Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  • × author_ss:"Milstead, J.L."
  1. Milstead, J.L.: Thesauri in a full-text world (1998) 0.03
    0.030177874 = product of:
      0.09053362 = sum of:
        0.09053362 = sum of:
          0.05687567 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05687567 = score(doc=2337,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049684696 = queryNorm
              0.29905218 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
          0.033657953 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033657953 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049684696 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Despite early claims to the contemporary, thesauri continue to find use as access tools for information in the full-text environment. Their mode of use is changing, but this change actually represents an expansion rather than a contrdiction of their utility. Thesauri and similar vocabulary tools can complement full-text access by aiding users in focusing their searches, by supplementing the linguistic analysis of the text search engine, and even by serving as one of the tools used by the linguistic engine for its analysis. While human indexing contunues to be used for many databases, the trend is to increase the use of machine aids for this purpose. All machine-aided indexing (MAI) systems rely on thesauri as the basis for term selection. In the 21st century, the balance of effort between human and machine will change at both input and output, but thesauri will continue to play an important role for the foreseeable future
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  2. Milstead, J.L.; Berger, M.C.: ¬The Engineering Information thesaurus development project (1993) 0.02
    0.018575516 = product of:
      0.055726547 = sum of:
        0.055726547 = product of:
          0.11145309 = sum of:
            0.11145309 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11145309 = score(doc=5292,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.5860202 = fieldWeight in 5292, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5292)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the development of a thesaurus by Engineering Information, Inc. for use in indexing its databases. The concept in the former, highly precoordinate, indexing vocabulary were converted into postcoodinate descriptors, and a full set of thesaural relationships developed. Issues to be resolved in developing the vocabulary included the degree of postcoordination that was appropriate, the need to make the thesaurus usable with retrospective indexing that could not be converted and the demands on in-house staff during the development and conversion process
  3. Milstead, J.L.: Standards for relationships between subject indexing terms (2001) 0.01
    0.0080434345 = product of:
      0.024130303 = sum of:
        0.024130303 = product of:
          0.048260607 = sum of:
            0.048260607 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048260607 = score(doc=1148,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 1148, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1148)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)