Search (110 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. White, H.: Examining scientific vocabulary : mapping controlled vocabularies with free text keywords (2013) 0.05 
    0.047945403 = product of:
  0.1438362 = sum of:
    0.1438362 = sum of:
      0.08964503 = weight(_text_:reports in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08964503 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04999695 = queryNorm
          0.39809695 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
      0.054191172 = weight(_text_:22 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054191172 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04999695 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Scientific repositories create a new environment for studying traditional information science issues. The interaction between indexing terms provided by users and controlled vocabularies continues to be an area of debate and study. This article reports and analyzes findings from a study that mapped the relationships between free text keywords and controlled vocabulary terms used in the sciences. Based on this study's findings recommendations are made about which vocabularies may be better to use in scientific data repositories.
    Date
    29. 5.2015 19:09:22
  2. Clemson, P.A.: ¬An inside approach to a networked document cataloging (1997) 0.04 
    0.040082417 = product of:
  0.12024725 = sum of:
    0.12024725 = weight(_text_:citation in 702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12024725 = score(doc=702,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04999695 = queryNorm
        0.51289076 = fieldWeight in 702, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=702)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Information professions identified the need for a set of standard metadata almost as soon as the WWW became a reality. Several initiatives have already identified the types of bibliographic information that would be necessary to describe and locate an electronic publication. The descriptors identified in the OCLC/NCSA Dublin Core are combined with those assembled by the Coalition of Networked Information and the Internet Engineering Task force to produce a list of electronic citation elements. Advocates embedding these citation elements within electrinic documents through the use of HTML<META>tags and other markup techniques. There is also a call to cataloguing librarians to contribute their expertise in information resources management to document being prepared for the WWW in order to influence the quality of electronic publication from the insides
  3. Zavalina, O.; Palmer, C.L.; Jackson, A.S.; Han, M.-J.: Assessing descriptive substance in free-text collection-level metadata (2008) 0.04 
    0.03595905 = product of:
  0.10787715 = sum of:
    0.10787715 = sum of:
      0.06723377 = weight(_text_:reports in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06723377 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04999695 = queryNorm
          0.29857272 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
      0.04064338 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04064338 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04999695 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Collection-level metadata has the potential to provide important information about the features and purpose of individual collections. This paper reports on a content analysis of collection records in an aggregation of cultural heritage collections. The findings show that the free-text Description field often provides more accurate and complete representation of subjects and object types than the specified fields. Properties such as importance, uniqueness, comprehensiveness, provenance, and creator are articulated, as well as other vital contextual information about the intentions of a collector and the value of a collection, as a whole, for scholarly users. The results demonstrate that the semantically rich free-text Description field is essential to understanding the context of collections in large aggregations and can serve as a source of data for enhancing and customizing controlled vocabularies.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  4. Wessel, C.: "Publishing and sharing your metadata application profile" : 2. SCHEMAS-Workshop in Bonn (2001) 0.03 
    0.0301614 = product of:
  0.090484194 = sum of:
    0.090484194 = sum of:
      0.06338861 = weight(_text_:reports in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06338861 = score(doc=5650,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04999695 = queryNorm
          0.28149706 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
      0.027095586 = weight(_text_:22 in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027095586 = score(doc=5650,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04999695 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Immer mehr Institutionen erkennen die Bedeutung von Metadaten für die Auffindung elektronischer Dokumente und entwickeln ihr eigenes, domain-spezifisches Application Profile. Sie wählen aus einem bereits existierenden Set von Metadaten ein für ihre Bedürfnisse passendes Subset aus, fügen lokale Ergänzungen hinzu und passen die Definitionen an. Um andere über die eigenen Anwendungen zu informieren, ist es sinnvoll, die jeweiligen Application Profiles zu veröffentlichen. Dadurch wird eine Nachnutzung ermöglicht und neuen Anwendern die Entwicklung eigener Profile erleichtert. Weitere Vorteile wären eine Standardisierung der Metadatenelemente und -formate und Erhöhung der Interoperabilität. In diesem Kontext entstehende Fragen wurden auf dem 2. SCHEMAS-Workshop diskutiert, der vom 23. bis 24. November 2000 in Bonn stattfand. Die einzelnen Vorträge finden sich unter <http://lwww. schemas-forum.org/workshops/ws2/Programme.htm/>. SCHEMAS1 ist die Bezeichnung für ein "Forum for Metadata Schema Implementors". Dieses EU-Projekt wird getragen von Makx Dekkers (PricewaterhouseCoopers), Tom Baker (GMD) und Rachel Heery (UKOLN). In seiner Einführung erläuterte Makx Dekkers die Ziele von SCHEMAS: Da es viele verschiedene Schemes zur Beschreibung von Internet-Ressourcen gibt, wächst die Notwendigkeit der Entwicklung von Standards zur Vermeidung von Doppelarbeit und Konfusion. SCHEMAS stellt Informationen bereit (Metadata Watch Reports, Standards Framework Reports, Guidelines), veranstaltet Workshops und entwickelt ein Registry, in dem Metadatenprofile gesammelt werden sollen. Dadurch sollen Anwender von Metadatenformaten über den Status und neue Entwicklungen im Bereich Metadaten informiert werden. Über die Definition des Begriffs Application Profile war bereits beim 8. Workshop der Dublin Core Metadata Initiative in Ottawa im Oktober2 diskutiert worden. Rachel Heery legte nun folgende Definition vor: In einem "Namespace Schema" werden neue Elemente genannt und definiert, so dass ein standardisiertes Set entsteht. Ein "Application Profile" nutzt bereits vorhandene Elemente aus einem oder mehreren Namespace Schemas nach und optimiert diese für eine bestimmte Anwendung. Da die Zahl der Namespaces und Application Profiles ständig zunimmt, ist es sinnvoll, sie an einer zentralen Stelle zu registrieren. Diese Zentralstelle will das SCHEMAS Registry werden. Tom Baker beschrieb dessen Funktion mit einem Vergleich aus der Linguistik: Metadaten sind eine Sprache, Registries das Wörterbuch. Wie ein Wörterbuch, so hat auch ein Registry zwei Aufgaben: Es beschreibt Sprache anhand von Gebrauchsbeispielen und schreibt diesen Gebrauch vor, indem es Empfehlungen gibt (describe and prescribe). Dadurch entsteht ein Standard für diese Sprache
    Date
    11. 3.2001 17:10:22
  5. Nichols introduces MARCit (1998) 0.02 
    0.022411257 = product of:
  0.06723377 = sum of:
    0.06723377 = product of:
      0.13446754 = sum of:
        0.13446754 = weight(_text_:reports in 1438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13446754 = score(doc=1438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.59714544 = fieldWeight in 1438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1438)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Reports the release of MARCit, a software package that enables the cataloguing of Internet resources into MARC format bibliographic records
  6. Guidarelli, N.M.: Subject data in the metadata record (2000) 0.02 
    0.022411257 = product of:
  0.06723377 = sum of:
    0.06723377 = product of:
      0.13446754 = sum of:
        0.13446754 = weight(_text_:reports in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13446754 = score(doc=439,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.59714544 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Reports on a discussion forum of the ALCTS SAC Subcommittee on metadata and subject analysis
  7. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.02 
    0.019159475 = product of:
  0.057478424 = sum of:
    0.057478424 = product of:
      0.11495685 = sum of:
        0.11495685 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11495685 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  8. Chivers, A.; Feather, J.: ¬The management of digital data : a metadata approach (1998) 0.02 
    0.018676046 = product of:
  0.05602814 = sum of:
    0.05602814 = product of:
      0.11205628 = sum of:
        0.11205628 = weight(_text_:reports in 2363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11205628 = score(doc=2363,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.49762118 = fieldWeight in 2363, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2363)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Reports on a research study, conducted at the Department of Information and Library Studies, Loughborough University, to investigate the potential of metadata for universal data management and explore the attitudes of UK information professionals to these issues
  9. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.02 
    0.018063724 = product of:
  0.054191172 = sum of:
    0.054191172 = product of:
      0.108382344 = sum of:
        0.108382344 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.108382344 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
  10. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02 
    0.018063724 = product of:
  0.054191172 = sum of:
    0.054191172 = product of:
      0.108382344 = sum of:
        0.108382344 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.108382344 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  11. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.02 
    0.015805759 = product of:
  0.047417276 = sum of:
    0.047417276 = product of:
      0.09483455 = sum of:
        0.09483455 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09483455 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
  12. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02 
    0.015805759 = product of:
  0.047417276 = sum of:
    0.047417276 = product of:
      0.09483455 = sum of:
        0.09483455 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09483455 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  13. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.02 
    0.015805759 = product of:
  0.047417276 = sum of:
    0.047417276 = product of:
      0.09483455 = sum of:
        0.09483455 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09483455 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  14. Younger, J.A.: Resources description in the digital age (1997) 0.01 
    0.014940838 = product of:
  0.044822514 = sum of:
    0.044822514 = product of:
      0.08964503 = sum of:
        0.08964503 = weight(_text_:reports in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08964503 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.39809695 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Describes the evolving ways of making documents and document like objects bibliographically accessible by the library cataloguing community and reports initiatives. Includes: definition of a basic set of data elements known as the Dublin Core; examination of library cataloguing objectives and record structures; proposals for persistent addresses for resources; and support for the idea of data registry to facilitate interoperability among metadata schemes
  15. Popham, M.: Resource discovery metadata for electronic texts and linguistic corpora (1997) 0.01 
    0.014940838 = product of:
  0.044822514 = sum of:
    0.044822514 = product of:
      0.08964503 = sum of:
