Search (82 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Formale Begriffsanalyse"
  1. Wille, R.: Line diagrams of hierarchical concept systems (1984) 0.03 
    0.03208051 = product of:
  0.06416102 = sum of:
    0.060400415 = weight(_text_:von in 3040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060400415 = score(doc=3040,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.47163114 = fieldWeight in 3040, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3040)
    0.003760605 = product of:
      0.011281814 = sum of:
        0.011281814 = weight(_text_:a in 3040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011281814 = score(doc=3040,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3040, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3040)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Engl. Übersetzung von: Liniendiagramme hierarchischer Begriffssysteme
    Type
    a
  2. Wille, R.: Bedeutungen von Begriffsverbänden (1987) 0.03 
    0.03208051 = product of:
  0.06416102 = sum of:
    0.060400415 = weight(_text_:von in 3041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060400415 = score(doc=3041,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.47163114 = fieldWeight in 3041, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3041)
    0.003760605 = product of:
      0.011281814 = sum of:
        0.011281814 = weight(_text_:a in 3041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011281814 = score(doc=3041,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3041, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3041)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Type
    a
  3. Vogt, C.; Wille, R.: Formale Begriffsanalyse : Darstellung und Analyse von bibliographischen Daten (1994) 0.03 
    0.028070446 = product of:
  0.056140892 = sum of:
    0.052850362 = weight(_text_:von in 7603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052850362 = score(doc=7603,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.41267726 = fieldWeight in 7603, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7603)
    0.0032905294 = product of:
      0.009871588 = sum of:
        0.009871588 = weight(_text_:a in 7603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009871588 = score(doc=7603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 7603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7603)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Type
    a
  4. Großkopf, A.; Harras, G.: Begriffliche Erkundung semantischer Strukturen von Sprechaktverben (2000) 0.02 
    0.024644516 = product of:
  0.049289033 = sum of:
    0.04530031 = weight(_text_:von in 4204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04530031 = score(doc=4204,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.35372335 = fieldWeight in 4204, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4204)
    0.003988724 = product of:
      0.011966172 = sum of:
        0.011966172 = weight(_text_:a in 4204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011966172 = score(doc=4204,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 4204, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4204)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Type
    a
  5. Kollewe, W.; Skorsky, M.; Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - ein Werkzeug zur begrifflichen Analyse und Erkundung von Daten (1994) 0.02 
    0.024060382 = product of:
  0.048120763 = sum of:
    0.04530031 = weight(_text_:von in 8942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04530031 = score(doc=8942,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.35372335 = fieldWeight in 8942, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8942)
    0.002820454 = product of:
      0.008461362 = sum of:
        0.008461362 = weight(_text_:a in 8942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008461362 = score(doc=8942,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 8942, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8942)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Type
    a
  6. Wille, R.; Wachter, C.: Begriffsanalyse von Dokumenten (1992) 0.02 
    0.024060382 = product of:
  0.048120763 = sum of:
    0.04530031 = weight(_text_:von in 341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04530031 = score(doc=341,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.35372335 = fieldWeight in 341, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=341)
    0.002820454 = product of:
      0.008461362 = sum of:
        0.008461362 = weight(_text_:a in 341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008461362 = score(doc=341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=341)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Type
    a
  7. Andelfinger, U.: Inhaltliche Erschließung des Bereichs 'Sozialorientierte Gestaltung von Informationstechnik' : Ein begriffsanalytischer Ansatz (2000) 0.02 
    0.024060382 = product of:
  0.048120763 = sum of:
    0.04530031 = weight(_text_:von in 4201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04530031 = score(doc=4201,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.35372335 = fieldWeight in 4201, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4201)
    0.002820454 = product of:
      0.008461362 = sum of:
        0.008461362 = weight(_text_:a in 4201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008461362 = score(doc=4201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4201)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Type
    a
  8. Wille, R.: Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung in der Wirtschaft (2002) 0.02 
    0.02370751 = product of:
  0.04741502 = sum of:
    0.04576976 = weight(_text_:von in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04576976 = score(doc=547,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.357389 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
    0.0016452647 = product of:
      0.004935794 = sum of:
        0.004935794 = weight(_text_:a in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004935794 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung ist einem pragmatischen Wissensverständnis verpflichtet, nach dem menschliches Wissen in einem offenen Prozess menschlichen Denkens, Argumentierens und Kommunizierens entsteht und weiterlebt. Sie gründet sich auf eine mathematische Begriffstheorie, die auf das wechselseitige Zusammenwirken von Formalem und Inhaltlichem ausgerichtet ist. Wie diese theoretische Konzeption in der wirtschaftlichen Praxis zur Wirkung kommt wird erläutert anhand der Kernprozesse des organisationalen Wissensmanagements, d.h. nach G. Probst et al. anhand von Wissensidentifikation, Wissenserwerb, Wissensentwicklung, Wissens(ver)teilung, Wissensnutzung und Wissensbewahrung; jeweils an einem Beispiel wird der Einsatz spezifischer Methoden der Begrifflichen Wissensverarbeitung demonstriert. Abschließend wird auf den prozesshaften Wirkungszusammenhang von Wissenszielen und Wissensbewertungen mit den Kernprozessen aus Sicht der Begrifflichen Wissensverarbeitung eingegangen.
    Type
    a
  9. Kollewe, W.; Sander, C.; Schmiede, R.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA als Instrument der bibliothekarischen Sacherschließung (1995) 0.02 
    0.020050319 = product of:
  0.040100638 = sum of:
    0.03775026 = weight(_text_:von in 927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03775026 = score(doc=927,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.29476947 = fieldWeight in 927, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=927)
    0.002350378 = product of:
      0.007051134 = sum of:
        0.007051134 = weight(_text_:a in 927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007051134 = score(doc=927,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 927, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=927)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Aufbau und Erschließung begrifflicher Datenbanken: Beiträge zur bibliothekarischen Klassifikation. Eine Auswahl von Vorträgen der Jahrestagungen 1993 (Kaiserslautern) und 1994 (Oldenburg) der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation. Hrsg.: H. Havekost u. H.-J. Wätjen
    Type
    a
  10. Kipke, U.; Wille, R.: Begriffsverbände als Ablaufschemata zur Gegenstandsbestimmung (1986) 0.02 
    0.016040254 = product of:
  0.03208051 = sum of:
    0.030200208 = weight(_text_:von in 3039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030200208 = score(doc=3039,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.23581557 = fieldWeight in 3039, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3039)
    0.0018803024 = product of:
      0.005640907 = sum of:
        0.005640907 = weight(_text_:a in 3039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005640907 = score(doc=3039,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3039, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3039)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Ausgeführt wird, wie Begriffsverbände als Ablaufschemata zur Gegenstandsbestimmung genutzt werden können. Im Gegensatz zur Baumabfrage gestattet die beschriebene Methode dem Benutzer ein Höchstmaß an Freiheit und Transparenz. Demonstriert wird die Methode an der Bestimmung des Symmetrieprinzips von Flächenmustern
    Type
    a
  11. Kollewe, W.: Instrumente der Literaturverwaltung : Inhaltliche analyse von Datenbeständen durch 'Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung' (1996) 0.02 
    0.016040254 = product of:
  0.03208051 = sum of:
    0.030200208 = weight(_text_:von in 4376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030200208 = score(doc=4376,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.23581557 = fieldWeight in 4376, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4376)
    0.0018803024 = product of:
      0.005640907 = sum of:
        0.005640907 = weight(_text_:a in 4376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005640907 = score(doc=4376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4376)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Type
    a
  12. Wachter, C.; Wille, R.: Formale Begriffsanalyse von Literaturdaten (1992) 0.02 
    0.015100104 = product of:
  0.060400415 = sum of:
    0.060400415 = weight(_text_:von in 3141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060400415 = score(doc=3141,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.47163114 = fieldWeight in 3141, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3141)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  13. Kaytoue, M.; Kuznetsov, S.O.; Assaghir, Z.; Napoli, A.: Embedding tolerance relations in concept lattices : an application in information fusion (2010) 0.01 
    0.0147087015 = product of:
  0.058834806 = sum of:
    0.058834806 = product of:
      0.08825221 = sum of:
        0.012711613 = weight(_text_:a in 4843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012711613 = score(doc=4843,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.22966442 = fieldWeight in 4843, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4843)
        0.075540595 = weight(_text_:z in 4843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075540595 = score(doc=4843,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2562021 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 4843, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4843)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) is a well founded mathematical framework used for conceptual classication and knowledge management. Given a binary table describing a relation between objects and attributes, FCA consists in building a set of concepts organized by a subsumption relation within a concept lattice. Accordingly, FCA requires to transform complex data, e.g. numbers, intervals, graphs, into binary data leading to loss of information and poor interpretability of object classes. In this paper, we propose a pre-processing method producing binary data from complex data taking advantage of similarity between objects. As a result, the concept lattice is composed of classes being maximal sets of pairwise similar objects. This method is based on FCA and on a formalization of similarity as a tolerance relation (reexive and symmetric). It applies to complex object descriptions and especially here to interval data. Moreover, it can be applied to any kind of structured data for which a similarity can be dened (sequences, graphs, etc.). Finally, an application highlights that the resulting concept lattice plays an important role in information fusion problem, as illustrated with a real-world example in agronomy.
  14. Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung : Methoden und Anwendungen. Mit Beiträgen zahlreicher Fachwissenschaftler (2000) 0.01 
    0.013934327 = product of:
  0.027868655 = sum of:
    0.026693465 = weight(_text_:von in 4193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026693465 = score(doc=4193,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.2084335 = fieldWeight in 4193, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4193)
    0.001175189 = product of:
      0.003525567 = sum of:
        0.003525567 = weight(_text_:a in 4193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003525567 = score(doc=4193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 4193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4193)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: GANTER, B.: Begriffe und Implikationen; BURMEISTER, P.: ConImp: Ein Programm zur Fromalen Begriffsanalyse; Lengnink, K.: Ähnlichkeit als Distanz in Begriffsverbänden; POLLANDT, S.: Datenanalyse mit Fuzzy-Begriffen; PREDIGER, S.: Terminologische Merkmalslogik in der Formalen Begriffsanalyse; WILLE, R. u. M. ZICKWOLFF: Grundlagen einer Triadischen Begriffsanalyse; LINDIG, C. u. G. SNELTING: Formale Begriffsanalyse im Software Engineering; STRACK, H. u. M. SKORSKY: Zugriffskontrolle bei Programmsystemen und im Datenschutz mittels Formaler Begriffsanalyse; ANDELFINGER, U.: Inhaltliche Erschließung des Bereichs 'Sozialorientierte Gestaltung von Informationstechnik': Ein begriffsanalytischer Ansatz; GÖDERT, W.: Wissensdarstellung in Informationssystemen, Fragetypen und Anforderungen an Retrievalkomponenten; ROCK, T. u. R. WILLE: Ein TOSCANA-Erkundungssystem zur Literatursuche; ESCHENFELDER, D. u.a.: Ein Erkundungssystem zum Baurecht: Methoden der Entwicklung eines TOSCANA-Systems; GROßKOPF, A. u. G. HARRAS: Begriffliche Erkundung semantischer Strukturen von Sprechaktverben; ZELGER, J.: Grundwerte, Ziele und Maßnahmen in einem regionalen Krankenhaus: Eine Anwendung des Verfahrens GABEK; KOHLER-KOCH, B. u. F. VOGT: Normen- und regelgeleitete internationale Kooperationen: Formale Begriffsanalyse in der Politikwissenschaft; HENNING, H.J. u. W. KEMMNITZ: Entwicklung eines kontextuellen Methodenkonzeptes mit Hilfer der Formalen Begriffsanalyse an Beispielen zum Risikoverständnis; BARTEL, H.-G.: Über Möglichkeiten der Formalen Begriffsanalyse in der Mathematischen Archäochemie
  15. Pollandt, S.: Fuzzy-Begriffe : Formale Begriffsanalyse unscharfer Daten (1997) 0.01 
    0.013077075 = product of:
  0.0523083 = sum of:
    0.0523083 = weight(_text_:von in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0523083 = score(doc=2086,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.40844458 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Ausgehend von der Theorie der Fuzzy-Mengen und Fuzzy-Logik werden neue Methoden zur Analyse unscharfer Daten entwickelt. Dazu wird die Theorie der Formalen Begriffsanalyse in einer Reihe von Methoden und Verfahren erweitert und somit der Forderung von Anwendern nach Möglichkeiten zur begriffsanalytischen Erfassung unscharfer Daten Rechnung getragen. Die benötigten theoretischen Grundlagen werden einführend bereitgestellt, die mathematische Darstellung wird an leicht nachvollziehbaren praktischen Beispielen veranschaulicht
  16. Sander, C.; Schmiede, R.; Wille, R.: ¬Ein begriffliches Datensystem zur Literatur der interdisziplinären Technikforschung (1993) 0.01 
    0.01144244 = product of:
  0.04576976 = sum of:
    0.04576976 = weight(_text_:von in 5255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04576976 = score(doc=5255,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.357389 = fieldWeight in 5255, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5255)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Begriffliche Datensysteme sind im Rahmen der Formalen Begriffsanalyse entstanden und gründen sich auf mathematische Formalisierungen von Begriff, Begriffssystem und Begriffliche Datei. Sie machen Wissen, das in einer Datenbasis vorliegt, begrifflich zugänglich und interpretierbar. Hierfür werden begriffliche Zusammenhänge entsprechend gewählter Frageaspekte in gestuften Liniendiagrammen dargestellt. Durch Verfeinern, Vergröbern und Wechseln von Begriffstrukturen kann man unbegrenzt durch das in der Datenbasis gespeicherte Wissen "navigieren". In einem Forschungsprojekt, gefördert vom Zentrum für interdisziplinäre Technikforschung an der TH Darmstadt, ist ein Prototyp eines begrifflichen Datensystems erstellt worden, dem als Datenkontext eine ausgewählte, begrifflich aufgearbeitete Menge von Büchern zur interdisziplinären Technikforschung zugrunde liegt. Mit diesem Prototyp soll die flexible und variable Verwendung begrifflicher datensysteme im Literaturbereich demonstriert werden
