 = weight(_text_:22 in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108382344 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 9:30:22
  15. Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006) 0.02
    0.018063724 = product of:
      0.054191172 = sum of:
        0.054191172 = product of:
          0.108382344 = sum of:
            0.108382344 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108382344 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:22:28
  16. Metz, A.: Community service : a bibliography (1996) 0.02
    0.018063724 = product of:
      0.054191172 = sum of:
        0.054191172 = product of:
          0.108382344 = sum of:
            0.108382344 = weight(_text_:22 in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108382344 = score(doc=5341,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    17.10.1996 14:22:33
  17. Belkin, N.J.; Croft, W.B.: Retrieval techniques (1987) 0.02
    0.018063724 = product of:
      0.054191172 = sum of:
        0.054191172 = product of:
          0.108382344 = sum of:
            0.108382344 = weight(_text_:22 in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108382344 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.109-145
  18. Smith, L.C.: Artificial intelligence and information retrieval (1987) 0.02
    0.018063724 = product of:
      0.054191172 = sum of:
        0.054191172 = product of:
          0.108382344 = sum of:
            0.108382344 = weight(_text_:22 in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108382344 = score(doc=335,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.41-77
  19. Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987) 0.02
    0.018063724 = product of:
      0.054191172 = sum of:
        0.054191172 = product of:
          0.108382344 = sum of:
            0.108382344 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108382344 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
  20. Grudin, J.: Human-computer interaction (2011) 0.02
    0.015805759 = product of:
      0.047417276 = sum of:
        0.047417276 = product of:
          0.09483455 = sum of:
            0.09483455 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09483455 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04999695 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    27.12.2014 18:54:22