        0.08964503 = weight(_text_:reports in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08964503 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.39809695 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Reports on a workshop convened by the Oxford Text Archiuve, UK, which focussed on identifying the metadata essential to finding electronic texts of interest to those working in the fields of literary and linguistic studies, encompassing texts of every type and period. Makes recommendations for changes to the Dublin Core metadata format to enable better resource discovery
  16. Brattli, T.: Fagreferentkonferansen 1998 : nettbaserte bibliotektjenester (1998) 0.01 
    0.014940838 = product of:
  0.044822514 = sum of:
    0.044822514 = product of:
      0.08964503 = sum of:
        0.08964503 = weight(_text_:reports in 3001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08964503 = score(doc=3001,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.39809695 = fieldWeight in 3001, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3001)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Reports on the conference arranged by Tromso University Library in March 1998. O. Husby described BIBSYS Digital Library, a project aimed at collections, coordinated access to external collections, and integration with the BIBSYS database. H. Geleijnse outlined Tilburg University Library's digital document services. L. Longva presented Tromso University Library, and J.E. Roed Oslo University's new library. J. Hakala described the Nordic Metadata Project. Representatives from journal agents, publishers and libraries discussed electronic journals
  17. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.01 
    0.013547793 = product of:
  0.04064338 = sum of:
    0.04064338 = product of:
      0.08128676 = sum of:
        0.08128676 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08128676 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  18. Greenberg, J.: Theoretical considerations of lifecycle modeling : an analysis of the Dryad Repository demonstrating automatic metadata propagation, inheritance, and value system adoption (2009) 0.01 
    0.013205959 = product of:
  0.039617877 = sum of:
    0.039617877 = product of:
      0.079235755 = sum of:
        0.079235755 = weight(_text_:reports in 2990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079235755 = score(doc=2990,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.3518713 = fieldWeight in 2990, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2990)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The Dryad repository is for data supporting published research in the field of evolutionary biology and related disciplines. Dryad development team members seek a theoretical framework to aid communication about metadata issues and plans. This article explores lifecycle modeling as a theoretical framework for understanding metadata in the repostiroy enivornment. A background discussion reviews the importance of theory, the status of a metadata theory, and lifecycle concepts. An analysis draws examples from the Dryad repository demonstrating automatic propagation, metadata inheritance, and value system adoption, and reports results from a faceted term mapping experiment that included 12 vocabularies and approximately 600 terms. The article also reports selected key findings from a recent survey on the data-sharing attitudes and behaviors of nearly 400 evolutionary biologists. Te results confirm the applicability of lifecycle modeling to Dryad's metadata infrastructure. The article concludes that lifecycle modeling provides a theoretical framework that can enhance our understanding of metadata, aid communication about the topic of metadata in the repository environment, and potentially help sustain robust repository development.
  19. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Who dunnit? : Metatags and hyperauthorship (2001) 0.01 
    0.013073232 = product of:
  0.039219696 = sum of:
    0.039219696 = product of:
      0.07843939 = sum of:
        0.07843939 = weight(_text_:reports in 6031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07843939 = score(doc=6031,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.34833482 = fieldWeight in 6031, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6031)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Multiple authorship is a topic of growing concern in a number of scientific domains. When, as is increasingly common, scholarly articles and clinical reports have scores or even hundreds of authors-what Cronin (in press) has termed "hyperauthorship" -the precise nature of each individual's contribution is often masked. A notation that describes collaborators' contributions and allows those contributions to be tracked in, and across, texts (and over time) offers a solution. Such a notation should be useful, easy to use, and acceptable to communities of scientists. Drawing on earlier work, we present a proposal for an XML-like "contribution" mark-up, and discuss the potential benefits and possible drawbacks
  20. Chan, L.M.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; O'Neill, E.T.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: ¬A faceted approach to subject data in the Dublin Core metadata record (2001) 0.01 
    0.013073232 = product of:
  0.039219696 = sum of:
    0.039219696 = product of:
      0.07843939 = sum of:
        0.07843939 = weight(_text_:reports in 6109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07843939 = score(doc=6109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.34833482 = fieldWeight in 6109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6109)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This article describes FAST, the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology, a project at OCLC to make Library of Congress Subject Headings easier to use in Dublin Core metadata by breaking out facets of space, time, and form. Work on FAST can be watched at its web site, http://www.miskatonic.org/library/, which has recent presentations and reports. It is interesting to see facets and Dublin Core combined, though both LCSH and FAST subject headings are beyond what most people making a small faceted classification would want or need.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 98
  • d 9
  • dk 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 102
  • el 11
  • s 5
  • b 2
  • m 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications