Poulter, A.; Brunt, R.: On reading "Information storage and retrieval in the professional curriculum" by Rodney Brunt (2007)
0.03
0.03447506 = product of:
0.103425175 = sum of:
0.103425175 = sum of:
0.05630404 = weight(_text_:indexing in 870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05630404 = score(doc=870,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.29604656 = fieldWeight in 870, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=870)
0.047121134 = weight(_text_:22 in 870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047121134 = score(doc=870,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 870, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=870)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Reflects on a paper extolling teaching cataloguing and indexing at library school written for Library Review in 1980. Design/methodology/approach - Reflective debate on the content of the original paper. Findings - The sentiments of the original paper were supported, with the added proviso that nowadays the ability to organise information is a basic skill everyone needs. Practical implications - May be of interest to practitioners and library educators interested in this long standing debate. Originality/value - Paper carries a response by the original author to the reflections on his paper.
- Date
- 23.12.2007 18:40:22
