Search (154 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Normdateien"
  1. Leth, P.: Subject access - the Swedish approach (2007) 0.04
    0.037244894 = product of:
      0.055867337 = sum of:
        0.01592848 = weight(_text_:of in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01592848 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
        0.039938856 = product of:
          0.07987771 = sum of:
            0.07987771 = weight(_text_:22 in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07987771 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049130294 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  2. Hengel, C.: Mapping name authorities : the Virtual International Authority File (VIAF) (2007) 0.04
    0.037244894 = product of:
      0.055867337 = sum of:
        0.01592848 = weight(_text_:of in 1266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01592848 = score(doc=1266,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 1266, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1266)
        0.039938856 = product of:
          0.07987771 = sum of:
            0.07987771 = weight(_text_:22 in 1266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07987771 = score(doc=1266,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049130294 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1266, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1266)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  3. Goossens, P.: Authority control : trends and challenges (2007) 0.04
    0.037244894 = product of:
      0.055867337 = sum of:
        0.01592848 = weight(_text_:of in 1290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01592848 = score(doc=1290,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 1290, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1290)
        0.039938856 = product of:
          0.07987771 = sum of:
            0.07987771 = weight(_text_:22 in 1290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07987771 = score(doc=1290,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049130294 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1290, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1290)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  4. Vellucci, S.L.: Metadata and authority control (2000) 0.03
    0.031920645 = product of:
      0.047880966 = sum of:
        0.024583299 = weight(_text_:of in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024583299 = score(doc=180,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
        0.023297668 = product of:
          0.046595335 = sum of:
            0.046595335 = weight(_text_:22 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046595335 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049130294 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A variety of information communities have developed metadata schemes to meet the needs of their own users. The ability of libraries to incorporate and use multiple metadata schemes in current library systems will depend on the compatibility of imported data with existing catalog data. Authority control will play an important role in metadata interoperability. In this article, I discuss factors for successful authority control in current library catalogs, which include operation in a well-defined and bounded universe, application of principles and standard practices to access point creation, reference to authoritative lists, and bibliographic record creation by highly trained individuals. Metadata characteristics and environmental models are examined and the likelihood of successful authority control is explored for a variety of metadata environments.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.03
    0.030012354 = product of:
      0.04501853 = sum of:
        0.018392624 = weight(_text_:of in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018392624 = score(doc=249,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
        0.026625905 = product of:
          0.05325181 = sum of:
            0.05325181 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05325181 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049130294 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Russell, B.M.; Spillane, J.L.: Using the Web for name authority work (2001) 0.03
    0.027920596 = product of:
      0.041880894 = sum of:
        0.018583227 = weight(_text_:of in 167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018583227 = score(doc=167,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 167, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=167)
        0.023297668 = product of:
          0.046595335 = sum of:
            0.046595335 = weight(_text_:22 in 167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046595335 = score(doc=167,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049130294 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 167, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=167)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    While many catalogers are using the Web to find the information they need to perform authority work quickly and accurately, the full potential of the Web to assist catalogers in name authority work has yet to be realized. The ever-growing nature of the Web means that available information for creating personal name, corporate name, and other types of headings will increase. In this article, we examine ways in which simple and effective Web searching can save catalogers time and money in the process of authority work. In addition, questions involving evaluating authority information found on the Web are explored.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Tillett, B.B.: Authority control at the international level (2000) 0.03
    0.026421316 = product of:
      0.039631974 = sum of:
        0.022990782 = weight(_text_:of in 191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022990782 = score(doc=191,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 191, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=191)
        0.016641192 = product of:
          0.033282384 = sum of:
            0.033282384 = weight(_text_:22 in 191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033282384 = score(doc=191,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049130294 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 191, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=191)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    International efforts to provide authority control include the work of IFLA, the AUTHOR Project funded by the European Commission, and related work conducted under the auspices of the ICA/CDS. IFLA developed the guidelines Form and Structure of Corporate Headings, documented the formulation of names along the lines of national origin in its publication Names of Persons, and published Guidelines for Authority and Reference Entries. Attention has shifted from a single authority record for each entity that would be shared internationally through the exchange of records to linking parallel authority records for the same entity. The access control of the future will account for difference in cataloging rules, transliteration standards, and cultural differences within the same language as well as for the need for different languages and scripts and will enable users to display the script and form of a heading that they expect. Project AUTHOR is a shared set of resource national authority files that used selections from the authority files of France, the United Kingdom, Spain, Portugal, and Belgium. The prototype tested an adaptation of Z39.50 server software for authority records and displays for user interface. An international standard for authority control records has been developed for corporate bodies, persons, and families. Through joint meetings efforts have been synchronized to develop authority control at the international level.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  8. Hickey, T.B.; Toves, J.; O'Neill, E.T.: NACO normalization : a detailed examination of the authority file comparison rules (2006) 0.03
    0.026260808 = product of:
      0.039391212 = sum of:
        0.016093547 = weight(_text_:of in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016093547 = score(doc=5760,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.20947541 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
        0.023297668 = product of:
          0.046595335 = sum of:
            0.046595335 = weight(_text_:22 in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046595335 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049130294 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Normalization rules are essential for interoperability between bibliographic systems. In the process of working with Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO) authority files to match records with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and developing the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) subject heading schema, the authors found inconsistencies in independently created NACO normalization implementations. Investigating these, the authors found ambiguities in the NACO standard that need resolution, and came to conclusions on how the procedure could be simplified with little impact on matching headings. To encourage others to test their software for compliance with the current rules, the authors have established a Web site that has test files and interactive services showing their current implementation.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Wolverton, R.E.: Becoming an authority on authority control : an annotated bibliography of resources (2006) 0.03
    0.026260808 = product of:
      0.039391212 = sum of:
        0.016093547 = weight(_text_:of in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016093547 = score(doc=120,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.20947541 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
        0.023297668 = product of:
          0.046595335 = sum of:
            0.046595335 = weight(_text_:22 in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046595335 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049130294 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Authority control has long been an important part of the cataloging process. However, few studies have been conducted examining how librarians learn about it. Research conducted to date suggests that many librarians learn about authority control on the job rather than in formal classes. To offer an introduction to authority control information for librarians, an annotated bibliography is provided. It includes monographs, articles and papers, electronic discussion groups, Web sites related to professional conferences, additional Web sites related to authority control, and training offered through the Name Authority Cooperative Program and the Subject Authority Cooperative Program. A summary of possible future trends in authority control is also provided.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. Byrum, J.D.: ¬The emerging global bibliographical network : the era of international standardization in the development of cataloging policy (2000) 0.03
    0.025085872 = product of:
      0.037628807 = sum of:
        0.020987613 = weight(_text_:of in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020987613 = score(doc=190,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.27317715 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
        0.016641192 = product of:
          0.033282384 = sum of:
            0.033282384 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033282384 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049130294 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogers have become interdependent in their pursuit to provide bibliographic control and access. This interdependency has brought with it the need for greater agreement in applying common cataloging policies and rules. The expanded application of AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) is fostering greater uniformity in the provision of bibliographic description and access. The rules have been translated into numerous languages and used in European, Middle Eastern, and Latin American countries. Cataloging committees and individual libraries in Europe and South Africa have expressed strong interest in adopting, adapting, or aligning with AACR2. PCC (Program for Cooperative Cataloguing) is one of the most successful cooperative cataloging efforts and has a considerable international component, which encourages the use of AACR, LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings), and MARC. AACR2 is successful on an international level because it is based in internationally developed standards, including ISBDs and the Paris Principles. ISBDs (International Standard Bibliographic Description) and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records are examples of the contributions that IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) has made to the internationalization of cataloging. IFLA sponsored the international conference that resulted in the Paris Principles as well as subsequent projects to craft international policy in relation to uniform headings for persons, corporate bodies, and titles.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Horn, M.E.: "Garbage" in, "refuse and refuse disposal" out : making the most of the subject authority file in the OPAC (2002) 0.02
    0.024291996 = product of:
      0.036437992 = sum of:
        0.013140325 = weight(_text_:of in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013140325 = score(doc=156,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
        0.023297668 = product of:
          0.046595335 = sum of:
            0.046595335 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046595335 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049130294 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Subject access in the OPAC, as discussed in this article, is predicated on two different kinds of searching: subject (authority, alphabetic, or controlled vocabulary searching) or keyword (uncontrolled, free text, natural language vocabulary). The literature has focused on demonstrating that both approaches are needed, but very few authors address the need to integrate keyword into authority searching. The article discusses this difference and compares, with a query on the term garbage, search results in two online catalogs, one that performs keyword searches through the authority file and one where only bibliographic records are included in keyword searches.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007) 0.02
    0.017351426 = product of:
      0.02602714 = sum of:
        0.009385947 = weight(_text_:of in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009385947 = score(doc=1291,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.12216854 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
        0.016641192 = product of:
          0.033282384 = sum of:
            0.033282384 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033282384 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049130294 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    More and more users index everything on their own in the web 2.0. There are services for links, videos, pictures, books, encyclopaedic articles and scientific articles. All these services are library independent. But must that really be? Can't libraries help with their experience and tools to make user indexing better? On the experience of a project from German language Wikipedia together with the German person authority files (Personen Namen Datei - PND) located at German National Library (Deutsche Nationalbibliothek) I would like to show what is possible. How users can and will use the authority files, if we let them. We will take a look how the project worked and what we can learn for future projects. Conclusions - Authority files can have a role in the web 2.0 - there must be an open interface/ service for retrieval - everything that is indexed on the net with authority files can be easy integrated in a federated search - O'Reilly: You have to found ways that your data get more important that more it will be used
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  13. Lorenz, B.; Steffens, M.: Systematik und Schlagwortnormdatei zwischen Universalität und Individualität (1997) 0.02
    0.015531778 = product of:
      0.046595335 = sum of:
        0.046595335 = product of:
          0.09319067 = sum of:
            0.09319067 = weight(_text_:22 in 5819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09319067 = score(doc=5819,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049130294 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5819, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5819)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    24. 5.2001 19:22:37
  14. Bourdon, F.: Funktionale Anforderungen an bibliographische Datensätze und ein internationales Nummernsystem für Normdaten : wie weit kann Normierung durch Technik unterstützt werden? (2001) 0.01
    0.013312953 = product of:
      0.039938856 = sum of:
        0.039938856 = product of:
          0.07987771 = sum of:
            0.07987771 = weight(_text_:22 in 6888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07987771 = score(doc=6888,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049130294 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6888, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6888)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 12:30:22
  15. Yu, A.J.: ¬The future of authority control for CJK name headings (1999) 0.01
    0.011872388 = product of:
      0.035617165 = sum of:
        0.035617165 = weight(_text_:of in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035617165 = score(doc=360,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.46359703 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Authority control of Chinese, Japanese and Korean name headings in the Library of Congress. Complains about the lack of vernacular script
    Source
    Journal of the Hong Kong Library Association. 1999, no.17, S.79-86
  16. Souza, R. de Mattos: ¬The representation of archival information in controlled vocabularies : the context of the archival institutions in Rio de Janeiro (2019) 0.01
    0.011061445 = product of:
      0.033184335 = sum of:
        0.033184335 = weight(_text_:of in 5490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033184335 = score(doc=5490,freq=50.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.43193102 = fieldWeight in 5490, product of:
              7.071068 = tf(freq=50.0), with freq of:
                50.0 = termFreq=50.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5490)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    We aim to trace the scenario of the use of controlled vocabularies as tools of research and work in the scope of representation and retrieval of information in institutions that have archival collections, in order to highlight the need for greater emphasis on the subject of representation of archival information in the academic field, increasing the visibility for the study and analysis of the collections in question and their contents, relevant to the information society. We investigate the current scenario of the use of controlled vocabularies in the archival collections of Rio de Janeiro, the theoretical-methodological changes arising from the impacts of information technologies on analysis, representation, such as classification and indexing, content retrieval, information needs in the contemporary world. The representation of information is associated with classification and retrieval of information to the organization of knowledge in information science. There is a gap in the archival area regarding the expression representation of information from the description of the nineteenth century. As for the theoretical-methodological aspect, there was a theoretical survey of the representation of information in publications in the interdisciplinary areas; as to the op-erational methodology, questionnaires were applied to information agencies on the use of controlled vocabularies, in relation to the treatment of information in archival collections. We conclude by demonstrating the importance of adopting the concept of information representation in archives, using controlled vocabularies associated with new information technologies and informational ecology, consolidating the area as a scientific and interdisciplinary field for information science.
  17. Borbinha, J.: Authority control in the world of metadata (2004) 0.01
    0.010945801 = product of:
      0.032837402 = sum of:
        0.032837402 = weight(_text_:of in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032837402 = score(doc=5666,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.4274153 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the concept of "metadata" in the scope of the "digital library," two terms recently used in a great diversity of perspectives. It is not the intent to promote privilege of any particular view, but rather to help provide a better understanding of these multiple perspectives. The paper starts with a discussion of the concept of digital library, followed by an analysis of the concept of metadata. It continues with a discussion about the relationship of this concept with technology, services, and scenarios of application. The concluding remarks stress the three main arguments assumed for the relevance of the concept of metadata: the growing number of heterogeneous genres of information resources, the new emerging scenarios for interoperability, and issues related to the cost and complexity of current technology.
  18. Tillett, B.B.: Authority control : state of the art and new perspectives (2004) 0.01
    0.010272265 = product of:
      0.030816795 = sum of:
        0.030816795 = weight(_text_:of in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030816795 = score(doc=5655,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Authority control is necessary for meeting the catalog's objectives of enabling users to find the works of an author and to collocate all works of a person or corporate body. This article looks at the current state of authority control as compared to the visions of the 1979 LITA (Library Information and Technology Association) Institutes and the 1984 Authority Control Interest Group. It explores a new view of IFLA's Universal Bibliographic Control (UBC) and a future vision of a virtual international authority file as a building block for the Semantic Web and reinforces the importance of authority control to improve the precision of searches of large databases or the Internet.
  19. Smiraglia, R.P.: Authority control of works: cataloging's chimera? (2004) 0.01
    0.010137981 = product of:
      0.03041394 = sum of:
        0.03041394 = weight(_text_:of in 5678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03041394 = score(doc=5678,freq=42.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.39587128 = fieldWeight in 5678, product of:
              6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
                42.0 = termFreq=42.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5678)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Explicit authority control of works is essentially non-existent. Our catalogs are built on a principle of controlling headings, and primarily headings for names of authors. Our syndetic structure creates a spider's web of networked relationships among forms of headings, but it ends there, despite the potential richness of depth among bibliographic entities. Effective authority control of works could yield richness in the catalog that would enhance retrieval capabilities. Works are considered to constitute the intellectual content of informative artifacts that may be collected and ordered for retrieval. In a 1992 study the author examined a random sample of works drawn from the catalog of the Georgetown University Library. For each progenitor work, an instantiation network (also referred to as a bibliographic family) was constituted. A detailed analysis of the linkages that would be required for authority control of these networks is reviewed here. A new study is also presented, in which Library of Congress authority records for the works in this sample are sought and analyzed. Results demonstrate a near total lack of control, with only 5.6% of works for which authority records were found. From a sample of 410 works, of which nearly half have instantiation networks, only 23 works could be said to have implicit authority control. However, many instantiation networks are made up of successive derivations that can be implicitly linked through collocation. The difficult work of explicitly linking instantiations comes with title changes, translations, and containing relations. The empirical evidence in the present study suggests that explicit control of expressions will provide the best control over instantiation networks because it is instantiations such as translations, abridgments, and adaptations that require explicit linking.
  20. Pestana, O.: Alignment in medical sciences : towards improvement of UDC (2015) 0.01
    0.009933152 = product of:
      0.029799456 = sum of:
        0.029799456 = weight(_text_:of in 2298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029799456 = score(doc=2298,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.38787308 = fieldWeight in 2298, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2298)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A classification scheme represents a powerful indexing and retrieval tool. Obsolete terminology and misalignment between widely used systems is key impediment to better use of classification. This paper looks into the issues caused by delay in the revision of UDC class of medical sciences and possible solutions. Following a short description of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) and of the National Library of Medicine (NLM) Classification, the author analyses the notations and captions included in 61 class of the UDC Summary. All the classes, subclasses and special auxiliary subdivisions are covered in order to find compatible notations between both schemes, out-of-date vocabulary and out-of-date subdivisions of UDC. As a result of this study and in light of the most recent developments in medical sciences, one subdivision is questioned and several vocabulary expressions included in the caption fields are proposed to be changed or updated.
    Source
    Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 142
  • el 17
  • b 2
  • m 2
  • More… Less…