Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Moed, H.F."
  1. Moed, H.F.; Halevi, G.: Multidimensional assessment of scholarly research impact (2015) 0.03
    0.029886894 = product of:
      0.08966068 = sum of:
        0.08966068 = weight(_text_:systematic in 2212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08966068 = score(doc=2212,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.31573826 = fieldWeight in 2212, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2212)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article introduces the Multidimensional Research Assessment Matrix of scientific output. Its base notion holds that the choice of metrics to be applied in a research assessment process depends on the unit of assessment, the research dimension to be assessed, and the purposes and policy context of the assessment. An indicator may by highly useful within one assessment process, but less so in another. For instance, publication counts are useful tools to help discriminate between those staff members who are research active, and those who are not, but are of little value if active scientists are to be compared with one another according to their research performance. This paper gives a systematic account of the potential usefulness and limitations of a set of 10 important metrics, including altmetrics, applied at the level of individual articles, individual researchers, research groups, and institutions. It presents a typology of research impact dimensions and indicates which metrics are the most appropriate to measure each dimension. It introduces the concept of a "meta-analysis" of the units under assessment in which metrics are not used as tools to evaluate individual units, but to reach policy inferences regarding the objectives and general setup of an assessment process.
  2. Moed, H.F.; Vriens, M.: Possible inaccuracies occuring in citation analysis (1989) 0.02
    0.02144916 = product of:
      0.064347476 = sum of:
        0.064347476 = product of:
          0.12869495 = sum of:
            0.12869495 = weight(_text_:indexing in 6900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12869495 = score(doc=6900,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.6766778 = fieldWeight in 6900, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6900)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  3. Braam, R.R.; Moed, H.F.; Raan, F.J. van: Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis : T.1: Structural aspects - T.2: Dynamical Aspects (1991) 0.02
    0.016086869 = product of:
      0.048260607 = sum of:
        0.048260607 = product of:
          0.09652121 = sum of:
            0.09652121 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09652121 = score(doc=1119,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.5075084 = fieldWeight in 1119, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1119)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  4. Moed, H.F.: Differences in the construction of SCI based bibliometric indicators among various producers : a first overview (1996) 0.01
    0.01072458 = product of:
      0.032173738 = sum of:
        0.032173738 = product of:
          0.064347476 = sum of:
            0.064347476 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064347476 = score(doc=5073,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.3383389 = fieldWeight in 5073, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5073)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  5. Moed, H.F.; Bruin, R.E.D.; Leeuwen, T.N.V.: New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance : database description, overview of indicators and first applications (1995) 0.01
    0.0080434345 = product of:
      0.024130303 = sum of:
        0.024130303 = product of:
          0.048260607 = sum of:
            0.048260607 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048260607 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  6. Moed, H.F.; Halevi, G.: On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals (2016) 0.01
    0.005609659 = product of:
      0.016828977 = sum of:
        0.016828977 = product of:
          0.033657953 = sum of:
            0.033657953 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033657953 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:11:17
  7. Moed, H.F.; Leeuwen, T.N. van; Reedijk, J.: ¬A new classification system to describe the ageing of scientific journals and their impact factors (1998) 0.01
    0.00536229 = product of:
      0.016086869 = sum of:
        0.016086869 = product of:
          0.032173738 = sum of:
            0.032173738 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032173738 = score(doc=4719,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.16916946 = fieldWeight in 4719, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4719)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Citation indexing