Nielsen, H.J.: ¬The nature of fiction and its significance for classification and indexing (1997)
0.12
0.12121933 = product of:
0.18182899 = sum of:
0.12552495 = weight(_text_:systematic in 1785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12552495 = score(doc=1785,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.44203353 = fieldWeight in 1785, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1785)
0.05630404 = product of:
0.11260808 = sum of:
0.11260808 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11260808 = score(doc=1785,freq=8.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.5920931 = fieldWeight in 1785, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1785)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Considers the nature of fiction in relation to classification and indexing systems. Literary theory today is very heterogeneous. In designing an indexing system a single trend of school should not be chosen. Following a systematic extension and development of the 'how' facet of fictional documents is an useful approach. Themes should be a visible aspect in classification and indexing systems. Aspects of literary history, period, literary movement and influence should be noted
