Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Challenges and opportunities for KOS standards (2007) 0.02

0.019783817 = product of:
  0.098919086 = sum of:
    0.098919086 = weight(_text_:22 in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.098919086 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18262155 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052150324 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 22. 9.2007 15:41:14

Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Knowledge organization system standards (2009) 0.01
```
0.0113162575 = product of:
  0.05658129 = sum of:
    0.05658129 = weight(_text_:system in 3833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05658129 = score(doc=3833,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1642502 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052150324 = queryNorm
        0.34448233 = fieldWeight in 3833, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3833)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

This entry presents an overview of the standards for different types of knowledge organization system (KOS). Their development history and the principles within them are described. Standards for thesauri receive most attention, since other types of KOS are less standardized. The arrival of the Internet, enabling simultaneous access to multiple disparate systems and resources, caused a major reorientation of standardization efforts in the last decade, towards interoperability goals. Current initiatives address two main needs: interoperability between KOSs, and data exchange between one vocabulary application and another. The prospects for bringing the standards together are discussed.

Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001) 0.01

0.009891909 = product of:
  0.049459543 = sum of:
    0.049459543 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049459543 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18262155 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052150324 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 22. 9.2007 15:45:57

Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.01

0.009891909 = product of:
  0.049459543 = sum of:
    0.049459543 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049459543 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18262155 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052150324 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 8.12.2007 19:25:22

Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesauri, topics and other structures in knowledge management software (2000) 0.01

0.008478778 = product of:
  0.042393893 = sum of:
    0.042393893 = weight(_text_:22 in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042393893 = score(doc=102,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18262155 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052150324 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 22. 9.2007 15:45:45

Aitchison, J.; Dextre Clarke, S.G.: ¬The Thesaurus : a historical viewpoint, with a look to the future (2004) 0.01

0.008478778 = product of:
  0.042393893 = sum of:
    0.042393893 = weight(_text_:22 in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042393893 = score(doc=5005,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18262155 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052150324 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 22. 9.2007 15:46:13

Dextre Clarke, S.G.: ¬The Information Retrieval Thesaurus (2019) 0.01
```
0.006858689 = product of:
  0.034293443 = sum of:
    0.034293443 = weight(_text_:system in 5210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034293443 = score(doc=5210,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1642502 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052150324 = queryNorm
        0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 5210, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5210)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

In the post-war period before computers were readily available, urgent demand for scientific and industrial develop-ment stimulated research and development (R&D) that led to the birth of the information retrieval thesaurus. This article traces the early history, speciation and progressive improvement of the thesaurus to reach the state now conveyed by guidelines in inter-national and national standards. Despite doubts about the effec-tiveness of the thesaurus throughout this period, and notwith-standing the dominance of Google and other search engines in the information retrieval (IR) scene today, the thesaurus still plays a complementary part in the organization of knowledge and in-formation resources. Success today depends on interoperability, and is opening up opportunities in linked data applications. At the same time, the IR demand from workers in the knowledge society drives interest in hybrid forms of knowledge organization system (KOS) that may pool the genes of thesauri with those of ontologies and classification schemes.

Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

Years

Types

Themes