-
Burrell, Q.L.: "Type/Token-Taken" informetrics : Some comments and further examples (2003)
0.18
0.18477368 = product of:
0.27716053 = sum of:
0.022990782 = weight(_text_:of in 2116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022990782 = score(doc=2116,freq=6.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 2116, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2116)
0.25416973 = product of:
0.50833946 = sum of:
0.50833946 = weight(_text_:informetrics in 2116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.50833946 = score(doc=2116,freq=6.0), product of:
0.36125907 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
1.4071327 = fieldWeight in 2116, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2116)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Egghe has propounded the notion of Type/Token-Taken (T/TT) informetrics. In this note we show how his ideas relate to ones that are already well known in informetrics and resolve some of the specific problems posed.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.13, S.1260-1263
-
Egghe, L.: Expansion of the field of informetrics : the second special issue (2006)
0.18
0.1810405 = product of:
0.27156073 = sum of:
0.022526272 = weight(_text_:of in 7119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022526272 = score(doc=7119,freq=4.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 7119, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7119)
0.24903446 = product of:
0.49806893 = sum of:
0.49806893 = weight(_text_:informetrics in 7119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.49806893 = score(doc=7119,freq=4.0), product of:
0.36125907 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
1.3787029 = fieldWeight in 7119, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7119)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Einführung in ein "Special Issue on Informetrics"
-
Egghe, L.: Type/Token-Taken informetrics (2003)
0.18
0.17690733 = product of:
0.26536098 = sum of:
0.022011995 = weight(_text_:of in 1608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022011995 = score(doc=1608,freq=22.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.28651062 = fieldWeight in 1608, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1608)
0.24334899 = product of:
0.48669797 = sum of:
0.48669797 = weight(_text_:informetrics in 1608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.48669797 = score(doc=1608,freq=22.0), product of:
0.36125907 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
1.347227 = fieldWeight in 1608, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Type/Token-Taken informetrics is a new part of informetrics that studies the use of items rather than the items itself. Here, items are the objects that are produced by the sources (e.g., journals producing articles, authors producing papers, etc.). In linguistics a source is also called a type (e.g., a word), and an item a token (e.g., the use of words in texts). In informetrics, types that occur often, for example, in a database will also be requested often, for example, in information retrieval. The relative use of these occurrences will be higher than their relative occurrences itself; hence, the name Type/ Token-Taken informetrics. This article studies the frequency distribution of Type/Token-Taken informetrics, starting from the one of Type/Token informetrics (i.e., source-item relationships). We are also studying the average number my* of item uses in Type/Token-Taken informetrics and compare this with the classical average number my in Type/Token informetrics. We show that my* >= my always, and that my* is an increasing function of my. A method is presented to actually calculate my* from my, and a given a, which is the exponent in Lotka's frequency distribution of Type/Token informetrics. We leave open the problem of developing non-Lotkaian Type/TokenTaken informetrics.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.7, S.603-610
-
Pillai, C.V.R.; Girijakumari, S.: Widening horizons of informetrics (1996)
0.17
0.17386869 = product of:
0.260803 = sum of:
0.026011098 = weight(_text_:of in 7172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026011098 = score(doc=7172,freq=12.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 7172, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7172)
0.23479192 = product of:
0.46958384 = sum of:
0.46958384 = weight(_text_:informetrics in 7172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.46958384 = score(doc=7172,freq=8.0), product of:
0.36125907 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
1.2998534 = fieldWeight in 7172, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Traces the origin and development of informetrics in the field of library and information science. 'Informatrics' is seen as a generic term to denote studies in which quantitative methods are applied. Discusses various applications of informetrics including citation analysis; impact factor; absolescence and ageing studies; bibliographic coupling; co-citation; and measurement of information such as retrieval performance assessment. Outlines recent developments in informetrics and calls for attention to be paid to the quality of future research in the field to ensure its reliability
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996)
0.16
0.16458546 = product of:
0.24687818 = sum of:
0.03084537 = weight(_text_:of in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03084537 = score(doc=7659,freq=30.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.4014868 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.2160328 = sum of:
0.17609395 = weight(_text_:informetrics in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17609395 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36125907 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.48744506 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.039938856 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039938856 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- It is possible, using ISI's Journal Citation Report (JCR), to calculate average impact factors (AIF) for LCR's subject categories but it can be more useful to know the global Impact Factor (GIF) of a subject category and compare the 2 values. Reports results of a study to compare the relationships between AIFs and GIFs of subjects, based on the particular case of the average impact factor of a subfield versus the impact factor of this subfield as a whole, the difference being studied between an average of quotients, denoted as AQ, and a global average, obtained as a quotient of averages, and denoted as GQ. In the case of impact factors, AQ becomes the average impact factor of a field, and GQ becomes its global impact factor. Discusses a number of applications of this technique in the context of informetrics and scientometrics
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.16
0.15806948 = product of:
0.2371042 = sum of:
0.021071399 = weight(_text_:of in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021071399 = score(doc=994,freq=14.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.2160328 = sum of:
0.17609395 = weight(_text_:informetrics in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17609395 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36125907 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.48744506 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.039938856 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039938856 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Citation rates are becoming increasingly important in judging the research quality of journals, institutions and departments, and individual faculty. This paper looks at the pattern of citations across different management science journals and over time. A stochastic model is proposed which views the generating mechanism of citations as a gamma mixture of Poisson processes generating overall a negative binomial distribution. This is tested empirically with a large sample of papers published in 1990 from six management science journals and found to fit well. The model is extended to include obsolescence, i.e., that the citation rate for a paper varies over its cited lifetime. This leads to the additional citations distribution which shows that future citations are a linear function of past citations with a time-dependent and decreasing slope. This is also verified empirically in a way that allows different obsolescence functions to be fitted to the data. Conclusions concerning the predictability of future citations, and future research in this area are discussed.
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem "Special Issue on Informetrics"
-
Egghe, L.: Little science, big science and beyond (1994)
0.15
0.14935078 = product of:
0.22402616 = sum of:
0.018583227 = weight(_text_:of in 6883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018583227 = score(doc=6883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 6883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6883)
0.20544294 = product of:
0.41088587 = sum of:
0.41088587 = weight(_text_:informetrics in 6883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.41088587 = score(doc=6883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36125907 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
1.1373718 = fieldWeight in 6883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6883)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Discusses the quality of bibliometrics, informetrics and scientometrics research, intradisciplinary communication and science policy
-
Bar-Ilan, J.: Informetrics (2009)
0.14
0.14425823 = product of:
0.21638735 = sum of:
0.019508323 = weight(_text_:of in 3822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019508323 = score(doc=3822,freq=12.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 3822, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3822)
0.19687903 = product of:
0.39375806 = sum of:
0.39375806 = weight(_text_:informetrics in 3822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.39375806 = score(doc=3822,freq=10.0), product of:
0.36125907 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
1.0899603 = fieldWeight in 3822, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3822)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Informetrics is a subfield of information science and it encompasses bibliometrics, scientometrics, cybermetrics, and webometrics. This encyclopedia entry provides an overview of informetrics and its subfields. In general, informetrics deals with quantitative aspects of information: its production, dissemination, evaluation, and use. Bibliometrics and scientometrics study scientific literature: papers, journals, patents, and citations; while in webometric studies the sources studied are Web pages and Web sites, and citations are replaced by hypertext links. The entry introduces major topics in informetrics: citation analysis and citation related studies, the journal impact factor, the recently defined h-index, citation databases, co-citation analysis, open access publications and its implications, informetric laws, techniques for mapping and visualization of informetric phenomena, the emerging subfields of webometrics, cybermetrics and link analysis, and research evaluation.
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
-
Stock, W.G.; Weber, S.: Facets of informetrics : Preface (2006)
0.14
0.1403487 = product of:
0.21052304 = sum of:
0.024903733 = weight(_text_:of in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024903733 = score(doc=76,freq=44.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.3241498 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
44.0 = termFreq=44.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.18561931 = product of:
0.37123862 = sum of:
0.37123862 = weight(_text_:informetrics in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.37123862 = score(doc=76,freq=20.0), product of:
0.36125907 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
1.0276244 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- According to Jean M. Tague-Sutcliffe "informetrics" is "the study of the quantitative aspects of information in any form, not just records or bibliographies, and in any social group, not just scientists" (Tague-Sutcliffe, 1992, 1). Leo Egghe also defines "informetrics" in a very broad sense. "(W)e will use the term' informetrics' as the broad term comprising all-metrics studies related to information science, including bibliometrics (bibliographies, libraries,...), scientometrics (science policy, citation analysis, research evaluation,...), webometrics (metrics of the web, the Internet or other social networks such as citation or collaboration networks), ..." (Egghe, 2005b,1311). According to Concepcion S. Wilson "informetrics" is "the quantitative study of collections of moderatesized units of potentially informative text, directed to the scientific understanding of information processes at the social level" (Wilson, 1999, 211). We should add to Wilson's units of text also digital collections of images, videos, spoken documents and music. Dietmar Wolfram divides "informetrics" into two aspects, "system-based characteristics that arise from the documentary content of IR systems and how they are indexed, and usage-based characteristics that arise how users interact with system content and the system interfaces that provide access to the content" (Wolfram, 2003, 6). We would like to follow Tague-Sutcliffe, Egghe, Wilson and Wolfram (and others, for example Björneborn & Ingwersen, 2004) and call this broad research of empirical information science "informetrics". Informetrics includes therefore all quantitative studies in information science. If a scientist performs scientific investigations empirically, e.g. on information users' behavior, on scientific impact of academic journals, on the development of the patent application activity of a company, on links of Web pages, on the temporal distribution of blog postings discussing a given topic, on availability, recall and precision of retrieval systems, on usability of Web sites, and so on, he or she contributes to informetrics. We see three subject areas in information science in which such quantitative research takes place, - information users and information usage, - evaluation of information systems, - information itself, Following Wolfram's article, we divide his system-based characteristics into the "information itself "-category and the "information system"-category. Figure 1 is a simplistic graph of subjects and research areas of informetrics as an empirical information science.
-
Egghe, L.: Expansion of the field of informetrics : origins and consequences (2005)
0.13
0.13241349 = product of:
0.19862023 = sum of:
0.022526272 = weight(_text_:of in 1910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022526272 = score(doc=1910,freq=4.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 1910, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1910)
0.17609395 = product of:
0.3521879 = sum of:
0.3521879 = weight(_text_:informetrics in 1910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3521879 = score(doc=1910,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36125907 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.9748901 = fieldWeight in 1910, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1910)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Voveriene, O.; Trumpiene, A.: Bibliometrics, scientometrics and informetrics : their relationship and interactions (1994)
0.13
0.13070534 = product of:
0.196058 = sum of:
0.03003503 = weight(_text_:of in 625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03003503 = score(doc=625,freq=16.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 625, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=625)
0.16602297 = product of:
0.33204594 = sum of:
0.33204594 = weight(_text_:informetrics in 625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.33204594 = score(doc=625,freq=4.0), product of:
0.36125907 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.9191352 = fieldWeight in 625, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=625)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Considers aspects of scientific methodology by which a new subject field attains the status of a branch of a science. Discusses recent developments of metrics in the science of science and library and information science. Presents definitions of librametrics, bibliometrics, scientometrics and informetrics and examines the relationships of the last 3 with each other and with science of science, library science and information science
-
Niemi, T.; Hirvonen, L.; Järvelin, K.: Multidimensional data model and query language for informetrics (2003)
0.13
0.13040152 = product of:
0.19560227 = sum of:
0.019508323 = weight(_text_:of in 1753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019508323 = score(doc=1753,freq=12.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 1753, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1753)
0.17609395 = product of:
0.3521879 = sum of:
0.3521879 = weight(_text_:informetrics in 1753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3521879 = score(doc=1753,freq=8.0), product of:
0.36125907 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.9748901 = fieldWeight in 1753, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1753)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Multidimensional data analysis or On-line analytical processing (OLAP) offers a single subject-oriented source for analyzing summary data based an various dimensions. We demonstrate that the OLAP approach gives a promising starting point for advanced analysis and comparison among summary data in informetrics applications. At the moment there is no single precise, commonly accepted logical/conceptual model for multidimensional analysis. This is because the requirements of applications vary considerably. We develop a conceptual/logical multidimensional model for supporting the complex and unpredictable needs of informetrics. Summary data are considered with respect of some dimensions. By changing dimensions the user may construct other views an the same summary data. We develop a multidimensional query language whose basic idea is to support the definition of views in a way, which is natural and intuitive for lay users in the informetrics area. We show that this view-oriented query language has a great expressive power and its degree of declarativity is greater than in contemporary operation-oriented or SQL (Structured Query Language)-like OLAP query languages.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.10, S.939-951
-
Näppilä, T.; Järvelin, K.; Niemi, T.: ¬A tool for data cube construction from structurally heterogeneous XML documents (2008)
0.13
0.12991188 = product of:
0.19486782 = sum of:
0.014840485 = weight(_text_:of in 1369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014840485 = score(doc=1369,freq=10.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.19316542 = fieldWeight in 1369, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1369)
0.18002734 = sum of:
0.14674495 = weight(_text_:informetrics in 1369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14674495 = score(doc=1369,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36125907 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.4062042 = fieldWeight in 1369, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1369)
0.033282384 = weight(_text_:22 in 1369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033282384 = score(doc=1369,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1369, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1369)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Data cubes for OLAP (On-Line Analytical Processing) often need to be constructed from data located in several distributed and autonomous information sources. Such a data integration process is challenging due to semantic, syntactic, and structural heterogeneity among the data. While XML (extensible markup language) is the de facto standard for data exchange, the three types of heterogeneity remain. Moreover, popular path-oriented XML query languages, such as XQuery, require the user to know in much detail the structure of the documents to be processed and are, thus, effectively impractical in many real-world data integration tasks. Several Lowest Common Ancestor (LCA)-based XML query evaluation strategies have recently been introduced to provide a more structure-independent way to access XML documents. We shall, however, show that this approach leads in the context of certain - not uncommon - types of XML documents to undesirable results. This article introduces a novel high-level data extraction primitive that utilizes the purpose-built Smallest Possible Context (SPC) query evaluation strategy. We demonstrate, through a system prototype for OLAP data cube construction and a sample application in informetrics, that our approach has real advantages in data integration.
- Date
- 9. 2.2008 17:22:42
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.3, S.435-449
-
Hjoerland, B.: Does informetrics need a theory? : a rejoinder to professor anthony van raan (2017)
0.13
0.12801495 = product of:
0.19202243 = sum of:
0.01592848 = weight(_text_:of in 3967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01592848 = score(doc=3967,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 3967, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3967)
0.17609395 = product of:
0.3521879 = sum of:
0.3521879 = weight(_text_:informetrics in 3967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3521879 = score(doc=3967,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36125907 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.9748901 = fieldWeight in 3967, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3967)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.12, S.2846
-
Yan, E.; Ding, Y.: Discovering author impact : a PageRank perspective (2011)
0.12
0.11776131 = product of:
0.17664196 = sum of:
0.010618987 = weight(_text_:of in 2704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010618987 = score(doc=2704,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 2704, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2704)
0.16602297 = product of:
0.33204594 = sum of:
0.33204594 = weight(_text_:informetrics in 2704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.33204594 = score(doc=2704,freq=4.0), product of:
0.36125907 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.9191352 = fieldWeight in 2704, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2704)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article provides an alternative perspective for measuring author impact by applying PageRank algorithm to a coauthorship network. A weighted PageRank algorithm considering citation and coauthorship network topology is proposed. We test this algorithm under different damping factors by evaluating author impact in the informetrics research community. In addition, we also compare this weighted PageRank with the h-index, citation, and program committee (PC) membership of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI) conferences. Findings show that this weighted PageRank algorithm provides reliable results in measuring author impact.
-
Rousseau, R.: Robert Fairthorne and the empirical power laws (2005)
0.12
0.11739126 = product of:
0.17608689 = sum of:
0.030816795 = weight(_text_:of in 4398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030816795 = score(doc=4398,freq=22.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 4398, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4398)
0.1452701 = product of:
0.2905402 = sum of:
0.2905402 = weight(_text_:informetrics in 4398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2905402 = score(doc=4398,freq=4.0), product of:
0.36125907 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.8042433 = fieldWeight in 4398, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4398)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Aims to review Fairthorne's classic article "Empirical hyperbolic distributions (Bradford-Zipf-Mandelbrot) for bibliometric description and prediction" (Journal of Documentation, Vol. 25, pp. 319-343, 1969), as part of a series marking the Journal of Documentation's 60th anniversary. Design/methodology/approach - Analysis of article content, qualitative evaluation of its subsequent impact, citation analysis, and diffusion analysis. Findings - The content, further developments and influence on the field of informetrics of this landmark paper are explained. Originality/value - A review is given of the contents of Fairthorne's original article and its influence on the field of informetrics. Its transdisciplinary reception is measured through a diffusion analysis.
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 61(2005) no.2, S.194-202
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.12
0.11580994 = sum of:
0.07803193 = product of:
0.23409578 = sum of:
0.23409578 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23409578 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.41652718 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.017808583 = weight(_text_:of in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017808583 = score(doc=562,freq=10.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.019969428 = product of:
0.039938856 = sum of:
0.039938856 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039938856 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Document representations for text classification are typically based on the classical Bag-Of-Words paradigm. This approach comes with deficiencies that motivate the integration of features on a higher semantic level than single words. In this paper we propose an enhancement of the classical document representation through concepts extracted from background knowledge. Boosting is used for actual classification. Experimental evaluations on two well known text corpora support our approach through consistent improvement of the results.
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
- Source
- Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2004), 1-4 November 2004, Brighton, UK
-
Burrell, Q.L.: Extending Lotkaian informetrics (2008)
0.12
0.115715496 = product of:
0.17357324 = sum of:
0.021071399 = weight(_text_:of in 2126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021071399 = score(doc=2126,freq=14.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 2126, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2126)
0.15250184 = product of:
0.30500367 = sum of:
0.30500367 = weight(_text_:informetrics in 2126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30500367 = score(doc=2126,freq=6.0), product of:
0.36125907 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.84427965 = fieldWeight in 2126, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2126)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The continuous version of the Lotka distribution, more generally referred to outside of informetrics as the Pareto distribution, has long enjoyed a central position in the theoretical development of informetrics despite several reported drawbacks in modelling empirical data distributions, most particularly that the inverse power form seems mainly to be evident only in the upper tails. We give a number of published examples graphically illustrating this shortcoming. In seeking to overcome this, we here draw attention to an intuitively reasonable generalization of the Pareto distribution, namely the Pareto type II distribution, of which we consider two versions. We describe its basic properties and some statistical features together with concentration aspects and argue that, at least in qualitative terms, it is better able to describe many observed informetric phenomena over the full range of the distribution. Suggestions for further investigations, including truncated and time-dependent versions, are also given.
-
Bar-Ilan, J.; Peritz, B.C.: Evolution, continuity, and disappearance of documents on a specific topic an the Web : a longitudinal study of "informetrics" (2004)
0.11
0.11436717 = product of:
0.17155075 = sum of:
0.02628065 = weight(_text_:of in 2886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02628065 = score(doc=2886,freq=16.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 2886, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2886)
0.1452701 = product of:
0.2905402 = sum of:
0.2905402 = weight(_text_:informetrics in 2886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2905402 = score(doc=2886,freq=4.0), product of:
0.36125907 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.8042433 = fieldWeight in 2886, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2886)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The present paper analyzes the changes that occurred to a set of Web pages related to "informetrics" over a period of 5 years between June 1998 and June 2003. Four times during this time span, in 1998,1999, 2002, and 2003, we monitored previously located pages and searched for new ones related to the topic. Thus, we were able to study the growth of the topic, white analyzing the rates of change and disappearance. The results indicate that modification, disappearance, and resurfacing cannot be ignored when studying the structure and development of the Web.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.11, S.980-990
-
Aström, F.: Changes in the LIS research front : time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004 (2007)
0.11
0.109536305 = product of:
0.16430445 = sum of:
0.017559499 = weight(_text_:of in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017559499 = score(doc=329,freq=14.0), product of:
0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.22855641 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
0.14674495 = product of:
0.2934899 = sum of:
0.2934899 = weight(_text_:informetrics in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2934899 = score(doc=329,freq=8.0), product of:
0.36125907 = queryWeight, product of:
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.049130294 = queryNorm
0.8124084 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Based on articles published in 1990-2004 in 21 library and information science (LIS) journals, a set of cocitation analyses was performed to study changes in research fronts over the last 15 years, where LIS is at now, and to discuss where it is heading. To study research fronts, here defined as current and influential cocited articles, a citations among documents methodology was applied; and to study changes, the analyses were time-sliced into three 5-year periods. The results show a stable structure of two distinct research fields: informetrics and information seeking and retrieval (ISR). However, experimental retrieval research and user oriented research have merged into one ISR field; and IR and informetrics also show signs of coming closer together, sharing research interests and methodologies, making informetrics research more visible in mainstream LIS research. Furthermore, the focus on the Internet, both in ISR research and in informetrics-where webometrics quickly has become a dominating research area-is an important change. The future is discussed in terms of LIS dependency on technology, how integration of research areas as well as technical systems can be expected to continue to characterize LIS research, and how webometrics will continue to develop and find applications.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.7, S.947-957
