-
Tartaglia, S.: ¬La sintassi delle stringhe di soggetto : metodo e principi (1997)
0.05
0.045808475 = product of:
0.13742542 = sum of:
0.13742542 = weight(_text_:citation in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13742542 = score(doc=1169,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.58616084 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Gives an account of the theoretical work underpinning the development of subject heading schemes for Italian libraries, as developed by the GRIS collaborative project of Italian research and academic libraries. Discusses semantic categories and principles of citation, rules for the syntax of subject headings, and logica syntactic principles for citation order
-
Prasher, R.G.: Index and indexing (1990)
0.04
0.040489353 = product of:
0.12146806 = sum of:
0.12146806 = weight(_text_:citation in 4777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12146806 = score(doc=4777,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.5180979 = fieldWeight in 4777, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4777)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reviews the evolution of subject indexing techniques such as: Chain indexing; POPSI; PRECIS, post-coordinate indexing; keyword indexing; and citation indexing. Specific developments that have taken place in India are reviewed
-
Duncan, D.: IFLA Core Programme for Universal Bibliographic Control and International MARC (UBCIM) and Division of Bibliographic Control reports on activities 1994-1995 : Section on Classification and Indexing (1996)
0.01
0.014940838 = product of:
0.044822514 = sum of:
0.044822514 = product of:
0.08964503 = sum of:
0.08964503 = weight(_text_:reports in 4927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08964503 = score(doc=4927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.39809695 = fieldWeight in 4927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4927)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Gnoli, C.: Knowledge organization in Italy (2004)
0.01
0.014171274 = product of:
0.04251382 = sum of:
0.04251382 = weight(_text_:citation in 3750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04251382 = score(doc=3750,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.18133426 = fieldWeight in 3750, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3750)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- "Subject headings Many Italian libraries create subject headings for their catalogues, using as a reference guide the "Soggettario per i catalogui delle biblioteche italiane." This is basically a list of subject terms created by the Biblioteca nazionale centrale di Firenze (BNCF), first published in 1956 and later updated with various lists of new subject headings. Though the Soggettario is still the main available reference, librarians are generally aware that it is outdated in both vocabulary and structure, especially as it does not provide explicit principles and rules to create and combine subject headings. A research group, called the Gruppo di ricerca sull'indicizzazione per soggetto (GRIS), was founded in 1990. It was devoted to improving the principles and consistency of subject indexing. Its members have performed in depth investigations of the structure of subject headings, starting with the principles of facet analysis used in PRECIS and including original developments. Results of their work are coded into the Guida all'indicizzazione per soggetto, published in 1996 and available also online <http:// wwwaib.it/aib/commiss/gris/gulda.htm>. The GRIS guide does not concern vocabulary, but morphological and syntactical rules for choosing and combining terms according to a sound citation order, based an a "role scheme." Unfortunately, GRIS principles have been applied only in a small number of libraries, mainly in Tuscany, rohere most GRIS members are located. A new project is now attempting to blend the traditional authority of the Soggettario with the more advanced principles of GRIS. A working group has been formed with people from BNCF, GRIS, and others, to study the feasibility of a renewal of the Soggettario. The group produced a report book in 2002, specifying the desirable features of the new system, and is at present searching for grants to implement it.
-
Chan, L.M.: Library of Congress Subject Headings : principles and application (1995)
0.01
0.013547793 = product of:
0.04064338 = sum of:
0.04064338 = product of:
0.08128676 = sum of:
0.08128676 = weight(_text_:22 in 3985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08128676 = score(doc=3985,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3985, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3985)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 25.11.2005 18:37:22
-
Nuovo soggettario : guida al sistema italiano di indicizzazione per soggetto, prototipo del thesaurus (2007)
0.01
0.011452119 = product of:
0.034356356 = sum of:
0.034356356 = weight(_text_:citation in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034356356 = score(doc=664,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.14654021 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- An entry is structured so as to present all the essential elements of the indexing system. For each term are given: category, facet, related terms, Dewey interdisciplinary class number and, if necessary; definition or scope notes. Sources used are referenced (an appendix in the book lists those used in the current work). Historical notes indicate whenever a change of term has occurred, thus smoothing the transition from the old lists. In chapter 5, the longest one, detailed instructions with practical examples show how to create entries and how to relate terms; upper relationships must always be complete, right up to the top term, whereas hierarchies of related terms not yet fully developed may remain unfinished. Subject string construction consists in a double operation: analysis and synthesis. The former is the analysis of logical functions performed by single concepts in the definition of the subject (e.g., transitive actions, object, agent, etc.) or in syntactic relationships (transitive relationships and belonging relationship), so that each term for those concepts is assigned its role (e.g., key concept, transitive element, agent, instrument, etc.) in the subject string, where the core is distinct from the complementary roles (e.g., place, time, form, etc.). Synthesis is based on a scheme of nuclear and complementary roles, and citation order follows agreed-upon principles of one-to-one relationships and logical dependence. There is no standard citation order based on facets, in a categorial logic, but a flexible one, although thorough. For example, it is possible for a time term (subdivision) to precede an action term, when the former is related to the latter as the object of action: "Arazzi - Sec. 16.-17. - Restauro" [Tapestry - 16th-17th century - Restoration] (p. 126). So, even with more complex subjects, it is possible to produce perfectly readable strings covering the whole of the subject matter without splitting it into two incomplete and complementary headings. To this end, some unusual connectives are adopted, giving the strings a more discursive style.
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Structured abstracts in the social sciences : presentation, readability and recall (1995)
0.01
0.0112056285 = product of:
0.033616886 = sum of:
0.033616886 = product of:
0.06723377 = sum of:
0.06723377 = weight(_text_:reports in 2383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06723377 = score(doc=2383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.29857272 = fieldWeight in 2383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2383)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study to explore the possibilities of extending the use of structured abstracts (which use subheadings such as background, aims, participants method, results, conclusions) of the type often found in biomedical periodicals; to test whether or not such structured abstracts are more easily searched, comprehended and recalled than abstracts set in the traditional manner; and to examine readers' preferences for different typographic settings for structured abstracts. Results indicated: that it is possible to produce structured abstracts for periodical articles in the social sciences; and that such abstracts may be easier to read, search and recall than abstracts presented in the traditional manner. Suggests that abstracts use 6 subheadings (background, aims, method, results, conclusions, and, optionally, comment) and recommends that these subheadings are conveyed in bold capital letters and, ideally, set apart from the main text by printer's rules
-
Bodoff, D.; Kambil, A.: Partial coordination : II. A preliminary evaluation and failure analysis (1998)
0.01
0.0112056285 = product of:
0.033616886 = sum of:
0.033616886 = product of:
0.06723377 = sum of:
0.06723377 = weight(_text_:reports in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06723377 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.29857272 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Partial coordination is a new method for cataloging documents for subject access. It is especially designed to enhance the precision of document searches in online environments. This article reports a preliminary evaluation of partial coordination that shows promising results compared with full-text retrieval. We also report the difficulties in empirically evaluating the effectiveness of automatic full-text retrieval in contrast to mixed methods such as partial coordination which combine human cataloging with computerized retrieval. Based on our study, we propose research in this area will substantially benefit from a common framework for failure analysis and a common data set. This will allow information retrieval researchers adapting 'library style'cataloging to large electronic document collections, as well as those developing automated or mixed methods, to directly compare their proposals for indexing and retrieval. This article concludes by suggesting guidelines for constructing such as testbed
-
Yi, K.; Chan, L.M.: Revisiting the syntactical and structural analysis of Library of Congress Subject Headings for the digital environment (2010)
0.01
0.0112056285 = product of:
0.033616886 = sum of:
0.033616886 = product of:
0.06723377 = sum of:
0.06723377 = weight(_text_:reports in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06723377 = score(doc=3431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.29857272 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- With the current information environment characterized by the proliferation of digital resources, including collaboratively created and shared resources, Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) is facing the challenges of effective and efficient subject-based organization and retrieval of digital resources. To explore the feasibility of utilizing LCSH in a digital environment, we might need to revisit its basic characteristics. The objectives of our study were to analyze LCSH in both syntactic and relational structures, to discover the structural characteristics of LCSH, and to identify problems and issues for the feasibility of LCSH as an effective subject access tool. This study reports and discusses issues raised by the syntactic and hierarchical structures of LCSH that present challenges to its use in a networked environment. Given the results of this study, we recommend a number of provisional future directions for the development of LCSH towards further becoming a viable system for digital and networked resources.
