-
Golub, K.; Soergel, D.; Buchanan, G.; Tudhope, D.; Lykke, M.; Hiom, D.: ¬A framework for evaluating automatic indexing or classification in the context of retrieval (2016)
0.10
0.09524199 = product of:
0.14286299 = sum of:
0.08966068 = weight(_text_:systematic in 3311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08966068 = score(doc=3311,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.31573826 = fieldWeight in 3311, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3311)
0.053202312 = product of:
0.106404625 = sum of:
0.106404625 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.106404625 = score(doc=3311,freq=14.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.55947536 = fieldWeight in 3311, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3311)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Tools for automatic subject assignment help deal with scale and sustainability in creating and enriching metadata, establishing more connections across and between resources and enhancing consistency. Although some software vendors and experimental researchers claim the tools can replace manual subject indexing, hard scientific evidence of their performance in operating information environments is scarce. A major reason for this is that research is usually conducted in laboratory conditions, excluding the complexities of real-life systems and situations. The article reviews and discusses issues with existing evaluation approaches such as problems of aboutness and relevance assessments, implying the need to use more than a single "gold standard" method when evaluating indexing and retrieval, and proposes a comprehensive evaluation framework. The framework is informed by a systematic review of the literature on evaluation approaches: evaluating indexing quality directly through assessment by an evaluator or through comparison with a gold standard, evaluating the quality of computer-assisted indexing directly in the context of an indexing workflow, and evaluating indexing quality indirectly through analyzing retrieval performance.
-
Huang, X.; Soergel, D.; Klavans, J.L.: Modeling and analyzing the topicality of art images (2015)
0.08
0.07873234 = product of:
0.11809851 = sum of:
0.08966068 = weight(_text_:systematic in 2127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08966068 = score(doc=2127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.31573826 = fieldWeight in 2127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2127)
0.028437834 = product of:
0.05687567 = sum of:
0.05687567 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05687567 = score(doc=2127,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.29905218 = fieldWeight in 2127, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2127)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This study demonstrates an improved conceptual foundation to support well-structured analysis of image topicality. First we present a conceptual framework for analyzing image topicality, explicating the layers, the perspectives, and the topical relevance relationships involved in modeling the topicality of art images. We adapt a generic relevance typology to image analysis by extending it with definitions and relationships specific to the visual art domain and integrating it with schemes of image-text relationships that are important for image subject indexing. We then apply the adapted typology to analyze the topical relevance relationships between 11 art images and 768 image tags assigned by art historians and librarians. The original contribution of our work is the topical structure analysis of image tags that allows the viewer to more easily grasp the content, context, and meaning of an image and quickly tune into aspects of interest; it could also guide both the indexer and the searcher to specify image tags/descriptors in a more systematic and precise manner and thus improve the match between the two parties. An additional contribution is systematically examining and integrating the variety of image-text relationships from a relevance perspective. The paper concludes with implications for relational indexing and social tagging.
-
Ahn, J.-w.; Soergel, D.; Lin, X.; Zhang, M.: Mapping between ARTstor terms and the Getty Art and Architecture Thesaurus (2014)
0.03
0.029550051 = product of:
0.08865015 = sum of:
0.08865015 = sum of:
0.048260607 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048260607 = score(doc=1421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 1421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1421)
0.04038954 = weight(_text_:22 in 1421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04038954 = score(doc=1421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1421)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- To make better use of knowledge organization systems (KOS) for query expansion, we have developed a pattern-based technique for composition ontology mapping in a specific domain. The technique was tested in a two-step mapping. The user's free-text queries were first mapped to Getty's Art & Architecture Thesaurus (AAT) terms. The AAT-based queries were then mapped to a search engine's indexing vocabulary (ARTstor terms). The result indicated that our technique has improved the mapping success rate from 40% to 70%. We discuss also how the technique may be applied to other KOS mapping and how it may be implemented in practical systems.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Soergel, D.: Indexing and retrieval performance : the logical evidence (1994)
0.03
0.028152019 = product of:
0.08445606 = sum of:
0.08445606 = product of:
0.16891211 = sum of:
0.16891211 = weight(_text_:indexing in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16891211 = score(doc=579,freq=18.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.8881396 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article presents a logical analysis of the characteristics of indexing and their effects on retrieval performance.It establishes the ability to ask the questions one needs to ask as the foundation of performance evaluation, and recall and discrimination as the basic quantitative performance measures for binary noninteractive retrieval systems. It then defines the characteristics of indexing that affect retrieval - namely, indexing devices, viewpoint-based and importance-based indexing exhaustivity, indexing specifity, indexing correctness, and indexing consistency - and examines in detail their effects on retrieval. It concludes that retrieval performance depends chiefly on the match between indexing and the requirements of the individual query and on the adaption of the query formulation to the characteristics of the retrieval system, and that the ensuing complexity must be considered in the design and testing of retrieval systems
-
Soergel, D.: Information structure management : a unified framework for indexing and searching in database, expert, information-retrieval, and hypermedia systems (1994)
0.02
0.02275027 = product of:
0.068250805 = sum of:
