Search (1887 results, page 1 of 95)

0.13241349 = product of:
  0.19862023 = sum of:
    0.022526272 = weight(_text_:of in 4589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022526272 = score(doc=4589,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049130294 = queryNorm
        0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 4589, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4589)
    0.17609395 = product of:
      0.3521879 = sum of:
        0.3521879 = weight(_text_:informetrics in 4589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3521879 = score(doc=4589,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36125907 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.9748901 = fieldWeight in 4589, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4589)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The author demonstrates how informetric analysis of information retrieval system content and use provides valuable insights that have applications for the modelling, design, and evaluation of information retrieval systems.

0.092858374 = product of:
  0.13928756 = sum of:
    0.021891601 = weight(_text_:of in 3801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021891601 = score(doc=3801,freq=34.0), product of:
        0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049130294 = queryNorm
        0.28494355 = fieldWeight in 3801, product of:
          5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
            34.0 = termFreq=34.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3801)
    0.11739596 = product of:
      0.23479192 = sum of:
        0.23479192 = weight(_text_:informetrics in 3801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23479192 = score(doc=3801,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.36125907 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.6499267 = fieldWeight in 3801, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3801)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Scientometrics have become an essential element in the practice and evaluation of science and research, including both the evaluation of individuals and national assessment exercises. This book brings together the theories that guide informetrics and scholarly communication research. It is a much needed compilation by leading scholars in the field that gathers together the theories that guide our understanding of authorship, citing, and impact

Content

Frontmatter -- -- Foreword -- -- Prologue -- -- Contents -- -- Introduction -- -- Part I: Critical informetrics -- -- The Incessant Chattering of Texts -- -- Informetrics Needs a Foundation in the Theory of Science -- -- Part II: Citation theories -- -- Referencing as Cooperation or Competition -- -- Semiotics and Citations -- -- Data Citation as a Bibliometric Oxymoron -- -- Part III: Statistical theories -- -- TypeToken Theory and Bibliometrics -- -- From a Success Index to a Success Multiplier -- -- From Matthew to Hirsch: A Success-Breeds-Success Story -- -- Informations Magic Numbers: The Numerology of Information Science -- -- Part IV: Authorship theories -- -- Authors as Persons and Authors as Bundles of Words -- -- The Angle Sum Theory: Exploring the Literature on Acknowledgments in Scholarly Communication -- -- The Flesh of Science: Somatics and Semiotics -- -- Part V: Knowledge organization theories -- -- Informetric Analyses of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOSs) -- -- Information, Meaning, and Intellectual Organization in Networks of Inter-Human Communication -- -- Modeling the Structure and Dynamics of Science Using Books -- -- Part VI: Altmetric theories -- -- Webometrics and Altmetrics: Home Birth vs. Hospital Birth -- -- Scientific Revolution in Scientometrics: The Broadening of Impact from Citation to Societal -- -- Altmetrics as Traces of the Computerization of the Research Process -- -- Interpreting Altmetrics: Viewing Acts on Social Media through the Lens of Citation and Social Theories -- -- Biographical information for the editor and contributors -- -- Index

0.069024295 = product of:
  0.10353644 = sum of:
    0.026011098 = weight(_text_:of in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026011098 = score(doc=55,freq=192.0), product of:
        0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049130294 = queryNorm
        0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
          13.856406 = tf(freq=192.0), with freq of:
            192.0 = termFreq=192.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
    0.07752534 = sum of:
      0.05869798 = weight(_text_:informetrics in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05869798 = score(doc=55,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.36125907 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049130294 = queryNorm
          0.16248168 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
      0.018827358 = weight(_text_:22 in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.018827358 = score(doc=55,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049130294 = queryNorm
          0.109432176 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Held for the first time in the United States, the Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4) is the fourth in the series of international conferences that bring together leading researchers from around the world. CoLIS4 provides a forum for critically exploring and analyzing library and information science as a discipline and as a field of research from historical, philosophical, theoretical, and methodological perspectives. The papers in this volume cover a wide variety of topics, presenting the latest research and information on new developments and new approaches to conceptual frameworks and methods in library and information science. Papers range from a re-examination of the core concepts to empirical studies, analyzing such areas as Web searching, information retrieval, informetrics, information behavior, aspects of learning, business intelligence, and information processing mechanisms. As library and information science is closely associated with a variety of other disciplines and its practice employs technologies that are changing rapidly, presenters focus on the old and the new, address theory and practice, and bridge diverse intellectual areas. From challenging existing approaches and proposing new ones to establishing models and reviewing methods-the presenters lead the way to change and further exploration.

Content

The Fourth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), held at the The Information School, University of Washington, Seattle, continued the tradition of the previous three CoLIS conferences, begun in 1991 at the University of Tampere, Finland. CoLIS4 was organized by Washington in cooperation with the Department of Information Studies, Tampere, the Royal School of Library and Information Science in Denmark, and the American Society for Information Science and Technology. As in the previous conferences, CoLIS4 invited papers presenting new research topics and approaches in library and information science (LIS) and, at the same time, encouraged contributors and attendees to step back from the practice and dissemination of their research to assess the current state of LIS as a discipline, from historical, theoretical, philosophical, and empirical perspectives. Held for the first time in North America-significantly at the home of a revitalized and actively expanding LIS program in a technology-rich region-CoLIS4 attracted 120 attendees from 16 countries. Presenters and attendees were mostly LIS researchers from academic institutions and research institutes, as well as a number from the information and technology industries. Three full days included a keynote address, 17 papers by an international slate of presenters, two panel discussions, and a poster session during an evening reception. The conference was preceded and followed by two days of tutorials and workshops, as well as a doctoral presentation forum. Breakfasts, lunches, coffee breaks, and a banquet at Microsoft Corporation headquarters were provided to give participants ample time to mix informally.
To encourage a spirit of deeper reflection, the organizing committee invited 20-minute paper presentations, each followed by 10 minutes of discussion. (There were no separate, concurrent tracks.) This approach encouraged direct follow-up questions and discussion which carried forward from session to session, providing a satisfying sense of continuity to the overall conference theme of exploring the interaction between conceptual and empirical approaches to LIS. The expressed goals of CoLIS4 were to: - explore the existing and emerging conceptual frameworks and methods of library and information science as a field, - encourage discourse about the character and definitions of key concepts in LIS, and - examine the position of LIS among parallel contemporary domains and professions likewise concerned with information and information technology, such as computer science, management information systems, and new media and communication studies. The keynote address by Tom Wilson (University of Sheffield) provided an historical perspective on the philosophical and research frameworks of LIS in the post-World War II period. He traced the changing emphases on the objects of LIS study: definitions of information and documents; information retrieval, relevance, systems, and architectures; information users and behaviors. He raised issues of the relevance of LIS research to real-world information services and practice, and the gradual shift in research approaches from quantitative to qualitative. He concluded by stressing the ongoing need of LIS for cumulative, theory-based, and content-rich bodies of research, meaningful to practitioners and useful to contemporary LIS education.
Themes and questions threaded throughout the conference papers and panels addressed the uniqueness of LIS as a contemporary "intersection of information, technology, people, and society" (CoLIS Proceedings Preface). Papers by Birger Hjørland and by Sanna Talja, Kimmo Tuominen, and Reijo Savolainen directly addressed the essential nature and metatheory of LIS as a field of inquiry by reviewing its theoretical models and epistemological perspectives, such as the information transfer model and socio-cognitive theory. The cognitive grounding of much LIS research was present in Pertti Vakkari's and Mikko Pennanen's study linking university students' concept formation with their search processes and task performances while preparing research proposals, as well as in Peter Ingwersen's analysis of the cognitive conception of document polyrepresentation (multiple ways of representing documents) applied to information retrieval. A number of papers presented empirically and theoretically derived taxonomies of the fundamental characteristics of information bearers (documents and systems) and information behaviors (both individual and collaborative). These mark a contemporary effort to enumerate and classify the elements that LIS researchers should be examining and with which they should be building systems and generating theory. Nicholas Belkin and Colleen Cool reported on field research with which they are constructing a taxonomy of interactions in information seeking and communication behavior, to be used to inform information system building. Rong Tang presented her taxonomic study of Web searching query patterns and argued for the need to link these to user cognitive operations and search tasks. Linda Cooper explored school children's categorizations and knowledge of information organization in libraries by having them arrange books and topics visually and spatially on "virtual" bookshelves. Kartriina Byström and Preben Hansen proposed a nested typology of the concepts of work tasks, information seeking tasks, and information retrieval tasks as units of analysis for LIS research. Work task and domain analysis figured importantly in several papers, reflecting a increasing application of information context research approaches. In addition to Byström and Hansen's theoretical study of the concepts of tasks in general, the work reported by researchers at Risø National Laboratory, Denmark (Annelise Mark Pejtersen, Bryan Cleal, Morten Hertzum, Hanne Albrechtsen) demonstrated the application of the Cognitive Work Analysis (CWA) framework used to inform the design of a virtual "collaboratory" used by three European film archives. Birger Hjørland asserted that domain analysis, including the study of the interests, goals, values, and consequences of information use and users in specific subject and work domains, is central to the practice of LIS.
LIS research and evaluation methodologies fell under the same scrutiny and systematization, particularly in the presentations employing multiple and mixed methodologies. Jaana Kekäläinen's and Kalervo Järvelin's proposal for a framework of laboratory information retrieval evaluation measures, applied along with analyses of information seeking and work task contexts, employed just such a mix. Marcia Bates pulled together Bradford's Law of Scattering of decreasingly relevant information sources and three information searching techniques (browsing, directed searching, and following links) to pose the question: what are the optimum searching techniques for the different regions of information concentrations? Jesper Schneider and Pia Borlund applied bibliometric methods (document co-citation, bibliographic coupling, and co-word analysis) to augment manual thesaurus construction and maintenance. Fredrik Åström examined document keyword co-occurrence measurement compared to and then combined with bibliometric co-citation analysis to map LIS concept spaces. Ian Ruthven, Mounia Lalmas, and Keith van Rijsbergen compared system-supplied query expansion terms with interactive user query expansion, incorporating both partial relevance assessment feedback (how relevant is a document) and ostensive relevance feedback (measuring when a document is assessed as relevant over time). Scheduled in the midst of the presentations were two stimulating panel and audience discussions. The first panel, chaired by Glynn Harmon, explored the current re-positioning of many library and information science schools by renaming themselves to eliminate the "library" word and emphasize the "information" word (as in "School of Information," "Information School," and schools of "Information Studies"). Panelists Marcia Bates, Harry Bruce, Toni Carbo, Keith Belton, and Andrew Dillon presented the reasons for name changes in their own information programs, which include curricular change and expansion beyond a "stereotypical" library focus, broader contemporary theoretical approaches to information, new clientele and markets for information services and professionals, new media formats and delivery models, and new interdisciplinary student and faculty recruitment from crossover fields. Sometimes criticized for over-broadness and ambiguity-and feared by library practitioners who were trained in more traditional library schools-renaming schools both results from and occasions a renewed examination of the definitions and boundaries of the field as a whole and the educational and research missions of individual schools.
Another panel discussion, "The Dark Side of Information Technology," chaired by Victor Rosenberg, focused on the role of LIS in studying and ameliorating the contemporary social impact of technology and of information itself. Panelists Rosenberg, Paul Edwards, and David Levy asked what the social and psychological impact of information and its technologies means for how LIS studies people and collections as parts of information "systems." They suggested that LIS as a discipline is the logical forum for discussing the negative effects of technology and the less healthy aspects of information-its increasing ubiquity and volume, speedy proliferation, and invasive potential-as well as their demonstrated positive potential for applications in education and community-building. Several audience contributors, however, questioned the reality and "hype" of information overload and threats to human psychology and social values, and also reminded the attendees that new technologies and information encourage self-sufficiency and independence in developing countries. (Indeed, the global impact of information science and technologies was a theme of several conference papers, for example, in the studies of Erica Cosijn, Ari Pirkola, Theo Bothma, and Kalervo Järvelin of cross-lingual information access in indigenous languages and in Irene Wormell's study of the global dissemination of national and regional LIS journals by means of informetric analysis and the quantitative study of information flows.) With re-examination of such a broad range of interests, principles, methodologies, and applications of LIS currently taking place, CoLIS4 was in itself a demonstration of a spontaneous, collaborative "domain analysis." The CoLIS4 goal of providing a forum for just this sort of discussion was well realized.

Date

22. 2.2007 18:56:23
22. 2.2007 19:12:10

0.055524558 = product of:
  0.08328684 = sum of:
    0.03003503 = weight(_text_:of in 3829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03003503 = score(doc=3829,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049130294 = queryNorm
        0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 3829, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3829)
    0.05325181 = product of:
      0.10650362 = sum of:
        0.10650362 = weight(_text_:22 in 3829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10650362 = score(doc=3829,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3829, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3829)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Date

6. 1.1999 10:29:22

0.04858399 = product of:
  0.072875984 = sum of:
    0.02628065 = weight(_text_:of in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02628065 = score(doc=5666,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049130294 = queryNorm
        0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
    0.046595335 = product of:
      0.09319067 = sum of:
        0.09319067 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09319067 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Footnote

Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)

0.04843366 = product of:
  0.07265049 = sum of:
    0.021289758 = weight(_text_:of in 1487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021289758 = score(doc=1487,freq=42.0), product of:
        0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049130294 = queryNorm
        0.2771099 = fieldWeight in 1487, product of:
          6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
            42.0 = termFreq=42.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1487)
    0.051360734 = product of:
      0.10272147 = sum of:
        0.10272147 = weight(_text_:informetrics in 1487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10272147 = score(doc=1487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36125907 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.28434294 = fieldWeight in 1487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.3530817 = idf(docFreq=76, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1487)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

Inhalt: KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION Towards a Future for Knowledge Organization Ingetraut Dahlberg Professor Neelameghan's Contribution to the Advancement and Development of Classification in the Context of Knowledge Organization Nancy J. Williamson Knowledge Orgnization System Over Time S. Seetharama The Facet Concept as a Universal Principle of Subdivisio Clare Beghtol Facet Analysis as a Knowledge Management Tool on the Internet Kathryn La Barre and Pauline Atherton Cochrane The Universal Decimal Classification: A Response to a Challenge I. C. Mellwaine Controlled Vocabularies as a Sphere of Influence Anita S. Coleman and Paul Bracke Aligning Systems of Relationship Rebecca Green and Carol A. Bean Terminologies, Ontologies and Information Access Widad Mustafa El Hadi SATSAN AUTOMATRIX Version 1 : A Computer Programme for Synthesis of Colon Class Number According to the Postulational Approach B. G. Satyapal and N. Sanjivini Satyapal. INTEROPERABILITY, DIGITAL LIBRARY AND INFORMATION RETRIEVAL Interoperable Institutional Digital Research Repositories and Their Potential for Open Access Research Knowledge Management T. B. Rajashekar Boundary Objects and the Digital Library Michael Shepherd and Corolyn Watters A PFT-based Approach to Make CDS/ISIS Data based OAI-Compliant Francis Jayakanth and L. Aswath The changing Language Technology and CDS/ ISIS: UNICODE and the Emergence of OTF K. H. Hussain and J. S. Rajeev Text Mining in Biomedicine: Challenges and Opportunities Padmini Srinivasan Determining Authorship of Web Pages Timothy C. Craven
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT IN SPECIALIZED AREAS Information System for Knowledge Management in the Specialized Division of a Hospital M. C. Vasudevan; Murali Mohan and Amit Kapoor Five Laws of Information Service and Architecting Knowledge Infrastructure for Education and Development k. R. Srivathsan Documentation of Compositions in Carnatic Music: Need for and Utility of a Computerized Database K. S. Nagarajan Saint Tyagaraja CD: A Model for Knowledge Organization and Presentation of Classical Carnatic Music---T. N. Rajan The National Tuberculosis Institute, Bangalore; Recent Development in Library and Information Services Sudha S. Murthy Sri Ramakrishna Math Libraries: Computer Applications D.N. Nagaraja Rao Save the Time of the Godly: Information Mediator's Role in Promoting Spiritual and Religious Accommodation Mohamed Taher INFORMATION SOCIETY Information Society, Information Networks and National Development : An Overview P. B. Mangla Digital Divide in India-Narrowing the Gap: An Appraisal with Special Reference to Karnataka K. N. Prasad Future of the Book: Will the Printed Book Survive the Digital Age? K. A. Isaac Role of Traditional Librarianship in the Internet/Digital Era a. Ratnakar A New Paradigm of Education System for Reaching the Unreached Through Open and Distance Education with Special Reference to the Indian Initiative S. B. Ghosh Knowledge Workers of the New Millennium: An Instance of Interdisciplinary Exchange and Discovery Michael Medland
THE PERSON AND ASSOCIATED ORGANIZATIONS Professional Profile of Professor A. Neelameghan: Excerpts from Interview Sessions Hemalatha lyer A. Neelameghan and UNESCO: Contributions and Remembrances John Rose Studies and Research in Informetrics at the Documentation Research and Training Centre (DRTC) , ISI Bangalore I. K. Ravichandra Rao and Bibhuti Bhusan Sahoo Professor A. Neelameghan M. A . Gopinath A Salutation of Affection K.S. Deshpande Professor A. Neelameghan and the Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science K. N. Prasad

0.04501853 = product of:
  0.06752779 = sum of:
    0.027588936 = weight(_text_:of in 4606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027588936 = score(doc=4606,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049130294 = queryNorm
        0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 4606, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4606)
    0.039938856 = product of:
      0.07987771 = sum of:
        0.07987771 = weight(_text_:22 in 4606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07987771 = score(doc=4606,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4606, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4606)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

0.043452375 = product of:
  0.06517856 = sum of:
    0.018583227 = weight(_text_:of in 6300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018583227 = score(doc=6300,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049130294 = queryNorm
        0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 6300, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6300)
    0.046595335 = product of:
      0.09319067 = sum of:
        0.09319067 = weight(_text_:22 in 6300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09319067 = score(doc=6300,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6300, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6300)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Footnote

Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship 22(1996) no.6, S.471 (N. Corral)

0.043452375 = product of:
  0.06517856 = sum of:
    0.018583227 = weight(_text_:of in 6620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018583227 = score(doc=6620,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049130294 = queryNorm
        0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 6620, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6620)
    0.046595335 = product of:
      0.09319067 = sum of:
        0.09319067 = weight(_text_:22 in 6620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09319067 = score(doc=6620,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6620, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6620)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Footnote

Rez. in: Online 22(1998) no.2, S.92 (C.A. Murchie)

0.043452375 = product of:
  0.06517856 = sum of:
    0.018583227 = weight(_text_:of in 1381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018583227 = score(doc=1381,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049130294 = queryNorm
        0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1381, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1381)
    0.046595335 = product of:
      0.09319067 = sum of:
        0.09319067 = weight(_text_:22 in 1381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09319067 = score(doc=1381,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1381, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1381)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Date

25. 3.2003 13:22:23

0.04164342 = product of:
  0.062465128 = sum of:
    0.022526272 = weight(_text_:of in 2022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022526272 = score(doc=2022,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049130294 = queryNorm
        0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 2022, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2022)
    0.039938856 = product of:
      0.07987771 = sum of:
        0.07987771 = weight(_text_:22 in 2022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07987771 = score(doc=2022,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2022, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2022)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Editor

Union of International Associations

Footnote

Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.50-51 (I. Dahlberg)

0.04164342 = product of:
  0.062465128 = sum of:
    0.022526272 = weight(_text_:of in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022526272 = score(doc=2891,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049130294 = queryNorm
        0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
    0.039938856 = product of:
      0.07987771 = sum of:
        0.07987771 = weight(_text_:22 in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07987771 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Editor

Union of International Associations

Footnote

Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.50-51 (I. Dahlberg)

0.04164342 = product of:
  0.062465128 = sum of:
    0.022526272 = weight(_text_:of in 2892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022526272 = score(doc=2892,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049130294 = queryNorm
        0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 2892, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2892)
    0.039938856 = product of:
      0.07987771 = sum of:
        0.07987771 = weight(_text_:22 in 2892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07987771 = score(doc=2892,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2892, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2892)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Editor

Union of International Associations

Footnote

Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.3/4, S.184-185 (I. Dahlberg)

0.04164342 = product of:
  0.062465128 = sum of:
    0.022526272 = weight(_text_:of in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022526272 = score(doc=5396,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049130294 = queryNorm
        0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
    0.039938856 = product of:
      0.07987771 = sum of:
        0.07987771 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07987771 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Footnote

Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)

Imprint

London : Society of Indexers

0.04164342 = product of:
  0.062465128 = sum of:
    0.022526272 = weight(_text_:of in 6157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022526272 = score(doc=6157,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049130294 = queryNorm
        0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 6157, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6157)
    0.039938856 = product of:
      0.07987771 = sum of:
        0.07987771 = weight(_text_:22 in 6157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07987771 = score(doc=6157,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6157, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6157)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Footnote

Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.6, S.483-484 (A.R. Lindsay)

0.04164342 = product of:
  0.062465128 = sum of:
    0.022526272 = weight(_text_:of in 627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022526272 = score(doc=627,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049130294 = queryNorm
        0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 627, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=627)
    0.039938856 = product of:
      0.07987771 = sum of:
        0.07987771 = weight(_text_:22 in 627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07987771 = score(doc=627,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 627, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=627)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Date

22. 2.1997 19:44:14

Footnote

Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship. 23(1997) no.1, S.54 (T.A. Brooks)

0.03988657 = product of:
  0.059829853 = sum of:
    0.026547467 = weight(_text_:of in 6130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026547467 = score(doc=6130,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049130294 = queryNorm
        0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 6130, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6130)
    0.033282384 = product of:
      0.06656477 = sum of:
        0.06656477 = weight(_text_:22 in 6130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06656477 = score(doc=6130,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6130, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6130)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Isbn

0-934485-22-4

Series

Proceedings / Geoscience Information Society ; 24)(Proceedings of the ... meeting of the Geoscience Information Society ; 28

0.039702613 = product of:
  0.059553917 = sum of:
    0.024331152 = weight(_text_:of in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024331152 = score(doc=1842,freq=42.0), product of:
        0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049130294 = queryNorm
        0.31669703 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
          6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
            42.0 = termFreq=42.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
    0.035222765 = product of:
      0.07044553 = sum of:
        0.07044553 = weight(_text_:22 in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07044553 = score(doc=1842,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.4094577 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

A system of library classification that flashed across the inquiring mind of young Melvil Louis Kossuth Dewey (known as Melvil Dewey) in 1873 is still the most popular classification scheme.. The modern library classification begins with Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). Melvil Dewey devised DDC in 1876. DDC has is credit of 128 years of boudless success. The DDC is being taught as a practical subject throughout the world and it is being used in majority of libraries in about 150 countries. This is the result of continuous revision that 22nd Edition of DDC has been published in July 2003. No other classification scheme has published so many editions. Some welcome changes have been made in DDC 22. To reduce the Christian bias in 200 religion, the numbers 201 to 209 have been devoted to specific aspects of religion. In the previous editions these numbers were devoted to Christianity. to enhance the classifier's efficiency, Table 7 has been removed from DDC 22 and the provision of adding group of persons is made by direct use of notation already available in schedules and in notation -08 from Table 1 Standard Subdivision. The present book is an attempt to explain, with suitable examples, the salient provisions of DDC 22. The book is written in simple language so that the students may not face any difficulty in understanding what is being explained. The examples in the book are explained in a step-by-step procedure. It is hoped that this book will prove of great help and use to the library professionals in general and library and information science students in particular.

Content

1. Introduction to DDC 22 2. Major changes in DDC 22 3. Introduction to the schedules 4. Use of Table 1 : Standard Subdivisions 5. Use of Table 2 : Areas 6. Use of Table 3 : Subdivisions for the arts, for individual literatures, for specific literary forms 7. Use to Table 4 : Subdivisions of individual languages and language families 8. Use of Table 5 : Ethic and National groups 9. Use of Table 6 : Languages 10. Treatment of Groups of Persons

Object

DDC-22

0.037515447 = product of:
  0.056273166 = sum of:
    0.022990782 = weight(_text_:of in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022990782 = score(doc=3948,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049130294 = queryNorm
        0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
    0.033282384 = product of:
      0.06656477 = sum of:
        0.06656477 = weight(_text_:22 in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06656477 = score(doc=3948,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

Enthält u.a.: Grimaldi, T.: The object of cataloguing; Byrum, J.D., O.M.A. Madison: Reflections an the goals, concepts and recommendations of the IFLA study an Functional Requirements of Bibliographic Records;

Date

29. 8.2005 12:54:22

0.037364896 = product of:
  0.056047343 = sum of:
    0.018392624 = weight(_text_:of in 770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018392624 = score(doc=770,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049130294 = queryNorm
        0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 770, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=770)
    0.037654717 = product of:
      0.07530943 = sum of:
        0.07530943 = weight(_text_:22 in 770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07530943 = score(doc=770,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 770, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=770)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Date

26. 7.2002 14:01:22

Footnote

Rez. in: Journal of documentation 49(1993) no.1, S.68-70. (A. Maltby); Journal of librarianship and information science 1993, S.108-109 (A.G. Curwen); Herald of library science 33(1994) nos.1/2, S.85 (P.N. Kaula); Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.45 (M.P. Satija)