Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Indexierungsstudien"
  • × year_i:[1970 TO 1980}
  1. Chan, L.M.: Alphabetical arrangement and subject collocation in Library of Congress Subject Headings (1977) 0.05 
    0.04781903 = product of:
  0.14345708 = sum of:
    0.14345708 = weight(_text_:systematic in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14345708 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049684696 = queryNorm
        0.5051812 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Beginning with Cutter, theorists of subject headings have conceded that certain elements of systematic arrangement in the dictionary catalog are inevitable; yet the fact that no specific guidelines have ever been developed for the determination of the extent to which subject collocation at the expense of specific and direct entry should be allowed has resulted in the many irregularities and inconsistencies now existing in the LCSH
  2. Wilson, P.: ¬The end of specifity (1979) 0.05 
    0.04781903 = product of:
  0.14345708 = sum of:
    0.14345708 = weight(_text_:systematic in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14345708 = score(doc=2274,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049684696 = queryNorm
        0.5051812 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Recently announced subject cataloging practices at the Library of Congress, calling for systematic duplication of entries at specific and generic levels, are in direct violation of the rule of exclusively specific entry, hitherto accepted by LC. It is argued that if the new practices are justified, consistency calls for their general application, which results in abandonment of the rule. But the new practices do not accomplish their ostensible goals, do not reveal more of the content of LC's collections, do introduce new inconveniences, do constitute a pointless enlargement of catalogs, and hence should be abandoned
  3. Swanson, D.R.: Some unexplained aspects of the Cranfield tests of indexing performance factors (1971) 0.02 
    0.02144916 = product of:
  0.064347476 = sum of:
    0.064347476 = product of:
      0.12869495 = sum of:
        0.12869495 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12869495 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.6766778 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Authors