0.068250805 = product of:
0.13650161 = sum of:
0.13650161 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13650161 = score(doc=2984,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.7177252 = fieldWeight in 2984, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2984)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Challenges in indexing electronic text and images. Ed.: R. Fidel et al
-
Soergel, D.: Knowledge organization for learning (2014)
0.01
0.011106558 = product of:
0.033319674 = sum of:
0.033319674 = product of:
0.06663935 = sum of:
0.06663935 = weight(_text_:22 in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06663935 = score(doc=1400,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.22-32
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Soergel, D.: Indexing and retrieval performance : the logical evidence (1997)
0.01
0.01072458 = product of:
0.032173738 = sum of:
0.032173738 = product of:
0.064347476 = sum of:
0.064347476 = weight(_text_:indexing in 578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064347476 = score(doc=578,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.3383389 = fieldWeight in 578, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=578)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Soergel, D.: Mathematical analysis of documentation systems : an attempt to a theory of classification and search request formulation (1967)
0.01
0.009479279 = product of:
0.028437834 = sum of:
0.028437834 = product of:
0.05687567 = sum of:
0.05687567 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05687567 = score(doc=5449,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.29905218 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- As an attempt to make a general structural theory of information retrieval, a documentation system (DS) is defined as a formal system consisting of (a) a set o of objects (documents); (b) a set A++ of elementary attributes (key-words), from which further attributes may be constructed: A++ generates A; (c) a set of axioms of the form X++(x)=m (m¯M, M a set of constant connecting attributes with objects: from the axioms further theorems (=true statements) may be constructed. By use of the theorems, different mappings O -> P(o) (P(o) set of all subsets of o) (search question -> set of documents retrieved) are defined. The type of a DS depends on two basic decisions: (1) choice of the rules for the construction of attributes and theorems, e.g., logical product in coordinate indexing; links. (2) choice of M; M may consist of the two constants 'applicable' and 'not applicable', or some positive integers, ...; Further practical decisions: A++ hierarchical or not; kind of mapping; introduction of roles (=further attributes). The most simple case - ordinary two-valued Coordinate Indexing - is discusssed in detail; o is a free distributive (but not Boolean) lattice, the homographic image a ring of subsets of o; instead of negation which is not useful, a useful retrieval operation 'praeternagation' is introduced. Furthermore these are discussed: a generalized definition of superimposed coding, some functions for the distance of objects or attributes; optimization and automatic derivation of classifications. The model takes into account term-term relations and document-document relations. It may serve as a structural framework in terms of which the functional problems of retrieval theory may be expressed more clearly
-
Golub, K.; Hansson, J.; Soergel, D.; Tudhope, D.: Managing classification in libraries : a methodological outline for evaluating automatic subject indexing and classification in Swedish library catalogues (2015)
0.01
0.009479279 = product of:
0.028437834 = sum of:
0.028437834 = product of:
0.05687567 = sum of:
0.05687567 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05687567 = score(doc=2300,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.29905218 = fieldWeight in 2300, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2300)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Subject terms play a crucial role in resource discovery but require substantial effort to produce. Automatic subject classification and indexing address problems of scale and sustainability and can be used to enrich existing bibliographic records, establish more connections across and between resources and enhance consistency of bibliographic data. The paper aims to put forward a complex methodological framework to evaluate automatic classification tools of Swedish textual documents based on the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) recently introduced to Swedish libraries. Three major complementary approaches are suggested: a quality-built gold standard, retrieval effects, domain analysis. The gold standard is built based on input from at least two catalogue librarians, end-users expert in the subject, end users inexperienced in the subject and automated tools. Retrieval effects are studied through a combination of assigned and free tasks, including factual and comprehensive types. The study also takes into consideration the different role and character of subject terms in various knowledge domains, such as scientific disciplines. As a theoretical framework, domain analysis is used and applied in relation to the implementation of DDC in Swedish libraries and chosen domains of knowledge within the DDC itself.
-
Berti, Jr., D.W.; Lima, G.; Maculan, B.; Soergel, D.: Computer-assisted checking of conceptual relationships in a large thesaurus (2018)
0.01
0.008975455 = product of:
0.026926363 = sum of:
0.026926363 = product of:
0.053852726 = sum of:
0.053852726 = weight(_text_:22 in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053852726 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 17. 1.2019 19:04:22
-
Komlodi, A.; Soergel, D.; Marchionini, G.: Search histories for user support in user interfaces (2006)
0.01
0.0067315903 = product of:
0.02019477 = sum of:
0.02019477 = product of:
0.04038954 = sum of:
0.04038954 = weight(_text_:22 in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04038954 = score(doc=5298,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:04:19
-
Zhang, P.; Soergel, D.: Towards a comprehensive model of the cognitive process and mechanisms of individual sensemaking (2014)
0.01
0.005609659 = product of:
0.016828977 = sum of:
0.016828977 = product of:
0.033657953 = sum of:
0.033657953 = weight(_text_:22 in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033657953 = score(doc=1344,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 16:55:39
-
Soergel, D.: Unleashing the power of data through organization : structure and connections for meaning, learning and discovery (2015)
0.01
0.005609659 = product of:
0.016828977 = sum of:
0.016828977 = product of:
0.033657953 = sum of:
0.033657953 = weight(_text_:22 in 2376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033657953 = score(doc=2376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2376)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 27.11.2015 20:52:22
