Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Hudon, M."
  1. Hudon, M.: Indexation et languages documentaires dans les milieux archivistiques à l'ere des nouvelles technologies de l'information (1997/98) 0.02
    0.018575516 = product of:
      0.055726547 = sum of:
        0.055726547 = product of:
          0.11145309 = sum of:
            0.11145309 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11145309 = score(doc=2844,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.5860202 = fieldWeight in 2844, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2844)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the theoretical and practical aspects of subject indexing with a view to the use of new information technologies. Discusses certain characteristics particular to records and to archival practices in their relationship to those aspects. Describes the successive operations of content analysis and translation into documentary languages that constitute the indexing process. Examines the development, use and appraisal of documentary lanyguages particularly descriptor based thesaurus
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Indexing and documentary languages in archival environments in the era of new information technologies
  2. Hudon, M.: Conceptual compatibility in controlled language tools used to index and access the content of moving image collections (2004) 0.01
    0.013931636 = product of:
      0.041794907 = sum of:
        0.041794907 = product of:
          0.083589815 = sum of:
            0.083589815 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083589815 = score(doc=2655,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.4395151 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Five controlled vocabularies currently used for content representation in collections of non art moving images were examined to determine their level of conceptual compatibility. Methods borrowed from previous research in the area of indexing language compatibility were used. Quantitative data and qualitative observations allowed us to estimate more precisely and realistically the actual degree of conceptual redundancy in these indexing languages. It was found that the conceptual overlap is high enough to justify the pursuit of research and development work an a common basic indexing and access language that could be used to name objects, events, categories of persons, and relations most frequently depicted in non art moving image collections.
  3. Hudon, M.: ¬A preliminary investigation of the usefulness of semantic relations and of standardized definitions for the purpose of specifying meaning in a thesaurus (1998) 0.01
    0.011375135 = product of:
      0.034125403 = sum of:
        0.034125403 = product of:
          0.068250805 = sum of:
            0.068250805 = weight(_text_:indexing in 55) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068250805 = score(doc=55,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.3588626 = fieldWeight in 55, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=55)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The terminological consistency of indexers working with a thesaurus as indexing aid remains low. This suggests that indexers cannot perceive easily or very clearly the meaning of each descriptor available as index term. This paper presents the background nd some of the findings of a small scale experiment designed to study the effect on interindexer terminological consistency of modifying the nature of the semantic information given with descriptors in a thesaurus. The study also provided some insights into the respective usefulness of standardized definitions and of traditional networks of hierarchical and associative relationships as means of providing essential meaning information in the thesaurus used as indexing aid
  4. Hudon, M.: Preparing terminological definitions for indexing and retrieval thesauri : a model (1996) 0.01
    0.01072458 = product of:
      0.032173738 = sum of:
        0.032173738 = product of:
          0.064347476 = sum of:
            0.064347476 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064347476 = score(doc=5193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.3383389 = fieldWeight in 5193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  5. Hudon, M.: Subject access to Web resources in education (2003) 0.01
    0.01072458 = product of:
      0.032173738 = sum of:
        0.032173738 = product of:
          0.064347476 = sum of:
            0.064347476 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064347476 = score(doc=3958,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.3383389 = fieldWeight in 3958, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3958)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  6. Hudon, M.: KO and classification education in the light of Benjamin Bloom's Taxonomy of learning objectives (2014) 0.01
    0.0067315903 = product of:
      0.02019477 = sum of:
        0.02019477 = product of:
          0.04038954 = sum of:
            0.04038954 = weight(_text_:22 in 1468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04038954 = score(doc=1468,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1468, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1468)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  7. Hudon, M.; Turner, J.M.; Devin, Y.: How many terms are enough? : stability and dynamism in vocabulary management for moving image collections (2000) 0.01
    0.0067028617 = product of:
      0.020108584 = sum of:
        0.020108584 = product of:
          0.04021717 = sum of:
            0.04021717 = weight(_text_:indexing in 117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04021717 = score(doc=117,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.21146181 = fieldWeight in 117, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=117)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Most moving image collections have existed for less than a century, and as we enter the new millennium we observe that the organisation of these collections is still characterized by ad hoc practices. An important stream of research in this area focuses on high-level access to images using methods from library and information science, and using text to create information useful for retrieval. It has been established that common names for objects seen in the image are the key to retrieval in such collections. On a day-to-day basis, those responsible for collection management build indexing vocabularies, creating terms as necessary, and often structuring them loosely into a thesaurus. Discussions with moving image collection librarians have led us to believe that there may be an optimal number of common names a thesaurus for managing general collections of moving images should contain, and that the terms may even be the same from one thesaurus to the next. In this paper, we describe the methodology adopted for studying this question, and report preliminary results