-
Belter, C.W.: Citation analysis as a literature search method for systematic reviews (2016)
0.19
0.1917852 = product of:
0.2876778 = sum of:
0.26354748 = weight(_text_:systematic in 3158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26354748 = score(doc=3158,freq=12.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.9280771 = fieldWeight in 3158, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3158)
0.024130303 = product of:
0.048260607 = sum of:
0.048260607 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048260607 = score(doc=3158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 3158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3158)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Systematic reviews are essential for evaluating biomedical treatment options, but the growing size and complexity of the available biomedical literature combined with the rigor of the systematic review method mean that systematic reviews are extremely difficult and labor-intensive to perform. In this article, I propose a method of searching the literature by systematically mining the various types of citation relationships between articles. I then test the method by comparing its precision and recall to that of 14 published systematic reviews. The method successfully retrieved 74% of the studies included in these reviews and 90% of the studies it could reasonably be expected to retrieve. The method also retrieved fewer than half of the total number of publications retrieved by these reviews and can be performed in substantially less time. This suggests that the proposed method offers a promising complement to traditional text-based methods of literature identification and retrieval for systematic reviews.
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.08
0.078800134 = product of:
0.2364004 = sum of:
0.2364004 = sum of:
0.12869495 = weight(_text_:indexing in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12869495 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.6766778 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.10770545 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10770545 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.08
0.078800134 = product of:
0.2364004 = sum of:
0.2364004 = sum of:
0.12869495 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12869495 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.6766778 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.10770545 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10770545 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.06
0.06035575 = product of:
0.18106724 = sum of:
0.18106724 = sum of:
0.11375134 = weight(_text_:indexing in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11375134 = score(doc=613,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.59810436 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.06731591 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06731591 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Abschnitte zu: The origins of citation indexing in science - Citation analysis in sociology, history and philosophy of science - From ASIS to ASIST
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.06
0.058544468 = product of:
0.1756334 = sum of:
0.1756334 = sum of:
0.08043434 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08043434 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.42292362 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.09519906 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09519906 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.06
0.055101942 = product of:
0.16530582 = sum of:
0.16530582 = sum of:
0.11145309 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11145309 = score(doc=1149,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.5860202 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.053852726 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053852726 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper presents a test of the validity of using Google Scholar to evaluate the publications of researchers by comparing the premises on which its search engine, PageRank, is based, to those of Garfield's theory of citation indexing. It finds that the premises are identical and that PageRank and Garfield's theory of citation indexing validate each other.
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.04
0.035126686 = product of:
0.10538005 = sum of:
0.10538005 = sum of:
0.048260607 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048260607 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.057119444 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057119444 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.03
0.03447506 = product of:
0.103425175 = sum of:
0.103425175 = sum of:
0.05630404 = weight(_text_:indexing in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05630404 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.29604656 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.047121134 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047121134 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006)
0.03
0.03447506 = product of:
0.103425175 = sum of:
0.103425175 = sum of:
0.05630404 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05630404 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.29604656 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.047121134 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047121134 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:20:01
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020)
0.03
0.03447506 = product of:
0.103425175 = sum of:
0.103425175 = sum of:
0.05630404 = weight(_text_:indexing in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05630404 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.29604656 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.047121134 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047121134 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 17.11.2020 12:22:59
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Malin, M.V.: ¬The Science Citation Index : a new concept in indexing (1968)
0.03
0.03033369 = product of:
0.09100107 = sum of:
0.09100107 = product of:
0.18200214 = sum of:
0.18200214 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18200214 = score(doc=5000,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.95696694 = fieldWeight in 5000, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5000)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Model, F.: 'Citation indexing' und Rückwärtskatalogisierung' : Beispiele für Zitatendokumentation (1964)
0.03
0.03033369 = product of:
0.09100107 = sum of:
0.09100107 = product of:
0.18200214 = sum of:
0.18200214 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18200214 = score(doc=5002,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.95696694 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.03
0.029550051 = product of:
0.08865015 = sum of:
0.08865015 = sum of:
0.048260607 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048260607 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.04038954 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04038954 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998)
0.03
0.029550051 = product of:
0.08865015 = sum of:
0.08865015 = sum of:
0.048260607 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048260607 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.04038954 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04038954 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:33:24
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003)
0.03
0.029550051 = product of:
0.08865015 = sum of:
0.08865015 = sum of:
0.048260607 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048260607 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
0.04038954 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04038954 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.03
0.029550051 = product of:
0.08865015 = sum of:
0.08865015 = sum of:
0.048260607 = weight(_text_:indexing in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048260607 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.04038954 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04038954 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.03
0.029550051 = product of:
0.08865015 = sum of:
0.08865015 = sum of:
0.048260607 = weight(_text_:indexing in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048260607 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.04038954 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04038954 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.03
0.029550051 = product of:
0.08865015 = sum of:
0.08865015 = sum of:
0.048260607 = weight(_text_:indexing in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048260607 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.04038954 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04038954 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.03
0.029550051 = product of:
0.08865015 = sum of:
0.08865015 = sum of:
0.048260607 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048260607 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.04038954 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04038954 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014)
0.03
0.029550051 = product of:
0.08865015 = sum of:
0.08865015 = sum of:
0.048260607 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048260607 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.04038954 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04038954 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 16:52:04
- Theme
- Citation indexing
