Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Lykke, M."
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Golub, K.; Soergel, D.; Buchanan, G.; Tudhope, D.; Lykke, M.; Hiom, D.: ¬A framework for evaluating automatic indexing or classification in the context of retrieval (2016) 0.10
    0.09524199 = product of:
      0.14286299 = sum of:
        0.08966068 = weight(_text_:systematic in 3311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08966068 = score(doc=3311,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.31573826 = fieldWeight in 3311, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3311)
        0.053202312 = product of:
          0.106404625 = sum of:
            0.106404625 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.106404625 = score(doc=3311,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.55947536 = fieldWeight in 3311, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3311)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Tools for automatic subject assignment help deal with scale and sustainability in creating and enriching metadata, establishing more connections across and between resources and enhancing consistency. Although some software vendors and experimental researchers claim the tools can replace manual subject indexing, hard scientific evidence of their performance in operating information environments is scarce. A major reason for this is that research is usually conducted in laboratory conditions, excluding the complexities of real-life systems and situations. The article reviews and discusses issues with existing evaluation approaches such as problems of aboutness and relevance assessments, implying the need to use more than a single "gold standard" method when evaluating indexing and retrieval, and proposes a comprehensive evaluation framework. The framework is informed by a systematic review of the literature on evaluation approaches: evaluating indexing quality directly through assessment by an evaluator or through comparison with a gold standard, evaluating the quality of computer-assisted indexing directly in the context of an indexing workflow, and evaluating indexing quality indirectly through analyzing retrieval performance.
  2. Golub, K.; Lykke, M.; Tudhope, D.: Enhancing social tagging with automated keywords from the Dewey Decimal Classification (2014) 0.01
    0.009479279 = product of:
      0.028437834 = sum of:
        0.028437834 = product of:
          0.05687567 = sum of:
            0.05687567 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05687567 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.29905218 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the potential of applying the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) as an established knowledge organization system (KOS) for enhancing social tagging, with the ultimate purpose of improving subject indexing and information retrieval. Design/methodology/approach - Over 11.000 Intute metadata records in politics were used. Totally, 28 politics students were each given four tasks, in which a total of 60 resources were tagged in two different configurations, one with uncontrolled social tags only and another with uncontrolled social tags as well as suggestions from a controlled vocabulary. The controlled vocabulary was DDC comprising also mappings from the Library of Congress Subject Headings. Findings - The results demonstrate the importance of controlled vocabulary suggestions for indexing and retrieval: to help produce ideas of which tags to use, to make it easier to find focus for the tagging, to ensure consistency and to increase the number of access points in retrieval. The value and usefulness of the suggestions proved to be dependent on the quality of the suggestions, both as to conceptual relevance to the user and as to appropriateness of the terminology. Originality/value - No research has investigated the enhancement of social tagging with suggestions from the DDC, an established KOS, in a user trial, comparing social tagging only and social tagging enhanced with the suggestions. This paper is a final reflection on all aspects of the study.
  3. Svarre, T.; Lykke, M.: Experiences with automated categorization in e-government information retrieval (2014) 0.01
    0.009479279 = product of:
      0.028437834 = sum of:
        0.028437834 = product of:
          0.05687567 = sum of:
            0.05687567 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05687567 = score(doc=1372,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.29905218 = fieldWeight in 1372, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1372)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    High-precision search results are essential for supporting e-government employees' information tasks. Prior studies have shown that existing features of e-government retrieval systems need improvement in terms of search facilities (e.g., Goh et al. 2008), navigation (e.g., de Jong and Lentz 2006) and metadata (e.g., Kopackova, Michalek and Cejna 2010). This paper investigates how automated categorization can enhance information organization and retrieval, and presents the results of a realistic evaluation that compared automated categorization with free text indexing of the government intranet used by Danish tax authorities. The evaluation demonstrates a potential for automated categorization in a government context. In terms of quantitative measures free text indexing performed at the same level or better than searching by categorization. However, the qualitative analysis revealed that categorized overviews were useful if the participant did not possess much knowledge of the task at hand. When task knowledge was present, categorization was used to support the assumptions of a correct search. Participants avoided automated categorization if high-precision documents were among the top results or if few documents were retrieved. The findings emphasise the importance of simultaneous search options for e-government IR systems, and reveal that automated categorization is valuable in improving search facilities in e-government.