Search (19 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986) 0.05
    0.04965986 = product of:
      0.07448979 = sum of:
        0.021237973 = weight(_text_:of in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021237973 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
        0.05325181 = product of:
          0.10650362 = sum of:
            0.10650362 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10650362 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049130294 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
  2. Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987) 0.02
    0.017750604 = product of:
      0.05325181 = sum of:
        0.05325181 = product of:
          0.10650362 = sum of:
            0.10650362 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10650362 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17204592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049130294 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
  3. Lancaster, F.W.; Li, J.: ¬The law of constant accessibility of information (1988/89) 0.01
    0.010729032 = product of:
      0.032187093 = sum of:
        0.032187093 = weight(_text_:of in 1565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032187093 = score(doc=1565,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.41895083 = fieldWeight in 1565, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1565)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 15(1988/89), S.24-25
  4. Carpenter, M.P.; Narin, F.: ¬The adequacy of Science Citation Index (SCI) as an indicator of international scientific activity (1981) 0.01
    0.010729032 = product of:
      0.032187093 = sum of:
        0.032187093 = weight(_text_:of in 6680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032187093 = score(doc=6680,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.41895083 = fieldWeight in 6680, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6680)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 32(1981), S.430-439
  5. Hjerppe, R.: ¬An outline of bibliometrics and citation analysis (1980) 0.01
    0.010011677 = product of:
      0.03003503 = sum of:
        0.03003503 = weight(_text_:of in 1115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03003503 = score(doc=1115,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 1115, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1115)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Imprint
    Stockholm : Royal Institute of Technology Library
  6. King, J.: ¬A review of bibliometric and other indicators and their role in research evaluation (1987) 0.01
    0.010011677 = product of:
      0.03003503 = sum of:
        0.03003503 = weight(_text_:of in 1708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03003503 = score(doc=1708,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 1708, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1708)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 13(1987) no.5, S.261-276
  7. Pao, M.L.: ¬An empirical examination of Lotka's law (1986) 0.01
    0.010011677 = product of:
      0.03003503 = sum of:
        0.03003503 = weight(_text_:of in 7520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03003503 = score(doc=7520,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 7520, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7520)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 37(1986), S.26-33
  8. Tsay, M.-Y.: ¬A bibliometric study of indexing and abstracting, 1876-1976 (1989) 0.01
    0.009291613 = product of:
      0.027874837 = sum of:
        0.027874837 = weight(_text_:of in 5060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027874837 = score(doc=5060,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 5060, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5060)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In a bibliometric study of references to indexing and abstracting from 1876 to 1976 a total of 2.381 references in Wellisch's Indexing and abstracting: an international bibliography were analysed by a PL/I program. Most of the articles (67%) appeared as journal papers. The Bradford-Zipf law was applied to investigate the journal literature. Thirteen core journals were identified, six of which emphasize the subject of indexing and abstracting. Lotka's law was used to measure the productivity of authors. The vast majority, 1.533 out of 1.966 authors, contributed only one article. The leading authors and their active life in this subject were also studied. English is the predominant language of articles on indexing and abstracting
  9. Davies, R.: Q-analysis : a methodology for librarianship and information science (1985) 0.01
    0.009196312 = product of:
      0.027588936 = sum of:
        0.027588936 = weight(_text_:of in 589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027588936 = score(doc=589,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 589, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=589)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Q-analysis is a methodology for investigating a wide range of structural phenomena. Strutures are defined in terms of relations between members of sets and their salient features are revealed using techniques of algebraic topology. However, the basic method can be mastered by non-mathematicians. Q-analysis has been applied to problems as diverse as discovering the rules for the diagnosis of a rare disease and the study of tactics in a football match. Other applications include some of interest to librarians and information scientists. In bibliometrics, Q-analysis has proved capable of emulating techniques such as bibliographic coupling, co-citation analysis and co-word analysis. It has also been used to produce a classification scheme for television programmes based on different principles from most bibliographic classifications. This paper introduces the basic ideas of Q-analysis. Applications relevant to librarianship and information science are reviewed and present limitations of the approach described. New theoretical advances including some in other fields such as planning and design theory and artificial intelligence may lead to a still more powerful method of investigating structure
