-
Kim, L.; Portenoy, J.H.; West, J.D.; Stovel, K.W.: Scientific journals still matter in the era of academic search engines and preprint archives (2020)
0.03
0.029886894 = product of:
0.08966068 = sum of:
0.08966068 = weight(_text_:systematic in 5961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08966068 = score(doc=5961,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.31573826 = fieldWeight in 5961, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5961)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Journals play a critical role in the scientific process because they evaluate the quality of incoming papers and offer an organizing filter for search. However, the role of journals has been called into question because new preprint archives and academic search engines make it easier to find articles independent of the journals that publish them. Research on this issue is complicated by the deeply confounded relationship between article quality and journal reputation. We present an innovative proxy for individual article quality that is divorced from the journal's reputation or impact factor: the number of citations to preprints posted on arXiv.org. Using this measure to study three subfields of physics that were early adopters of arXiv, we show that prior estimates of the effect of journal reputation on an individual article's impact (measured by citations) are likely inflated. While we find that higher-quality preprints in these subfields are now less likely to be published in journals compared to prior years, we find little systematic evidence that the role of journal reputation on article performance has declined.
-
Cabanac, G.; Labbé, C.: Prevalence of nonsensical algorithmically generated papers in the scientific literature (2021)
0.03
0.029886894 = product of:
0.08966068 = sum of:
0.08966068 = weight(_text_:systematic in 410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08966068 = score(doc=410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.31573826 = fieldWeight in 410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=410)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In 2014 leading publishers withdrew more than 120 nonsensical publications automatically generated with the SCIgen program. Casual observations suggested that similar problematic papers are still published and sold, without follow-up retractions. No systematic screening has been performed and the prevalence of such nonsensical publications in the scientific literature is unknown. Our contribution is 2-fold. First, we designed a detector that combs the scientific literature for grammar-based computer-generated papers. Applied to SCIgen, it has a 83.6% precision. Second, we performed a scientometric study of the 243 detected SCIgen-papers from 19 publishers. We estimate the prevalence of SCIgen-papers to be 75 per million papers in Information and Computing Sciences. Only 19% of the 243 problematic papers were dealt with: formal retraction (12) or silent removal (34). Publishers still serve and sometimes sell the remaining 197 papers without any caveat. We found evidence of citation manipulation via edited SCIgen bibliographies. This work reveals metric gaming up to the point of absurdity: fraudsters publish nonsensical algorithmically generated papers featuring genuine references. It stresses the need to screen papers for nonsense before peer-review and chase citation manipulation in published papers. Overall, this is yet another illustration of the harmful effects of the pressure to publish or perish.
-
Luhmann, J.; Burghardt, M.: Digital humanities - A discipline in its own right? : an analysis of the role and position of digital humanities in the academic landscape (2022)
0.03
0.029886894 = product of:
0.08966068 = sum of:
0.08966068 = weight(_text_:systematic in 460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08966068 = score(doc=460,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.31573826 = fieldWeight in 460, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=460)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Although digital humanities (DH) has received a lot of attention in recent years, its status as "a discipline in its own right" (Schreibman et al., A companion to digital humanities (pp. xxiii-xxvii). Blackwell; 2004) and its position in the overall academic landscape are still being negotiated. While there are countless essays and opinion pieces that debate the status of DH, little research has been dedicated to exploring the field in a systematic and empirical way (Poole, Journal of Documentation; 2017:73). This study aims to contribute to the existing research gap by comparing articles published over the past three decades in three established English-language DH journals (Computers and the Humanities, Literary and Linguistic Computing, Digital Humanities Quarterly) with research articles from journals in 15 other academic disciplines (corpus size: 34,041 articles; 299 million tokens). As a method of analysis, we use latent Dirichlet allocation topic modeling, combined with recent approaches that aggregate topic models by means of hierarchical agglomerative clustering. Our findings indicate that DH is simultaneously a discipline in its own right and a highly interdisciplinary field, with many connecting factors to neighboring disciplines-first and foremost, computational linguistics, and information science. Detailed descriptive analyses shed some light on the diachronic development of DH and also highlight topics that are characteristic for DH.
-
Digital libraries: current issues : Digital Libraries Workshop DL 94, Newark, NJ, May 19-20, 1994. Selected papers (1995)
0.03
0.029550051 = product of:
0.08865015 = sum of:
0.08865015 = sum of:
0.048260607 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048260607 = score(doc=1385,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
0.04038954 = weight(_text_:22 in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04038954 = score(doc=1385,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This volume is the first book coherently summarizing the current issues in digital libraries research, design and management. It presents, in a homogeneous way, thoroughly revised versions of 15 papers accepted for the First International Workshop on Digital Libraries, DL '94, held at Rutgers University in May 1994; in addition there are two introductory chapters provided by the volume editors, as well as a comprehensive bibliography listing 262 entries. Besides introductory aspects, the topics addressed are administration and management, information retrieval and hypertext, classification and indexing, and prototypes and applications. The volume is intended for researchers and design professionals in the field, as well as for experts from libraries administration and scientific publishing.
- Date
- 22. 1.1996 18:26:45
-
Walters, W.H.; Linvill, A.C.: Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas (2011)
0.02
0.02462504 = product of:
0.07387512 = sum of:
0.07387512 = sum of:
0.04021717 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04021717 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.21146181 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.033657953 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033657953 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- We investigate the extent to which open-access (OA) journals and articles in biology, computer science, economics, history, medicine, and psychology are indexed in each of 11 bibliographic databases. We also look for variations in index coverage by journal subject, journal size, publisher type, publisher size, date of first OA issue, region of publication, language of publication, publication fee, and citation impact factor. Two databases, Biological Abstracts and PubMed, provide very good coverage of the OA journal literature, indexing 60 to 63% of all OA articles in their disciplines. Five databases provide moderately good coverage (22-41%), and four provide relatively poor coverage (0-12%). OA articles in biology journals, English-only journals, high-impact journals, and journals that charge publication fees of $1,000 or more are especially likely to be indexed. Conversely, articles from OA publishers in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America are especially unlikely to be indexed. Four of the 11 databases index commercially published articles at a substantially higher rate than articles published by universities, scholarly societies, nonprofit publishers, or governments. Finally, three databases-EBSCO Academic Search Complete, ProQuest Research Library, and Wilson OmniFile-provide less comprehensive coverage of OA articles than of articles in comparable subscription journals.
-
Hobert, A.; Jahn, N.; Mayr, P.; Schmidt, B.; Taubert, N.: Open access uptake in Germany 2010-2018 : adoption in a diverse research landscape (2021)
0.02
0.023909515 = product of:
0.07172854 = sum of:
0.07172854 = weight(_text_:systematic in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07172854 = score(doc=250,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.2525906 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- This study investigates the development of open access (OA) to journal articles from authors affiliated with German universities and non-university research institutions in the period 2010-2018. Beyond determining the overall share of openly available articles, a systematic classification of distinct categories of OA publishing allowed us to identify different patterns of adoption of OA. Taking into account the particularities of the German research landscape, variations in terms of productivity, OA uptake and approaches to OA are examined at the meso-level and possible explanations are discussed. The development of the OA uptake is analysed for the different research sectors in Germany (universities, non-university research institutes of the Helmholtz Association, Fraunhofer Society, Max Planck Society, Leibniz Association, and government research agencies). Combining several data sources (incl. Web of Science, Unpaywall, an authority file of standardised German affiliation information, the ISSN-Gold-OA 3.0 list, and OpenDOAR), the study confirms the growth of the OA share mirroring the international trend reported in related studies. We found that 45% of all considered articles during the observed period were openly available at the time of analysis. Our findings show that subject-specific repositories are the most prevalent type of OA. However, the percentages for publication in fully OA journals and OA via institutional repositories show similarly steep increases. Enabling data-driven decision-making regarding the implementation of OA in Germany at the institutional level, the results of this study furthermore can serve as a baseline to assess the impact recent transformative agreements with major publishers will likely have on scholarly communication.
