-
Chan, L.M.: Social bookmarking and subject indexing (2011)
0.02
0.018958557 = product of:
0.05687567 = sum of:
0.05687567 = product of:
0.11375134 = sum of:
0.11375134 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11375134 = score(doc=1806,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.59810436 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Subject access: preparing for the future. Conference on August 20 - 21, 2009 in Florence, the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section sponsored an IFLA satellite conference entitled "Looking at the Past and Preparing for the Future". Eds.: P. Landry et al
-
Tennis, J.T.: Social tagging and the next steps for indexing (2006)
0.02
0.016086869 = product of:
0.048260607 = sum of:
0.048260607 = product of:
0.09652121 = sum of:
0.09652121 = weight(_text_:indexing in 570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09652121 = score(doc=570,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.5075084 = fieldWeight in 570, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=570)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Voss, J.: Collaborative thesaurus tagging the Wikipedia way (2006)
0.02
0.015166845 = product of:
0.045500536 = sum of:
0.045500536 = product of:
0.09100107 = sum of:
0.09100107 = weight(_text_:indexing in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09100107 = score(doc=620,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.47848347 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper explores the system of categories that is used to classify articles in Wikipedia. It is compared to collaborative tagging systems like del.icio.us and to hierarchical classification like the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). Specifics and commonalities of these systems of subject indexing are exposed. Analysis of structural and statistical properties (descriptors per record, records per descriptor, descriptor levels) shows that the category system of Wikimedia is a thesaurus that combines collaborative tagging and hierarchical subject indexing in a special way.
-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.01
0.0134631805 = product of:
0.04038954 = sum of:
0.04038954 = product of:
0.08077908 = sum of:
0.08077908 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08077908 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Furner, J.: Folksonomies (2009)
0.01
0.01072458 = product of:
0.032173738 = sum of:
0.032173738 = product of:
0.064347476 = sum of:
0.064347476 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064347476 = score(doc=3857,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.3383389 = fieldWeight in 3857, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3857)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Folksonomies are indexing languages that emerge from the distributed resource-description activity of multiple agents who make use of online tagging services to assign tags (i.e., category labels) to the resources in collections. Although individuals' motivations for engaging in tagging activity vary widely, folksonomy-based retrieval systems can be evaluated by measuring the degree to which taggers and searchers agree on tag-resource pairings.
-
Rafferty, P.: Tagging (2018)
0.01
0.009384007 = product of:
0.02815202 = sum of:
0.02815202 = product of:
0.05630404 = sum of:
0.05630404 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05630404 = score(doc=4647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.29604656 = fieldWeight in 4647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4647)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article examines tagging as knowledge organization. Tagging is a kind of indexing, a process of labelling and categorizing information made to support resource discovery for users. Social tagging generally means the practice whereby internet users generate keywords to describe, categorise or comment on digital content. The value of tagging comes when social tags within a collection are aggregated and shared through a folksonomy. This article examines definitions of tagging and folksonomy, and discusses the functions, advantages and disadvantages of tagging systems in relation to knowledge organization before discussing studies that have compared tagging and conventional library-based knowledge organization systems. Approaches to disciplining tagging practice are examined and tagger motivation discussed. Finally, the article outlines current research fronts.
-
Goodrum, A.; Hibbard, C.E.; Fels, C.D.; Woodcock, C.K.: ¬The creation of keysigns : American sign language metadata (2008)
0.01
0.0080434345 = product of:
0.024130303 = sum of:
0.024130303 = product of:
0.048260607 = sum of:
0.048260607 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048260607 = score(doc=2272,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 2272, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2272)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- This paper reports preliminary results from a pilot test of the creation of a folksonomic gestural taxonomy for sign language indexing and retrieval. Skilled sign language interpreters and deaf participants were asked to create sign language metadata or 'Keysigns' that they would assign to classify topics presented by three deaf scientists during a day-log workshop. Although their Keysigns demonstrate a high degree of content conformity, the physical signing itself lacked consistency. Comments made by participants revealed that signed metadata was not a commonly understood concept and that the exercise was cognitively challenging. The paper concludes with suggestions for ways to make the creation of folksonomic Keysign metadata easier from cognitive and physical perspectives.
-
Peters, I.: Folksonomies, social tagging and information retrieval (2011)
0.01
0.0080434345 = product of:
0.024130303 = sum of:
0.024130303 = product of:
0.048260607 = sum of:
0.048260607 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048260607 = score(doc=4907,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Services in Web 2.0 generate a large quantity of information, distributed over a range of resources (e.g. photos, URLs, videos) and integrated into different platforms (e.g. social bookmarking systems, sharing platforms (Peters, 2009). To adequately use this mass of information and to extract it from the platforms, users must be equipped with suitable tools and knowledge. After all, the best information is useless if users cannot find it: 'The model of information consumption relies on the information being found' (Vander Wal, 2004). In Web 2.0, the retrieval component has been established through so-called folksonomies (Vander Wal, 2005a), which are considered as several combinations of an information resource, one or more freely chosen keywords ('tags') and a user. Web 2.0 services that use folksonomies as an indexing and retrieval tool are defined as 'collaborative information services' because they allow for the collaborative creation of a public database that is accessible to all users (registered, where necessary) via the tags of the folksonomy (Ding et al., 2009; Heymann, Paepcke and Garcia-Molina, 2010).
