-
Madison, O.M:A.: ¬The role of the name main-entry heading in the online environment (1992)
0.05
0.04965986 = product of:
0.07448979 = sum of:
0.021237973 = weight(_text_:of in 4397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021237973 = score(doc=4397,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4397, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4397)
0.05325181 = product of:
0.10650362 = sum of:
0.10650362 = weight(_text_:22 in 4397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10650362 = score(doc=4397,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4397, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4397)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Serials librarian. 22(1992), S.371-391
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.04
0.04244388 = product of:
0.063665815 = sum of:
0.026011098 = weight(_text_:of in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026011098 = score(doc=2845,freq=12.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.037654717 = product of:
0.07530943 = sum of:
0.07530943 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07530943 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996)
0.04
0.03777396 = product of:
0.056660935 = sum of:
0.03003503 = weight(_text_:of in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03003503 = score(doc=6732,freq=16.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
0.026625905 = product of:
0.05325181 = sum of:
0.05325181 = weight(_text_:22 in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05325181 = score(doc=6732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Considers the problem of applying standard concepts of cataloguing and bibliographic control to electronic media by studying the degree of fit between the Standford Integrated Digital Library Project (SDLP) and both the USMARC format and the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI). Notes the lack of fit of both USMARC and TEI but stresses the advantages of the latter due its lack of dependency on 3 digit tags and its use of SGML conventions
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
-
Gatti, T.H.: Utilization of students as cataloging assistants at carnegie category I institution libraries (2005)
0.04
0.03777396 = product of:
0.056660935 = sum of:
0.03003503 = weight(_text_:of in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03003503 = score(doc=43,freq=16.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
0.026625905 = product of:
0.05325181 = sum of:
0.05325181 = weight(_text_:22 in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05325181 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A survey of 261 libraries was undertaken to determine the level of use of and duties performed by student assistants in monographic cataloging operations. Ninety-five of 142 responding libraries (64.1 percent) indicate that they use student assistants for some type of monographic cataloging tasks. These tasks are downloading of bibliographic and authority records, monographic cataloging, classification, subject heading authority control, holdings, database maintenance, and editing of 246 or 505 MARC tags. Some respondents expressed reluctance to use student assistants for higher-level cataloging tasks.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Seminario FRBR : Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: reguisiti funzionali per record bibliografici, Florence, 27-28 January 2000, Proceedings (2000)
0.04
0.037515447 = product of:
0.056273166 = sum of:
0.022990782 = weight(_text_:of in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022990782 = score(doc=3948,freq=6.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
0.033282384 = product of:
0.06656477 = sum of:
0.06656477 = weight(_text_:22 in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06656477 = score(doc=3948,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Enthält u.a.: Grimaldi, T.: The object of cataloguing; Byrum, J.D., O.M.A. Madison: Reflections an the goals, concepts and recommendations of the IFLA study an Functional Requirements of Bibliographic Records;
- Date
- 29. 8.2005 12:54:22
-
Languages of the world : cataloguing issues and problems (1993)
0.04
0.037244894 = product of:
0.055867337 = sum of:
0.01592848 = weight(_text_:of in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01592848 = score(doc=4242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
0.039938856 = product of:
0.07987771 = sum of:
0.07987771 = weight(_text_:22 in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07987771 = score(doc=4242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 15. 6.1996 18:06:22
-
Henze, G.: Weiterentwicklung der RAK (2001)
0.04
0.037244894 = product of:
0.055867337 = sum of:
0.01592848 = weight(_text_:of in 7159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01592848 = score(doc=7159,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 7159, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7159)
0.039938856 = product of:
0.07987771 = sum of:
0.07987771 = weight(_text_:22 in 7159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07987771 = score(doc=7159,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 7159, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7159)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 8.2001 15:46:46
- Footnote
- Mit Abb. "AACR type of publication model"
-
Bourdon, F.: Functional requirements and numbering of authority records (FRANAR) : to what extent can authority control be supported by technical means? (2002)
0.04
0.037244894 = product of:
0.055867337 = sum of:
0.01592848 = weight(_text_:of in 3929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01592848 = score(doc=3929,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 3929, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3929)
0.039938856 = product of:
0.07987771 = sum of:
0.07987771 = weight(_text_:22 in 3929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07987771 = score(doc=3929,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3929, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3929)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 30. 8.2005 9:22:54
-
Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001)
0.04
0.037244894 = product of:
0.055867337 = sum of:
0.01592848 = weight(_text_:of in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01592848 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.039938856 = product of:
