Search (366 results, page 2 of 19)

0.041841652 = product of:
  0.12552495 = sum of:
    0.12552495 = weight(_text_:systematic in 375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12552495 = score(doc=375,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049684696 = queryNorm
        0.44203353 = fieldWeight in 375, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=375)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The human process of determining bibliographic data from title pages of monographs is complex, yet systematic. This paper investigates the intellectual process involved, in conceptual and logical levels, by proposing a model of the expert system for determining title proper as the first element of the first area in ISBD. It assumes that the title page of a monograph consists of more than one block of character or graphic representation. Each block has its physical and content characteristics and can be separated from other blocks by separators. Three categories of expert knowledge are identified, and the system model is discussed along with its individual system component. It applies the "list" concept for the system data structure and addresses the potentiality of this conceptual model.

0.041841652 = product of:
  0.12552495 = sum of:
    0.12552495 = weight(_text_:systematic in 381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12552495 = score(doc=381,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049684696 = queryNorm
        0.44203353 = fieldWeight in 381, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=381)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

An experiment in latest entry cataloging of selected serial title changes is currently being conducted at Northwestern University Library. The integrated structure of Northwestern's automated system NOTIS and its applications to serials processing were primary factors leading to the investigation of latest entry cataloging as an alternative to the current standard of successive entry cataloging for serial title changes. A systematic investigation was conducted through most of 1985 and allowed project staff to identify and evaluate a number of concerns and problems. The study team is encouraged with the results, but will continue gathering cataloging statistics and will conduct user studies before adopting latest entry cataloging as a permanent option.

0.041841652 = product of:
  0.12552495 = sum of:
    0.12552495 = weight(_text_:systematic in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12552495 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049684696 = queryNorm
        0.44203353 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Since this book is into shifting worlds and changing minds it is best approached with a perspective open to change. What you get is a systematic dismantling of the cult of rationality through an examination of human perception. The result is a simpler, more natural way of being, free from the limitations of particular belief systems. The idea is that the emancipated mind finds peace through awareness and compassion. It is clearly written, but a bit scholarly drawing from a broad base of scientific and philosophical thought. As such it organizes and makes accessible some of the brightest thinkers of all time.

0.03621345 = product of:
  0.10864034 = sum of:
    0.10864034 = sum of:
      0.068250805 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.068250805 = score(doc=1637,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049684696 = queryNorm
          0.3588626 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
      0.04038954 = weight(_text_:22 in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04038954 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049684696 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The development of the general theory of subject indexing language and of POPSI for organisation, storage and retrieval of subjects embodies in documents has a striking parallel in the search for and development of 'universal forms' and 'deep structure' in language and linguistic studies. This paper briefly traces the development of POPSI language as a metalanguage for information organisation and for generating information retrieval thesaurus. Also a computer-based system for generating an information retrieval thesaurus from modulated subject headings formulated according to POPSI which are enriched with certain codes for relating the terms in the subject headings is described. It is also mentioned that, if it is possible to form a table of equivalent terms in another language for the terms already used to generate the thesaurus, then it is possible to translate the thesaurus automatically into the other language

Source

International forum on information and documentation. 8(1983), S.22-29

0.03586427 = product of:
  0.10759281 = sum of:
    0.10759281 = weight(_text_:systematic in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10759281 = score(doc=1659,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049684696 = queryNorm
        0.3788859 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The model of operationalist and conceptualist searching styles describes searching behavior of experienced online searchers. It is based on the systematic observation of five experienced online searchers doing their regular, job-related searches, and on the analysis of 10 to 13 searches conducted by each of them. Operationalist searchers aim at optimal strategies to achieve precise retrieval; they use a large range of system capabilities in their interaction. They preserve the specific meaning of the request, and the aim of their interactions is an answer set representing the request precisely. Conceptualist searchers analyze a request by seeking to fit it into a faceted structure. They first enter the facet that represents the most important aspect of the request. Their search is then centered on retrieving subsets from this primary set by introducing additional facets. In contrast to the operationalists, they are primarily concerned with recall. During the interaction they preserve the faceted structure, but may change the specific meaning of the request. Although not comprehensive, the model aids in recognizing special and individual characteristics of searching behavior which provide explanations of previous research and guidelines for further investigations into the search process

0.03447506 = product of:
  0.103425175 = sum of:
    0.103425175 = sum of:
      0.05630404 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05630404 = score(doc=1361,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049684696 = queryNorm
          0.29604656 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
      0.047121134 = weight(_text_:22 in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047121134 = score(doc=1361,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049684696 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

THESYS is based on the natural language processing of free-text databases. It yields statistically evaluated correlations between words of the database. These correlations correspond to traditional thesaurus relations. The person who has to build a thesaurus is thus assisted by the proposals made by THESYS. THESYS is being tested on commercial databases under real world conditions. It is part of a text processing project at Siemens, called TINA (Text-Inhalts-Analyse). Software from TINA is actually being applied and evaluated by the US Department of Commerce for patent search and indexing (REALIST: REtrieval Aids by Linguistics and STatistics)

Date

6. 1.1999 10:22:07

0.03447506 = product of:
  0.103425175 = sum of:
    0.103425175 = sum of:
      0.05630404 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05630404 = score(doc=2477,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049684696 = queryNorm
          0.29604656 = fieldWeight in 2477, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2477)
      0.047121134 = weight(_text_:22 in 2477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047121134 = score(doc=2477,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049684696 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2477, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2477)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The use of interactive videodiscs for preserving, presenting and retrieving pictorial collections in Australia was pioneered at the New South Wales Government Printing Office, Sydney. This project has now stored some 200.000 historical photographs on interactive videodisc, associated with sophisticated microcomputer data bases using the specially developed Just Image software. Videodisc systems to retrieve pictorial material are being used to preserve and present the pictorial collections of various Australian libraries and museums, and standards for the description and indexing of photographs are being developed.

Date

3. 1.1999 11:22:04

0.032173738 = product of:
  0.09652121 = sum of:
    0.09652121 = product of:
      0.19304243 = sum of:
        0.19304243 = weight(_text_:indexing in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19304243 = score(doc=664,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            1.0150168 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

LCSH

PRECIS (Indexing system)

PRECIS

Documents / Subject indexing / Schemes: PRECIS

Subject

PRECIS (Indexing system)
Documents / Subject indexing / Schemes: PRECIS

0.031123232 = product of:
  0.09336969 = sum of:
    0.09336969 = product of:
      0.18673939 = sum of:
        0.18673939 = weight(_text_:indexing in 6965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18673939 = score(doc=6965,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.98187536 = fieldWeight in 6965, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6965)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: WELLISCH, H.H.: The literature of indexing; THOMAS, D.: Book indexing principles and stan-dards; FETTERS, L.K.: Indexing software; MILSTEAD, J.L.: Database design: Indexing applications; PRESCHEL, B.M.: Indexing for print, online, and CD-ROM; BRENNER, E.H.: Vocabulary control; ANDERSON, J.D.: Indexing and classification: file organization and display for information retrieval; CROFT, W.B.: Automatic indexing; SARACEVIC, T.: Indexing, searching, and relevance; LIPETZ, B.-A.: The usefulness of indexes; THOMAS, D.: History of the American Society of Indexers

LCSH

Indexing / Congresses

Subject

Indexing / Congresses

0.03033369 = product of:
  0.09100107 = sum of:
    0.09100107 = product of:
      0.18200214 = sum of:
        0.18200214 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18200214 = score(doc=1357,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.95696694 = fieldWeight in 1357, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1357)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Indexing specialized formats and subjects. Ed.: H. Feinberg

0.02997611 = product of:
  0.08992833 = sum of:
    0.08992833 = product of:
      0.17985666 = sum of:
        0.17985666 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17985666 = score(doc=5604,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.94568604 = fieldWeight in 5604, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5604)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