-
Veittes, M.: Electronic Book (1995)
0.02
0.022438636 = product of:
0.06731591 = sum of:
0.06731591 = product of:
0.13463181 = sum of:
0.13463181 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13463181 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22
-
Zschunke, P.; Svensson, P.: Bücherbrett für alle Fälle : Geräte-Speicher fassen Tausende von Seiten (2000)
0.02
0.019039815 = product of:
0.057119444 = sum of:
0.057119444 = product of:
0.11423889 = sum of:
0.11423889 = weight(_text_:22 in 4823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11423889 = score(doc=4823,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4823, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4823)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 3. 5.1997 8:44:22
18. 6.2000 9:11:22
-
Leuser, P.: SGML-Einsatz bei Duden und Brockhaus : ein Verlag auf neuem Weg (1993)
0.02
0.01795091 = product of:
0.053852726 = sum of:
0.053852726 = product of:
0.10770545 = sum of:
0.10770545 = weight(_text_:22 in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10770545 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Infodoc. 19(1993) H.3, S.20-22
-
Polatscheck, K.: Elektronische Versuchung : Test des Sony Data Discman: eine digitale Konkurrenz für Taschenbücher? (1992)
0.02
0.01795091 = product of:
0.053852726 = sum of:
0.053852726 = product of:
0.10770545 = sum of:
0.10770545 = weight(_text_:22 in 6381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10770545 = score(doc=6381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6381)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Zeit. Nr.xx vom ???, S.22
-
Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998)
0.02
0.01795091 = product of:
0.053852726 = sum of:
0.053852726 = product of:
0.10770545 = sum of:
0.10770545 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10770545 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
-
Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017)
0.02
0.01586651 = product of:
0.04759953 = sum of:
0.04759953 = product of:
0.09519906 = sum of:
0.09519906 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09519906 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 4.2017 10:42:05
22. 4.2017 10:48:38
-
Dechsling, R.: Softwaretypen : Datenbank, Hypertext oder linearer Text? (1994)
0.02
0.015707046 = product of:
0.047121134 = sum of:
0.047121134 = product of:
0.09424227 = sum of:
0.09424227 = weight(_text_:22 in 8074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09424227 = score(doc=8074,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8074, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8074)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Börsenblatt. Nr.50 vom 24.6.1994, S.19-22
-
Electronic publishing and electronic information communication (1996)
0.02
0.015707046 = product of:
0.047121134 = sum of:
0.047121134 = product of:
0.09424227 = sum of:
0.09424227 = weight(_text_:22 in 6664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09424227 = score(doc=6664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6664)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.181-247
-
Schmitz, H.: Lese- und Lernstoff allerwege : NuvoMedia bietet 'RocketBook' an, Bertelsmann ist dabei (1998)
0.02
0.015707046 = product of:
0.047121134 = sum of:
0.047121134 = product of:
0.09424227 = sum of:
0.09424227 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09424227 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 12. 2.1996 22:34:46
-
Roberts, R.: Searching the New Dictionary of National Biography (1997)
0.02
0.015166845 = product of:
0.045500536 = sum of:
0.045500536 = product of:
0.09100107 = sum of:
0.09100107 = weight(_text_:indexing in 968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09100107 = score(doc=968,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.47848347 = fieldWeight in 968, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=968)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Describes the eidtorial thinking and planning behind the preparation of the New Dictionary of National Biography (DNB) for publication in print and electronic form. Focuses on issues arising from the attempt to capture 'clean' information from literary prose. Details the characters of the DNB, access through indexes, core data, clean data, indexing the subject, indexing the text, and editorial tracking
-
Swiaczny, F.: Elektronisches Publizieren bei MATEO (1998)
0.01
0.0134631805 = product of:
0.04038954 = sum of:
0.04038954 = product of:
0.08077908 = sum of:
0.08077908 = weight(_text_:22 in 2356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08077908 = score(doc=2356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2356)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.1, S.35-38
-
Friesel, U.: ¬Das Buch wie Cola aus dem Automaten : Book-on-Demand: Gedruckt aus dem Internet, was gewünscht wird, und zwar sofort (1999)
0.01
0.0134631805 = product of:
0.04038954 = sum of:
0.04038954 = product of:
0.08077908 = sum of:
0.08077908 = weight(_text_:22 in 3902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08077908 = score(doc=3902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3902)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 17. 7.1996 9:33:22
-
Oßwald, A.: Proaktives Wissensmanagement für Fachbereiche, Hochschule und externe Partner : Bibliotheksdienstleistungen als Brücke zur Praxis (2000)
0.01
0.0134631805 = product of:
0.04038954 = sum of:
0.04038954 = product of:
0.08077908 = sum of:
0.08077908 = weight(_text_:22 in 4711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08077908 = score(doc=4711,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4711, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4711)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 27.10.2001 12:22:54
-
ap: Virtuelle Bibliotheken überall hin mitnehmen : Geräte-Speicher fassen Tausende von Seiten (2000)
0.01
0.0134631805 = product of:
0.04038954 = sum of:
0.04038954 = product of:
0.08077908 = sum of:
0.08077908 = weight(_text_:22 in 747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08077908 = score(doc=747,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 747, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=747)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 3. 5.1997 8:44:22