0.07987771 = sum of:
0.07987771 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07987771 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
-
Frohnsdorff, G.: Facts? of publication : cataloging problems posed by deceptive information (1999)
0.04
0.036076307 = product of:
0.05411446 = sum of:
0.030816795 = weight(_text_:of in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030816795 = score(doc=108,freq=22.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.023297668 = product of:
0.046595335 = sum of:
0.046595335 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046595335 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- False imprint information and other deceptive publication details present problems for catalogers. In this article, I describe different types of misleading information, including fictitions names of publishers, incorrect places of publication, and false dates; mention possible reasons for deception, including fear of prosecution, and emphasize the need for catalogers to be suspicious when handling certain types of material. Erotic printed materials and bootleg sound recordings are discussed in detail, and examples of misleading information in each medium and explanations of how cataloging rules address or fail to address specific circumstances are included. Catalogers need to be aware of both the potential problems associated with certain types of materials and the types of reference sources to consult when dealing with those materials.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Davis-Brown, B.; Williamson, D.: Cataloging at the Library of Congress in the digital age (1996)
0.04
0.036076307 = product of:
0.05411446 = sum of:
0.030816795 = weight(_text_:of in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030816795 = score(doc=604,freq=22.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
0.023297668 = product of:
0.046595335 = sum of:
0.046595335 = weight(_text_:22 in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046595335 = score(doc=604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The Library of Congress is participating in a number of initiatives to explore issues surrounding description and cataloging of digital materials. Addtionally, programs have been written by LC staff which enable electronic enhancements in cataloging activities, such as the receipt of online information from publishers in the Electronic CIP Program. This paper is both an overview of the status of cataloging-related digital projects at LC and a description of software which facilitates productivity through the provision of software which facilitates productivity through the provision of advanced search capabilities and the elimination of repetitive keying.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.171-196
-
Stalberg, E.; Cronin, C.: Assessing the cost and value of bibliographic control (2011)
0.04
0.036076307 = product of:
0.05411446 = sum of:
0.030816795 = weight(_text_:of in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030816795 = score(doc=2592,freq=22.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
0.023297668 = product of:
0.046595335 = sum of:
0.046595335 = weight(_text_:22 in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046595335 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In June 2009, the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Heads of Technical Services in Large Research Libraries Interest Group established the Task Force on Cost/Value Assessment of Bibliographic Control to address recommendation 5.1.1.1 of On the Record: Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control, which focused on developing measures for costs, benefits, and value of bibliographic control. This paper outlines results of that task force's efforts to develop and articulate metrics for evaluating the cost and value of cataloging activities specifically, and offers some next steps that the community could take to further the profession's collective understanding of the costs and values associated with bibliographic control.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Davies-Brown, B.; Williamson, D.: Cataloging at the Library of Congress in the digital age (1996)
0.04
0.03512022 = product of:
0.05268033 = sum of:
0.029382661 = weight(_text_:of in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029382661 = score(doc=2118,freq=20.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
0.023297668 = product of:
0.046595335 = sum of:
0.046595335 = weight(_text_:22 in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046595335 = score(doc=2118,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The Library of Congress is participating in a number of initiatives to explore issues surrounding description and cataloging of digital materials. Additionally, programs have been written by LC staff which enable electronic enhancements in cataloging activities, such as the receipt of online information from publishers in the Electronic CIP Program. This paper is both an overview of the status of cataloging-related digital projects at LC and a description of software which facilitates productivity through the provision of advanced search capabilities and the elimination of repetitive keying.
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
-
Brunt, R.: Old rules for a new game : Cutter revisited (1998)
0.04
0.03512022 = product of:
0.05268033 = sum of:
0.029382661 = weight(_text_:of in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029382661 = score(doc=771,freq=20.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.023297668 = product of:
0.046595335 = sum of:
0.046595335 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046595335 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- It is contended that while there are considerable numbers of people interested in the application of information retrieval (IR) software on their home computers in their professional, working and recreational activities, they are not very well served in using it to best advantage. Describes the writer's attempts to transfer some of the recorded good practice of the first information managers to contemporary problems. Data input standards devoted to library organisation may be developed to establish a set of principles to encourage the consistent organisation of the entire range of objects which might be represented in databases. Specific areas of difficulty are examined.
