-
Dahlberg, I.: Einteilungsprinzipien von Klassifikationssystemen (1974)
0.04
0.040100638 = product of:
0.080201276 = sum of:
0.07550052 = weight(_text_:von in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07550052 = score(doc=86,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.58953893 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
0.004700756 = product of:
0.014102268 = sum of:
0.014102268 = weight(_text_:a in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014102268 = score(doc=86,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Type
- a
-
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017)
0.04
0.0355058 = product of:
0.0710116 = sum of:
0.03737085 = weight(_text_:von in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03737085 = score(doc=3494,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.29180688 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.03364075 = product of:
0.05046112 = sum of:
0.004935794 = weight(_text_:a in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004935794 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.045525327 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045525327 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Pages
- S.22-36
- Source
- Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
- Type
- a
-
Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018)
0.03
0.03432339 = product of:
0.06864678 = sum of:
0.030200208 = weight(_text_:von in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030200208 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.23581557 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.03844657 = product of:
0.057669856 = sum of:
0.005640907 = weight(_text_:a in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005640907 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.052028947 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052028947 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Der Beitrag skizziert die Grundlagen der Arbeit mit Klassifikationen in Bibliotheken und erläutert die Grundbegriffe der bibliothekarischen Klassifikationstheorie. Schwerpunkte bilden die Ordnungsprinzipien und Strukturierungsmittel von Klassifikationen sowie die verschiedenen Klassifikationstypologien. Dabei werden vorzugsweise Beispiele aus Klassifikationen verwendet, die im deutschen Sprachraum verbreitet sind.
- Pages
- S.1-22
- Type
- a
-
Farradane, J.E.L.: ¬A scientific theory of classification and indexing : further considerations (1952)
0.03
0.028751936 = product of:
0.05750387 = sum of:
0.052850362 = weight(_text_:von in 1655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052850362 = score(doc=1655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.41267726 = fieldWeight in 1655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1655)
0.0046535116 = product of:
0.013960535 = sum of:
0.013960535 = weight(_text_:a in 1655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013960535 = score(doc=1655,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 1655, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1655)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Fortsetzung von: J. Doc. 6(1950) S.83-99.
- Type
- a
-
Gödert, W.: Strukturierung von Klassifikationssystemen und Online-Retrieval (1995)
0.03
0.027868655 = product of:
0.05573731 = sum of:
0.05338693 = weight(_text_:von in 922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05338693 = score(doc=922,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.416867 = fieldWeight in 922, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=922)
0.002350378 = product of:
0.007051134 = sum of:
0.007051134 = weight(_text_:a in 922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007051134 = score(doc=922,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 922, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=922)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Aufbau und Erschließung begrifflicher Datenbanken: Beiträge zur bibliothekarischen Klassifikation. Eine Auswahl von Vorträgen der Jahrestagungen 1993 (Kaiserslautern) und 1994 (Oldenburg) der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation. Hrsg.: H. Havekost u. H.-J. Wätjen
- Type
- a
-
Gödert, W.: Bibliothekarische Klassifikationssysteme und on-line-Kataloge : Grundlagen und Anwendungen (1987)
0.03
0.0270943 = product of:
0.0541886 = sum of:
0.0523083 = weight(_text_:von in 4576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0523083 = score(doc=4576,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.40844458 = fieldWeight in 4576, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4576)
0.0018803024 = product of:
0.005640907 = sum of:
0.005640907 = weight(_text_:a in 4576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005640907 = score(doc=4576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4576)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In diesem Beitrag beabsichtigen wir, einen Überblick über den derzeitigen Stand der bibliothekarischen Klassifikationstheorie zu geben. Die Darstellung ist angelehnt an die 1985 erschienene Norm DIN 32 705,Erstellung und Weiterentwicklung von Klassifikationssystemen', stellt jedoch die Problematik bibliothekarischer Klassifikationssysteme in den Vordergrund. In einem zweiten Teil beschäftigen wir uns mit Problemen von Klassifikationssystemen in typischen bibliothekarischen Anwendungsbereichen. Der Schwerpunkt liegt dabei auf dem Online-Katalog; es wird ein Vorschlag zur Verwendung von Facettenklassifikationen diskutiert. Abschließend werden Fragen der kooperativen klassifikatorischen Inhaltserschließung gestreift.
- Type
- a
-
Wang, Z.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation (2008)
0.02
0.023021962 = product of:
0.09208785 = sum of:
0.09208785 = sum of:
0.005640907 = weight(_text_:a in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005640907 = score(doc=2346,freq=8.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.060432475 = weight(_text_:z in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060432475 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2562021 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.23587814 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.026014473 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026014473 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Potential and benefits of classification schemes and thesauri in building organizational taxonomies cannot be fully utilized by organizations. Empirical data of building an organizational taxonomy by the top-down approach of using classification schemes and thesauri appear to be lacking. The paper seeks to make a contribution in this regard. Design/methodology/approach - A case study of building an organizational taxonomy was conducted in the information studies domain for the Division of Information Studies at Nanyang Technology University, Singapore. The taxonomy was built by using the Dewey Decimal Classification, the Information Science Taxonomy, two information systems taxonomies, and three thesauri (ASIS&T, LISA, and ERIC). Findings - Classification schemes and thesauri were found to be helpful in creating the structure and categories related to the subject facet of the taxonomy, but organizational community sources had to be consulted and several methods had to be employed. The organizational activities and stakeholders' needs had to be identified to determine the objectives, facets, and the subject coverage of the taxonomy. Main categories were determined by identifying the stakeholders' interests and consulting organizational community sources and domain taxonomies. Category terms were selected from terminologies of classification schemes, domain taxonomies, and thesauri against the stakeholders' interests. Hierarchical structures of the main categories were constructed in line with the stakeholders' perspectives and the navigational role taking advantage of structures/term relationships from classification schemes and thesauri. Categories were determined in line with the concepts and the hierarchical levels. Format of categories were uniformed according to a commonly used standard. The consistency principle was employed to make the taxonomy structure and categories neater. Validation of the draft taxonomy through consultations with the stakeholders further refined the taxonomy. Originality/value - No similar study could be traced in the literature. The steps and methods used in the taxonomy development, and the information studies taxonomy itself, will be helpful for library and information schools and other similar organizations in their effort to develop taxonomies for organizing content and aiding navigation on organizational sites.
- Date
- 7.11.2008 15:22:04
- Type
- a
-
Gnoli, C.; Ledl, A.; Park, Z.; Trzmielewski, M.: Phenomenon-based vs. disciplinary classification : possibilities for evaluating and for mapping (2018)
0.02
0.021473734 = product of:
0.085894935 = sum of:
0.085894935 = product of:
0.1288424 = sum of:
0.007977448 = weight(_text_:a in 4804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007977448 = score(doc=4804,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4804, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4804)
0.12086495 = weight(_text_:z in 4804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12086495 = score(doc=4804,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2562021 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.47175628 = fieldWeight in 4804, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4804)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Type
- a
-
Fairthorne, R.A.: Temporal structure in bibliographic classification (1978)
0.02
0.016980406 = product of:
0.03396081 = sum of:
0.030200208 = weight(_text_:von in 1650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030200208 = score(doc=1650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.23581557 = fieldWeight in 1650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1650)
0.003760605 = product of:
0.011281814 = sum of:
0.011281814 = weight(_text_:a in 1650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011281814 = score(doc=1650,freq=8.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1650, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1650)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Neither in theory nor in practice does contemporary classification ignore temporal sequence in the sense of history. But it is regarded in a rather static way, as if classification could be reduced to some unique landscape to be viewed by the classifier as from a balloon. ...
- Footnote
- Zusammenfassung von P.A. Richmond (S.413-415) "This is one of the most interesting papers to come along in many a moon"
- Type
- a
-
Rescheleit, W.; Menner, L.: Vergleich der Wissensrepräsentationssprache FRL mit Dezimalklassifikation und Facettenklassifikation (1986)
0.02
0.016721193 = product of:
0.033442385 = sum of:
0.03203216 = weight(_text_:von in 1555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03203216 = score(doc=1555,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.2501202 = fieldWeight in 1555, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1555)
0.001410227 = product of:
0.004230681 = sum of:
0.004230681 = weight(_text_:a in 1555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004230681 = score(doc=1555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 1555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1555)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Beim Vergleich von Klassifikationen mit Frame-Wissensbasen für Expertensysteme zeigen sich einige elementare Gemeinsamkeiten: Beide haben das Ziel einer geordneten Darstellung von Wissen. Beide bilden dazu Klassen und weisen hierarchische Beziehungen zwischen diesen Klassen auf. Anahnd der Wissensrepräsentationssprache FRL (Frame Representation Language) wird untersucht, inwieweit beide Systeme sich in das jeweils andere übertragen lassen. Die FRL speichert Wissen in einer speziellen Datenstruktur, den Frames, die aus einem Framenamen, der den jeweiligen Begriff bezeichnet, und Slots, die die Eigenschaften des Begriffs enthalten, bestehen. Eine effektive Speicherung des Wissens wird dadurch erreicht, daß die Frames in einer polyhierarchischen Struktur geordnet sind und in generischer Relation zueinander stehen müssen. Über die generische Relation lassen sich die Eigenschaften höherer Begriffe auf ihre Subklassen vererben. Es werden die Ergebnisse eines Versuchs dargestellt, Elemente bestehender Universalklassifikationen (DK, BC2) in die FRL zu übertragen
- Type
- a
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999)
0.01
0.014417464 = product of:
0.057669856 = sum of:
0.057669856 = product of:
0.08650478 = sum of:
0.008461362 = weight(_text_:a in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008461362 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.078043416 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078043416 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
- Type
- a
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999)
0.01
0.014417464 = product of:
0.057669856 = sum of:
0.057669856 = product of:
0.08650478 = sum of:
0.008461362 = weight(_text_:a in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008461362 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.078043416 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078043416 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
- Type
- a
-
Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017)
0.01
0.014417464 = product of:
0.057669856 = sum of:
0.057669856 = product of:
0.08650478 = sum of:
0.008461362 = weight(_text_:a in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008461362 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.078043416 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078043416 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 5.2017 18:46:22
- Type
- a
-
Perreault, J.: Categories and relators : a new schema (1994)
0.01
0.013440417 = product of:
0.026880834 = sum of:
0.022650154 = weight(_text_:von in 8863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022650154 = score(doc=8863,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.17686167 = fieldWeight in 8863, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8863)
0.004230681 = product of:
0.012692042 = sum of:
0.012692042 = weight(_text_:a in 8863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012692042 = score(doc=8863,freq=18.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 8863, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8863)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Based on the works of Aristotle, Ramon Lull, I. Kant and the experiences with relationships published in the works of S.R. Ranganathan, E.de Grolier, J. Mills, J.C. Costello, E. Wall, R. Pagès, A. Leroy, P. Braffort, M. Kervégant, J.C. Gardin and J. Farradane, categories and relationships were collected, analyzed, grouped and classified in a triadic way so that a scheme resulted by which 120 relationships could be defined and identified by their positions and their codes. The exercise was meant to create and supply a tool for the replacement of the non-significant relation symbol, the colon, in the UDC by a letter code which could express the actual relationship contained in a classificatory statement. Examples for their application illustrate different cases occuring
- Footnote
- Reprint von: Rev. Int. Doc. 32(1965) no.4, S.136-144; dto. als FID/CR report no.4 u. im Buch des Verf.: Towards a theory for UDC. London: Bingley 1969, S.119-148
- Type
- a
-
Hjoerland, B.; Nicolaisen, J.: Scientific and scholarly classifications are not "naïve" : a comment to Begthol (2003) (2004)
0.01
0.010751466 = product of:
0.021502933 = sum of:
0.01887513 = weight(_text_:von in 3023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01887513 = score(doc=3023,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.14738473 = fieldWeight in 3023, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3023)
0.0026278028 = product of:
0.007883408 = sum of:
0.007883408 = weight(_text_:a in 3023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007883408 = score(doc=3023,freq=10.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 3023, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3023)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Relationships between Knowledge Organization in LIS and Scientific & Scholarly Classifications In her paper "Classification for Information Retrieval and Classification for Knowledge Discovery: Relationships between 'Professional' and 'Naive' Classifications" (KO v30, no.2, 2003), Beghtol outlines how Scholarly activities and research lead to classification systems which subsequently are disseminated in publications which are classified in information retrieval systems, retrieved by the users and again used in Scholarly activities and so on. We think this model is correct and that its point is important. What we are reacting to is the fact that Beghtol describes the Classifications developed by scholars as "naive" while she describes the Classifications developed by librarians and information scientists as "professional." We fear that this unfortunate terminology is rooted in deeply ar chored misjudgments about the relationships between scientific and Scholarly classification an the one side and LIS Classifications an the other. Only a correction of this misjudgment may give us in the field of knowledge organization a Chance to do a job that is not totally disrespected and disregarded by the rest of the intellectual world.
- Footnote
- Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Classification for information retrieval and classification for knowledge discovery: relationships between 'professional' and 'naive' classifications" in: Knowledge organization. 30(2003), no.2, S.64-73; vgl. dazu auch die Erwiderung von C. Beghtol in: Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.1, S.62-63.
- Type
- a
-
Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997)
0.01
0.010299881 = product of:
0.041199524 = sum of:
0.041199524 = product of:
0.061799284 = sum of:
0.009770338 = weight(_text_:a in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009770338 = score(doc=1171,freq=6.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.052028947 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052028947 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- All classifications are based on ideologies and Dewey is marked by its author's origins in 19th century North America. Subsequent revisions indicate changed ways of understanding the world. Section 157 (psycho-pathology) is now included with 616.89 (mental troubles), reflecting the move to a genetic-based approach. Table 5 (racial, ethnic and national groups) is however unchanged, despite changing views on such categorisation
- Source
- Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
- Type
- a
-
Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996)
0.01
0.010001066 = product of:
0.040004265 = sum of:
0.040004265 = product of:
0.060006395 = sum of:
0.007977448 = weight(_text_:a in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007977448 = score(doc=7242,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.052028947 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052028947 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a comparative study of 3 classification schemes: LCC, DDC and NLM Classification to determine their effectiveness in classifying materials on health insurance. Examined 2 hypotheses: that there would be no differences in the scatter of the 3 classification schemes; and that there would be overlap between all 3 schemes but no difference in the classes into which the subject was placed. There was subject scatter in all 3 classification schemes and litlle overlap between the 3 systems
- Date
- 22. 4.1997 21:10:19
- Type
- a
-
Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006)
0.01
0.009611643 = product of:
0.03844657 = sum of:
0.03844657 = product of:
0.057669856 = sum of:
0.005640907 = weight(_text_:a in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005640907 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.052028947 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052028947 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 27. 5.2007 22:19:35
- Type
- a
-
Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001)
0.01
0.0090123955 = product of:
0.036049582 = sum of:
0.036049582 = product of:
0.054074373 = sum of:
0.008549047 = weight(_text_:a in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008549047 = score(doc=166,freq=6.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
0.045525327 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045525327 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The idea of sameness is used to gather material in classifications. However, it is also used to separate what is different. Sameness and difference as guiding principles of classification seem obvious but are actually fundamental characteristics specifically related to Western culture. Sameness is not a singular factor, but has the potential to represent multiple characteristics or facets. This article explores the ramifications of which characteristics are used to define classifications and in what order. It explains the primacy of division by discipline, its origins in Western philosophy, and the cultural specificity that results. The Dewey Decimal Classification is used as an example throughout.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Type
- a
-
Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 4: themes and rhemes (2018)
0.01
0.008842215 = product of:
0.03536886 = sum of:
0.03536886 = product of:
0.05305329 = sum of:
0.014031581 = weight(_text_:a in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014031581 = score(doc=4152,freq=22.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.25351265 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.039021708 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039021708 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This is the fourth in a series of papers on classification based on phenomena instead of disciplines. Together with types, levels and facets that have been discussed in the previous parts, themes and rhemes are further structural components of such a classification. In a statement or in a longer document, a base theme and several particular themes can be identified. Base theme should be cited first in a classmark, followed by particular themes, each with its own facets. In some cases, rhemes can also be expressed, that is new information provided about a theme, converting an abstract statement ("wolves, affected by cervids") into a claim that some thing actually occurs ("wolves are affected by cervids"). In the Integrative Levels Classification rhemes can be expressed by special deictic classes, including those for actual specimens, anaphoras, unknown values, conjunctions and spans, whole universe, anthropocentric favoured classes, and favoured host classes. These features, together with rules for pronounciation, make a classification of phenomena a true language, that may be suitable for many uses.
- Date
- 17. 2.2018 18:22:25
- Type
- a