LCSH

NEPHIS (Indexing system)
Indexing

Subject

NEPHIS (Indexing system)
Indexing

0.029674836 = product of:
  0.08902451 = sum of:
    0.08902451 = product of:
      0.17804901 = sum of:
        0.17804901 = weight(_text_:indexing in 373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17804901 = score(doc=373,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.9361814 = fieldWeight in 373, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=373)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Pattern indexing is an attempt at combining standardized and free indexing. In contrast to prevailing indexing methods, notably precoordinated ones, pattern indexing also taskes into consideration the terminological and information retrieval habits in certain disciplines of science. It is based on patterns consisting of subject categories reflecting the conceptual and methodological framework of a given discipline. Zhese categories provide structured sets of standardized subject headings. To allow for flexibility and adequacy, these headings may be complemented by free indexing terms. Pattern indexing is intended to mend opaque catalog structures and terminological uncertainties of topical subject headings in common precoordinated indexing practice. Pattren indexing is discussed in the context of literary scholarship.

0.028374568 = product of:
  0.0851237 = sum of:
    0.0851237 = product of:
      0.1702474 = sum of:
        0.1702474 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1702474 = score(doc=1679,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.8951606 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This article introduces a series of 8 papers giving a survey of the decisions to be made in the choice of the most expedient indexing method and presenting a short description of the contents of each of the papers, namely: the definability of the requested information; individual vs. generic concepts; the predictibility of their mode of expression; the fidelity of concept representation: the indexing language vocabulary; the indexing language grammar; the category-controlled interplay between vocabulary and grammar in an indexing language; the practice of information supply: the personal file; the employment of a large indexing language vocabulary; eth employment of an indexing language syntax

0.027863272 = product of:
  0.083589815 = sum of:
    0.083589815 = product of:
      0.16717963 = sum of:
        0.16717963 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16717963 = score(doc=1062,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.8790302 = fieldWeight in 1062, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1062)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Introduction to subject indexing. - Subject analysis. - Elements of practical classification. - Universal Decimal Classification [UDC]. -Classified catalogue. - Alphabetical subject catalogue. - Post-coordinate indexing

0.027863272 = product of:
  0.083589815 = sum of:
    0.083589815 = product of:
      0.16717963 = sum of:
        0.16717963 = weight(_text_:indexing in 8129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16717963 = score(doc=8129,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.8790302 = fieldWeight in 8129, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8129)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

LCSH

Indexing.

Subject

Indexing.

0.026811447 = product of:
  0.08043434 = sum of:
    0.08043434 = product of:
      0.16086867 = sum of:
        0.16086867 = weight(_text_:indexing in 870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16086867 = score(doc=870,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.84584725 = fieldWeight in 870, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=870)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.026811447 = product of:
  0.08043434 = sum of:
    0.08043434 = product of:
      0.16086867 = sum of:
        0.16086867 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16086867 = score(doc=1358,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.84584725 = fieldWeight in 1358, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1358)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.026811447 = product of:
  0.08043434 = sum of:
    0.08043434 = product of:
      0.16086867 = sum of:
        0.16086867 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16086867 = score(doc=5226,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.84584725 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.026811447 = product of:
  0.08043434 = sum of:
    0.08043434 = product of:
      0.16086867 = sum of:
        0.16086867 = weight(_text_:indexing in 6888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16086867 = score(doc=6888,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.84584725 = fieldWeight in 6888, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6888)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Theme

Citation indexing

0.026811447 = product of:
  0.08043434 = sum of:
    0.08043434 = product of:
      0.16086867 = sum of:
        0.16086867 = weight(_text_:indexing in 6983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16086867 = score(doc=6983,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.84584725 = fieldWeight in 6983, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6983)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Indexing terms supplied by authors can increase subject control of their documents. The terms can be used in the creation of indexes, abstracts, and other devices for information retrieval in the special library. An examination of the American Mathematical Society author indexing program suggests that contributions of authors enhance indexing efforts of editors