- Date
- 24. 1.2007 19:38:22
- Footnote
- Festschrift article to mark the retirement of Douglas Anderson from 24 years at the School of Information and Media, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland
-
Callahan, P.F.: ISBD(S) revised edition and AACR2 1988 revision : a comparison (1992)
0.04
0.035091337 = product of:
0.052637003 = sum of:
0.026011098 = weight(_text_:of in 5993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026011098 = score(doc=5993,freq=12.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 5993, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5993)
0.026625905 = product of:
0.05325181 = sum of:
0.05325181 = weight(_text_:22 in 5993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05325181 = score(doc=5993,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5993, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5993)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Article appearing as part of an issue devoted to the theme, Serials Cataloguing: Modern Perspectives and International Developments. Pt.2. In 1988, a revision of AACR2 and a revised edition of the ISBD for serials were published. Discusses and compares the origins of theses 2 standards and their relationship. Describes the inconsistencies between the 2 texts and evaluates their compatibility. Concludes that there is a high degree of compatability on major points but that relatively little progress has been made since the original editions in reducing the substantial number of minor differences
- Source
- Serials librarian. 22(1992) no.3/4, S.249-262
-
Gorman, M.: Metadata or cataloguing? : a false choice (1999)
0.04
0.035091337 = product of:
0.052637003 = sum of:
0.026011098 = weight(_text_:of in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026011098 = score(doc=6095,freq=12.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.026625905 = product of:
0.05325181 = sum of:
0.05325181 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05325181 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Libraries, their collections, and bibliographic control are essential components of the provision of access to recorded knowledge. Cataloging is a primary method of bibliographic control. Full or traditional cataloging is very expensive, but relying on keyword searching is inadequate. Alternatives for a solution to cataloging needs for electronic resources including the use of metadata and the Dublin Core are examined. Many questions exist regarding the long-term future of today's electronic documents. Recommendations are made for preserving recorded knowledge and information in the electronic resources for future generations
- Source
- Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22
-
Morris, V.: Automated language identification of bibliographic resources (2020)
0.04
0.035091337 = product of:
0.052637003 = sum of:
0.026011098 = weight(_text_:of in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026011098 = score(doc=5749,freq=12.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
0.026625905 = product of:
0.05325181 = sum of:
0.05325181 = weight(_text_:22 in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05325181 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article describes experiments in the use of machine learning techniques at the British Library to assign language codes to catalog records, in order to provide information about the language of content of the resources described. In the first phase of the project, language codes were assigned to 1.15 million records with 99.7% confidence. The automated language identification tools developed will be used to contribute to future enhancement of over 4 million legacy records.
- Date
- 2. 3.2020 19:04:22
-
Caudle, D.M.: Cataloging videotapes (1995)
0.03
0.034702852 = product of:
0.05205428 = sum of:
0.018771894 = weight(_text_:of in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018771894 = score(doc=2635,freq=4.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
0.033282384 = product of:
0.06656477 = sum of:
0.06656477 = weight(_text_:22 in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06656477 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes the process of cataloguing a videotape on OCLC. Considers decisions to make before cataloguing, such as the level of detail required. Describes the OCLC MARC audiovisual format and explains rules for titles and notes
- Date
- 27.11.1995 17:07:22
-
Seymour, C.: Cataloging Internet resources (1996)
0.03
0.034702852 = product of:
0.05205428 = sum of:
0.018771894 = weight(_text_:of in 4679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018771894 = score(doc=4679,freq=4.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 4679, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4679)
0.033282384 = product of:
0.06656477 = sum of:
0.06656477 = weight(_text_:22 in 4679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06656477 = score(doc=4679,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4679, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4679)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes the OCLC project for cataloguing Internet resources, a project aimed at developing rules for electronic material, and as a possible solution for the difficulty of locating materials on the Internet. No attempts is made to catalogue all the resources on the Internet and choice of materials is left to participating libraries
- Source
- Information and librarianship. 22(1996) no.1, S.33-35
-
Dunkle, C.B.: Outsourcing the catalog department : a mediation inspired by the business and library literature (1996)
0.03
0.034702852 = product of:
0.05205428 = sum of:
0.018771894 = weight(_text_:of in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018771894 = score(doc=4907,freq=4.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
0.033282384 = product of:
0.06656477 = sum of:
0.06656477 = weight(_text_:22 in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06656477 = score(doc=4907,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Draws on parallels between outsourcing in business and in libraries to examine the difficulties and implications of outsourcing the catalogue department. Examines why cataloguing, in particular, has received outsourcing attention. 2 major reasons emerge: cataloguing is a non core activity, and catalogue departments are troublesome
- Source
- Journal of academic librarianship. 22(1996) no.1, S.33-43
