Search (91 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Mishra, K.S.: Bibliographic databases and exchange formats (1997) 0.04
    0.040899914 = product of:
      0.10224978 = sum of:
        0.045724586 = weight(_text_:system in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045724586 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1642502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
        0.056525193 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056525193 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18262155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Computers play an important role in the development of bibliographic databases. Exchange formats are needed for the generation and exchange of bibliographic data at different levels: international, national, regional and local. Discusses the formats available at national and international level such as the International Standard Exchange Format (ISO 2709); the various MARC formats and the Common Communication Format (CCF). Work on Indian standards involving the Bureau of Indian Standards, the National Information System for Science and Technology (NISSAT) and other institutions proceeds only slowly
    Source
    DESIDOC bulletin of information technology. 17(1997) no.5, S.17-22
  2. Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004) 0.04
    0.040899914 = product of:
      0.10224978 = sum of:
        0.045724586 = weight(_text_:system in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045724586 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1642502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.056525193 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056525193 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18262155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The paper performs a thought experiment on the concept of a record based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and library system functions, and concludes that if we want to develop a functional bibliographic record we need to do it within the context of a flexible, functional library systems record structure. The article suggests a new way to look at the library systems record that would allow libraries to move forward in terms of technology but also in terms of serving library users.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
  3. UNIMARC and CDS/ISIS : Proceedings of the Workshops held in Budapest, 21.-22. June 1993 and Barcelona, 26. August 1993 (1994) 0.04
    0.035787422 = product of:
      0.08946855 = sum of:
        0.040009014 = weight(_text_:system in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040009014 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1642502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
        0.049459543 = weight(_text_:22 in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049459543 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18262155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: CAMPOS, F.: UNIMARC: state of the art on the universal format for international exchange; HOLT, B.: The maintenance of UNIMARC; WILLER, M.: UNIMARC / Authorities format; HOPKINSON, A.: CDS/ISIS as a tool for implementing UNIMARC; BERKE, S. u. M. SIPOS: The comprehensive information system of the National Széchényi Library and the Hungarian MARC format; SHRAIBERG, Y.: Application of the CDS/ISIS software package and UNIMARC format in the automated systems of the Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology and other libraries of the Russian Federation; STOKLASOVA, B.: Exchange formats in the Czech Republic: past, present and future
  4. Riva, P.: Mapping MARC 21 linking entry fields to FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2004) 0.03
    0.030674934 = product of:
      0.076687336 = sum of:
        0.034293443 = weight(_text_:system in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034293443 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1642502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
        0.042393893 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042393893 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18262155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic relationships have taken on even greater importance in the context of ongoing efforts to integrate concepts from the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) into cataloging codes and database structures. In MARC 21, the linking entry fields are a major mechanism for expressing relationships between bibliographic records. Taxonomies of bibliographic relationships have been proposed by Tillett, with an extension by Smiraglia, and in FRBR itself. The present exercise is to provide a detailed bidirectional mapping of the MARC 21 linking fields to these two schemes. The correspondence of the Tillett taxonomic divisions to the MARC categorization of the linking fields as chronological, horizontal, or vertical is examined as well. Application of the findings to MARC format development and system functionality is discussed.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.02
    0.02398161 = product of:
      0.11990805 = sum of:
        0.11990805 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11990805 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18262155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  6. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02
    0.022610078 = product of:
      0.11305039 = sum of:
        0.11305039 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11305039 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18262155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  7. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02
    0.019783817 = product of:
      0.098919086 = sum of:
        0.098919086 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.098919086 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18262155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  8. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.02
    0.019783817 = product of:
      0.098919086 = sum of:
        0.098919086 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.098919086 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18262155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
  9. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.02
    0.019783817 = product of:
      0.098919086 = sum of:
        0.098919086 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.098919086 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18262155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  10. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.02
    0.019783817 = product of:
      0.098919086 = sum of:
        0.098919086 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.098919086 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18262155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  11. Oehlschläger, S.: Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme : Aus der 46. Sitzung am 21. und 22. April 2004 im Bibliotheksservice-Zentrum Baden-Württemberg in Konstanz (2004) 0.02
    0.017893711 = product of:
      0.044734277 = sum of:
        0.020004507 = weight(_text_:system in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020004507 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1642502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.1217929 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
        0.024729772 = weight(_text_:22 in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024729772 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18262155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    "Die verbundübergreifende Fernleihe für Monografien steht kurz vor ihrer flächendeckenden Einführung. Voraussetzung hierfür ist ein funktionierendes Online-Fernleih-System in jedem Verbund. Dies ist prototypisch realisiert. Die Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme geht davon aus, dass ab dem 1. Januar 2005 der Echtbetrieb aufgenommen werden kann und die Leistungen nach der neuen Leihverkehrsordnung abgerechnet werden können. Zur Klärung von Detailfragen trifft sich im Juni die Arbeitsgruppe Verbundübergreifende Fernleihe. Bereits in der letzten Sitzung wurde festgelegt, dass die jeweiligen Bibliotheken über die Festlegung des Leitwegs entscheiden sollen, und die Verbundzentralen nur dann eingreifen werden, wenn Probleme entstehen sollten. Die individuelle Leitwegsteuerung, sowohl innerhalb des Verbundes als auch bei der Festlegung der Reihenfolge der anzugehenden Verbünde hat in einigen Verbünden hohe Priorität. Traditionell gewachsene Beziehungen müssen von den Bestellsystemen abgebildet werden können. Eine lokale Zusammenarbeit wird auch über Verbundgrenzen hinaus möglich sein. Im Hinblick auf die Verrechnung verbundübergreifender Fernleihen haben sich die Verbünde auf einen einheitlichen Verrechnungszeitraum geeinigt. Voraussetzung ist außerdem, dass die Unterhaltsträger die notwendigen Rahmenbedingungen für die Abrechnung schaffen und die neue Leihverkehrsordnung in allen Bundesländern rechtzeitig in Kraft gesetzt wird."
  12. Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998) 0.02
    0.016957557 = product of:
      0.084787786 = sum of:
        0.084787786 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.084787786 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18262155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    2. 8.2001 16:22:33
  13. UNIMARC manual : IFLA UBCIM Programme (1987) 0.02
    0.016166084 = product of:
      0.08083042 = sum of:
        0.08083042 = weight(_text_:system in 62) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08083042 = score(doc=62,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1642502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.49211764 = fieldWeight in 62, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=62)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    LCSH
    UNIMARC System
    Subject
    UNIMARC System
  14. Kernernman, V.Y.; Koenig, M.E.D.: USMARC as a standardized format for the Internet hypermedia document control/retrieval/delivery system design (1996) 0.02
    0.016003607 = product of:
      0.08001803 = sum of:
        0.08001803 = weight(_text_:system in 5565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08001803 = score(doc=5565,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1642502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 5565, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5565)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Surveys how the USMARC integrated bibliographic format (UBIF) could be mapped onto an hypermedia document USMARC format (HDUF) to meet the requirements of a hypermedia document control/retrieval/delivery (HDRD) system for the Internet. Explores the characteristics of such a system using an example of the WWW's directory and searching engine Yahoo!. Discusses additional standard specifications for the UBIF's structure, content designation, and data content to map this format into the HDUF that can serve as a proxy for the Net HDRD system
  15. Matoria, R.K.; Upadhyay, P.K.: Migration of data from one library management system to another : a case study in India (2004) 0.02
    0.016003607 = product of:
      0.08001803 = sum of:
        0.08001803 = weight(_text_:system in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08001803 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1642502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  16. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.02
    0.015987739 = product of:
      0.079938695 = sum of:
        0.079938695 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079938695 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18262155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  17. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.02
    0.015987739 = product of:
      0.079938695 = sum of:
        0.079938695 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079938695 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18262155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  18. Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996) 0.01
    0.014131299 = product of:
      0.07065649 = sum of:
        0.07065649 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07065649 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18262155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    29. 9.1996 18:58:22
  19. Hoffmann, L.: ¬Die Globalisierung macht vor der Katalogisierung nicht Halt : Mit AACR2 zum Global Player? (2003) 0.01
    0.014131299 = product of:
      0.07065649 = sum of:
        0.07065649 = weight(_text_:22 in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07065649 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18262155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2016 12:15:46
  20. Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995) 0.01
    0.0139892725 = product of:
      0.06994636 = sum of:
        0.06994636 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06994636 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18262155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052150324 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    11. 9.1996 19:22:20
    Source
    Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 66
  • d 20
  • f 2
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 81
  • s 5
  • el 3
  • m 3
  • b 2
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications