-
Hodge, G.M.: Automated support to indexing (1992)
0.04
0.041952223 = product of:
0.12585667 = sum of:
0.12585667 = sum of:
0.07843939 = weight(_text_:reports in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07843939 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.34833482 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
0.047417276 = weight(_text_:22 in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047417276 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Automated support to indexing forms a continuum from computer support to clerical activities, quality control, intellectual activities and to full automatic indexing. Describes the current indexing environment and examines the need for automated support. Reports on case studies of various indexing services which are at different stages along the continuum. Describes academic and corporate research projects and commercial indexing software. Examines the future of related technologies and offers advice on how to get started on the continuum
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIS 44(1993) no.2, S.119-121 (B.H. Weinberg); International cataloguing and bibliographic control 22(1993) no.2, S.34 (E. Svenonius); Information processing and management 29(1993) no.4, S.528-531 (L.L.Hill)
-
Dixon, Y.: Indexing for children (1996)
0.02
0.021129537 = product of:
0.06338861 = sum of:
0.06338861 = product of:
0.12677722 = sum of:
0.12677722 = weight(_text_:reports in 6937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12677722 = score(doc=6937,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.5629941 = fieldWeight in 6937, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6937)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In a survey of children's informative books only 58% were found to have indexes. Describes work carried out to produce indexes for a set of primary school books. Reports the views of librarians' and publishers' on children's indexes. A worksheet was devised for investigating children's use of indexes. Reports children's reactions to this. Sets ot standards in the UK National Curriculum relating to indexing. Outlines principles for indexing for children
-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.02
0.018063724 = product of:
0.054191172 = sum of:
0.054191172 = product of:
0.108382344 = sum of:
0.108382344 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.108382344 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
-
Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001)
0.02
0.018063724 = product of:
0.054191172 = sum of:
0.054191172 = product of:
0.108382344 = sum of:
0.108382344 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.108382344 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
-
Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000)
0.02
0.018063724 = product of:
0.054191172 = sum of:
0.054191172 = product of:
0.108382344 = sum of:
0.108382344 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.108382344 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
-
Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001)
0.02
0.018063724 = product of:
0.054191172 = sum of:
0.054191172 = product of:
0.108382344 = sum of:
0.108382344 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.108382344 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
-
Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978)
0.02
0.015805759 = product of:
0.047417276 = sum of:
0.047417276 = product of:
0.09483455 = sum of:
0.09483455 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09483455 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.02
0.015805759 = product of:
0.047417276 = sum of:
0.047417276 = product of:
0.09483455 = sum of:
0.09483455 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09483455 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001)
0.02
0.015805759 = product of:
0.047417276 = sum of:
0.047417276 = product of:
0.09483455 = sum of:
0.09483455 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09483455 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.02
0.015805759 = product of:
0.047417276 = sum of:
0.047417276 = product of:
0.09483455 = sum of:
0.09483455 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09483455 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000)
0.02
0.015805759 = product of:
0.047417276 = sum of:
0.047417276 = product of:
0.09483455 = sum of:
0.09483455 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09483455 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
-
Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000)
0.02
0.015805759 = product of:
0.047417276 = sum of:
0.047417276 = product of:
0.09483455 = sum of:
0.09483455 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09483455 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
-
Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001)
0.02
0.015805759 = product of:
0.047417276 = sum of:
0.047417276 = product of:
0.09483455 = sum of:
0.09483455 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09483455 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001)
0.02
0.015805759 = product of:
0.047417276 = sum of:
0.047417276 = product of:
0.09483455 = sum of:
0.09483455 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09483455 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004)
0.02
0.015805759 = product of:
0.047417276 = sum of:
0.047417276 = product of:
0.09483455 = sum of:
0.09483455 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09483455 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 17.10.2005 13:54:22
-
Imholtz, A.A.: Indexer nascitur, not fit : Lewis Carroll as indexer again (1996)
0.01
0.014940838 = product of:
0.044822514 = sum of:
0.044822514 = product of:
0.08964503 = sum of:
0.08964503 = weight(_text_:reports in 6935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08964503 = score(doc=6935,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.39809695 = fieldWeight in 6935, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6935)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The author Lewis Carroll produced humorous indexes to his late novels, childhood magazines, and to Tennyson's poem 'In Memoriam'. He also produced an indexing system for his personal correspondence. Details the procedure he followed in this letter register and reports on a study of it which shows that he employed, in embryonic form, 20th century database concepts
-
Lavallee, C.: Indexation manuelle et indexation assistee par ordinateur : comparison de la performance de deux index d'une monographie (1996)
0.01
0.014940838 = product of:
0.044822514 = sum of:
0.044822514 = product of:
0.08964503 = sum of:
0.08964503 = weight(_text_:reports in 740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08964503 = score(doc=740,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.39809695 = fieldWeight in 740, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=740)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reports an experiment, conducted in Mar 95 in the context of a course at the School of Library and Information Science at the University of Montreal, which evaluates the information retrieval capabilities of a manual index and a semi automated index developed according to the Bennion method. The application of a formula developed by Bennion shows that the indexes are almost identical
-
Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992)
0.01
0.013547793 = product of:
0.04064338 = sum of:
0.04064338 = product of:
0.08128676 = sum of:
0.08128676 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08128676 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)
-
Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999)
0.01
0.013547793 = product of:
0.04064338 = sum of:
0.04064338 = product of:
0.08128676 = sum of:
0.08128676 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08128676 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
-
Odini, C.: ¬The performance of manual indexes and online databases in information retrieval (1994)
0.01
0.013073232 = product of:
0.039219696 = sum of:
0.039219696 = product of:
0.07843939 = sum of:
0.07843939 = weight(_text_:reports in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07843939 = score(doc=949,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.34833482 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reports a comparative study carried out at Sheffield University to compare the performance of 2 manual indexes and 3 related online databases in the retrieval of records in the technological subject of: Cathodic protection of concrete structures. The manual sources were: Engineering Index and Current Technology Index; and the online databases were: COMPENDEX, NTIS and SCISEARCH. Performance was measured in terms of relative recall and prescision. While online searches showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources still manifested some qualities which render them valuable. Emphasizes the selection of databases on the basis of a compromise between high recall and high precision, and ultimately between both of these factors and cost
