Search (40 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Wille, R."
  1. Wille, R.: Line diagrams of hierarchical concept systems (1984) 0.03
    0.03208051 = product of:
      0.06416102 = sum of:
        0.060400415 = weight(_text_:von in 3040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060400415 = score(doc=3040,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.47163114 = fieldWeight in 3040, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3040)
        0.003760605 = product of:
          0.011281814 = sum of:
            0.011281814 = weight(_text_:a in 3040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011281814 = score(doc=3040,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3040, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3040)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Engl. Übersetzung von: Liniendiagramme hierarchischer Begriffssysteme
    Type
    a
  2. Wille, R.: Bedeutungen von Begriffsverbänden (1987) 0.03
    0.03208051 = product of:
      0.06416102 = sum of:
        0.060400415 = weight(_text_:von in 3041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060400415 = score(doc=3041,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.47163114 = fieldWeight in 3041, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3041)
        0.003760605 = product of:
          0.011281814 = sum of:
            0.011281814 = weight(_text_:a in 3041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011281814 = score(doc=3041,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3041, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3041)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Type
    a
  3. Vogt, C.; Wille, R.: Formale Begriffsanalyse : Darstellung und Analyse von bibliographischen Daten (1994) 0.03
    0.028070446 = product of:
      0.056140892 = sum of:
        0.052850362 = weight(_text_:von in 7603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052850362 = score(doc=7603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.41267726 = fieldWeight in 7603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7603)
        0.0032905294 = product of:
          0.009871588 = sum of:
            0.009871588 = weight(_text_:a in 7603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009871588 = score(doc=7603,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 7603, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7603)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Type
    a
  4. Wille, R.: Begriffsdenken : von der griechischen Philosophie bis zur Künstlichen Intelligenz heute (1995) 0.03
    0.028070446 = product of:
      0.056140892 = sum of:
        0.052850362 = weight(_text_:von in 3433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052850362 = score(doc=3433,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.41267726 = fieldWeight in 3433, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3433)
        0.0032905294 = product of:
          0.009871588 = sum of:
            0.009871588 = weight(_text_:a in 3433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009871588 = score(doc=3433,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 3433, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3433)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Type
    a
  5. Kollewe, W.; Skorsky, M.; Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - ein Werkzeug zur begrifflichen Analyse und Erkundung von Daten (1994) 0.02
    0.024060382 = product of:
      0.048120763 = sum of:
        0.04530031 = weight(_text_:von in 8942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04530031 = score(doc=8942,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.35372335 = fieldWeight in 8942, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8942)
        0.002820454 = product of:
          0.008461362 = sum of:
            0.008461362 = weight(_text_:a in 8942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008461362 = score(doc=8942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 8942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8942)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Type
    a
  6. Wille, R.; Wachter, C.: Begriffsanalyse von Dokumenten (1992) 0.02
    0.024060382 = product of:
      0.048120763 = sum of:
        0.04530031 = weight(_text_:von in 341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04530031 = score(doc=341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.35372335 = fieldWeight in 341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=341)
        0.002820454 = product of:
          0.008461362 = sum of:
            0.008461362 = weight(_text_:a in 341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008461362 = score(doc=341,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 341, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=341)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Type
    a
  7. Wille, R.: Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung in der Wirtschaft (2002) 0.02
    0.02370751 = product of:
      0.04741502 = sum of:
        0.04576976 = weight(_text_:von in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04576976 = score(doc=547,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.357389 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
        0.0016452647 = product of:
          0.004935794 = sum of:
            0.004935794 = weight(_text_:a in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004935794 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung ist einem pragmatischen Wissensverständnis verpflichtet, nach dem menschliches Wissen in einem offenen Prozess menschlichen Denkens, Argumentierens und Kommunizierens entsteht und weiterlebt. Sie gründet sich auf eine mathematische Begriffstheorie, die auf das wechselseitige Zusammenwirken von Formalem und Inhaltlichem ausgerichtet ist. Wie diese theoretische Konzeption in der wirtschaftlichen Praxis zur Wirkung kommt wird erläutert anhand der Kernprozesse des organisationalen Wissensmanagements, d.h. nach G. Probst et al. anhand von Wissensidentifikation, Wissenserwerb, Wissensentwicklung, Wissens(ver)teilung, Wissensnutzung und Wissensbewahrung; jeweils an einem Beispiel wird der Einsatz spezifischer Methoden der Begrifflichen Wissensverarbeitung demonstriert. Abschließend wird auf den prozesshaften Wirkungszusammenhang von Wissenszielen und Wissensbewertungen mit den Kernprozessen aus Sicht der Begrifflichen Wissensverarbeitung eingegangen.
    Type
    a
  8. Kollewe, W.; Sander, C.; Schmiede, R.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA als Instrument der bibliothekarischen Sacherschließung (1995) 0.02
    0.020050319 = product of:
      0.040100638 = sum of:
        0.03775026 = weight(_text_:von in 927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03775026 = score(doc=927,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.29476947 = fieldWeight in 927, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=927)
        0.002350378 = product of:
          0.007051134 = sum of:
            0.007051134 = weight(_text_:a in 927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007051134 = score(doc=927,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 927, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=927)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Aufbau und Erschließung begrifflicher Datenbanken: Beiträge zur bibliothekarischen Klassifikation. Eine Auswahl von Vorträgen der Jahrestagungen 1993 (Kaiserslautern) und 1994 (Oldenburg) der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation. Hrsg.: H. Havekost u. H.-J. Wätjen
    Type
    a
  9. Kipke, U.; Wille, R.: Begriffsverbände als Ablaufschemata zur Gegenstandsbestimmung (1986) 0.02
    0.016040254 = product of:
      0.03208051 = sum of:
        0.030200208 = weight(_text_:von in 3039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030200208 = score(doc=3039,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.23581557 = fieldWeight in 3039, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3039)
        0.0018803024 = product of:
          0.005640907 = sum of:
            0.005640907 = weight(_text_:a in 3039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005640907 = score(doc=3039,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3039, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3039)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Ausgeführt wird, wie Begriffsverbände als Ablaufschemata zur Gegenstandsbestimmung genutzt werden können. Im Gegensatz zur Baumabfrage gestattet die beschriebene Methode dem Benutzer ein Höchstmaß an Freiheit und Transparenz. Demonstriert wird die Methode an der Bestimmung des Symmetrieprinzips von Flächenmustern
    Type
    a
  10. Wachter, C.; Wille, R.: Formale Begriffsanalyse von Literaturdaten (1992) 0.02
    0.015100104 = product of:
      0.060400415 = sum of:
        0.060400415 = weight(_text_:von in 3141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060400415 = score(doc=3141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.47163114 = fieldWeight in 3141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3141)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  11. Wille, R.: Denken in Begriffen : von der griechischen Philosophie bis zur Künstlichen Intelligenz heute (1993) 0.01
    0.01144244 = product of:
      0.04576976 = sum of:
        0.04576976 = weight(_text_:von in 3145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04576976 = score(doc=3145,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.357389 = fieldWeight in 3145, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3145)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Mechanistisches Denken und seine maschinelle Umsetzung (insbesondere in komplexe Computersysteme) gefährdet heute zunehmend die kognitive Autonomie des Menschen. Seinen besonderen Ausdruck findet dieses Denken in den Zielen der Künstlichen Intelligenz, denen die Metapher des künstlichen Menschen zugrunde liegt. Um die Beschränktheit mechanistischen Denkens deutlich werden zu lassen, wird die Geschichte des Begriffs von der griechischen Antike bis heute in ihren wichtigsten Stationen dargelegt. Das macht insbesondere den inhaltlichen Verlust sichtbar, den einschränkende Formalisierungen des Begriffsdenkens mit sich bringen. Es wird dafür plädiert, die enge Verbindung von Inhaltlichem und Formalem im Begriffsdenken zu reaktivieren; hierzu wird dem machanistischen Weltbild entgegengestellt das Weltbild der menschlichen Kommunikationsgemeinschaft, für das kommunikatives Denken und Handeln konstitutiv ist
  12. Sander, C.; Schmiede, R.; Wille, R.: ¬Ein begriffliches Datensystem zur Literatur der interdisziplinären Technikforschung (1993) 0.01
    0.01144244 = product of:
      0.04576976 = sum of:
        0.04576976 = weight(_text_:von in 5255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04576976 = score(doc=5255,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.357389 = fieldWeight in 5255, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5255)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Begriffliche Datensysteme sind im Rahmen der Formalen Begriffsanalyse entstanden und gründen sich auf mathematische Formalisierungen von Begriff, Begriffssystem und Begriffliche Datei. Sie machen Wissen, das in einer Datenbasis vorliegt, begrifflich zugänglich und interpretierbar. Hierfür werden begriffliche Zusammenhänge entsprechend gewählter Frageaspekte in gestuften Liniendiagrammen dargestellt. Durch Verfeinern, Vergröbern und Wechseln von Begriffstrukturen kann man unbegrenzt durch das in der Datenbasis gespeicherte Wissen "navigieren". In einem Forschungsprojekt, gefördert vom Zentrum für interdisziplinäre Technikforschung an der TH Darmstadt, ist ein Prototyp eines begrifflichen Datensystems erstellt worden, dem als Datenkontext eine ausgewählte, begrifflich aufgearbeitete Menge von Büchern zur interdisziplinären Technikforschung zugrunde liegt. Mit diesem Prototyp soll die flexible und variable Verwendung begrifflicher datensysteme im Literaturbereich demonstriert werden
  13. Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - a graphical tool for analyzing and exploring data (1995) 0.01
    0.010773733 = product of:
      0.043094933 = sum of:
        0.043094933 = product of:
          0.0646424 = sum of:
            0.012613453 = weight(_text_:a in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012613453 = score(doc=1901,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
            0.052028947 = weight(_text_:22 in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052028947 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    TOSCANA is a computer program which allows an online interaction with larger data bases to analyse and explore data conceptually. It uses labelled line diagrams of concept lattices to communicate knowledge coded in given data. The basic problem to create online presentations of concept lattices is solved by composing prepared diagrams to nested line diagrams. A larger number of applications in different areas have already shown that TOSCANA is a useful tool for many purposes
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.78-81
    Type
    a
  14. Kollewe, W.; Sander, C.; Schmiede, R.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA als Instrument der bibliothekarischen Sacherschließung (1995) 0.01
    0.007550052 = product of:
      0.030200208 = sum of:
        0.030200208 = weight(_text_:von in 585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030200208 = score(doc=585,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.23581557 = fieldWeight in 585, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=585)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    TOSCANA ist ein Computerprogramm, mit dem begriffliche Erkundungssysteme auf der Grundlage der Formalen Begriffsanalyse erstellt werden können.In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird diskutiert, wie TOSCANA zur bibliothekarischen Sacherschließung und thematischen Literatursuche eingesetzt werden kann. Berichtet wird dabei von dem Forschungsprojekt 'Anwendung eines Modells begrifflicher Wissenssysteme im Bereich der Literatur zur interdisziplinären Technikforschung', das vom Darmstädter Zentrum für interdisziplinäre Technikforschung gefördert worden ist
  15. Wille, R.: Lattices in data analysis : how to draw them with a computer (1989) 0.00
    0.0013295747 = product of:
      0.005318299 = sum of:
        0.005318299 = product of:
          0.015954897 = sum of:
            0.015954897 = weight(_text_:a in 3043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015954897 = score(doc=3043,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 3043, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3043)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  16. Ganter, B.; Stahl, J.; Wille, R.: Conceptual measurement and many-valued contexts (1986) 0.00
    0.0011633779 = product of:
      0.0046535116 = sum of:
        0.0046535116 = product of:
          0.013960535 = sum of:
            0.013960535 = weight(_text_:a in 3137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013960535 = score(doc=3137,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 3137, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3137)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Classification as a tool of research. Ed.: W. Gaul u. M. Schader
    Type
    a
  17. Vogt, F.; Wachter, C.; Wille, R.: Data analysis based on a conceptual file (1991) 0.00
    0.0011633779 = product of:
      0.0046535116 = sum of:
        0.0046535116 = product of:
          0.013960535 = sum of:
            0.013960535 = weight(_text_:a in 3140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013960535 = score(doc=3140,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 3140, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3140)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  18. Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - a graphical tool for analyzing and exploring data (1995) 0.00
    0.0011633779 = product of:
      0.0046535116 = sum of:
        0.0046535116 = product of:
          0.013960535 = sum of:
            0.013960535 = weight(_text_:a in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013960535 = score(doc=595,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  19. Luksch, P.; Wille, R.: ¬A mathematical model for conceptual knowledge systems (1991) 0.00
    0.0010882404 = product of:
      0.0043529617 = sum of:
        0.0043529617 = product of:
          0.013058884 = sum of:
            0.013058884 = weight(_text_:a in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013058884 = score(doc=3033,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Objects, attributes, and concepts are basic notations of conceptual knowledge; they are linked by the following four basic relations: an object has an attribute, an object belongs to a concept, an attribute abstracts from a concept, and a concept is a subconcept of another concept. These structural elements are well mathematized in formal concept analysis. Therefore, conceptual knowledge systems can be mathematically modelled in the frame of formal concept analysis. How such modelling may be performed is indicated by an example of a conceptual knowledge system. The formal definition of the model finally clarifies in which ways representation, inference, acquisition, and communication of conceptual knowledge can be mathematically treated
    Type
    a
  20. Wille, R.: Begriffliche Datensysteme als Werkzeuge der Wissenskommunikation (1992) 0.00
    9.97181E-4 = product of:
      0.003988724 = sum of:
        0.003988724 = product of:
          0.011966172 = sum of:
            0.011966172 = weight(_text_:a in 8826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011966172 = score(doc=8826,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 8826, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Mensch und Maschine: Informationelle Schnittstellen der Kommunikation. Proc. des 3. Int. Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'92), 5.-7.11.1992 in Saarbrücken. Hrsg.: H.H. Zimmermann, H.-D. Luckhardt u. A. Schulz
    Type
    a