-
Dahlberg, I.: Einteilungsprinzipien von Klassifikationssystemen (1974)
0.04
0.040100638 = product of:
0.080201276 = sum of:
0.07550052 = weight(_text_:von in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07550052 = score(doc=86,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.58953893 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
0.004700756 = product of:
0.014102268 = sum of:
0.014102268 = weight(_text_:a in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014102268 = score(doc=86,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Type
- a
-
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017)
0.04
0.0355058 = product of:
0.0710116 = sum of:
0.03737085 = weight(_text_:von in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03737085 = score(doc=3494,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.29180688 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.03364075 = product of:
0.05046112 = sum of:
0.004935794 = weight(_text_:a in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004935794 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.045525327 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045525327 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Pages
- S.22-36
- Source
- Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
- Type
- a
-
Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018)
0.03
0.03432339 = product of:
0.06864678 = sum of:
0.030200208 = weight(_text_:von in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030200208 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.23581557 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.03844657 = product of:
0.057669856 = sum of:
0.005640907 = weight(_text_:a in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005640907 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.052028947 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052028947 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Der Beitrag skizziert die Grundlagen der Arbeit mit Klassifikationen in Bibliotheken und erläutert die Grundbegriffe der bibliothekarischen Klassifikationstheorie. Schwerpunkte bilden die Ordnungsprinzipien und Strukturierungsmittel von Klassifikationen sowie die verschiedenen Klassifikationstypologien. Dabei werden vorzugsweise Beispiele aus Klassifikationen verwendet, die im deutschen Sprachraum verbreitet sind.
- Pages
- S.1-22
- Type
- a
-
Farradane, J.E.L.: ¬A scientific theory of classification and indexing : further considerations (1952)
0.03
0.028751936 = product of:
0.05750387 = sum of:
0.052850362 = weight(_text_:von in 1655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052850362 = score(doc=1655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.41267726 = fieldWeight in 1655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1655)
0.0046535116 = product of:
0.013960535 = sum of:
0.013960535 = weight(_text_:a in 1655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013960535 = score(doc=1655,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 1655, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1655)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Fortsetzung von: J. Doc. 6(1950) S.83-99.
- Type
- a
-
Gödert, W.: Strukturierung von Klassifikationssystemen und Online-Retrieval (1995)
0.03
0.027868655 = product of:
0.05573731 = sum of:
0.05338693 = weight(_text_:von in 922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05338693 = score(doc=922,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.416867 = fieldWeight in 922, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=922)
0.002350378 = product of:
0.007051134 = sum of:
0.007051134 = weight(_text_:a in 922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007051134 = score(doc=922,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 922, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=922)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Aufbau und Erschließung begrifflicher Datenbanken: Beiträge zur bibliothekarischen Klassifikation. Eine Auswahl von Vorträgen der Jahrestagungen 1993 (Kaiserslautern) und 1994 (Oldenburg) der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation. Hrsg.: H. Havekost u. H.-J. Wätjen
- Type
- a
-
Gödert, W.: Bibliothekarische Klassifikationssysteme und on-line-Kataloge : Grundlagen und Anwendungen (1987)
0.03
0.0270943 = product of:
0.0541886 = sum of:
0.0523083 = weight(_text_:von in 4576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0523083 = score(doc=4576,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.40844458 = fieldWeight in 4576, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4576)
0.0018803024 = product of:
0.005640907 = sum of:
0.005640907 = weight(_text_:a in 4576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005640907 = score(doc=4576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4576)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In diesem Beitrag beabsichtigen wir, einen Überblick über den derzeitigen Stand der bibliothekarischen Klassifikationstheorie zu geben. Die Darstellung ist angelehnt an die 1985 erschienene Norm DIN 32 705,Erstellung und Weiterentwicklung von Klassifikationssystemen', stellt jedoch die Problematik bibliothekarischer Klassifikationssysteme in den Vordergrund. In einem zweiten Teil beschäftigen wir uns mit Problemen von Klassifikationssystemen in typischen bibliothekarischen Anwendungsbereichen. Der Schwerpunkt liegt dabei auf dem Online-Katalog; es wird ein Vorschlag zur Verwendung von Facettenklassifikationen diskutiert. Abschließend werden Fragen der kooperativen klassifikatorischen Inhaltserschließung gestreift.
- Type
- a
-
Wang, Z.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation (2008)
0.02
0.023021962 = product of:
0.09208785 = sum of:
0.09208785 = sum of:
0.005640907 = weight(_text_:a in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005640907 = score(doc=2346,freq=8.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.060432475 = weight(_text_:z in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060432475 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2562021 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.23587814 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.026014473 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026014473 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Potential and benefits of classification schemes and thesauri in building organizational taxonomies cannot be fully utilized by organizations. Empirical data of building an organizational taxonomy by the top-down approach of using classification schemes and thesauri appear to be lacking. The paper seeks to make a contribution in this regard. Design/methodology/approach - A case study of building an organizational taxonomy was conducted in the information studies domain for the Division of Information Studies at Nanyang Technology University, Singapore. The taxonomy was built by using the Dewey Decimal Classification, the Information Science Taxonomy, two information systems taxonomies, and three thesauri (ASIS&T, LISA, and ERIC). Findings - Classification schemes and thesauri were found to be helpful in creating the structure and categories related to the subject facet of the taxonomy, but organizational community sources had to be consulted and several methods had to be employed. The organizational activities and stakeholders' needs had to be identified to determine the objectives, facets, and the subject coverage of the taxonomy. Main categories were determined by identifying the stakeholders' interests and consulting organizational community sources and domain taxonomies. Category terms were selected from terminologies of classification schemes, domain taxonomies, and thesauri against the stakeholders' interests. Hierarchical structures of the main categories were constructed in line with the stakeholders' perspectives and the navigational role taking advantage of structures/term relationships from classification schemes and thesauri. Categories were determined in line with the concepts and the hierarchical levels. Format of categories were uniformed according to a commonly used standard. The consistency principle was employed to make the taxonomy structure and categories neater. Validation of the draft taxonomy through consultations with the stakeholders further refined the taxonomy. Originality/value - No similar study could be traced in the literature. The steps and methods used in the taxonomy development, and the information studies taxonomy itself, will be helpful for library and information schools and other similar organizations in their effort to develop taxonomies for organizing content and aiding navigation on organizational sites.
- Date
- 7.11.2008 15:22:04
- Type
- a
-
Gnoli, C.; Ledl, A.; Park, Z.; Trzmielewski, M.: Phenomenon-based vs. disciplinary classification : possibilities for evaluating and for mapping (2018)
0.02
0.021473734 = product of:
0.085894935 = sum of:
0.085894935 = product of:
0.1288424 = sum of:
0.007977448 = weight(_text_:a in 4804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007977448 = score(doc=4804,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4804, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4804)
0.12086495 = weight(_text_:z in 4804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12086495 = score(doc=4804,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2562021 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.47175628 = fieldWeight in 4804, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4804)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Type
- a
-
Fairthorne, R.A.: Temporal structure in bibliographic classification (1978)
0.02
0.016980406 = product of:
0.03396081 = sum of:
0.030200208 = weight(_text_:von in 1650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030200208 = score(doc=1650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.23581557 = fieldWeight in 1650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1650)
0.003760605 = product of:
0.011281814 = sum of:
0.011281814 = weight(_text_:a in 1650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011281814 = score(doc=1650,freq=8.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1650, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1650)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Neither in theory nor in practice does contemporary classification ignore temporal sequence in the sense of history. But it is regarded in a rather static way, as if classification could be reduced to some unique landscape to be viewed by the classifier as from a balloon. ...
- Footnote
- Zusammenfassung von P.A. Richmond (S.413-415) "This is one of the most interesting papers to come along in many a moon"
- Type
- a
-
Rescheleit, W.; Menner, L.: Vergleich der Wissensrepräsentationssprache FRL mit Dezimalklassifikation und Facettenklassifikation (1986)
0.02
0.016721193 = product of:
0.033442385 = sum of:
0.03203216 = weight(_text_:von in 1555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03203216 = score(doc=1555,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.2501202 = fieldWeight in 1555, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1555)
0.001410227 = product of:
0.004230681 = sum of:
0.004230681 = weight(_text_:a in 1555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004230681 = score(doc=1555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 1555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1555)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Beim Vergleich von Klassifikationen mit Frame-Wissensbasen für Expertensysteme zeigen sich einige elementare Gemeinsamkeiten: Beide haben das Ziel einer geordneten Darstellung von Wissen. Beide bilden dazu Klassen und weisen hierarchische Beziehungen zwischen diesen Klassen auf. Anahnd der Wissensrepräsentationssprache FRL (Frame Representation Language) wird untersucht, inwieweit beide Systeme sich in das jeweils andere übertragen lassen. Die FRL speichert Wissen in einer speziellen Datenstruktur, den Frames, die aus einem Framenamen, der den jeweiligen Begriff bezeichnet, und Slots, die die Eigenschaften des Begriffs enthalten, bestehen. Eine effektive Speicherung des Wissens wird dadurch erreicht, daß die Frames in einer polyhierarchischen Struktur geordnet sind und in generischer Relation zueinander stehen müssen. Über die generische Relation lassen sich die Eigenschaften höherer Begriffe auf ihre Subklassen vererben. Es werden die Ergebnisse eines Versuchs dargestellt, Elemente bestehender Universalklassifikationen (DK, BC2) in die FRL zu übertragen
- Type
- a
-
Ereshefsky, M.: ¬The poverty of the Linnaean hierarchy : a philosophical study of biological taxonomy (2007)
0.02
0.016659169 = product of:
0.033318337 = sum of:
0.030200208 = weight(_text_:von in 2493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030200208 = score(doc=2493,freq=8.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.23581557 = fieldWeight in 2493, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2493)
0.0031181292 = product of:
0.009354387 = sum of:
0.009354387 = weight(_text_:a in 2493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009354387 = score(doc=2493,freq=22.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.16900843 = fieldWeight in 2493, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2493)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The question of whether biologists should continue to use the Linnaean hierarchy has been a hotly debated issue. Ereshefsky argues that biologists should abandon the Linnaean system and adopt an alternative that is in line with evolutionary theory. He then makes specific recommendations for a post-Linnaean method of classification.
- Content
- Part I: The historical turn 1. The philosophy of classification 2. A primer of biological taxonomy 3. History and classification Part II: The multiplicity of nature 4. Species pluralism 5. How to be a discerning pluralist Part III: Hierarchies and nomenclature 6. The evolution of the Linnaean hierarchy 7. Post-Linnaean taxonomy 8. The future of biological nomenclature
- Footnote
- Rez. in: KO 35(2008) no.4, S.255-259 (B. Hjoerland): "This book was published in 2000 simultaneously in hardback and as an electronic resource, and, in 2007, as a paperback. The author is a professor of philosophy at the University of Calgary, Canada. He has an impressive list of contributions, mostly addressing issues in biological taxonomy such as units of evolution, natural kinds and the species concept. The book is a scholarly criticism of the famous classification system developed by the Swedish botanist Carl Linnaeus (1707-1778). This system consists of both a set of rules for the naming of living organisms (biological nomenclature) and principles of classification. Linné's system has been used and adapted by biologists over a period of almost 250 years. Under the current system of codes, it is now applied to more than two million species of organisms. Inherent in the Linnaean system is the indication of hierarchic relationships. The Linnaean system has been justified primarily on the basis of stability. Although it has been criticized and alternatives have been suggested, it still has its advocates (e.g., Schuh, 2003). One of the alternatives being developed is The International Code of Phylogenetic Nomenclature, known as the PhyloCode for short, a system that radically alters the current nomenclatural rules. The new proposals have provoked hot debate on nomenclatural issues in biology. . . ."
- RSWK
- Linné, Carl von <Biologe, 1707-1778> / Systematik / Philosophie
Linné, Carl /von (Biologe, 1707-1778) / Systematik / Biologie / Philosophie (SWB)
- Subject
- Linné, Carl von <Biologe, 1707-1778> / Systematik / Philosophie
Linné, Carl /von (Biologe, 1707-1778) / Systematik / Biologie / Philosophie (SWB)
-
DIN 32705: Klassifikationssysteme: Erstellung und Weiterentwicklung von Klassifikationssystemen (1987)
0.02
0.01601608 = product of:
0.06406432 = sum of:
0.06406432 = weight(_text_:von in 1653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06406432 = score(doc=1653,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.5002404 = fieldWeight in 1653, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1653)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Vgl. zur Einführung in die Norm auch die Beiträge von W. Gödert: Bibliothekarische Klassifikationssysteme ... in: Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis 11(1987) und I. Dahlberg: DIN 32705: ... in: International classification 19(1992)
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999)
0.01
0.014417464 = product of:
0.057669856 = sum of:
0.057669856 = product of:
0.08650478 = sum of:
0.008461362 = weight(_text_:a in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008461362 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.078043416 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078043416 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
- Type
- a
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999)
0.01
0.014417464 = product of:
0.057669856 = sum of:
0.057669856 = product of:
0.08650478 = sum of:
0.008461362 = weight(_text_:a in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008461362 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.078043416 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078043416 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
- Type
- a
-
Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017)
0.01
0.014417464 = product of:
0.057669856 = sum of:
0.057669856 = product of:
0.08650478 = sum of:
0.008461362 = weight(_text_:a in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008461362 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.078043416 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078043416 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 5.2017 18:46:22
- Type
- a
-
Integrative level classification: Research project (2004-)
0.01
0.014375968 = product of:
0.028751936 = sum of:
0.026425181 = weight(_text_:von in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026425181 = score(doc=1151,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.20633863 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
0.0023267558 = product of:
0.0069802674 = sum of:
0.0069802674 = weight(_text_:a in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0069802674 = score(doc=1151,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Integrative level classification (ILC) is a research project being developed since 2004 by some members of the Italian chapter of ISKO, also involving cooperation with other researchers. Anyone interested is welcome to contact us at: ilc@mate.unipv.it. Aim of the project is to test application of the theory of integrative levels to knowledge organization (KO). This implies a naturalistic-ontological approach to KO, which is obviously not the only possible approach - actually it even looks to be unfashionable nowadays, although it agrees with current trends towards interdisciplinarity and interrelation between many research fields.
- Footnote
- Mit einer Abbildung der Klassen der ILC als Liniendiagramm (von U. Priss)
-
Perreault, J.: Categories and relators : a new schema (1994)
0.01
0.013440417 = product of:
0.026880834 = sum of:
0.022650154 = weight(_text_:von in 8863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022650154 = score(doc=8863,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.17686167 = fieldWeight in 8863, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8863)
0.004230681 = product of:
0.012692042 = sum of:
0.012692042 = weight(_text_:a in 8863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012692042 = score(doc=8863,freq=18.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 8863, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8863)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Based on the works of Aristotle, Ramon Lull, I. Kant and the experiences with relationships published in the works of S.R. Ranganathan, E.de Grolier, J. Mills, J.C. Costello, E. Wall, R. Pagès, A. Leroy, P. Braffort, M. Kervégant, J.C. Gardin and J. Farradane, categories and relationships were collected, analyzed, grouped and classified in a triadic way so that a scheme resulted by which 120 relationships could be defined and identified by their positions and their codes. The exercise was meant to create and supply a tool for the replacement of the non-significant relation symbol, the colon, in the UDC by a letter code which could express the actual relationship contained in a classificatory statement. Examples for their application illustrate different cases occuring
- Footnote
- Reprint von: Rev. Int. Doc. 32(1965) no.4, S.136-144; dto. als FID/CR report no.4 u. im Buch des Verf.: Towards a theory for UDC. London: Bingley 1969, S.119-148
- Type
- a
-
Vickery, B.C.: Faceted classification : A guide to construction and use of special schemes (1986)
0.01
0.013319439 = product of:
0.026638879 = sum of:
0.022650154 = weight(_text_:von in 2475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022650154 = score(doc=2475,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.17686167 = fieldWeight in 2475, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2475)
0.003988724 = product of:
0.011966172 = sum of:
0.011966172 = weight(_text_:a in 2475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011966172 = score(doc=2475,freq=16.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2475, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2475)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- A perfect little book, with just 63 pages of text. From chapter A, Introduction, to U, Mechanization, it covers everything about making a faceted classification: what they are, why they are needed, how to do facet analysis, examples from existing faceted schemes, orderings, common subdivisions, the contents of each facet, notation, filing order, how to perform classification with the created system, and indexing. Each chapter is brief but has full coverage of the subject. "The technique of constructing a special faceted classification is not a settled, automatic, codified procedure. Nothing so complex as the field of knowledge could be analysed and organized by rule-of-thumb. We can therefore offer no more than a guide, describing tested procedures and discussing some difficulties." Vickery was a member of the Classification Research Group and one of the foremost classificationists.
- Footnote
- Nicht leicht lesbar; es existiert auch eine (problematische) deutsche Übersetzung der Ausgabe von 1960: München: Verl. Dok. 1969
-
Buchanan, B.: Bibliothekarische Klassifikationstheorie (1989)
0.01
0.013077075 = product of:
0.0523083 = sum of:
0.0523083 = weight(_text_:von in 3921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0523083 = score(doc=3921,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.40844458 = fieldWeight in 3921, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3921)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Inhalt: Klassifikation: Definition und Einsatzmöglichkeiten - Die verschiedenen Arten von Klassenbeziehungen - Präkombinierte Klassifikationssysteme und Facettenklassifikationen - Methodische Überlegungen zur Lösung von Ordnungsproblemen - Konstruktion einer Facettenklassifikation, 1. Teil - Konstruktion einer Facettenklassifikation, 2. Teil - Gestaltung des Notationssystems, 1. Teil - Gestaltung des Notationssystems, 2. Teil - Gestaltung des Notationssystems, 3. Teil - Das alphabetische Sachregister - Universalklassifikationen - Kritische Anmerkungen zur systematischen Ordnung - Automatische Indexierung
- Issue
- Übers. von U. Reimer-Böhner.
-
Soergel, D.E.: Klassifikationssysteme und Thesauri : Eine Anleitung zur Herstellung von Klassifikationssystemen und Thesauri im Bereich der Dokumentation (1969)
0.01
0.013077075 = product of:
0.0523083 = sum of:
0.0523083 = weight(_text_:von in 2020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0523083 = score(doc=2020,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.40844458 = fieldWeight in 2020, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2020)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Überblick über Aufgaben und Aufbau eines Thesaurus. Aufwand für Herstellung von Thesauri. Begriffe und Begriffsbenennungen. Klassifikationssystem und Thesaurus und ihre Funktionen in einem Dokumentationssystem. Thesaurus-Struktur. Thesaurus-Format. Arbeitsablauf der Thesaurus-Herstellung. Regeln für Begriffsbenennungen, Rechtschreibung u.ä. Weiterentwicklung von Thesauri. Thesauri als Grundlage für kooperative Dokumentation.