-
(Sears') List of Subject Headings (1994)
0.01
0.007902879 = product of:
0.023708638 = sum of:
0.023708638 = product of:
0.047417276 = sum of:
0.047417276 = weight(_text_:22 in 3789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047417276 = score(doc=3789,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3789, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3789)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.45-46 (M.P. Satija)
-
Studwell, W.E.: Why not an 'AACR' for subject headings? (1985)
0.01
0.007902879 = product of:
0.023708638 = sum of:
0.023708638 = product of:
0.047417276 = sum of:
0.047417276 = weight(_text_:22 in 363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047417276 = score(doc=363,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 363, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=363)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 13:22:01
-
Hearn, S.: Comparing catalogs : currency and consistency of controlled headings (2009)
0.01
0.007902879 = product of:
0.023708638 = sum of:
0.023708638 = product of:
0.047417276 = sum of:
0.047417276 = weight(_text_:22 in 3600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047417276 = score(doc=3600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3600)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996)
0.01
0.0067738965 = product of:
0.02032169 = sum of:
0.02032169 = product of:
0.04064338 = sum of:
0.04064338 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04064338 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
-
(Sears') List of Subject Headings (1997)
0.01
0.0067738965 = product of:
0.02032169 = sum of:
0.02032169 = product of:
0.04064338 = sum of:
0.04064338 = weight(_text_:22 in 3788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04064338 = score(doc=3788,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3788, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3788)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vorgänger: 'List of Subject Headings for small libraries, compiled from lists used in nine representative small libraries', Ed.: M.E. Sears. - 1st ed. 1923. - 2nd ed. 1926. - 3rd ed. 1933. - 4th ed. 1939, Ed.: I.S. Monro. - 5th ed. 1944: 'Sears List of Subject Headings', Ed. I. S. Monro. - 6th ed. 1950, Ed.: B.M. Frick. - 7th ed. 1954 - 8th ed. 1959. - 'List of Subject Headings'. - 9th. ed. 1965, Ed.: B.M. Westby. - 10th ed. 1972. - 11th ed. 1977. - 12th ed. 1982. - 13th ed. 1986, Ed.: C. Rovira u. C. Reyes. - 14th ed. 1991. Ed. M.T. Mooney. - 15th ed. 1994, Ed.: J. Miller // Rez. 15th ed.: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.45-46 (M.P. Satija)
-
MacEwan, A.: Crossing language barriers in Europe : Linking LCSH to other subject heading languages (2000)
0.01
0.0067738965 = product of:
0.02032169 = sum of:
0.02032169 = product of:
0.04064338 = sum of:
0.04064338 = weight(_text_:22 in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04064338 = score(doc=5618,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 27. 5.2001 16:22:10
-
Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.: Entering the millennium : a new century for LCSH (2000)
0.01
0.0067738965 = product of:
0.02032169 = sum of:
0.02032169 = product of:
0.04064338 = sum of:
0.04064338 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04064338 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 27. 5.2001 16:22:21
-
O'Neill, E.T.; Chan, L.M.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; El-Hoshy, L.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Form subdivisions : their identification and use in LCSH (2001)
0.01
0.0067738965 = product of:
0.02032169 = sum of:
0.02032169 = product of:
0.04064338 = sum of:
0.04064338 = weight(_text_:22 in 2205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04064338 = score(doc=2205,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2205, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2205)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Anderson, J.D.; Pérez-Carballo, J.: Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) (2009)
0.01
0.0067738965 = product of:
0.02032169 = sum of:
0.02032169 = product of:
0.04064338 = sum of:
0.04064338 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04064338 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 27. 8.2011 14:22:13
-
Sears' list of subject headings (2018)
0.01
0.0067738965 = product of:
0.02032169 = sum of:
0.02032169 = product of:
0.04064338 = sum of:
0.04064338 = weight(_text_:22 in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04064338 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 21.12.2018 18:22:12
-
Cheti, A.; Viti, E.: Functionality and merits of a faceted thesaurus : the case of the Nuovo soggettario (2023)
0.01
0.0067738965 = product of:
0.02032169 = sum of:
0.02032169 = product of:
0.04064338 = sum of:
0.04064338 = weight(_text_:22 in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04064338 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04999695 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 26.11.2023 18:59:22