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 41(1985) no.4, S.221-246
  10. McCain, K.W.: Co-cited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure (1986) 0.01
    0.008760218 = product of:
      0.02628065 = sum of:
        0.02628065 = weight(_text_:of in 5505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02628065 = score(doc=5505,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 5505, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5505)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 37(1986), S.111-122
  11. Stock, W.G.: ¬Die Wichtigkeit wissenschaftlicher Dokumente relativ zu gegebenen Thematiken (1981) 0.01
    0.00758657 = product of:
      0.02275971 = sum of:
        0.02275971 = weight(_text_:of in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02275971 = score(doc=13,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Scientific documents are more or less important in relation to give subjects and this importance can be measured. An empirical investigation into philosophical information was carried out using a weighting algorithm developed by N. Henrichs which results in a distribution by weighting of documents on an average philosophical subject. With the aid of statistical methods a threshold value can be obtained that separates the important and unimportant documents on a subject. The knowledge of theis threshold value is important for various practical and theoretic questions: providing new possibilities for research strategy in information retrieval; evaluation of the 'titleworthiness' of subjects by comparison of document titles and themes for which the document at hand is important; and making available data on thematic trends for scientific results
  12. Stock, W.G.: Informetrische Untersuchungsmethoden auf der Grundlage der Textwortmethode (1984) 0.01
    0.0075087575 = product of:
      0.022526272 = sum of:
        0.022526272 = weight(_text_:of in 721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022526272 = score(doc=721,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 721, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=721)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the mathematical basis of scientometrics involving text keywords independent of thesauri and classification schemes
  13. Fairthorne, R.A.: Bradford's law and perspective (1980) 0.01
    0.0075087575 = product of:
      0.022526272 = sum of:
        0.022526272 = weight(_text_:of in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022526272 = score(doc=4992,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u. L. Kajberg
  14. Kinnucan, M.T.: Statistical methods in information science research (1986) 0.01
    0.0070793247 = product of:
      0.021237973 = sum of:
        0.021237973 = weight(_text_:of in 272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021237973 = score(doc=272,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 272, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=272)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 21(1986), S.147-178
  15. White, H.D.; McCain, W.: Bibliometrics (1989) 0.01
    0.0070793247 = product of:
      0.021237973 = sum of:
        0.021237973 = weight(_text_:of in 341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021237973 = score(doc=341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=341)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 24(1989), S.119-186
  16. Ziman, J.M.: ¬The proliferation of scientific literature : a natural process (1980) 0.01
    0.0070793247 = product of:
      0.021237973 = sum of:
        0.021237973 = weight(_text_:of in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021237973 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  17. Peritz, B.C.: ¬A classification of citation roles for the social sciences and related fields (1983) 0.01
    0.006194409 = product of:
      0.018583227 = sum of:
        0.018583227 = weight(_text_:of in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018583227 = score(doc=3073,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  18. Rees-Potter, L.K.: Dynamic thesaural systems : a bibliometric study of terminological and conceptual change in sociology and economics with application to the design of dynamic thesaural systems (1989) 0.01
    0.006130875 = product of:
      0.018392624 = sum of:
        0.018392624 = weight(_text_:of in 5059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018392624 = score(doc=5059,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 5059, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5059)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Thesauri have been used in the library and information science field to provide a standard descriptor language for indexers or searchers to use in an informations storage and retrieval system. One difficulty has been the maintenance and updating of thesauri since terms used to describe concepts change over time and vary between users. This study investigates a mechanism by which thesauri can be updated and maintained using citation, co-citation analysis and citation context analysis.
  19. Vasiljev, A.: ¬The law of requisite variety as applied to subject indexing and retrieval (1989) 0.01
    0.0053094937 = product of:
      0.01592848 = sum of:
        0.01592848 = weight(_text_:of in 5069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01592848 = score(doc=5069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.076827854 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049130294 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 5069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5069)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)