-
Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008)
0.01
0.007933255 = product of:
0.023799766 = sum of:
0.023799766 = product of:
0.04759953 = sum of:
0.04759953 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04759953 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.14-22
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Wesch, M.: Information R/evolution (2006)
0.01
0.007853523 = product of:
0.023560567 = sum of:
0.023560567 = product of:
0.047121134 = sum of:
0.047121134 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047121134 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 5. 1.2008 19:22:48
-
Peters, I.: Folksonomies : indexing and retrieval in Web 2.0 (2009)
0.01
0.0075834226 = product of:
0.022750268 = sum of:
0.022750268 = product of:
0.045500536 = sum of:
0.045500536 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045500536 = score(doc=4203,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.23924173 = fieldWeight in 4203, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4203)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Zugl.: Düsseldorf, Univ., Diss., 2009 u.d.T.: Peters, Isabella: Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval Rez. in: IWP - Information Wissenschaft & Praxis, 61(2010) Heft 8, S.469-470 (U. Spree): "... Nachdem sich die Rezensentin durch 418 Seiten Text hindurch gelesen hat, bleibt sie unentschieden, wie der auffällige Einsatz langer Zitate (im Durchschnitt drei Zitate, die länger als vier kleingedruckte Zeilen sind, pro Seite) zu bewerten ist, zumal die Zitate nicht selten rein illustrativen Charakter haben bzw. Isabella Peters noch einmal zitiert, was sie bereits in eigenen Worten ausgedrückt hat. Redundanz und Verlängerung der Lesezeit halten sich hier die Waage mit der Möglichkeit, dass sich die Leserin einen unmittelbaren Eindruck von Sprache und Duktus der zitierten Literatur verschaffen kann. Eindeutig unschön ist das Beenden eines Gedankens oder einer Argumentation durch ein Zitat (z. B. S. 170). Im deutschen Original entstehen auf diese Weise die für deutsche wissenschaftliche Qualifikationsarbeiten typischen denglischen Texte. Für alle, die sich für Wissensrepräsentation, Information Retrieval und kollaborative Informationsdienste interessieren, ist "Folksonomies : Indexing and Retrieval in Web 2.0" trotz der angeführten kleinen Mängel zur Lektüre und Anschaffung - wegen seines beinahe enzyklopädischen Charakters auch als Nachschlage- oder Referenzwerk geeignet - unbedingt zu empfehlen. Abschließend möchte ich mich in einem Punkt der Produktinfo von de Gruyter uneingeschränkt anschließen: ein "Grundlagenwerk für Folksonomies".
-
Morrison, P.J.: Tagging and searching : search retrieval effectiveness of folksonomies on the World Wide Web (2008)
0.01
0.0067315903 = product of:
0.02019477 = sum of:
0.02019477 = product of:
0.04038954 = sum of:
0.04038954 = weight(_text_:22 in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04038954 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 1. 8.2008 12:39:22
-
Moreiro-González, J.-A.; Bolaños-Mejías, C.: Folksonomy indexing from the assignment of free tags to setup subject : a search analysis into the domain of legal history (2018)
0.01
0.0067028617 = product of:
0.020108584 = sum of:
0.020108584 = product of:
0.04021717 = sum of:
0.04021717 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04021717 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.21146181 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008)
0.01
0.005609659 = product of:
0.016828977 = sum of:
0.016828977 = product of:
0.033657953 = sum of:
0.033657953 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033657953 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Hayman, S.; Lothian, N.: Taxonomy directed folksonomies : integrating user tagging and controlled vocabularies for Australian education networks (2007)
0.01
0.00536229 = product of:
0.016086869 = sum of:
0.016086869 = product of:
0.032173738 = sum of:
0.032173738 = weight(_text_:indexing in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032173738 = score(doc=705,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.16916946 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 73RD IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL 19-23 August 2007, Durban, South Africa. - 157 - Classification and Indexing
-
Braun, M.: Lesezeichen zum Stöbern : "Social bookmark"-Seiten setzen auf die Empfehlungen ihrer Nutzer (2007)
0.00
0.0044877273 = product of:
0.013463181 = sum of:
0.013463181 = product of:
0.026926363 = sum of:
0.026926363 = weight(_text_:22 in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026926363 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 3. 5.1997 8:44:22