  17. Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - a graphical tool for analyzing and exploring data (1995) 0.01 
    0.010773733 = product of:
  0.043094933 = sum of:
    0.043094933 = product of:
      0.0646424 = sum of:
        0.012613453 = weight(_text_:a in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012613453 = score(doc=1901,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
        0.052028947 = weight(_text_:22 in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052028947 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    TOSCANA is a computer program which allows an online interaction with larger data bases to analyse and explore data conceptually. It uses labelled line diagrams of concept lattices to communicate knowledge coded in given data. The basic problem to create online presentations of concept lattices is solved by composing prepared diagrams to nested line diagrams. A larger number of applications in different areas have already shown that TOSCANA is a useful tool for many purposes
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.78-81
    Type
    a
  18. Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000) 0.01 
    0.009232819 = product of:
  0.036931276 = sum of:
    0.036931276 = product of:
      0.055396914 = sum of:
        0.009871588 = weight(_text_:a in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009871588 = score(doc=5095,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
        0.045525327 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045525327 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This paper presents an abstract formalization of the notion of "facets". Facets are relational structures of units, relations and other facets selected for a certain purpose. Facets can be used to structure large knowledge representation systems into a hierarchical arrangement of consistent and independent subsystems (facets) that facilitate flexibility and combinations of different viewpoints or aspects. This paper describes the basic notions, facet characteristics and construction mechanisms. It then explicates the theory in an example of a faceted information retrieval system (FaIR)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:47:06
    Type
    a
  19. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.01 
    0.009232819 = product of:
  0.036931276 = sum of:
    0.036931276 = product of:
      0.055396914 = sum of:
        0.009871588 = weight(_text_:a in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009871588 = score(doc=2654,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
        0.045525327 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045525327 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
    Type
    a
  20. Kollewe, W.; Sander, C.; Schmiede, R.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA als Instrument der bibliothekarischen Sacherschließung (1995) 0.01 
    0.007550052 = product of:
  0.030200208 = sum of:
    0.030200208 = weight(_text_:von in 585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030200208 = score(doc=585,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.23581557 = fieldWeight in 585, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=585)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    TOSCANA ist ein Computerprogramm, mit dem begriffliche Erkundungssysteme auf der Grundlage der Formalen Begriffsanalyse erstellt werden können.In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird diskutiert, wie TOSCANA zur bibliothekarischen Sacherschließung und thematischen Literatursuche eingesetzt werden kann. Berichtet wird dabei von dem Forschungsprojekt 'Anwendung eines Modells begrifflicher Wissenssysteme im Bereich der Literatur zur interdisziplinären Technikforschung', das vom Darmstädter Zentrum für interdisziplinäre Technikforschung gefördert worden ist

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 43
  • d 38

Types

  • a 70
  • m 7
  • p 3
  • s 3
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications