-
Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents
0.07
0.067038804 = product of:
0.1005582 = sum of:
0.07803193 = product of:
0.23409578 = sum of:
0.23409578 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23409578 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.41652718 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.022526272 = weight(_text_:of in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022526272 = score(doc=2514,freq=16.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In this paper, we present two ways to improve the precision of HITS-based algorithms onWeb documents. First, by analyzing the limitations of current HITS-based algorithms, we propose a new weighted HITS-based method that assigns appropriate weights to in-links of root documents. Then, we combine content analysis with HITS-based algorithms and study the effects of four representative relevance scoring methods, VSM, Okapi, TLS, and CDR, using a set of broad topic queries. Our experimental results show that our weighted HITS-based method performs significantly better than Bharat's improved HITS algorithm. When we combine our weighted HITS-based method or Bharat's HITS algorithm with any of the four relevance scoring methods, the combined methods are only marginally better than our weighted HITS-based method. Between the four relevance scoring methods, there is no significant quality difference when they are combined with a HITS-based algorithm.
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
- Source
- WWW '02: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on World Wide Web, May 7-11, 2002, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
-
Bawden, D.: Google and the universe of knowledge (2008)
0.05
0.04858399 = product of:
0.072875984 = sum of:
0.02628065 = weight(_text_:of in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02628065 = score(doc=844,freq=4.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
0.046595335 = product of:
0.09319067 = sum of:
0.09319067 = weight(_text_:22 in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09319067 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 7. 6.2008 16:22:20
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 64(2008) no.3, S.xxx
-
MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000)
0.04
0.043893527 = product of:
0.06584029 = sum of:
0.018771894 = weight(_text_:of in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018771894 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
0.047068395 = product of:
0.09413679 = sum of:
0.09413679 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09413679 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes the development of EEVL and outlines the services offered. The potential market for EEVL is discussed, and a case study of promotional activities is presented
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:40:22
-
Vidmar, D.J.: Darwin on the Web : the evolution of search tools (1999)
0.04
0.043452375 = product of:
0.06517856 = sum of:
0.018583227 = weight(_text_:of in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018583227 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
0.046595335 = product of:
0.09319067 = sum of:
0.09319067 = weight(_text_:22 in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09319067 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Computers in libraries. 19(1999) no.5, S.22-28
-
Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000)
0.04
0.043452375 = product of:
0.06517856 = sum of:
0.018583227 = weight(_text_:of in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018583227 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.046595335 = product of:
0.09319067 = sum of:
0.09319067 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09319067 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 25. 8.2005 17:42:22
-
Birmingham, J.: Internet search engines (1996)
0.04
0.037244894 = product of:
0.055867337 = sum of:
0.01592848 = weight(_text_:of in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01592848 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
0.039938856 = product of:
0.07987771 = sum of:
0.07987771 = weight(_text_:22 in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07987771 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Basically a good listing in table format of features from the major search engines
- Date
- 10.11.1996 16:36:22
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.04
0.036480736 = product of:
0.054721102 = sum of:
0.028095199 = weight(_text_:of in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028095199 = score(doc=1149,freq=14.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.026625905 = product of:
0.05325181 = sum of:
0.05325181 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05325181 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper presents a test of the validity of using Google Scholar to evaluate the publications of researchers by comparing the premises on which its search engine, PageRank, is based, to those of Garfield's theory of citation indexing. It finds that the premises are identical and that PageRank and Garfield's theory of citation indexing validate each other.
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
-
Huvila, I.: Affective capitalism of knowing and the society of search engine (2016)
0.04
0.035839226 = product of:
0.053758837 = sum of:
0.033789407 = weight(_text_:of in 3246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033789407 = score(doc=3246,freq=36.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.43980673 = fieldWeight in 3246, product of:
6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
36.0 = termFreq=36.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3246)
0.019969428 = product of:
0.039938856 = sum of:
0.039938856 = weight(_text_:22 in 3246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039938856 = score(doc=3246,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3246, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3246)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss the affective premises and economics of the influence of search engines on knowing and informing in the contemporary society. Design/methodology/approach A conceptual discussion of the affective premises and framings of the capitalist economics of knowing is presented. Findings The main proposition of this text is that the exploitation of affects is entwined in the competing market and emancipatory discourses and counter-discourses both as intentional interventions, and perhaps even more significantly, as unintentional influences that shape the ways of knowing in the peripheries of the regime that shape cultural constellations of their own. Affective capitalism bounds and frames our ways of knowing in ways that are difficult to anticipate and read even from the context of the regime itself. Originality/value In the relatively extensive discussion on the role of affects in the contemporary capitalism, influence of affects on knowing and their relation to search engine use has received little explicit attention so far.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 68(2016) no.5, S.566-588
-
Notess, G.R.: Toward more comprehensive Web searching : single searching versus megasearching (1998)
0.03
0.033580456 = product of:
0.050370682 = sum of:
0.023744777 = weight(_text_:of in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023744777 = score(doc=3278,freq=10.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
0.026625905 = product of:
0.05325181 = sum of:
0.05325181 = weight(_text_:22 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05325181 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In spite of their size, the major Web indexes are not comprehensive. Considers approaches carrying out comprehensive searches, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages. In the single search tool approach, users search the largest of the databses one by one, using the command language uniqe to each to increase the precision of the esearch. In the megasearch approach, search engines use 1 form that simultaneously seands a single query to a number of search engines and then presents the results. Inference Find, Dogpile and MetaFind are examples of good metasearch engines
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.2, S.73-76
-
Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000)
0.03
0.033580456 = product of:
0.050370682 = sum of:
0.023744777 = weight(_text_:of in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023744777 = score(doc=4869,freq=10.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.026625905 = product of:
0.05325181 = sum of:
0.05325181 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05325181 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:39:23
-
Rose, D.E.: Reconciling information-seeking behavior with search user interfaces for the Web (2006)
0.03
0.033052213 = product of:
0.049578317 = sum of:
0.02628065 = weight(_text_:of in 5296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02628065 = score(doc=5296,freq=16.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 5296, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5296)
0.023297668 = product of:
0.046595335 = sum of:
0.046595335 = weight(_text_:22 in 5296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046595335 = score(doc=5296,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5296, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5296)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- User interfaces of Web search engines reflect attributes of the underlying tools used to create them, rather than what we know about how people look for information. In this article, the author examines several characteristics of user search behavior: the variety of information-seeking goals, the cultural and situational context of search, and the iterative nature of the search task. An analysis of these characteristics suggests ways that interfaces can be redesigned to make searching more effective for users.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:58:06
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.797-799
-
Nicholson, S.; Sierra, T.; Eseryel, U.Y.; Park, J.-H.; Barkow, P.; Pozo, E.J.; Ward, J.: How much of it is real? : analysis of paid placement in Web search engine results (2006)
0.03
0.032456603 = product of:
0.048684902 = sum of:
0.028715475 = weight(_text_:of in 5278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028715475 = score(doc=5278,freq=26.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.37376386 = fieldWeight in 5278, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5278)
0.019969428 = product of:
0.039938856 = sum of:
0.039938856 = weight(_text_:22 in 5278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039938856 = score(doc=5278,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5278, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5278)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Most Web search tools integrate sponsored results with results from their internal editorial database in providing results to users. The goal of this research is to get a better idea of how much of the screen real estate displays real editorial results as compared to sponsored results. The overall average results are that 40% of all results presented on the first screen are real results, and when the entire first Web page is considered, 67% of the results are nonsponsored results. For general search tools such as Google, 56% of the first screen and 82% of the first Web page contain nonsponsored results. Other results include that query structure makes a significant difference in the percentage of nonsponsored results returned by a search. Similarly, the topic of the query also can have a significant effect on the percentage of sponsored results displayed by most Web search tools.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:32:57
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.4, S.448-461
-
Koch, T.: Quality-controlled subject gateways : definitions, typologies, empirical overview (2000)
0.03
0.031920645 = product of:
0.047880966 = sum of:
0.024583299 = weight(_text_:of in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024583299 = score(doc=631,freq=14.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
0.023297668 = product of:
0.046595335 = sum of:
0.046595335 = weight(_text_:22 in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046595335 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- 'Quality-controlled subject gateways' are Internet services which apply a rich set of quality measures to support systematic resource discovery. Considerable manual effort is used to secure a selection of resources which meet quality criteria and to display a rich description of these resources with standards-based metadata. Regular checking and updating ensure good collection management. A main goal is to provide a high quality of subject access through indexing resources using controlled vocabularies and by offering a deep classification structure for advanced searching and browsing. This article provides an initial empirical overview of existing services of this kind, their approaches and technologies, based on proposed working definitions and typologies of subject gateways
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:37:55
-
Campbell, D.: Australian subject gateways : political and strategic issues (2000)
0.03
0.031909253 = product of:
0.04786388 = sum of:
0.021237973 = weight(_text_:of in 4875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021237973 = score(doc=4875,freq=8.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4875, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4875)
0.026625905 = product of:
0.05325181 = sum of:
0.05325181 = weight(_text_:22 in 4875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05325181 = score(doc=4875,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4875, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4875)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The key political and strategic issues which needs to be addressed for the future development of the Australian subject gateways are: continued quality of content creation, integration of access to print and electronic resources, archiving and persistent identification, sustainability of services and service integration. These issues will be more effectively tackled internationally, and the Australian subject gateways are keen to work with international collaborators to achieve a mutually beneficial outcome
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:41:16
-
Furner, J.: ¬A unifying model of document relatedness for hybrid search engines (2003)
0.03
0.03092255 = product of:
0.046383824 = sum of:
0.026414396 = weight(_text_:of in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026414396 = score(doc=2717,freq=22.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
0.019969428 = product of:
0.039938856 = sum of:
0.039938856 = weight(_text_:22 in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039938856 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Previous work an search-engine design has indicated that information-seekers may benefit from being given the opportunity to exploit multiple sources of evidence of document relatedness. Few existing systems, however, give users more than minimal control over the selections that may be made among methods of exploitation. By applying the methods of "document network analysis" (DNA), a unifying, graph-theoretic model of content-, collaboration-, and context-based systems (CCC) may be developed in which the nature of the similarities between types of document relatedness and document ranking are clarified. The usefulness of the approach to system design suggested by this model may be tested by constructing and evaluating a prototype system (UCXtra) that allows searchers to maintain control over the multiple ways in which document collections may be ranked and re-ranked.
- Date
- 11. 9.2004 17:32:22
- Source
- Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
-
Hsieh-Yee, I.: ¬The retrieval power of selected search engines : how well do they address general reference questions and subject questions? (1998)
0.03
0.03070492 = product of:
0.046057377 = sum of:
0.02275971 = weight(_text_:of in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02275971 = score(doc=2186,freq=12.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
0.023297668 = product of:
0.046595335 = sum of:
0.046595335 = weight(_text_:22 in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046595335 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Evaluates the performance of 8 major Internet search engines in answering 21 real reference questions and 5 made up subject questions. Reports on the retrieval and relevancy ranking abilities of the search engines. Concludes that the search engines did not produce good results for the reference questions unlike for the subject questions. The best engines are identified by type of questions, with Infoseek best for the subject questions, and OpenText best for refrence questions
- Date
- 25.12.1998 19:22:51
- Footnote
- Part of an issue devoted to electronic resources and their use in libraries, from the viewpoint of reference services, with an emphasis on the Internet and Geographic Information Systems
-
Heery, R.: Information gateways : collaboration and content (2000)
0.03
0.03070492 = product of:
0.046057377 = sum of:
0.02275971 = weight(_text_:of in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02275971 = score(doc=4866,freq=12.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
0.023297668 = product of:
0.046595335 = sum of:
0.046595335 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046595335 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Information subject gateways provide targeted discovery services for their users, giving access to Web resources selected according to quality and subject coverage criteria. Information gateways recognise that they must collaborate on a wide range of issues relating to content to ensure continued success. This report is informed by discussion of content activities at the 1999 Imesh Workshop. The author considers the implications for subject based gateways of co-operation regarding coverage policy, creation of metadata, and provision of searching and browsing across services. Other possibilities for co-operation include working more closely with information providers, and diclosure of information in joint metadata registries
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:38:54
-
Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998)
0.03
0.03070492 = product of:
0.046057377 = sum of:
0.02275971 = weight(_text_:of in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02275971 = score(doc=1673,freq=12.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
0.023297668 = product of:
0.046595335 = sum of:
0.046595335 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046595335 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The Wolverhampton Web Library (WWLib) is a WWW search engine that provides access to UK based information. The experimental version developed in 1995, was a success but highlighted the need for a much higher degree of automation. An interesting feature of the experimental WWLib was that it organised information according to DDC. Discusses the advantages of classification and describes the automatic classifier that is being developed in Java as part of the new, fully automated WWLib
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia; vgl. auch: http://www7.scu.edu.au/programme/posters/1846/com1846.htm.
-
Lewandowski, D.; Spree, U.: Ranking of Wikipedia articles in search engines revisited : fair ranking for reasonable quality? (2011)
0.03
0.030380417 = product of:
0.045570623 = sum of:
0.028929431 = weight(_text_:of in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028929431 = score(doc=444,freq=38.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.37654874 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
38.0 = termFreq=38.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.016641192 = product of:
0.033282384 = sum of:
0.033282384 = weight(_text_:22 in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033282384 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper aims to review the fiercely discussed question of whether the ranking of Wikipedia articles in search engines is justified by the quality of the articles. After an overview of current research on information quality in Wikipedia, a summary of the extended discussion on the quality of encyclopedic entries in general is given. On this basis, a heuristic method for evaluating Wikipedia entries is developed and applied to Wikipedia articles that scored highly in a search engine retrieval effectiveness test and compared with the relevance judgment of jurors. In all search engines tested, Wikipedia results are unanimously judged better by the jurors than other results on the corresponding results position. Relevance judgments often roughly correspond with the results from the heuristic evaluation. Cases in which high relevance judgments are not in accordance with the comparatively low score from the heuristic evaluation are interpreted as an indicator of a high degree of trust in Wikipedia. One of the systemic shortcomings of Wikipedia lies in its necessarily incoherent user model. A further tuning of the suggested criteria catalog, for instance, the different weighing of the supplied criteria, could serve as a starting point for a user model differentiated evaluation of Wikipedia articles. Approved methods of quality evaluation of reference works are applied to Wikipedia articles and integrated with the question of search engine evaluation.
- Date
- 30. 9.2012 19:27:22
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.1, S.117-132
-
Conhaim, W.W.: Search tools (1996)
0.03
0.030012354 = product of:
0.04501853 = sum of:
0.018392624 = weight(_text_:of in 4738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018392624 = score(doc=4738,freq=6.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 4738, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4738)
0.026625905 = product of:
0.05325181 = sum of:
0.05325181 = weight(_text_:22 in 4738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05325181 = score(doc=4738,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4738, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4738)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes the 3 most popular searching tools for the WWW: InfoSeek, Yahoo and Lycos. Searching Internet directories can also be a useful search technique. Lists other searching engines. Points out a number of evaluations of these search engines published on the WWW. A number of search tools are available for specialized areas. Sites are available that enable parallel searching using several tools at once. Describes WWW pages with information about search engines
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:39:31
